Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 3

Name: OnePlus 3
Brand: OnePlus

Jogador poderoso. Todas as coisas boas vêm com "três". Provavelmente isto é o que o fabricante chinês de smartphones estava pensando quando lançou a terceira geração do assassino de carros chefe: O OnePlus 3. Mas nem tudo é um arco iris.

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM OnePlus Two Smartphone Touchscreen Phablet

Test device courtesy of OnePlus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 3 (3 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 530, Análises do: 624 MHz

Memória

6 GB

, LPDDR4

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, multi-touch de 10 pontos, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, optic-AMOLED, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 52.49 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: combo fones + microfone (3,5 mm), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: proximidade, hall, aceleração, posição, G-sensor, bússola digital, BeiDou

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 5, e 8), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.35 x 152.7 x 74.7

Bateria

3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 298, 1.12 µm, OIS, detecção de face auto foco (PDAF), f/2.0, vídeo UHD, suporte para RAW, Auto-HDR)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Sony IMX179, 1.4 µm, EIS, foco fixo, f/2.0, 1080p video)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo de dados, ferramenta SIM, guia rápida, OxygenOS 3.1, 12 Meses Garantia, Head SAR: 0.394 W/kg, Body SAR: 0.323 W/kg, USB Type-C, dual-nano SIM, fanless

peso

161 g, Suprimento de energia: 100 g

Preço

399 Euro

Links

OnePlus página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	303 MBit/s +6%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 MBit/s
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s -13%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	290 MBit/s +13%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 MBit/s
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s -20%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

OnePlus 3

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Xiaomi Mi 5

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

OnePlus 3

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

OnePlus 3

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

Canon EOS 70D


471 cd/m²	421 cd/m²	398 cd/m²
468 cd/m²	419 cd/m²	399 cd/m²
475 cd/m²	429 cd/m²	399 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 475 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 431 cd/m² Minimum: 2.24 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 419 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		-6%	31%	-6%	15%	6%	5%	4%
Brightness middle	419	451 8%	554 32%	784 87%	445 6%	582 39%	297 -29%	583 39%
Brightness	431	446 3%	552 28%	774 80%	434 1%	563 31%	297 -31%	560 30%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	96 14%	91 8%	93 11%	91 8%	93 11%	91 8%
Black Level *		0.3		0.43	0.36	0.38		0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.1	3.84 6%	1.59 61%	6.5 -59%	2.8 32%	4.4 -7%	2.67 35%	3.55 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12		2.56 79%	11.7 2%	5.8 52%	7.4 38%	3.98 67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	3.97 -20%	2.01 39%	8 -142%	3.7 -12%	4.8 -45%	2.81 15%	3.88 -18%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.46 ^89%	2.01 ^109%	2.22 ^99%	2.31 ^95%	2.2 ^100%	2.08 ^106%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6550 ^99%	7283 ^89%	6321 ^103%	8699 ^75%	7164 ^91%	6175 ^105%	6379 ^102%	7280 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	89.38	58.07 -35%	82.12 -8%	68.08 -24%		77.78 -13%	66.31 -26%	59.05 -34%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	90.14 -10%	99.98 0%	97.46 -3%		99.44 -1%	99.79 0%	92.8 -7%
Contrast		1503		1823	1236	1532		1267

