Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 5T

Está de volta! Poucos meses depois do seu antecessor ter sido lançado, a OnePlus apresentou o seu mais novo smartphone. O OnePlus 5T vem no formato moderno 2:1 e melhorou as câmeras. Mas há mudanças suficientes para que seja uma atualização convincente?
OnePlus 5T (5 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.5 GHz, Kryo 280
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
Pantalha
6.01 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, tela capacitiva, AMOLED, 2.5D Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor Hall, acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, proximidade, RGB, sensor hub, USB Type C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B30/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 156.1 x 75
Bateria
12.5 Wh, 3300 mAh Lítio-Ion, Dash Charge (5V 4A)
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix dual-camera: Sony IMX 298, 1.12μm, f/1.7, focal: 27.22 mm, dual-LED flash, || 20 MPix IMX 376K, 1.0 μm, focal: 27.22 mm, video: 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Sensor IMX 371, pixel size: 1.0 μm, aperture: f/2.0, 1080p@30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, FOnte de alimentação, capa, ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, bandwidth (downlad/upload): 600Mbps/150Mbps (LTE); SAR values: 1.41 W/kg (body), 0.51 W/kg (head), fanless
peso
162 g, Suprimento de energia: 106 g
Preço
559 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T

Size Comparison

159.5 mm 73.4 mm 8.1 mm 172 g157.9 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 175 g156.1 mm 75 mm 7.3 mm 162 g155.4 mm 75.2 mm 7.5 mm 165 g154.2 mm 74.1 mm 7.25 mm 153 g151.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 158 g148 mm 73.4 mm 7.4 mm 156 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s +1%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s -23%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s -49%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s +70%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s +27%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s -38%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS OnePlus 5T - overview
GPS OnePlus 5T - overview
GPS OnePlus 5T - path
GPS OnePlus 5T - path
GPS OnePlus 5T - loop
GPS OnePlus 5T - loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
402
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 439 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 423.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 425 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.32
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6"
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2"
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen
-23%
-47%
-16%
-61%
20%
6%
Brightness middle
425
620
46%
656
54%
415
-2%
432
2%
560
32%
426
0%
Brightness
423
610
44%
634
50%
420
-1%
428
1%
562
33%
431
2%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
93
1%
87
-5%
87
-5%
93
1%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.79
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
4.2
-100%
5.3
-152%
2.7
-29%
4.18
-99%
1.7
19%
1.6
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.4
5.8
-71%
7.8
-129%
4.3
-26%
8.53
-151%
3.4
-0%
4.1
-21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
3.9
-56%
5.2
-108%
3.3
-32%
5.3
-112%
1.6
36%
1.7
32%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.02 109%
2.22 99%
2.36 93%
2.33 94%
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
CCT
6455 101%
7086 92%
7905 82%
6787 96%
7487 87%
6435 101%
6329 103%
Contrast
785
1640
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points -3%
LG V30
173749 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points -4%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points +3%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points +7%
LG V30
6854 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points -25%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points +9%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points -23%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points +6%
LG V30
5603 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points -21%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points +5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points -21%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points -59%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points -9%
LG V30
2702 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points -10%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points -14%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points +1%
LG V30
4238 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points -9%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points -11%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points -64%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points -24%
LG V30
2091 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points -18%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points +15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points +8%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points -75%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points +1%
LG V30
5949 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points 0%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points -40%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points -11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points -42%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points -11%
LG V30
1009 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points -12%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points -7%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points -56%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points -2%
LG V30
1900 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points +3%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points -3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points -37%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points -6%
LG V30
6078 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points 0%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points +2%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points -51%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points -5%
LG V30
8016 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points +4%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points +7%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points -25%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points -6%
LG V30
34139 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points -30%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points -18%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points -68%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points -7%
LG V30
55271 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points -43%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points +8%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points -39%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points -5%
LG V30
14601 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points -2%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points -71%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points 0%
LG V30
4738 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points -18%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points +5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points +1%
LG V30
5895 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points -17%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points -15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points -41%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points -1%
LG V30
2808 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points -19%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points -3%
LG V30
3635 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points -15%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points -82%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points -4%
LG V30
3903 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points -13%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points -1%
LG V30
2931 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points -20%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
60 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps -52%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps -2%
LG V30
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps -3%
OnePlus 5
60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
113 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps -73%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps -1%
LG V30
113 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps -8%
OnePlus 5
115 fps +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
53 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps -34%
LG V30
35 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps -28%
OnePlus 5
56 fps +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps +6%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
60 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps -7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps -2%
LG V30
59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps -17%
OnePlus 5
61 fps +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
37 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps +14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps -46%
LG V30
19 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps -38%
OnePlus 5
41 fps +11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps +3%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
41 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps -76%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps 0%
LG V30
40 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps +2%
OnePlus 5
42 fps +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps -10%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
23 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps +9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps -43%
LG V30
13 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps -43%
OnePlus 5
25 fps +9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps -4%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
25 fps
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps -4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps -79%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps -4%
LG V30
24 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps 0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps -16%

