Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 8 Pro: Agora também carrega sem fio

Name: OnePlus 8 Pro
Brand: OnePlus

Esperamos muito tempo.

O carregamento sem fio e a certificação IP em um smartphone OnePlus finalmente se tornaram realidade. Uma tela de 120 Hz e uma câmera com filtro de cores também são outros recursos. Esclareceremos nesta análise se o OnePlus 8 Pro vale a pena pelo alto preço de pelo menos US$ 799.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/23/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM OnePlus Smartphone

Test device courtesy of OnePlus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 8 Pro (8 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memória

12 GB

Pantalha

6.78 polegadas 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 513 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, 240 Hz touch sampling, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 236 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, sensor laser, sensor flicker, sensor frontal RGB, A-GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/E5a)

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n7/n28/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 165.3 x 74.3

Bateria

4510 mAh Lítio-Ion, WarpCharge 30T, WarpCharge 30 Wireless

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.78, phase comparison AF (omni-reactive), laser AF, contrast AF, OIS, dual LED flash, videos @ 2160p/60 FPS (camera 1); 48.0 MP, f/2.2, ultra-wide-angle lens (camera 2); 8.0 MP, f/2.44, OIS, telephoto lens (camera 3); 5.0 MP, f/2.4, colour filter
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2,45, vídeos @ 1080p/30 FPS

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo (híbrido), Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, carcaça de silicone, película protetora, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, IP68 certified; LTE Cat 18 (download) / Cat 13 (upload) (1.2 Gbit/s / 150 Mbit/s); SAR: 0.97 W/kg (head), 1.07 W/kg (body), fanless, waterproof

peso

199 g, Suprimento de energia: 123 g

Preço

999 Euro

Links

OnePlus página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	199 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.78"	3168x1440
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	188 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.70"	3200x1440
88.2 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080
87.1 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	226 g	64 GB SSD	6.50"	2688x1242
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	OnePlus 7T Pro SD 855+, Adreno 640	206 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	3120x1440
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	209 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.58"	2640x1200

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1544 (797^min - 1619^max) MBit/s +76%
OnePlus 8 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	876 (767^min - 904^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	863 (759^min - 898^max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	816 (403^min - 832^max) MBit/s -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	589 (461^min - 625^max) MBit/s -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	352 (311^min - 375^max) MBit/s -60%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	883 (834^min - 919^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	835 (808^min - 847^max) MBit/s 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	831 (745^min - 872^max) MBit/s
Huawei P40 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	821 (388^min - 998^max) MBit/s -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	580 (550^min - 597^max) MBit/s -30%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (347^min - 505^max) MBit/s -43%

OnePlus 8 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø831 (745-872)

OnePlus 8 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (767-904)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Huawei P40

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Huawei P40

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Huawei P40

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker OnePlus 8 Pro: 11.2 ∆E min: 2.44 - max: 17.32 ∆E


780 cd/m²	782 cd/m²	751 cd/m²
787 cd/m²	796 cd/m²	789 cd/m²
765 cd/m²	772 cd/m²	793 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 796 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 779.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 796 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.237

	OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S20+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	OnePlus 7T Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6"
Screen		-87%	-13%	-49%	-133%	-38%
Brightness middle	796	740 -7%	753 -5%	790 -1%	606 -24%	584 -27%
Brightness	779	747 -4%	762 -2%	790 1%	611 -22%	576 -26%
Brightness Distribution	94	94 0%	96 2%	97 3%	95 1%	95 1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.68	2.6 -282%	0.9 -32%	1.4 -106%	3.46 -409%	1.1 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.55	4.57 -195%	1.6 -3%	3.4 -119%	5.64 -264%	2.3 -48%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.1	1.5 -36%	1.5 -36%	1.9 -73%	2 -82%	1.8 -64%
Gamma	2.237 ^98%	2.269 ^97%	2.24 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.258 ^97%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6310 ^103%	6284 ^103%	6415 ^101%	6466 ^101%	6779 ^96%	6355 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

