Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 7 Pro

Análise ao vivo.

O OnePlus 7 Pro é o novo carro-chefe da empresa. O dispositivo tem uma enorme tela livre de entalhes, câmeras traseiras triplas e muito mais. Leia mais para descobrir se este suposto assassino de carros-chefe pode atender às expectativas.
Atualização: Seção GPS atualizada, adicionadas medições PWM e fotos de teste adicionais.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/20/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

OnePlus 7 Pro (7 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Memória

12 GB

Pantalha

6.67 polegadas 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, 90 Hz, Brilhante: sim, HDR

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 239 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Sáida de áudio via USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor laser, sensor de proximidade, sensor hub

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: Bandas 2, 3, 5, 8. UMTS: Bandas, 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 19. LTE: Bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 66., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 162.6 x 75.9

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Warp Charge com carga rápida de 30 W

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Sony IMX586, 1.6 μm, f/1.6, OIS (camera 1), 8 MP telephoto, 1 μm, OIS, f/2.4 (camera 2), 16 MP ultra-wide-angle, f/2.2 (camera 3), triple autofocus: PDAF, laser, contrast; Videos at 4K/60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Sony IMX471, 1 μm, f/2.0, fixed focus, EIS, retractable

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo com Dolby Atmos, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, capa de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Speed: Cat. 18 downloads (1.2 Gbps), Cat. 13 uploads (150 Mbps), fanless

peso

206 g, Suprimento de energia: 126 g

Preço

829 Euro

Links

OnePlus página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

OnePlus 7 Pro Huawei P30 Pro OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Apple iPhone Xs Max Xiaomi Mi 9 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	670 (542^min - 717^max) MBit/s +42%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	541 (129^min - 633^max) MBit/s +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s +13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	489 (439^min - 508^max) MBit/s +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (438^min - 506^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 (398^min - 508^max) MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1014 (944^min - 1115^max) MBit/s +117%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (624^min - 683^max) MBit/s +42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +45%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (619^min - 639^max) MBit/s +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (561^min - 684^max) MBit/s +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s +34%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	467 (375^min - 519^max) MBit/s

OnePlus 7 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø467 (375-519)

OnePlus 7 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø471 (438-506)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


584 cd/m²	583 cd/m²	589 cd/m²
581 cd/m²	586 cd/m²	597 cd/m²
578 cd/m²	579 cd/m²	580 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 597 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 584.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 586 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243

	OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4"	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Screen		-66%	-3%	11%	-189%	-16%
Brightness middle	586	710 21%	656 12%	593 1%	435 -26%	597 2%
Brightness	584	721 23%	659 13%	587 1%	442 -24%	608 4%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	88 -9%	94 -3%	95 -2%	89 -8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.39	3.7 -166%	1.7 -22%	0.9 35%	6.79 -388%	2.2 -58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	10.3 -281%	2.8 -4%	2 26%	14.93 -453%	3.6 -33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.5 6%	1.7 -6%	1.5 6%	5.4 -238%	1.6 -0%
Gamma	2.243 ^98%	2.1 ^105%	1.998 ^110%	2.27 ^97%	2.252 ^98%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6672 ^97%	6611 ^98%	6487 ^100%	6548 ^99%	7588 ^86%	6268 ^104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