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

243.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	142090 Points
OnePlus 2	65936 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points -9%
LG G5	124244 Points -13%
HTC 10	131866 Points -7%
Huawei P9	95743 Points -33%
Google Nexus 6P	79502 Points -44%
Motorola Moto X Force	89911 Points -37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	78324 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	133626 Points -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	94122 Points -34%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	7101 Points
OnePlus 2	4282 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -34%
LG G5	5581 Points -21%
HTC 10	5809 Points -18%
Huawei P9	7058 Points -1%
Google Nexus 6P	4716 Points -34%
Motorola Moto X Force	5365 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5094 Points -28%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	2496 Points
OnePlus 2	1681 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points -17%
LG G5	2079 Points -17%
HTC 10	2193 Points -12%
Huawei P9	2025 Points -19%
Google Nexus 6P	1405 Points -44%
Motorola Moto X Force	1774 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1649 Points -34%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2206 Points -12%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1465 Points -41%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	3537 Points
OnePlus 2	2536 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +15%
LG G5	2925 Points -17%
HTC 10	2806 Points -21%
Huawei P9	3930 Points +11%
Google Nexus 6P	1798 Points -49%
Motorola Moto X Force	2878 Points -19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2737 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3925 Points +11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1386 Points -61%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	2052 Points
OnePlus 2	1297 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points +1%
LG G5	1478 Points -28%
HTC 10	1772 Points -14%
Huawei P9	2627 Points +28%
Google Nexus 6P	1136 Points -45%
Motorola Moto X Force	1085 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	876 Points -57%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1124 Points -45%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1945 Points -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	4813 Points
OnePlus 2	2631 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -54%
LG G5	4807 Points 0%
HTC 10	5009 Points +4%
Huawei P9	1583 Points -67%
Google Nexus 6P	2424 Points -50%
Motorola Moto X Force	3376 Points -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	3137 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4299 Points -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2040 Points -58%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	1112 Points
OnePlus 2	923 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points -11%
LG G5	900 Points -19%
HTC 10	928 Points -17%
Huawei P9	1029 Points -7%
Google Nexus 6P	791 Points -29%
Motorola Moto X Force	939 Points -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	986 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1199 Points +8%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	837 Points -25%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	2398 Points
OnePlus 2	1140 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2170 (2120^min) Points -10%
LG G5	2396 Points 0%
HTC 10	2376 Points -1%
Huawei P9	1767 Points -26%
Google Nexus 6P	1335 Points -44%
Motorola Moto X Force	1262 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1335 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2538 Points +6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	5645 Points
OnePlus 2	4804 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6480 (6415^min) Points +15%
LG G5	5507 Points -2%
HTC 10	5117 Points -9%
Huawei P9	6522 Points +16%
Google Nexus 6P	4587 Points -19%
Motorola Moto X Force	4791 Points -15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	4492 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4429 Points -22%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	30241 Points
OnePlus 2	22400 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points -5%
LG G5	28730 Points -5%
HTC 10	27176 Points -10%
Huawei P9	19854 Points -34%
Google Nexus 6P	26876 Points -11%
Motorola Moto X Force	25751 Points -15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	26380 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	27795 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	34023 Points
OnePlus 2	31858 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points -3%
LG G5	32109 Points -6%
HTC 10	30061 Points -12%
Huawei P9	21577 Points -37%
Google Nexus 6P	34758 Points +2%
Motorola Moto X Force	38394 Points +13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	37725 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	41615 Points +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	21771 Points
OnePlus 2	10985 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points -10%
LG G5	20997 Points -4%
HTC 10	20344 Points -7%
Huawei P9	15517 Points -29%
Google Nexus 6P	14983 Points -31%
Motorola Moto X Force	11963 Points -45%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	12852 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	12854 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	3424 Points
OnePlus 2	1734 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points -21%
LG G5	3277 Points -4%
HTC 10	3157 Points -8%
Huawei P9	1237 Points -64%
Google Nexus 6P	1877 Points -45%
Motorola Moto X Force	2413 Points -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2009 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3316 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	4633 Points
OnePlus 2	1854 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points -35%
LG G5	4468 Points -4%
HTC 10	4581 Points -1%
Huawei P9	1080 Points -77%
Google Nexus 6P	2302 Points -50%
Motorola Moto X Force	3226 Points -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2336 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4557 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	1789 Points
OnePlus 2	1414 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points +12%
LG G5	1695 Points -5%
HTC 10	1512 Points -15%
Huawei P9	2510 Points +40%
Google Nexus 6P	1142 Points -36%
Motorola Moto X Force	1282 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1348 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1697 Points -5%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	60 fps
OnePlus 2	47 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps -15%
LG G5	47 fps -22%
HTC 10	43 fps -28%
Huawei P9	43 fps -28%
Google Nexus 6P	33 fps -45%
Motorola Moto X Force	42 fps -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	52 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	59 fps -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	18.75 fps -69%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	89 fps
OnePlus 2	48 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps -9%
LG G5	74 fps -17%
HTC 10	73 fps -18%
Huawei P9	40 fps -55%
Google Nexus 6P	44 fps -51%
Motorola Moto X Force	58 fps -35%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	56 fps -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	78.9 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	27.11 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	46 fps
OnePlus 2	23 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps -41%
LG G5	30 fps -35%
HTC 10	24 fps -48%
Huawei P9	19 fps -59%
Google Nexus 6P	17 fps -63%
Motorola Moto X Force	17 fps -63%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	27 fps -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps -17%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	11.81 fps -74%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	47 fps
OnePlus 2	23 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps -19%
LG G5	42 fps -11%
HTC 10	39 fps -17%
Huawei P9	18 fps -62%
Google Nexus 6P	25 fps -47%
Motorola Moto X Force	27 fps -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	25 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	17.54 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	30 fps
OnePlus 2	19 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -50%
LG G5	17 fps -43%
HTC 10	14 fps -53%
Huawei P9	11 fps -63%
Google Nexus 6P	9.5 fps -68%
Motorola Moto X Force	12 fps -60%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	19 fps -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps -7%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	31 fps
OnePlus 2	19 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps -10%
LG G5	31 fps 0%
HTC 10	24 fps -23%
Huawei P9	10 fps -68%
Google Nexus 6P	16 fps -48%
Motorola Moto X Force	20 fps -35%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	18 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps -10%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	18 fps
OnePlus 2	11 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7.9 fps -56%
LG G5	11 fps -39%
HTC 10	10 fps -44%
Huawei P9	7.1 fps -61%
Motorola Moto X Force	7.3 fps -59%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	6.1 fps -66%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	18 fps
OnePlus 2	11 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -17%
LG G5	18 fps 0%
HTC 10	18 fps 0%
Huawei P9	6.5 fps -64%
Motorola Moto X Force	12 fps -33%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5.8 fps -68%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	23.32 fps
OnePlus 2	15.68 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps -43%
LG G5	25.26 fps +8%
Huawei P9	7.9 fps -66%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	14.52 fps -38%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	631 Points
OnePlus 2	427 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points +16%
LG G5	543 Points -14%
HTC 10	608 Points -4%
Huawei P9	328 Points -48%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	478 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	858 Points +36%

Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
OnePlus 3	33064 Points
OnePlus 2	21533 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	32273 Points -2%
LG G5	25532 Points -23%
Huawei P9	16610 Points -50%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	23747 Points -28%

Legend

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | BaseMark OS II | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	122 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	80 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	163 Points +34%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 Points -11%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 Points -11%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 Points +5%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	116 Points -5%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	103 Points -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	106 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	190 Points +56%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 Points -7%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	54.4 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.29 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	75.1 Points +38%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.7 Points -9%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.1 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	68.4 Points +26%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.4 Points -13%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.37 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	48.2 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	118.7 Points +118%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 Points -15%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	1112 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	923 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	994 Points -11%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	900 Points -19%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	928 Points -17%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1029 Points -7%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	791 Points -29%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	939 Points -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	986 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1199 Points +8%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	837 Points -25%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	9155 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6955 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13191 Points +44%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9731 Points +6%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8905 Points -3%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11783 Points +29%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8804 Points -4%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8699 Points -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8851 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	15967 Points +74%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8059 Points -12%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2921 ms *
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6585 ms * -125%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2564 ms * +12%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3461 ms * -18%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3146 ms * -8%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2923 ms * -0%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4193 ms * -44%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4080 ms * -40%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4377 ms * -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1743 ms * +40%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5553 ms * -90%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	408.7 MB/s
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	234.2 MB/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	487.3 MB/s +19%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	427.6 MB/s +5%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	275.1 MB/s -33%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	281.3 MB/s -31%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	236.3 MB/s -42%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	252 MB/s -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	256.8 MB/s -37%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	153.3 MB/s
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	125.5 MB/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	145.1 MB/s -5%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	141.3 MB/s -8%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	115.6 MB/s -25%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	72.2 MB/s -53%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	122.5 MB/s -20%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.99 MB/s -69%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	99.4 MB/s -35%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	137.6 MB/s
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21.87 MB/s -84%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	86.7 MB/s -37%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	89.3 MB/s -35%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	29.92 MB/s -78%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 MB/s -72%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	20.1 MB/s -85%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	22.55 MB/s -84%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19.11 MB/s -86%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	18.23 MB/s
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13.94 MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	15.79 MB/s -13%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16.22 MB/s -11%
HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15.89 MB/s -13%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.45 MB/s +160%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.79 MB/s -35%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19.78 MB/s +9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14.53 MB/s -20%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps

Real Racing 3
	Configurações	Valor
	high	35 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40.5 °C	39.7 °C	36.9 °C
42.1 °C	41.8 °C	37.1 °C
41.4 °C	39.6 °C	37.1 °C

Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C


36.7 °C	37.2 °C	39.1 °C
37.1 °C	38.5 °C	39.5 °C
36.6 °C	38.8 °C	39.5 °C

Máximo: 39.5 °C
Médio: 38.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 33.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.07 / 0.27 Watt
Ocioso	0.57 / 1.24 / 1.36 Watt
Carga	5.92 / 10.53 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh
Power Consumption		4%	-4%	-13%	-19%	5%
Idle Minimum *	0.57	0.63 -11%	0.5 12%	0.55 4%	0.68 -19%	0.87 -53%
Idle Average *	1.24	1.1 11%	1.9 -53%	1.37 -10%	1.49 -20%	1.2 3%
Idle Maximum *	1.36	1.56 -15%	2.2 -62%	2.25 -65%	1.91 -40%	1.27 7%
Load Average *	5.92	5.95 -1%	3.2 46%	6.24 -5%	7.4 -25%	4.69 21%
Load Maximum *	10.53	6.7 36%	6.4 39%	9.12 13%	9.71 8%	5.63 47%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		22h 18min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 28min

	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	OnePlus 2 mAh	Honor 7 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime		-25%	-30%	-26%	16%	-14%	-10%
Reader / Idle	1338	1393 4%	888 -34%	1273 -5%	1663 24%	1655 24%	1446 8%
H.264	847	580 -32%	553 -35%	648 -23%	914 8%	714 -16%	776 -8%
WiFi v1.3	840	356 -58%	484 -42%	413 -51%	732 -13%	513 -39%	530 -37%
Load	268	229 -15%	241 -10%	203 -24%	392 46%	197 -26%	263 -2%

Pro

+ Construção

+ Alto desempenho sem afogamento

+ Boa câmera

+ Armazenamento rápido

+ WiFi veloz

+ Dual-SIM

+ USB Tipo C

+ Deslizador de notificações

+ Boa tela

+ Armazenamento interno generoso

+ Boa qualidade das chamadas e supressão de ruído

+ Carga rápida

Contra

- LTE Cat.. Apenas 6

- Conectividade de bandas regional variante

- Armazenamento não expansível

- Sem rádio

- Sem infravermelhos

- Alto falante com ruído

- Modo sRGB inútil

In review: OnePlus 3. Review sample courtesy of OnePlus.

O OnePlus 3 é um smartphone bem-sucedido que não oferece apenas uma configuração sólida, mas também tem um bom visual e é bem construído. Ele possui um veloz Snapdragon 820, muito generosos 6 GB de memória de trabalho, um leitor de digitais, dual-SIM, o tão esperado NFC, uma boa câmera e carga rápida - e tudo isto por menos de 400 Euros (~$442). Dificilmente outro smartphone com ambições tão premium existe. Inclusive considerando o mercado chinês, dificilmente existem verdadeiras alternativas, particularmente não com esta qualidade.

Atualmente o rival mais forte certamente seria o ZTE Axon 7. Sua vantagem é que o seu preço cairá, enquanto que os preços dos aparelhos OnePlus são muito estáveis. Pelo menos a empresa se afastou da sua estratégia de boas-vindas. Outra alternativa interessante é o LG G5, cujo preço já caiu o suficiente.

Mais smartphones por menos de 400 Euros (~$442) não é possível.

No entanto, o OnePlus 3 não é perfeito e não será uma ameaça para o líder da categoria da Samsung. A resolução da tela e a qualidade de reprodução simplesmente não é suficiente para isso, e a câmera no S7 é pelo menos um grau melhor, especialmente em condições de baixa iluminação, e a conectividade e e o equipamento de sensores no OnePlus 3 não é impecável. O LTE Cat.6 já é padrão desde o primeiro semestre de 2015, e o smartphone também tem perdeu suas qualidades de Globetrotter. Infelizmente, o armazenamento não pode ser expandido e o alto falante não é impressionante.

Isto é reclamar em um alto padrão, e inclusive se os aspectos técnicos não são suficientes para subir para o pódio do vencedor, o OnePlus mais uma vez fornece um aparelho potente que é atraente.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

OnePlus 3 - 07/11/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

89%

Teclado

70 / 75 → 93%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

48 / 60 → 80%

Peso

91%