Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 6
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG V30 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 430 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
| OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 26% | 15% | -48% | 34% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 430 | 630 47% | 565 31% | 432 0% | 600 40% | 425 -1% |
| Brightness | 437 | 632 45% | 571 31% | 428 -2% | 606 39% | 423 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 96 10% | 96 10% | 87 0% | 94 8% | 92 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.5 35% | 2.3 -0% | 4.18 -82% | 1.2 48% | 2.1 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 4.3 7% | 4.8 -4% | 8.53 -85% | 3 35% | 3.4 26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.1 12% | 1.9 21% | 5.3 -121% | 1.6 33% | 2.5 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.33 94% | 2.23 99% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6160 106% | 6513 100% | 6332 103% | 7487 87% | 6707 97% | 6455 101% |
| Contrast | 1432 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 236 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 236 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 236 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 6 | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | LG V30 | OnePlus 5T | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -5% | 4% | -27% | -3% | 142% | 545% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 726 | 679 -6% | 819 13% | 669 -8% | 699 -4% | 760 ? 5% | 1839 ? 153% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 201.4 | 198.7 -1% | 204.9 2% | 193.2 -4% | 203.4 1% | 297 ? 47% | 1425 ? 608% |
| Random Read 4KB | 137 | 149.4 9% | 129.7 -5% | 78.2 -43% | 138.1 1% | 152.9 ? 12% | 277 ? 102% |
| Random Write 4KB | 21.8 | 17 -22% | 22.74 4% | 10.21 -53% | 20 -8% | 131.6 ? 504% | 309 ? 1317% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.25 ? | 79.2 ? | 62.8 | 76 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.12 ? | 67.2 ? | 47.2 | 59.6 ? |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Smooth | 60 fps | ||
| Balanced | 40 fps | ||
| HD | 30 fps | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (108.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 5T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.6 / 1 / 1.6 Watt |
| Carga |
4.3 / 8.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -43% | -39% | 11% | -44% | -2% | -33% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.75 -25% | 0.72 -20% | 0.68 -13% | 1.03 -72% | 0.58 3% | 0.862 ? -44% | 0.894 ? -49% |
| Idle Average * | 1 | 2.25 -125% | 2.21 -121% | 0.95 5% | 2.4 -140% | 1.44 -44% | 1.728 ? -73% | 1.456 ? -46% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.6 | 2.26 -41% | 2.22 -39% | 1.09 32% | 2.6 -63% | 1.53 4% | 2.07 ? -29% | 1.616 ? -1% |
| Load Average * | 4.3 | 4.89 -14% | 4.6 -7% | 4.58 -7% | 2.96 31% | 3.17 26% | 4.87 ? -13% | 6.45 ? -50% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.6 | 9.6 -12% | 9.34 -9% | 5.16 40% | 6.6 23% | 8.54 1% | 9.27 ? -8% | 9.8 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -6% | -19% | -19% | -1% | -25% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1806 | 1678 -7% | 1402 -22% | 1343 -26% | 1754 -3% | 1292 -28% |
| H.264 | 791 | 718 -9% | 722 -9% | 674 -15% | 799 1% | 634 -20% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 762 | 716 -6% | 679 -11% | 521 -32% | 718 -6% | 564 -26% |
| Load | 246 | 239 -3% | 159 -35% | 237 -4% | 257 4% | 180 -27% |
Pro
Contra
O OnePlus 6 é um smartphone de alta qualidade, oferecendo recursos de ponta com uma excelente relação preço-desempenho. No entanto, seu preço baixo n{ao é coincidência: A OnePlus desconsidera completamente o assunto da RV, que também é refletido na tecnologia da tela, onde a resolução FHD+ precisa ser suficiente. No geral, não parece haver nenhum avanço em termos de painel, o entalhe é puramente uma questão de gosto. Teríamos desejado algo semelhante à tela True-Tone da Apple ou a um painel de 120 Hz. Para começar, o monobloco de alumínio também segue uma tendência, mas não concede as capacidades de carregamento sem fio de telefone celular da OnePlus. Da mesma forma, em vez de um padrão de transferência mais rápido que poderia oferecer mais recursos, como saída de vídeo ou um modo de área de desktop, o USB 2.0 é invocado.
Em vez disso, o OnePlus conta com as principais competências de um smartphone e equipa seu smartphone mais recente com mais velocidade, um armazenamento maior e mais rápido, um software atualizado e uma boa câmera. No entanto, os avanços em comparação com o predecessor também são marginais. A duração da bateria é quase a mesma que a do antecessor, o que, apesar de não ser uma surpresa, ainda é boa, dado que o OnePlus 5T já era duradouro. Além disso, ele vem com uma tecnologia de carga rápida extremamente rápida, que já conhecemos do OnePlus 5T, mas não leva mais o nome Dash Charge (o nome teve que ser alterado devido a conflitos de licenciamento).
A OnePlus mais uma vez produz um excelente smartphone. Antecipando alguns gimmicks de gama alta, o OnePlus 6 faz um ótimo trabalho em combinar alto desempenho com um preço baixo.
Em resumo, o OnePlus mais uma vez oferece um smartphone muito bom. Mas a concorrência nessa área está aumentando. O Honor 10 com o seu preço agressivo (a partir de 399 Euros), em particular, não é nada para ser ridicularizado e o Asus ZenFone 5z, em breve disponível, bem como o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s jogam na mesma liga, em termos de tecnologia e preço.
OnePlus 6
- 05/29/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
