Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 8
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 735 cd/m²
Contraste: 930:1 (Preto: 0.79 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
| Nokia 8 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.3" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 24% | 29% | 23% | 38% | |
| Brightness middle | 735 | 426 -42% | 482 -34% | 566 -23% | 604 -18% |
| Brightness | 707 | 431 -39% | 472 -33% | 564 -20% | 580 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 90 -2% | 94 2% | 91 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.79 | 0.33 58% | 0.44 44% | ||
| Contrast | 930 | 1461 57% | 1373 48% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 1.6 76% | 3.2 52% | 2.7 60% | 1.2 82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.9 | 4.1 68% | 5.4 58% | 5.4 58% | 2.3 82% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 1.7 80% | 2.2 73% | 3.1 63% | 1.6 81% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 8906 73% | 6329 103% | 6581 99% | 6335 103% | 6688 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8 | OnePlus 5 | HTC U11 | Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 10% | 67% | -1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 680 | 748 10% | 717 5% | 793 17% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 199.1 | 201.5 1% | 206.4 4% | 193.2 -3% |
| Random Read 4KB | 145.7 | 141 -3% | 91.4 -37% | 127.2 -13% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.57 | 19.3 32% | 80 449% | 15.25 5% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.8 ? | 68.8 ? -10% | 63.9 ? -17% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 51.7 ? | 46.25 ? -11% | 53.5 ? 3% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.04 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.86 / 2.13 / 2.16 Watt |
| Carga |
4.65 / 9.99 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Nokia 8 3090 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 9% | 11% | 33% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.86 | 0.73 15% | 0.73 15% | 0.78 9% | 0.54 37% |
| Idle Average * | 2.13 | 1.44 32% | 1.96 8% | 1.1 48% | 1.63 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.16 | 1.5 31% | 1.98 8% | 1.16 46% | 1.67 23% |
| Load Average * | 4.65 | 6.91 -49% | 4.82 -4% | 4.15 11% | 2.74 41% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.99 | 8.51 15% | 7.15 28% | 5.12 49% | 7.78 22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8 3090 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | -19% | 10% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1506 | 1534 2% | 1250 -17% | 1667 11% | 1629 8% |
| H.264 | 733 | 623 -15% | 498 -32% | 771 5% | 698 -5% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 650 | 518 -20% | 560 -14% | 719 11% | 585 -10% |
| Load | 237 | 247 4% | 212 -11% | 264 11% | 202 -15% |
Pro
Contra
O Nokia 8 ganha pontos com sua carcaça de alumínio soberbamente construída e uma tela QHD de 5,3 polegadas muito brilhante. Também ganha pontos de simpatia com o seu sofisticado So Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Isto, juntamente com 4 GB de RAM e o acelerador Adreno 540 pixel, garante sempre uma velocidade de operação rápida. Depois está a longa duração da bateria, carregamento rápido via Quick Charge 3.0 e inclusive um ponto forte exclusivo com o "Bothie": A câmera de 13 MP no Nokia 8 pode tirar fotos e gravar vídeos simultaneamente com sua webcam e câmera principal, em um tipo de modo de tela dividido e cria uma quase selfie dupla. Isto também funciona com a resolução 4K em vídeos e é acompanhado por um excelente com surround Ozo 360°, graças aos três microfones.
Com o Nokia 8, a HMD Global oferece um smartphone de gama alta que é muito avançado em quase todos os aspectos e, portanto, posiciona-se corretamente na órbita de líderes, como o iPhone 8 da Apple ou o Galaxy S8 da Samsung. No entanto, ele não exatamente no mesmo nível com os rivais fortes.
Ao desconsiderar o modo especial inovador das câmeras que provavelmente atrairá usuários criativos, o Nokia 8 ainda é um smartphone muito bom. No entanto, pequenas discrepâncias impedem que ele atinja um grau mais elevado. Por exemplo, uma classificação de proteção IP67 que protege o aparelho de entrada de água e poeira pode ser esperada de um dispositivo de gama premium. Também teríamos desejado que o veloz módulo LTE suportasse mais frequências. Uma ou outra banda de frequência ausente evita que o Nokia 8 seja um verdadeiro cidadão do mundo. A velocidade de transmissão Wi-Fi também não é muito estimulante em comparação com a concorrência premium.
Além da variante de um só SIM que testamos, a Nokia também oferece o 8 em uma versão com slot para dois SIMs. Além disso, um modelo com 128 GB de armazenamento será lançado em breve. No entanto, informações sobre isso não podem ser encontradas no site em alemão da Nokia, no momento deste teste.
Nokia 8
- 10/19/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
