Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 6 (2018)

Name: Nokia 6 2018
Brand: Nokia

Um Finn frio. A Nokia atualizou seu smartphone Nokia 6 de gama média. Enquanto o nome permanece o mesmo, idealmente, sua configuração e qualidade melhoraram. Vamos descobrir se esse é o caso em nossa análise.

Florian Schaar, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/23/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Phablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 6.1 (6 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 508

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 20 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, até 256 GB (slot SIM 2), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giro, proximidade, bússola, digitais, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900, UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100 LTE: 700, 800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 148.8 x 75.8

Bateria

3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 16 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 500 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1.0 µm
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 1.12 µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 1, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, headset, nenhum, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR-value head (EU): 0.49 W/Kg; SAR-value body (EU): 0.71 W/Kg, fanless

peso

175 g, Suprimento de energia: 76 g

Preço

299 Euro

Links

Nokia página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 6 2018 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	345 MBit/s
Motorola Moto X4 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	336 MBit/s -3%
Sony Xperia XA2 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	289 MBit/s -16%
HTC U11 Life Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	274 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto X4 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	309 MBit/s +7%
Nokia 6 2018 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	289 MBit/s
HTC U11 Life Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	224 MBit/s -22%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


439 cd/m²	433 cd/m²	399 cd/m²
446 cd/m²	417 cd/m²	391 cd/m²
438 cd/m²	427 cd/m²	400 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 446 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 421.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: 684:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16

	Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Sony Xperia XA2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Motorola Moto X4 LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		21%	21%	31%
Brightness middle	417	513 23%	469 12%	545 31%
Brightness	421	506 20%	479 14%	526 25%
Brightness Distribution	88	93 6%	86 -2%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.61	0.42 31%	0.37 39%	0.42 31%
Contrast	684	1221 79%	1268 85%	1298 90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.1	5 18%	5.5 10%	4.9 20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.2	11.4 -2%	10.7 4%	8.5 24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.1	7.8 -10%	6.7 6%	5.4 24%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.1 ^105%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	8362 ^78%	7964 ^82%	8064 ^81%	7610 ^85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2381 Hz

≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2381 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2381 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29.2 ms rise
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	72580 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	71552 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4	70445 Points -3%
HTC U11 Life	73617 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)	68642 Points -5%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	90435 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	89228 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points -1%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	5484 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	5844 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X4	5919 Points +8%
HTC U11 Life	5818 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	4719 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	5006 Points +6%
Motorola Moto X4	4887 Points +4%
HTC U11 Life	4835 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)	4968 Points +5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	1504 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	1563 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X4	1536 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life	1368 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +319%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	3237 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	3256 Points +1%
Motorola Moto X4	3279 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	3215 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +214%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	1161 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	1328 Points +14%
Motorola Moto X4	1405 Points +21%
HTC U11 Life	838 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +483%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	1520 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	1500 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4	1519 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	1515 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +1012%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	895 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	921 Points +3%
Motorola Moto X4	795 Points -11%
HTC U11 Life	858 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +75%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	883 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	865 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X4	870 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life	877 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +521%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	4210 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	4170 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4	4115 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life	4193 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +258%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	3690 Points
Motorola Moto X4	3894 Points +6%
HTC U11 Life	3956 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +225%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	17030 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	16974 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4	16767 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life	16859 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	18572 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	18534 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4	18355 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life	18469 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	13196 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	13112 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4	12870 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life	12919 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	1332 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	1334 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4	1351 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	1336 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	1249 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	1251 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4	1259 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	1257 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +280%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	1733 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	1737 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4	1816 Points +5%
HTC U11 Life	1711 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	814 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	811 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4	835 Points +3%
HTC U11 Life	839 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +279%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	707 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	709 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4	724 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life	729 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +362%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	1738 Points
Sony Xperia XA2	1631 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X4	1811 Points +4%
HTC U11 Life	1779 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +89%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	31 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	31 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4	31 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life	29 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +178%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	30 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	30 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4	30 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life	30 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +833%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	15 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	15 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4	15 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life	14 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +403%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	14 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	14 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4	14 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life	14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +1081%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	10 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	10 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4	11 fps +10%
HTC U11 Life	9.8 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +557%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	9.8 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	9.7 fps -1%
Motorola Moto X4	9.6 fps -2%
HTC U11 Life	9.7 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +1096%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	5.9 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	6 fps +2%
Motorola Moto X4	5.7 fps -3%
HTC U11 Life	5.4 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +710%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018	5.6 fps
Sony Xperia XA2	5.5 fps -2%
Motorola Moto X4	5.3 fps -5%
HTC U11 Life	5.5 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +1161%