258 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 258 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 258 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	909 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	944 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	906 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1326 Points +46%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	779 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)	903 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1012 Points +11%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3318 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2899 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3338 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3476 Points +5%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3165 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)	3268 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3370 Points +2%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3027 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2932 Points -3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4511 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8)	2981 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points +147%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2659 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2519 Points -5%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3979 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8)	2723 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points +199%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13471 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	14760 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	13142 Points -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	12645 Points -6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	14352 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=22)	13584 Points +1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11153 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10583 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10952 Points -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10442 Points -6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	11341 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)	11246 Points +1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	82562 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	41415 Points -50%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	82937 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	96826 Points +17%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	72173 Points -13%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	70593 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=20)	84555 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	149017 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	48476 Points -67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	150281 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	206190 Points +38%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	118129 Points -21%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	82652 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 180392, n=20)	147707 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	32240 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	27431 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	32384 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33898 Points +5%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	30561 Points -5%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46731 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=20)	35224 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8811 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5696 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9123 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	7893 Points -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8165 Points -7%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6739 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11371 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6392 Points -44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12394 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	11302 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10637 Points -6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7499 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4928 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4124 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4729 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3839 Points -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4503 Points -9%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4975 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9807 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7576 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8823 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8605 Points -12%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7286 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 11492, n=22)	9645 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12665 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9471 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12694 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11448 Points -10%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7905 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 16809, n=22)	12921 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5480 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4455 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4283 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4604 Points -16%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5718 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=22)	5138 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7117 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6896 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7157 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5471 Points -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6266 Points -12%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6060 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=72, last 2 years)	3088 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8106 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8469 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8299 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6088 Points -25%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7044 Points -13%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6465 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=72, last 2 years)	3272 Points -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4987 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4180 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4895 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4038 Points -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4519 Points -9%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4971 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=72, last 2 years)	3285 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8111 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7459 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7986 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6916 Points -15%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6508 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8947, n=23)	8073 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=161, last 2 years)	7911 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9379 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9190 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9356 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8006 Points -15%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6771 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 11999, n=22)	9501 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33560, n=161, last 2 years)	11758 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5506 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4495 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5277 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4683 Points -15%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5728 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4733 - 5780, n=22)	5319 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=161, last 2 years)	4659 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6618 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6355 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6578 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5509 Points -17%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5648 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)	6202 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=71, last 2 years)	2850 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8279 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8783 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8173 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6527 Points -21%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6360 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)	8249 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=71, last 2 years)	3103 Points -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3888 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3230 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3830 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3564 Points -8%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4057 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)	3414 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=71, last 2 years)	2702 Points -31%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps +50%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)	75.4 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +45%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	206 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	199 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	203 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	287 fps +39%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps -10%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)	206 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)	286 fps +39%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps +47%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps -5%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)	71.7 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	126 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	126 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	122 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	157 fps +25%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	111 fps -12%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	118 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)	123.6 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)	169.3 fps +34%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	77 fps +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	40 fps -33%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	52 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)	60.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	66.4 fps +11%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	85 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	100 fps +14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps -10%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	75 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)	86 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)	120 fps +36%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	45 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	45 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	45 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps +7%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	24 fps -47%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31 fps -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)	40.5 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)	48.5 fps +8%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	51 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	63 fps +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	48 fps -6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	44 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)	51.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)	72.1 fps +41%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	52 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	47 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	58 fps +21%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	26 fps -46%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	36 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)	43.2 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)	51.4 fps +7%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	58 fps +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	54 (20^min) fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	75 fps +39%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps -13%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	50 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)	52.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)	81.6 fps +51%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	33 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	46 fps +48%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps -45%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	23 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)	27.8 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)	38.3 fps +24%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	29 fps +45%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	19 fps -5%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)	20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +65%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	585231 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	296746 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	595466 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	510245 Points -13%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	486654 Points -17%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	496966 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)	579049 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5993 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4779 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6072 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5607 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4992 Points -17%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5589 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)	5871 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +6%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10058 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9281 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10002 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	14189 Points +41%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	9294 Points -8%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9782 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)	9660 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +1%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7240 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3775 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7945 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2350 Points -68%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5091 Points -30%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6038 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)	7073 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11842 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10803 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11567 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	16996 Points +44%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10618 Points -10%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10138 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)	11779 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +46%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1496 Points
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1378 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1514 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1745 Points +17%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1236 Points -17%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1629 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)	1497 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +5%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	129.1 Points +104%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points +92%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	70 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	65 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)	63.6 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	63.4 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	62.4 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	50.6 Points -20%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	301.9 Points +163%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	116.6 Points +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	115.4 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	115.4 Points +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	114.8 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)	113.1 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	89.3 Points -22%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	153 runs/min +126%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min +106%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	71.8 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	68.6 runs/min +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)	67.7 runs/min
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)	66.4 runs/min -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)	63.9 runs/min -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)	62.8 runs/min -7%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	181 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)	106.7 Points +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	104 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	101 Points -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	93 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	86 Points -17%
Huawei P40 Pro	Points -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	49388 Points +109%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	37643 Points +59%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	23999 Points +1%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	23690 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	23678 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	22834 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)	22518 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	18094 Points -24%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	2488 ms * -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	2134 ms * -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)	2031 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	2021 ms * -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	1945 ms *
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	1914 ms * +2%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	571 ms * +71%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus 8 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S20+	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro	OnePlus 7T Pro	Huawei P40 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		2%	17%	-40%	3%	-8%	51%
Sequential Read 256KB	1627	1603 -1%	1739 7%	1489 -8%	1775 9%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) -5%	1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 15%
Sequential Write 256KB	730	694 -5%	750 3%	405 -45%	395.7 -46%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) -21%	1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) 98%
Random Read 4KB	208.3	199.6 -4%	264.9 27%	169 -19%	228.1 10%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) 1%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years) 33%
Random Write 4KB	197.7	229.8 16%	258.5 31%	26 -87%	271.8 37%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) -5%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) 56%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			82.3 ?(Nano Memory Card)	70.6 ?(34.7 - 82.5, n=5)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		57.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			68.1 ?(Nano Memory Card)	59.8 ?(30.7 - 71.7, n=5)