122 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 122 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 122 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3472 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4505 Points +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	2420 Points -30%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3306 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14)	3480 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +62%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10812 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10259 Points -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8906 Points -18%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9880 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14)	10955 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +46%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7470 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10177 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	13260 Points +78%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8574 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12)	7629 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +68%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	11766 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9793 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points -7%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	10984 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12996 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19)	12161 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9974 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7812 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points -9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8689 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9135 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19)	9710 Points -3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	64389 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55740 Points -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	64437 Points 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	51779 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55771 - 83518, n=17)	70036 Points +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106829 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	70318 Points -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	84459 Points -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	63469 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97354 - 110432, n=17)	105781 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	26936 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32302 Points +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	35217 Points +31%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31483 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (20636 - 45072, n=18)	32923 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7501 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4465 Points -40%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points -4%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	6374 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4969 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5251 - 7820, n=18)	7091 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9845 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5303 Points -46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8248 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5431 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6122 - 10008, n=18)	9272 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4091 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2875 Points -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points -12%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3551 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3828 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3001 - 4618, n=18)	3925 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7955 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4052 Points -49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	6368 Points -20%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5313 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5268 - 8141, n=18)	7186 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10420 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4449 Points -57%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8415 Points -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5767 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6358 - 10420, n=18)	9569 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4352 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3087 Points -29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points -13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3439 Points -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4164 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2345 - 4703, n=18)	3892 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5581 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4452 Points -20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4721 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4264 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4556 - 5747, n=20)	5489 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6248 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5246 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4400 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5429 - 6362, n=20)	6201 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4063 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2977 Points -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3496 Points -14%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3849 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2705 - 4612, n=20)	3954 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6270 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5200 Points -17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4317 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3969 - 6404, n=20)	5819 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8254 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7115 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5371 Points -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5869 Points -18%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4361 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5184 - 7148, n=20)	6793 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12419 Points +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4429 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2925 Points -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points -15%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3717 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4171 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1934 - 5024, n=20)	3942 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4759 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4348 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4242 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3800 - 5012, n=20)	4719 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5794 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5530 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4688 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4236 - 5884, n=20)	5618 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3317 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2488 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3183 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2104 - 3452, n=20)	3045 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points -19%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	58 fps -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	60 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20)	63.4 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	166 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	96 fps -42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	151 fps -9%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	138 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20)	153.1 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +78%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	55 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	59 fps +7%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20)	59.6 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +38%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	101 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	79 fps -22%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	91 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20)	92.3 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +73%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps +64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	50 fps +39%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	47 fps +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20)	47.7 fps +33%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +85%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	71 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	56 fps -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20)	62 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +75%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +81%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	31 fps +48%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (16 - 41, n=20)	31.7 fps +51%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +136%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	34 fps -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	33 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	39.2 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +78%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps +104%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	34 fps +48%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17 - 38, n=20)	32.5 fps +41%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps +120%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	37 fps -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	36 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=21)	39.9 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +102%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +60%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	21 fps +40%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (11 - 26, n=20)	20.9 fps +39%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +159%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	14 fps -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8.5 - 24, n=21)	16.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +113%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36.29 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.5 (9.69^min - 72.94^max) fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps -2%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	30.67 (5.93^min - 132.19^max) fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)	32.2 fps -11%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	22.73 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.18 (8.36^min - 46.5^max) fps +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +42%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28.46 (9.24^min - 54.37^max) fps +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)	27.5 fps +21%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	37.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32.26 (8.31^min - 85.07^max) fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27.02 (2.8^min - 80.83^max) fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)	35.9 fps -4%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	369294 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	333277 Points -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	293768 Points -20%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	316199 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16)	354450 Points -4%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Score
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4967 Score 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5020 Score +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3)	4806 Score -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +17%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4982 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4520 Points -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4895 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4330 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4701 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5397, n=19)	4796 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +30%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9143 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8344 Points -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11675 Points +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8138 Points -11%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8572 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=19)	8539 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +13%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5243 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4306 Points -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1815 Points -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points -23%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3907 Points -25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5210 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2661 - 7500, n=19)	5097 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +35%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9421 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8401 Points -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15659 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	7926 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7758 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9510, n=19)	9174 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +91%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1364 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1383 Points +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1731 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	1395 Points +2%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1409 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1076 - 1601, n=19)	1356 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +16%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1425 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1928 Points +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2407 Points +69%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1627 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4)	1334 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years)	2375 Points +67%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +99%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	62.5 Points
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	60.5 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16)	58.8 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)	44.13 Points -29%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +134%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	67.8 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15)	62 runs/min +1%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)	61.5 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	56 runs/min -9%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +35%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	122 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	115 Points +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	111 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20)	105.2 Points -5%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +56%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	24730 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21)	23749 Points -4%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	22447 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20849 Points -16%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)	16902 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)	2348 ms * -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19)	2147 ms * -9%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	2009 ms * -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	1965 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1857 ms * +5%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +22%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus 7 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus	Xiaomi Mi 9	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition	Huawei P30 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-28%	125%	-28%	116%	184%	381%
Sequential Read 256KB	1468	811 -45%	666 -55%	733 -50%	849 -42%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) 5%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 29%
Sequential Write 256KB	387	249.1 -36%	388.3 0%	253.3 -35%	250.8 -35%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) 49%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 280%
Random Read 4KB	174.1	135.2 -22%	149.4 -14%	145.1 -17%	174.4 0%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) 21%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 60%
Random Write 4KB	24.8	22.7 -8%	165.3 567%	22.3 -10%	159.2 542%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) 660%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 1154%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			82.6 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	70.6 ?(34.7 - 82.5, n=5)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			68.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	59.8 ?(30.7 - 71.7, n=5)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (58-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (59-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (52-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (57-61)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø30 (29-31)