Legend

Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	30.81 Points +9%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	28.99 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)	28.3 Points 0%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)	28.17 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)	27.37 Points -3%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +644%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	5050 Points +1%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)	4993 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	4893 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)	4771 Points -4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)	10236 ms * -3%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)	9923 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * +2%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	9493 ms * +4%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	8396 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +84%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Nokia 6 2018	117 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)	106 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)	105.9 Points -9%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	100 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	86 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 6 2018	Sony Xperia XA2	Motorola Moto X4	HTC U11 Life	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		3%	47%	38%	1%	1054%
Sequential Read 256KB	272.6	271.5 0%	281.6 3%	268 -2%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -11%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 575%
Sequential Write 256KB	118.3	127.4 8%	120.5 2%	120 1%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -15%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 1105%
Random Read 4KB	38.78	43.07 11%	45.4 17%	39.3 1%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) 11%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 614%
Random Write 4KB	15.3	13.82 -10%	55.3 261%	50.2 228%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 46%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 1920%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	61.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	60 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -14%

Shadow Fight 3
	Configurações	Valor
	high	59 fps
	minimal	29 fps

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	30 fps
	high HD	30 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.3 °C	33.5 °C	32.9 °C
32.9 °C	33.4 °C	35.4 °C
31.9 °C	32.9 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C


31.2 °C	31 °C	32 °C
31.2 °C	31.6 °C	31.9 °C
31.4 °C	31.7 °C	31.9 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 28.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.13 Watt
Ocioso	0.67 / 1.76 / 1.78 Watt
Carga	2.82 / 4.56 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh	HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	-6%	-12%	-18%	-50%
Idle Minimum *	0.67	0.39 42%	0.65 3%	0.63 6%	0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13) -9%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -33%
Idle Average *	1.76	1.61 9%	1.51 14%	2.1 -19%	1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13) -4%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	1.78	1.62 9%	1.57 12%	2.15 -21%	2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13) -21%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	2.82	3.12 -11%	3.88 -38%	3.34 -18%	3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13) -35%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -129%
Load Maximum *	4.56	4.92 -8%	5.47 -20%	4.83 -6%	5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13) -23%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -115%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		30h 33min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)		6h 02min

	Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh	HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh
Battery Runtime		7%	-15%	-6%
Reader / Idle	1833	2503 37%	1652 -10%	1820 -1%
H.264	675	766 13%	688 2%	798 18%
WiFi v1.3	942	886 -6%	659 -30%	725 -23%
Load	362	298 -18%	289 -20%	303 -16%

Pro

+ Android stock

+ Atualizações de segurança rápidas

+ Boas durações da bateria

+ Consumo de energia médio

+ Temperaturas muito baixas

+ Certificado para aptX

+ NFC e Bluetooth 5.0

+ Muitas bandas LTE

+ Sem bloatware

+ Tela antirrefletiva

+ Boa qualidade de imagem da câmera

+ Carcaça estável

+ Belo design

+ Boas durações da bateria

+ Os jogos são exibidos em até 60 fps

+ Tela táctil rápida

Contra

- O headset incluído poderia ter um melhor design

- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul visível

- Borda traseira não utilizada na parte inferior da tela

Review: Nokia 6 (2018). Test unit provided by HMD Global DE.

O mais novo produto da série Nokia 6 oferece um pacote interessante, mas a forte concorrência nessa faixa de preços dificulta muito. O modelo de 5,5 polegadas com o painel 16: 9 não tem realmente um único destaque para as vendas. Pelo menos um dos dispositivos de comparação também possui um slot SIM híbrido, 3 GB de RAM e 32 GB de armazenamento. A Nokia também decidiu ir contra a tendência atual de câmeras duplas, o que poderia ser uma desvantagem para compradores para os quais as especificações técnicas são importantes, no entanto, dando uma olhada nas fotos tiradas com a câmera mostra que a qualidade da câmera é tão boa quanto como a de câmeras duplas. Os puristas podem apreciar o sistema operacional Android completamente intacto e o fato de que não há software desnecessário instalado no telefone. As atualizações de segurança são instaladas diretamente pela Google graças ao Android One e podemos esperar mais atualizações do sistema.

Elegância, alto desempenho, sucesso completo ... em outras palavras: Um verdadeiro Nokia

O Nokia 6 oferece um excelente pacote: Ele tem um SoC rápido que pode atender todos os nossos requisitos atuais para um smartphone, um exterior de boa aparência, baixas temperaturas e uma boa configuração a um preço atraente. Não experimentamos fraquezas durante o nosso teste e definitivamente podemos recomendá-lo, considerando seu preço de $290.

Nokia 6 2018 - 05/15/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schaar

Acabamento

90%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

46 / 60 → 76%

Peso

90%

Bateria