Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 9 PureView
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 648 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Nokia 9 PureView P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4" | Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 16% | 8% | -6% | -74% | 24% | |
| Brightness middle | 648 | 656 1% | 597 -8% | 567 -12% | 543 -16% | 593 -8% |
| Brightness | 641 | 659 3% | 608 -5% | 559 -13% | 542 -15% | 587 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 89 -3% | 89 -3% | 92 0% | 94 2% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.7 26% | 2.2 4% | 3.3 -43% | 6.6 -187% | 0.9 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 2.8 46% | 3.6 31% | 6.1 -17% | 11 -112% | 2 62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.7 23% | 1.6 27% | 1.1 50% | 4.7 -114% | 1.5 32% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 1.998 110% | 2.23 99% | 2.46 89% | 1.835 120% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6592 99% | 6487 100% | 6268 104% | 6495 100% | 6817 95% | 6548 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235.8 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.7 - 48.9, n=4) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Firefox 67) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (46.4 - 54.1, n=4) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 9 PureView | Huawei P30 Pro | LG V40 ThinQ | Sony Xperia XZ3 | Xiaomi Mi 9 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 191% | 3% | 1% | 204% | 155% | 586% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 728 | 849 17% | 690 -5% | 681 -6% | 666 -9% | 760 ? 4% | 1887 ? 159% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 200.3 | 250.8 25% | 203.9 2% | 196.1 -2% | 388.3 94% | 297 ? 48% | 1471 ? 634% |
| Random Read 4KB | 132 | 174.4 32% | 130.1 -1% | 135.7 3% | 149.4 13% | 152.9 ? 16% | 278 ? 111% |
| Random Write 4KB | 20.18 | 159.2 689% | 23.36 16% | 22.22 10% | 165.3 719% | 131.6 ? 552% | 311 ? 1441% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.6 ? | 84.9 ? | 34.2 ? | 76 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 68.2 ? | 63.1 ? | 30.4 ? | 59.6 ? |
Dead Trigger 2
PUBG Mobile
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 9 PureView audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.06 / 0.56 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.65 / 2.34 / 2.43 Watt |
| Carga |
5.02 / 6.51 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | 11% | 24% | 30% | 27% | 10% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.65 | 1 39% | 0.68 59% | 0.87 47% | 0.8 52% | 0.67 59% | 0.862 ? 48% | 0.883 ? 46% |
| Idle Average * | 2.34 | 1.4 40% | 2.6 -11% | 1.39 41% | 1.2 49% | 1.26 46% | 1.728 ? 26% | 1.467 ? 37% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.43 | 1.7 30% | 2.77 -14% | 1.41 42% | 1.5 38% | 1.29 47% | 2.07 ? 15% | 1.621 ? 33% |
| Load Average * | 5.02 | 4.6 8% | 3.74 25% | 3.96 21% | 4.8 4% | 3.71 26% | 4.87 ? 3% | 6.58 ? -31% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.51 | 6.7 -3% | 6.82 -5% | 8.6 -32% | 6.2 5% | 9.3 -43% | 9.27 ? -42% | 9.91 ? -52% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 19% | 66% | 11% | -14% | 20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1250 | 1305 4% | 1966 57% | 1140 -9% | 1270 2% | 1650 32% |
| H.264 | 732 | 801 9% | 1193 63% | 659 -10% | 420 -43% | 1008 38% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 486 | 742 53% | 838 72% | 510 5% | 419 -14% | 546 12% |
| Load | 202 | 223 10% | 344 70% | 320 58% | 202 0% | 194 -4% |
Pro
Contra
O que começou como uma ideia ambiciosa acabou em decepção. A câmera quíntupla do Nokia 9 PureView certamente não é nada especial ou mesmo particularmente boa. Seu aplicativo de câmera é lento e não responde, o que piora ainda mais a impressão geral dessa câmera de smartphone.
Só podemos esperar que a HMD Global melhore ambos com uma atualização de software. É uma pena, de verdade, porque a ideia inovadora de combinar três imagens monocromáticas com duas fotos RGB tem muito potencial. As impressionantes capacidades de bokeh são a prova viva disso.
O Nokia 9 PureView não tira o máximo partido do seu inovador design de câmara quíntupla. Como resultado, definitivamente não está entre as melhores câmeras de smartphone disponíveis.
Se a qualidade da câmera é de extrema importância para você, então você terá que procurar outra coisa. O carro-chefe Mi 9 da Xiaomi vem à mente, o que, de fato, também é um pouco mais barato, para começar.
No geral, o Nokia 9 PureView ainda conseguiu deixar uma impressão decente. Sua carcaça de alumínio com certificação IP67 de alta qualidade é digna de um telefone carro-chefe e, graças ao recurso do Android One, as atualizações de segurança estão garantidas para os próximos anos. Adicionalmente, seu modem LTE Cat. 16 oferece velocidades rápidas de comunicação celular, possui um modem GPS bom e preciso, uma tela OLED muito brilhante e oferece um desempenho geral muito alto do sistema.
No entanto, a lista de desvantagens é simplesmente muito longa para um smartphone carro-chefe. Enquanto o conector para fones de 3,5 mm ausente pode ser suportado graças ao adaptador USB-C incluído, outros problemas, como o leitor de digitais com que ocasionalmente não detectou nossos dedos completamente ou a duração da bateria comparativamente curta são muito mais difíceis de engolir.
Nokia 9 PureView
- 04/18/2019 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