Legend

 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.5 Points
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.7 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.2 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.3 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.6 Points -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points -20%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points +12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points -10%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points -19%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * -204%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * -17%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3591 ms * -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434 ms * -11%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3268 ms * -6%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms *
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2622 ms * +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2237 ms * +28%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points +7%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points -6%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points -24%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points -48%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 5TSony Xperia XZ1Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLGoogle Pixel 2 XLLG V30Samsung Galaxy S8 PlusOnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-43%
5%
-25%
-6%
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
699
679
-3%
287.4
-59%
760
9%
669
-4%
788
13%
748
7%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.4
204.4
0%
205.3
1%
195.3
-4%
193.2
-5%
194.2
-5%
201.5
-1%
Random Read 4KB
138.1
156.6
13%
68.6
-50%
170.6
24%
78.2
-43%
127.2
-8%
141
2%
Random Write 4KB
20
14.93
-25%
7.59
-62%
17.84
-11%
10.21
-49%
15.27
-24%
19.3
-3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
71.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.71 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
57.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 36 °C35.1 °C32.2 °C 
 36.1 °C36 °C32.1 °C 
 35.4 °C34.8 °C31.7 °C 
Máximo: 36.1 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C
31.7 °C31.6 °C33.1 °C
31.6 °C32.1 °C33.6 °C
31.4 °C32.7 °C33.7 °C
Máximo: 33.7 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  25.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.72532.946.33137.244.44031.748.65039.648.96328.337.68027.329.910026.933.712526.732.91602445.520020.955.325020.956.631519.559.140018.568.450017.564.963017.567.480015.766.2100015.870125016.672.7160015.873.8200015.474.4250015.575.931501679.3400015.87850001671.8630016.371.5800016.371.41000016.272.41250016.464.71600016.446.3SPL28.686.3N1.165.5median 16.4median 68.4Delta2.27.731.629.825.433.525.327.532.925.333.634.931.627.428.427.22727.320.828.12241.121.347.920.852.421.258.719.462.519.565.417.76817.969.717.873.517.376.517.475.416.778.717.278.718.279.917.980.517.673.517.774.317.873.817.975.918.170.818.253.13087.81.374.1median 17.9median 73.51.49.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 5TOnePlus 5
OnePlus 5T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.58 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt
Carga midlight 3.17 / 8.54 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-46%
-36%
-38%
-2%
4%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.58
0.51
12%
0.84
-45%
1.28
-121%
0.72
-24%
0.68
-17%
0.73
-26%
Idle Average *
1.44
2.16
-50%
2.31
-60%
1.87
-30%
1.37
5%
1.13
22%
1.44
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.53
2.23
-46%
2.33
-52%
1.89
-24%
1.41
8%
1.16
24%
1.5
2%
Load Average *
3.17
7.45
-135%
4.76
-50%
3.73
-18%
3.46
-9%
4.69
-48%
6.91
-118%
Load Maximum *
8.54
9.28
-9%
6.39
25%
8.08
5%
7.83
8%
5.24
39%
8.51
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
29h 14min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 19min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 17min
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
-7%
-5%
6%
-2%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1754
1612
-8%
1665
-5%
1706
-3%
1914
9%
1565
-11%
1534
-13%
H.264
799
580
-27%
698
-13%
672
-16%
822
3%
742
-7%
623
-22%
WiFi v1.3
718
601
-16%
562
-22%
581
-19%
774
8%
736
3%
518
-28%
Load
257
172
-33%
286
11%
302
18%
267
4%
275
7%
247
-4%

