Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 9 PureView

Connect five.

A HMD Global foi além com seu novo carro-chefe Nokia 9 PureView e equipou-o com um total de cinco lentes para a câmera principal, a fim de obter uma qualidade de imagem superior. Não é apenas a câmera, o resto do dispositivo possui hardware ainda mais sofisticado. Descubra na nossa análise se o Nokia 9 PureView cumpre ou não as suas próprias expectativas.
Nokia 9 PureView
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6 GB 
, LPPDDR4X
Pantalha
5.99 polegadas 2:1, 2880 x 1440 pixel 538 PPI, capacitiva, P-OLED, QHD+, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Fingerprint Sensor, G-Sensor, E-Compass, Gyroscope, Hall Sensor, Barometer, Biometric Face Unlock, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.16 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 4x4 MIMO, WiFi Calling, head-SAR 0.88 W/kg, body-SAR 0.86 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 155 x 75
Bateria
3320 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Carregamento Qi Wireless
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 5 x 12 MP, f/1.82, 1,25 µm, 28 mm (2 x RBG, 3 x monochrome), RAW-Format, Camera2 API Full
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Flash de tela
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um alto-falante no lado inferior, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular de 18 watts (5V / 3A, 9V / 2A, 12V / 1.5A), cabo USB (Type-C para Type-A), SIM tool, adaptador de USB-C para 3,5 mm, Fones, Guia de início rápido, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
172 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g
Preço
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158 mm 73 mm 9.9 mm 193 g158.01 mm 73.37 mm 8.41 mm 192 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g155 mm 75 mm 8 mm 172 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
670 (542min - 717max) MBit/s +28%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
541 (129min - 633max) MBit/s +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s +15%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (492min - 579max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (430min - 578max) MBit/s +2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (421min - 559max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (382min - 499max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1014 (944min - 1115max) MBit/s +59%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (624min - 683max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (549min - 725max) MBit/s +6%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (655min - 698max) MBit/s +6%
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
638 (561min - 664max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (593min - 636max) MBit/s -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s -2%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
Nokia 9 PureView; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø638 (561-664)
Nokia 9 PureView; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø523 (421-559)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
619
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
671
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 675 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 641 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 648 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
Nokia 9 PureView
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4"
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen
16%
8%
-6%
-74%
24%
Brightness middle
648
656
1%
597
-8%
567
-12%
543
-16%
593
-8%
Brightness
641
659
3%
608
-5%
559
-13%
542
-15%
587
-8%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
89
-3%
89
-3%
92
0%
94
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
1.7
26%
2.2
4%
3.3
-43%
6.6
-187%
0.9
61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.2
2.8
46%
3.6
31%
6.1
-17%
11
-112%
2
62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.7
23%
1.6
27%
1.1
50%
4.7
-114%
1.5
32%
Gamma
2.3 96%
1.998 110%
2.23 99%
2.46 89%
1.835 120%
2.27 97%
CCT
6592 99%
6487 100%
6268 104%
6495 100%
6817 95%
6548 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2421 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points +97%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points +37%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2397 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2272 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=83, last 2 years)
5460 Points +126%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8909 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points +26%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points +11%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8687 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7934 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 30323, n=83, last 2 years)
15023 Points +69%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13272 Points
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points -35%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13519 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
13194 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
12011 Points -10%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9917 Points
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points +31%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10361 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11474 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points +2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8415 Points
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points +9%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8141 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7360 - 9868, n=27)
8368 Points -1%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64782 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points +20%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points -20%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58651 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
65330 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83854 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points +90%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points -24%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
79818 Points -5%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83927 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36069 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30418 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
36794 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6007 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points -17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4947 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6300 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8053 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points -33%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6439 Points -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8014 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3179 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points +20%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2731 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3603 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6322 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points +5%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points -16%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4842 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6517 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4034 - 6568, n=27)
5761 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)
11160 Points +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8435 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points +23%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points -32%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6024 Points -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8369 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5228 - 8451, n=27)
7671 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)
19815 Points +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3368 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points +24%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3672 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2110 - 3763, n=27)
3094 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)
5009 Points +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4612 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points -8%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3802 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4700 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5123 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points -27%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points -14%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4275 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5092 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3418 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points -11%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points +13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2740 Points -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3703 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5057 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points -15%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3741 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5184 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3512 - 5200, n=28)
4607 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=161, last 2 years)
7744 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5828 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points -17%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points -25%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4133 Points -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5810 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4133 - 8206, n=28)
5439 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=161, last 2 years)