OnePlus 7 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø29.6 (27-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


47 °C	45.2 °C	40.6 °C
46 °C	44.7 °C	41.4 °C
45.2 °C	43.8 °C	40 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C


35.4 °C	38.9 °C	42.9 °C
36.6 °C	39.5 °C	42.1 °C
37.4 °C	40 °C	40.9 °C

Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 39.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.9 / 1.8 / 2.9 Watt
Carga	5.5 / 8.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	17%	26%	20%	7%	11%	5%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.73 19%	1 -11%	0.67 26%	0.6 33%	0.68 24%	0.939 ?(0.58 - 1.96, n=19) -4%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Average *	1.8	1.53 15%	1.4 22%	1.26 30%	1.3 28%	2.6 -44%	1.506 ?(0.85 - 2.8, n=19) 16%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	2.07 29%	1.7 41%	1.29 56%	2.1 28%	2.77 4%	1.799 ?(1 - 2.9, n=19) 38%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 44%
Load Average *	5.5	6.03 -10%	4.6 16%	3.71 33%	4.5 18%	3.74 32%	4.61 ?(3.64 - 5.8, n=19) 16%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -19%
Load Maximum *	8.2	9.18 -12%	6.7 18%	9.3 -13%	8.6 -5%	6.82 17%	9.04 ?(7.49 - 11.9, n=19) -10%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		29h 05min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 56min

	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh
Battery Runtime		-14%	-9%	-7%	18%	29%
Reader / Idle	1745	1560 -11%	1305 -25%	1650 -5%		1966 13%
H.264	802	921 15%	801 0%	1008 26%		1193 49%
WiFi v1.3	768	483 -37%	742 -3%	546 -29%	905 18%	838 9%
Load	236	187 -21%	223 -6%	194 -18%		344 46%

Pro

+ Tela sem entalhes

+ Design premium

+ Ampla cobertura LTE

+ Zoom ótico 3x

+ Veloz armazenamento interno

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Carregamento ultra rápido

Contra

- Tela curva fácil de tocar acidentalmente

- Sem conector para fones

- Pesado

- Sem certificação IP

- Sem carregamento sem fio

- Wi-Fi comparativamente lento

Initial Verdict

The OnePlus 7 Pro smartphone review. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

O OnePlus 7 Pro já nos impressionou, apesar de ainda termos alguns testes para completar. O dispositivo possui armazenamento rápido, duração de bateria decente, carregamento ridiculamente rápido, um design premium, um scanner de digitais aprimorado e uma tela sem entalhes. Ah, e ele também tem uma tela de 90 Hz. E estávamos esquecendo da câmera frontal pop-up motorizada, que certamente chamara a atenção. Os alto falantes estéreo também nos impressionaram, com seu som encorpado e quente.

O 7 Pro pode ser o dispositivo OnePlus mais caro até hoje, mas ainda assim se sai muito bem contra os concorrentes, independentemente de qual versão você comprar. O OnePlus 7 regular pode, no entanto, oferecer uma relação preço-qualidade ainda maior, o qual será testado em breve.

Temos algumas críticas. A tela curva tem mais estilo do que substância, enquanto é um smartphone robusto e comparativamente longo. Além disso, o 7 Pro também fica relativamente quente, a ponto de ser difícil para algumas pessoas segurar o dispositivo durante sessões prolongadas de jogo. Desejamos que a OnePlus também certificasse seus dispositivos e acrescentasse o carregamento sem fio, já que são coisas fáceis para criticar do 7 Pro quando comparado a outros carros-chefes. Outros dispositivos também oferecem Wi-Fi mais rápido, e a justificativa da OnePlus de remover o conector para fones de ouvido ainda parece frágil, na melhor das hipóteses.