Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 7T Pro – o carregador mais rápido
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | OnePlus 7T Pro SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 206 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 3120x1440 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 02/2019 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12 | 198 g | 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 3040x1440 | |
| 85.7 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | OnePlus 7 Pro SD 855, Adreno 640 | 206 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 3120x1440 | |
| 88.6 % v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro SD 855, Adreno 640 | 191 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.39" | 2340x1080 | |
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 226 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.50" | 2688x1242 | |
| 85.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 606 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.258
| OnePlus 7T Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4" | OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -5% | 21% | 7% | 28% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 606 | 710 17% | 586 -3% | 594 -2% | 790 30% | 693 14% |
| Brightness | 611 | 721 18% | 584 -4% | 607 -1% | 790 29% | 703 15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 97 2% | 91 -4% | 97 2% | 96 1% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 3.7 -7% | 1.39 60% | 1.51 56% | 1.4 60% | 3.42 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.64 | 10.3 -83% | 2.7 52% | 4.27 24% | 3.4 40% | 6.12 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.5 25% | 1.6 20% | 2.6 -30% | 1.9 5% | 3.3 -65% |
| Gamma | 2.258 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.243 98% | 2.219 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.265 97% |
| CCT | 6779 96% | 6611 98% | 6672 97% | 6390 102% | 6466 101% | 6799 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 294 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 294 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 294 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (10286 - 15510, n=6) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (8702 - 11690, n=6) | |
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (38.9 - 44.6, n=2) | |
| Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (28.5 - 35, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (42.2 - 45.3, n=2) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 70.9, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (113.9 - 120.8, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (39.1 - 69.1, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (89 - 111, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23781 - 25353, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2007 - 2134, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 7T Pro | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | OnePlus 7 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | OnePlus 7T | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -29% | -2% | 90% | -9% | 174% | 363% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1489 | 811 -46% | 1468 -1% | 809 -46% | 1406 -6% | 1547 ? 4% | 1887 ? 27% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 405 | 249.1 -38% | 387 -4% | 196.9 -51% | 218.4 -46% | 575 ? 42% | 1471 ? 263% |
| Random Read 4KB | 169 | 135.2 -20% | 174.1 3% | 142.5 -16% | 170.1 1% | 210 ? 24% | 278 ? 64% |
| Random Write 4KB | 26 | 22.7 -13% | 24.8 -5% | 148.5 471% | 29.9 15% | 188.5 ? 625% | 311 ? 1096% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.1 / 3 / 3.5 Watt |
| Carga |
5.3 / 8.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 26% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 28% | 24% | 24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.1 | 0.73 65% | 0.9 57% | 0.7 67% | 0.92 56% | 0.9 57% | 1.183 ? 44% | 0.883 ? 58% |
| Idle Average * | 3 | 1.53 49% | 1.8 40% | 1 67% | 2.9 3% | 1.4 53% | 1.883 ? 37% | 1.467 ? 51% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.5 | 2.07 41% | 2.9 17% | 1.3 63% | 2.94 16% | 2.9 17% | 2.32 ? 34% | 1.621 ? 54% |
| Load Average * | 5.3 | 6.03 -14% | 5.5 -4% | 5.2 2% | 3.65 31% | 4.7 11% | 4.91 ? 7% | 6.58 ? -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.3 | 9.18 -11% | 8.2 1% | 10 -20% | 6.18 26% | 8.3 -0% | 8.59 ? -3% | 9.91 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -27% | -16% | -9% | 29% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2015 | 1560 -23% | 1745 -13% | 1768 -12% | 2618 30% | 2003 -1% |
| H.264 | 957 | 921 -4% | 802 -16% | 987 3% | 1346 41% | 967 1% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 912 | 483 -47% | 768 -16% | 762 -16% | 909 0% | 896 -2% |
| Load | 283 | 187 -34% | 236 -17% | 249 -12% | 408 44% | 283 0% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – A OnePlus tem uma excelente oferta
A OnePlus ainda tem o toque: O OnePlus 7T Pro é outro smartphone de alta qualidade que tem vários destaques, incluindo uma tela de 90 Hz, uma câmera com zoom 3x, uma carcaça mate e ótimos alto-falantes estéreo. Tudo isso vem com um preço ainda um pouco abaixo do de outros smartphones de última geração. Ainda assim, os dias em que os principais telefones OnePlus eram uma pechincha disponível por menos de US$ 400 terminaram. A Xiaomi é a empresa preferida para essa faixa de preço no momento com o seu Mi 9T Pro.
Os usuários ainda terão que se contentar com a ausência de alguns dos habituais recursos de carro-chefe: Por exemplo, não há garantia para a impermeabilidade do telefone, nem carregamento sem fio, nem slot microSD. Os fanáticos de longa data do OnePlus também podem sentir falta do conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, embora isso ocorra há algumas gerações. O smartphone também reduz seu desempenho sob carga extrema e seu Wi-Fi é mais lento que o dos dispositivos topo de gama.
O OnePlus 7T Pro é um smartphone de gama alta e uma excelente oferta, embora já não seja uma pechincha.
Se você aceitar alguns recursos de conectividade ausentes, obterá muitos recursos adicionais que os smartphones de última geração comuns não oferecem: Embora a tecnologia de carregamento rápido do OnePlus não seja mais incontestada como era há alguns anos atrás, ainda é uma das mais rápidas. A ampla gama de software limpo a amplo com atualizações regulares e uma tela sem entalhes são uma vantagem adicional.
Em suma, o OnePlus 7T Pro vale o dinheiro. Se você está procurando um smartphone de alta qualidade, definitivamente deve levar este dispositivo em consideração.
OnePlus 7T Pro
- 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