11504 Points +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3456 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points +21%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2809 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3764 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2185 - 3764, n=28)
3088 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=161, last 2 years)
4605 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4273 Points
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4242 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  ()
4273 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)
2841 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4978 Points
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4688 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  ()
4978 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)
3085 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2857 Points
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3183 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  ()
2857 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)
2706 Points -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=171, last 2 years)
85.9 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
151 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps +50%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps -9%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
105 fps -30%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
152 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (98 - 152, n=28)
142.5 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=171, last 2 years)
280 fps +85%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
50 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps +18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps +18%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps -34%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
50 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=171, last 2 years)
75.2 fps +50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps +29%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps +10%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps -29%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=171, last 2 years)
164.7 fps +98%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps +84%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps +47%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps -34%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
31 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=171, last 2 years)
65.5 fps +105%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps +16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps -7%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
41 fps -32%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
57 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=171, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +95%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
19 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps +63%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps +42%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps -32%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
19 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=172, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +152%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps +14%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps -6%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=171, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +102%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps +124%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps +52%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
16 fps -24%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
21 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (16 - 40, n=17)
29.1 fps +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=203, last 2 years)
49.7 fps +137%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps -3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30 fps -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (29 - 38, n=16)
35.2 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=203, last 2 years)
79.7 fps +115%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps +147%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps +54%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps -8%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (12 - 25, n=17)
18.6 fps +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=203, last 2 years)
37.5 fps +188%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps +16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps -14%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (11 - 31, n=17)
15.6 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=203, last 2 years)
31.9 fps +128%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287123 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points +6%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
316199 Points +10%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
270884 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
292268 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points -3%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=163, last 2 years)
119.7 Points +168%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.5 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.2 Points +28%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
44.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.7 - 48.9, n=4)
41.2 Points -8%
LG V40 ThinQ (Firefox 67)
22.71 Points -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years)
134.7 runs/min +167%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min +34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (46.4 - 54.1, n=4)
50.7 runs/min 0%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
50.5 runs/min
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
46.4 runs/min -8%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)
147.1 Points +65%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points +21%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
98 Points +10%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
94 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)
90.2 Points +1%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
89 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points +162%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
36870 Points +124%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points +49%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points +36%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
16982 Points +3%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
16484 Points
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
15906 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * -22%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2375 ms *
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
2361 ms * +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
2295 ms * +3%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009 ms * +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873 ms * +21%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years)
1577 ms * +34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 9 PureViewHuawei P30 ProLG V40 ThinQSony Xperia XZ3Xiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
191%
3%
1%
204%
155%
577%
Sequential Read 256KB
728
849
17%
690
-5%
681
-6%
666
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB
200.3
250.8
25%
203.9
2%
196.1
-2%
388.3
94%
Random Read 4KB
132
174.4
32%
130.1
-1%
135.7
3%
149.4
13%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
16%
Random Write 4KB
20.18
159.2
689%
23.36
16%
22.22
10%
165.3
719%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
552%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.6 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
68.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Dead Trigger 2
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Nokia 9 PureView; 1.5.5: Ø59.4 (18-60)
PUBG Mobile
051015202530Tooltip
Nokia 9 PureView; 0.11.0: Ø29.9 (23-31)
Carga Máxima
 32.2 °C32.6 °C32 °C 
 32.5 °C32.8 °C31.9 °C 
 32.1 °C32.6 °C31.5 °C 
Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
31 °C32.6 °C32.5 °C
30.3 °C31.1 °C33 °C
30.9 °C32.6 °C33.8 °C
Máximo: 33.8 °C
Médio: 32 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.533.92523.734.53125.828.64022.224.45033.1336326.628.18024.22310023.326.112521.83416022.544.420018.24525016.349.531515.655.740015.161.550014.167.263013.970.180013.671.1100014.873125013.676.7160013.675.7200013.872.8250014.374315014.676.3400014.577.5500014.672630014.867.4800014.665.31000014.960.91250014.968.91600014.956SPL26.685.7N0.862.3median 14.8median 67.4Delta1.78.833.537.823.73225.82322.225.733.13726.626.524.223.623.322.721.832.922.545.418.250.316.358.215.66315.164.914.167.513.967.813.67114.872.613.672.913.673.113.873.114.376.214.678.214.579.914.677.914.874.414.674.914.97714.973.614.95926.687.50.871.6median 14.8median 72.61.77.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 9 PureViewHuawei P30 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 9 PureView audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.56 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.65 / 2.34 / 2.43 Watt
Carga midlight 5.02 / 6.51 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
23%
11%
24%
30%
27%
10%
8%
Idle Minimum *
1.65
1
39%
0.68
59%
0.87
47%
0.8
52%
0.67
59%
0.862 ?(0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
48%
Idle Average *
2.34
1.4
40%
2.6
-11%
1.39
41%
1.2
49%
1.26
46%
1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.43
1.7
30%
2.77
-14%
1.41
42%
1.5
38%
1.29
47%
Load Average *
5.02
4.6
8%
3.74
25%
3.96
21%
4.8
4%
3.71
26%
Load Maximum *
6.51
6.7
-3%
6.82
-5%
8.6
-32%
6.2
5%
9.3
-43%
9.27 ?(6.2 - 12.3, n=26)
-42%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 50min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 22min
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
19%
66%
11%
-14%
20%
Reader / Idle
1250
1305
4%
1966
57%
1140
-9%
1270
2%
1650
32%
H.264
732
801
9%
1193
63%
659
-10%
420
-43%
1008
38%
WiFi v1.3
486
742
53%
838
72%
510
5%
419
-14%
546
12%
Load
202
223
10%
344
70%
320
58%
202
0%
194
-4%

