Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Oppo Reno2: Desempenho fraco de câmera

Com câmera selfie motorizada.

O Oppo Reno2 promete excelentes recursos para tirar fotos, longa duração da bateria e muito desempenho. Visualmente, o smartphone é definitivamente impressionante. Nossa análise mostrará quais outras qualidades o telefone pode trazer para a mesa.
Oppo Reno2 (Reno Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
Pantalha
6.50 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, até 256 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE FDD/TDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9 x 160 x 74.3
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48MP (f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 13MP (telephoto lens, f/2.4, 1/3.4", 1.0µm) + 8MP (ultra wide-angle lens, 1/3.2", 1.4µm) + 2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.0µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, fone, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, capa protetora, fones estéreo de 3,5 mm, agulha SIM, ColorOS 6.1, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.89 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.03 W/kg, fanless
peso
189 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g
Preço
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
81.2 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Oppo Reno2
SD 730G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83.3 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
85.8 %
v7 (old)
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87.2 %
v6 (old)
07/2019
Samsung Galaxy A80
SD 730, Adreno 618
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
85.7 %
v7 (old)
07/2019
LG G8s ThinQ
SD 855, Adreno 640
181 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.20"2248x1080
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2

Size Comparison

165.2 mm 76.5 mm 9.3 mm 220 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g160 mm 74.3 mm 9 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (465min - 517max) MBit/s +41%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (238min - 447max) MBit/s +19%
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
355 (187min - 387max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (321min - 333max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (249min - 327max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
618 (532min - 671max) MBit/s
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (474min - 617max) MBit/s -6%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (374min - 485max) MBit/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (360min - 501max) MBit/s -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (317min - 341max) MBit/s -46%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Oppo Reno2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø616 (532-671)
Oppo Reno2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (187-387)
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
17 ∆E
7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno2: 8.85 ∆E min: 2.76 - max: 18.5 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
41 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
75.2 ∆E
68.1 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno2: 44.09 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 75.17 ∆E
Oppo Reno2 - test chart
Oppo Reno2 - test chart (detail)
Oppo Reno2 - test chart (1 lux)
683
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
685
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
679
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 691 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 683.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 679 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo Reno2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"
Screen
-9%
6%
-9%
-2%
Brightness middle
679
625
-8%
693
2%
478
-30%
539
-21%
Brightness
683
607
-11%
703
3%
486
-29%
556
-19%
Brightness Distribution
98
89
-9%
96
-2%
96
-2%
88
-10%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
4.38
-25%
3.42
2%
2.97
15%
3.78
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.8
6.83
-0%
6.12
10%
10.18
-50%
6.95
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
4.1
2%
3.3
21%
2.5
40%
2.2
48%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.251 98%
2.265 97%
2.031 108%
2.274 97%
CCT
6532 100%
7251 90%
6799 96%
6533 99%
6013 108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 260.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 260.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 260.4 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
547 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (523 - 551, n=6)
543 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +82%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1762 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2666 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1646 - 1786, n=6)
1729 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +88%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1080 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1127 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2256 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1080 - 1127, n=3)
1099 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)
7481 Points +593%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
812 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points +13%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1906 Points +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (812 - 920, n=3)
878 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)
7952 Points +879%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3705 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  ()
2556 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  ()
6987 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8317 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  ()
8411 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9145 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 10200, n=7)
9376 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7134 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 8683, n=7)
7679 Points +8%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
33007 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points +20%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points +14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=5)
37271 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
50829 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points +131%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53548, n=5)
52404 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
14820 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points +49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points +31%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=5)
18710 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3399 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points +139%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=7)
3490 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3504 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points +208%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3678, n=7)
3561 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3075 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3371, n=7)
3254 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3513 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points +143%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3704, n=7)
3598 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3647 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points +213%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3773, n=7)
3710 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +440%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3112 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points -3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3390, n=7)
3238 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points +165%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2489, n=7)
2434 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2243 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points +219%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points +169%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2310, n=7)
2270 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3088 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3350, n=7)
3235 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2565 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points +168%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2701, n=7)
2602 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +203%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2434 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points +228%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=7)
2461 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +374%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3162 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3391, n=7)
3241 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points +146%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2310, n=7)
2267 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)
2846 Points +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2155 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points +208%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2199, n=7)
2162 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)
3095 Points +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2775, n=7)
2727 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)
2704 Points +3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (55 - 60, n=6)
58.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps -1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps +118%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 86, n=6)
84.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +229%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (25 - 39, n=6)
35.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +110%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps -2%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=6)
41.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +294%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps +123%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 29, n=6)
25.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +153%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps +163%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=6)
30 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +291%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps +173%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (9.7 - 17, n=6)
14.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +219%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps +176%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=6)
17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +315%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps +156%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 17, n=7)
15.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +209%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps +161%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 18, n=7)
17.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +343%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps +170%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.5 - 11, n=7)
9.79 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +274%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps +49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps +169%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.3 - 10, n=7)
7.09 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +378%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
260154 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points +2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
424308 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (251673 - 275660, n=6)
266066 Points +2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3268 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3268 - 3512, n=6)
3391 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +93%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6751 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points -5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6305 - 6796, n=6)
6610 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +51%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3678 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points +16%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points -7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3678 - 4544, n=6)
4056 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +84%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3858 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points +175%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3840 - 3984, n=6)
3883 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +338%
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1190 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1190 - 1365, n=6)
1286 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +31%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +163%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.3 Points +43%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.8 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6)
47.3 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.04 Points 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
45.82 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.02 Points -13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.8 Points +44%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
94.1 Points +12%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
84 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6)
84 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.2 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77.4 Points -8%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +212%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min +58%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min +47%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
43.6 runs/min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6)
42.7 runs/min -2%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min -11%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +125%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points +62%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6)
69.8 Points +6%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
66 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +114%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points +46%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points +37%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
17345 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6)
16793 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
3054 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6)
2898 ms * +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2770 ms * +9%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * +33%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021 ms * +34%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Reno2Xiaomi Mi Note 10OnePlus 7TSamsung Galaxy A80LG G8s ThinQAverage 256 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
109%
66%
-5%
11%
32%
574%
Sequential Read 256KB
469.3
480.5
2%
1406
200%
502
7%
791
69%
Sequential Write 256KB
201.8
243.6
21%
218.4
8%
190.4
-6%
182.4
-10%
Random Read 4KB
144.2
106.2
-26%
170.1
18%
117.5
-19%
138
-4%
Random Write 4KB
22
118.9
440%
29.9
36%
21.6
-2%
29.6
35%
65.3 ?(22 - 108.5, n=2)
197%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
74.5 ?()
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
53.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
53.5 ?()
0%
Arena of Valor
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Oppo Reno2; min: Ø60.8 (57-62)
Oppo Reno2; high HD: Ø60 (56-62)
Asphalt 9: Legends
051015202530Tooltip
Oppo Reno2; High Quality: Ø29.7 (23-32)
Oppo Reno2; Standard / low: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Carga Máxima
 33.4 °C33.3 °C31.9 °C 
 33.4 °C33.5 °C31.6 °C 
 32.9 °C33.5 °C31.2 °C 
Máximo: 33.5 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
28.3 °C30 °C30.1 °C
28 °C30.6 °C30.9 °C
29.8 °C30.5 °C30.8 °C
Máximo: 30.9 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.133.12532.929.83127.126.64030.524.75033.832.86325.924.88023.632.210024.624.712520.428.916019.541.120018.747.625017.255.931516.56040014.461.250016.362.463015.363.280014.66810001473.4125014.972.3160014.27320001573.8250014.776.6315014.578.5400014.379.5500014.676.3630015.176.980001575.11000014.975.91250015.363.4160001650SPL2787.5N0.969.3median 15median 69.3Delta1.410.142.946.342.343.934.834.63939.140.842.634.43528.127.125.125.123.627.822.137.120.244.919.650.218.456.418.960.520.163.62065.217.566.316.17515.576.217.874.3167315.971.416.172.316.363.416.564.816.572.116.970.916.663.91764.516.55567.866.429.383.620.818.51.255.5median 17.5median 64.5median 15.2median 69.63.411.91414.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Reno2Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Reno2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.34 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.25 / 1.36 Watt
Carga midlight 5.38 / 6.71 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-33%
3%
-38%
-25%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.7
-0%
0.9
-29%
0.6
14%
1.2
-71%
0.84 ?(0.49 - 1.55, n=6)
-20%
Idle Average *
1.25
1.8
-44%
1.4
-12%
1.2
4%
1.6
-28%
1.953 ?(0.96 - 4.91, n=6)
-56%
Idle Maximum *
1.36
2.2
-62%
2.9
-113%
1.4
-3%
2
-47%
2.26 ?(1 - 5.02, n=6)
-66%
Load Average *
5.38
5.2
3%
4.7
13%
5
7%
5
7%
Load Maximum *
6.71
7.5
-12%
8.3
-24%
7.1
-6%
10
-49%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
42h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 45min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 05min
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Battery Runtime
51%
16%
-6%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2533
2134
-16%
2003
-21%
1796
-29%
1689
-33%
H.264
1125
1423
26%
967
-14%
902
-20%
753
-33%
WiFi v1.3
616
1127
83%
896
45%
713
16%
693
13%
Load
185
387
109%
283
53%
200
8%
203
10%