Pro

+ Carcaça de metal muito estável
+ Ampla gama de bandas LTE
+ Wi-Fi veloz
+ Veloz memória UFS-2.1
+ Desempenho muito alto
+ Tela com cores precisas
+ Software fino e atualizado
+ GPS preciso
+ Qualidade nítida das chamadas
+ Tema de software escuro opcional
+ Câmeras muito boas
+ Consumo de energia bastante baixo
+ Longas durações da bateria
+ Interruptor físico para as notificações
+ Bons alto falantes

Contra

- Bastante pesado
- Sem slot microSD
- O microfone distorce os sons fortes
- Falta de cor em ângulos de visão mais amplos
- Não é resistente à água ou à poeira
- Esquenta sob uso extremo
- Perda mínima de desempenho sob uso intenso
Review: OnePlus 5T. Test unit provided by OnePlus.
Review: OnePlus 5T. Test unit provided by OnePlus.

O OnePlus 5T é um ótimo smartphone para gastadores inteligentes: Um bom preço, baixo consumo de energia e uma ótima relação preço-desempenho. O OnePlus 5T é atualmente um dos smartphones mais rápidos disponíveis que também oferece uma bateria muito durável, bons alto-falantes e ótimas câmeras. Os telefones carros-chefe dos grandes fabricantes ainda oferecem câmeras ligeiramente melhores, por exemplo, nossa unidade de teste não possui um estabilizador de imagem ótico. As velocidades LTE do OnePlus 5T também não são tão rápidas quanto as de outros smartphones, mas você quase nunca notará isso. O software não ocupa muito espaço e é bem cuidado pelo fabricante. O smartphone deve ter recepção em qualquer lugar do mundo e as velocidades de Wi-Fi são muito boas. O GPS é preciso, o exato sensor de digitais e o reconhecimento facial são um plus agradável e útil.

O dispositivo possui um dispositivo de armazenamento rápido que oferece generosos 128 GB - isso, no entanto, não pode ser expandido por um cartão microSD. Manipulação confortável, uma tela nítida com cores fortes e temperaturas aceitáveis completam o OnePlus 5T. Mesmo os amantes do antecessor podem querer pensar em uma atualização: Ele lhe trará um alto-falante ligeiramente melhor, melhores câmeras e uma bateria significativamente mais duradoura. E, claro, um design moderno com marcos finos.

O fabricante conseguiu criar um excelente smartphone de gama alta quase sem desvantagem alguma e corrigindo algumas deficiências do antecessor. Longas durações de bateria, alto desempenho do sistema, boas câmeras e um som forte fazem deste smartphone uma boa compra.

Embora o OnePlus 5T não tenha marcos tão finos ou seja tão fácil de usar como o Galaxy S8+, o OnePlus 5T é um excelente desenvolvimento do seu antecessor, que até agora conseguiu permanecer livre afirmações falsas (ao contrário do OnePlus 5 quando foi lançado). Então, definitivamente podemos afirmar: O assassino de carros-chefe está de volta!

OnePlus 5T - 01/03/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
53 / 60 → 88%
Peso
91%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
68 / 70 → 98%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
85%
Médio
82%
91%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 5T
Florian Wimmer, 2018-01-18 (Update: 2024-11- 4)