Pro

+ À prova de poeira e água para IP67
+ Android 9 e Android One
+ Bom GPS
+ NFC, Bluetooth 5.0, LTE Cat.16
+ Tela OLED muito brilhante
+ SoC veloz

Contra

- Porta USB-C lenta
- Câmera decepcionante
- Sensor de digitais com taxa de detecção moderada
- PWM flickering
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
- Alto-falante fraco
- Curta duração da bateria
In review: Nokia 9 PureView. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.
In review: Nokia 9 PureView. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

O que começou como uma ideia ambiciosa acabou em decepção. A câmera quíntupla do Nokia 9 PureView certamente não é nada especial ou mesmo particularmente boa. Seu aplicativo de câmera é lento e não responde, o que piora ainda mais a impressão geral dessa câmera de smartphone.

Só podemos esperar que a HMD Global melhore ambos com uma atualização de software. É uma pena, de verdade, porque a ideia inovadora de combinar três imagens monocromáticas com duas fotos RGB tem muito potencial. As impressionantes capacidades de bokeh são a prova viva disso.

O Nokia 9 PureView não tira o máximo partido do seu inovador design de câmara quíntupla. Como resultado, definitivamente não está entre as melhores câmeras de smartphone disponíveis.

Se a qualidade da câmera é de extrema importância para você, então você terá que procurar outra coisa. O carro-chefe Mi 9 da Xiaomi vem à mente, o que, de fato, também é um pouco mais barato, para começar.

No geral, o Nokia 9 PureView ainda conseguiu deixar uma impressão decente. Sua carcaça de alumínio com certificação IP67 de alta qualidade é digna de um telefone carro-chefe e, graças ao recurso do Android One, as atualizações de segurança estão garantidas para os próximos anos. Adicionalmente, seu modem LTE Cat. 16 oferece velocidades rápidas de comunicação celular, possui um modem GPS bom e preciso, uma tela OLED muito brilhante e oferece um desempenho geral muito alto do sistema.

No entanto, a lista de desvantagens é simplesmente muito longa para um smartphone carro-chefe. Enquanto o conector para fones de 3,5 mm ausente pode ser suportado graças ao adaptador USB-C incluído, outros problemas, como o leitor de digitais com que ocasionalmente não detectou nossos dedos completamente ou a duração da bateria comparativamente curta são muito mais difíceis de engolir.

Nokia 9 PureView - 04/18/2019 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 74%
Peso
90%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
69 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
60%
Médio
79%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 9 PureView
Manuel Masiero, 2019-04-22 (Update: 2019-04-25)