Pro

+ Câmera frontal tira boas fotos
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Nenhum entalhe ou furo perturbador
+ Muitos extras incluídos
+ Bom alto falante

Contra

- Duração da bateria medíocre
- Câmera principal decepcionante
- Tela com forte oscilação

Veredicto - Falta um polimento no Oppo Reno2

In review: Oppo Reno2. Test device courtesy of:
In review: Oppo Reno2. Test device courtesy of:

Nossos sentimentos sobre o Oppo Reno2 são confusos. Por um lado, possui uma aparência premium e o manuseio e o desempenho do hardware durante o uso diário são muito bons. Por outro lado, um olhar mais atento revela uma câmera bastante medíocre, que consiste basicamente em apenas quatro sensores individuais para diferentes cenários e uma duração relativamente curta, apesar da bateria grande. Além disso, os usuários com olhos sensíveis não poderão apreciar a tela por períodos prolongados.

Embora os compradores do Oppo Reno2 não estejam investindo em um telefone ruim, o sistema de câmeras quádruplas não deve ser o fator decisivo.

A câmera selfie Oppo Reno 2, que sobe automaticamente, é um recurso útil que concede aos usuários mais espaço na tela. Como resultado, nem um entalhe nem um furo interrompem o conteúdo exibido. Além disso, a câmera frontal tira fotos muito boas e até tira os holofotes da câmera principal. Assim, é aconselhável que compradores em potencial considerem suas expectativas pessoais para ver se estão alinhados com os pontos fortes e fracos do Reno2, a fim de evitar decepções no final.

Oppo Reno2 - 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
49 / 70 → 70%
Peso
89%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
27 / 64 → 43%
Desempenho da aplicação
64 / 86 → 75%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
64%
Médio
76%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Oppo Reno2: Desempenho fraco de câmera
Mike Wobker, 2020-03-25 (Update: 2020-04- 3)