OnePlus 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

OnePlus 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø31.2 (1-80)

OnePlus 8 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø30 (29-31)

OnePlus 8 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø29.8 (28-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


46.4 °C	46 °C	42.4 °C
46.6 °C	45.8 °C	42.5 °C
46.7 °C	45.6 °C	42.7 °C

Máximo: 46.7 °C
Médio: 45 °C


41.7 °C	43.6 °C	46.9 °C
41.4 °C	43.3 °C	45.6 °C
41 °C	43.8 °C	44.8 °C

Máximo: 46.9 °C
Médio: 43.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	2.2 / 3.3 / 3.7 Watt
Carga	5.9 / 8.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		20%	46%	31%	6%	48%	22%	28%
Idle Minimum *	2.2	1 55%	0.61 72%	0.92 58%	2.1 5%	0.92 58%	1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22) 48%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) 60%
Idle Average *	3.3	1.7 48%	1.19 64%	2.9 12%	3 9%	1.41 57%	2.23 ?(1.19 - 5.37, n=22) 32%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 56%
Idle Maximum *	3.7	2.3 38%	1.23 67%	2.94 21%	3.5 5%	1.47 60%	2.45 ?(1.23 - 5.41, n=22) 34%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 57%
Load Average *	5.9	5.8 2%	4.18 29%	3.65 38%	5.3 10%	3.35 43%	5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22) 11%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -11%
Load Maximum *	8.3	11.8 -42%	8.53 -3%	6.18 26%	8.3 -0%	6.37 23%	9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22) -17%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		35h 03min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 03min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 56min

	OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh
Battery Runtime		-12%	-11%	23%	-4%	-18%
Reader / Idle	2103	2041 -3%	2133 1%	2618 24%	2015 -4%	1474 -30%
H.264	1023	978 -4%	973 -5%	1346 32%	957 -6%	1137 11%
WiFi v1.3	923	794 -14%	865 -6%	909 -2%	912 -1%	743 -20%
Load	296	218 -26%	198 -33%	408 38%	283 -4%	198 -33%

Pro

+ Tela de 120 Hz brilhante e calibrada com precisão

+ Tela táctil lisa

+ Design elegante e rígido

+ Muito desempenho

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Sistema de câmera flexível

+ Memória veloz

+ Semafogamentos

+ GPS preciso

+ Muitas bandas LTE

+ Certificação IP

+ Tecnologia de carga rápida

Contra

- Qualidade média das chamadas

- Altas temperaturas sob uso intenso

- Somente um cabo USB 2.0 incluído

- Sem mmWave 5G

- Sem VHT160 com Wi-Fi 6

Veredicto - Alta qualidade e caro

The OnePlus 8 Pro smartphone review. Test device provided by OnePlus Germany.

O OnePlus 8 Pro é um ótimo smartphone e ainda é relativamente barato, considerando os recursos que ele oferece e em comparação com outros carros-chefes modernos. No entanto, o OnePlus quase atingiu a marca de US$ 1.000, tornando o OnePlus 8 Pro um smartphone de gama alta e preço baixo, com excelentes recursos, em vez de um carro-chefe acessível.

Isso inclui a excelente tela de 120 Hz, que é impressionantemente brilhante e suporta HDR10+. O OnePlus calibrou o painel suficientemente bem para editores de imagens profissionais. Além disso, sua taxa de 240 Hz faz com que a tela táctil seja incrivelmente rápida.

Novos recursos e um novo preço: O OnePlus 8 Pro oferece tecnologia de ponta, mas os smartphones da OnePlus não são mais baratos.

Valores de alto desempenho, sem afogamentos e sem mais falhas uso intenso sustentado, juntamente com a duração da bateria, carregamento rápido, software atual e armazenamento mais rápido. O que mais você poderia pedir? Bem, a OnePlus poderia melhorar a qualidade das chamadas e reduzir as temperaturas da superfície, que permanecem bastante altas.

No geral, no entanto, a OnePlus produziu um excelente smartphone principal que agora também atende às solicitações dos fãs de certificação IP e carregamento sem fio.

OnePlus 8 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

91%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

53 / 70 → 76%

Peso

88%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

94%

Desempenho do jogos

61 / 64 → 95%

Desempenho da aplicação

83 / 86 → 96%

Temperatura

82%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

78%

Médio

82%

89%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 8 Pro: Agora também carrega sem fio

Florian Schmitt, 2020-04-23 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Comparison devices

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

OnePlus 8 Pro audio analysis

OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Alta qualidade e caro

More articles related to this device

Price comparison