Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 5

Name: Nokia 5
Brand: Nokia

Retorno bem sucedido. Após o divórcio com a Microsoft, a Nokia já voltou com vários novos smartphones. Com o modelo Nokia 5 de 5,5 polegadas de gama média, o fabricante ganhou pontos, dado que há muito do que gostar e apenas pouco do que não gostar em suas ofertas.

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/15/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 5 (5 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 505 - 2048 MB VRAM

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 2.5D Corning Gorilla glass, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 8.47 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: cartões microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração (G-Sensor), surrounding light sensor, e-compass, sensor de digitais, giroscópio, proximidade, USB OTG, App2SD

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40), downloads up to 150 MBit/s, uploads up to 50 MBit/s , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.05 x 149.7 x 72.5

Bateria

3000 mAh

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix PDAF, 1,12 µm, f/2, flash de dois tons
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix AF, 1,12 µm, f/2, 84 graus de campo de visão

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Cabo USB, carregador modular, fones, instruções de início rápido, ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

148 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g

Preço

200 Euro

Links

Nokia página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	110 MBit/s -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.2 MBit/s -52%
Lenovo K6 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.4 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	122 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 MBit/s -55%
Lenovo K6 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51.9 MBit/s -57%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


652 cd/m²	624 cd/m²	599 cd/m²
661 cd/m²	630 cd/m²	614 cd/m²
667 cd/m²	643 cd/m²	621 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 667 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 634.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.59 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 630 cd/m²
Contraste: 1105:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37

	Nokia 5 IPS, 1280x720, 5.2"	Lenovo K6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5"	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"	Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5"	Wiko U Feel Prime IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen		-0%	-4%	26%	6%
Brightness middle	630	470 -25%	289 -54%	660 5%	411 -35%
Brightness	635	461 -27%	291 -54%	625 -2%	386 -39%
Brightness Distribution	90	88 -2%	96 7%	92 2%	86 -4%
Black Level *	0.57	0.38 33%		0.29 49%	0.36 37%
Contrast	1105	1237 12%		2276 106%	1142 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5	5.2 -4%	4.7 6%	4.9 2%	4.3 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.7	9.5 -9%	7.3 16%	7.6 13%	7.9 9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.9	5.6 19%	3 57%	4.8 30%	2.8 59%
Gamma	2.37 ^93%	2.24 ^98%	2.03 ^108%	2.18 ^101%	2.53 ^87%
CCT	8736 ^74%	7924 ^82%	6291 ^103%	7357 ^88%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5	45274 Points
Lenovo K6	43673 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	27232 Points -40%
Lenovo Moto G5	44653 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime	44420 Points -2%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5	5060 Points
Lenovo K6	3387 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4126 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G5	4730 Points -7%
Wiko U Feel Prime	3347 Points -34%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5	3807 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2913 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto G5	3583 Points -6%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 5	958 Points
Lenovo K6	263 Points -73%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	585 Points -39%
Lenovo Moto G5	815 Points -15%
Wiko U Feel Prime	290 Points -70%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 5	2154 Points
Lenovo K6	1282 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1060 Points -51%
Lenovo Moto G5	1656 Points -23%
Wiko U Feel Prime	1281 Points -41%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 5	788 Points
Lenovo K6	530 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	643 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G5	538 Points -32%
Wiko U Feel Prime	774 Points -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5	740 Points
Lenovo K6	732 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	312 Points -58%
Lenovo Moto G5	722 Points -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime	740 Points 0%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 5	671 Points
Lenovo K6	10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	551 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G5	686 Points +2%
Wiko U Feel Prime	10 Points -99%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5	671 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	517 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto G5	619 Points -8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5	2849 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1261 Points -56%
Lenovo Moto G5	2563 Points -10%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	974 Points
Lenovo Moto G5	1731 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5	9529 Points
Lenovo K6	9537 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4400 Points -54%
Lenovo Moto G5	9494 Points 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime	9548 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5	9684 Points
Lenovo K6	9691 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3838 Points -60%
Lenovo Moto G5	9617 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5	9023 Points
Lenovo K6	9034 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9022 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G5	9089 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 5	581 Points
Lenovo K6	554 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	53 Points -91%
Lenovo Moto G5	572 Points -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime	584 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5	503 Points
Lenovo K6	491 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	42 Points -92%
Lenovo Moto G5	496 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime	514 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5	1268 Points
Lenovo K6	1002 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	709 Points -44%
Lenovo Moto G5	1243 Points -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime	1118 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 5	298 Points
Lenovo K6	290 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto G5	296 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime	301 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5	245 Points
Lenovo K6	240 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G5	243 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime	250 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5	1227 Points
Lenovo K6	1047 Points -15%
Lenovo Moto G5	1245 Points +1%
Wiko U Feel Prime	1034 Points -16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5	27 fps
Lenovo K6	15 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9.7 fps -64%
Lenovo Moto G5	14 fps -48%
Wiko U Feel Prime	16 fps -41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5	17 fps
Lenovo K6	16 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	5.2 fps -69%
Lenovo Moto G5	16 fps -6%
Wiko U Feel Prime	17 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 5	14 fps
Lenovo K6	7 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3.8 fps -73%
Lenovo Moto G5	7.4 fps -47%
Wiko U Feel Prime	7.5 fps -46%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5	7.2 fps
Lenovo K6	7.1 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1.8 fps -75%
Lenovo Moto G5	7.1 fps -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime	7.1 fps -1%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5	10 fps
Lenovo K6	4.4 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5	5 fps -50%
Wiko U Feel Prime	4.8 fps -52%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5	4.6 fps
Lenovo K6	4.4 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5	4.6 fps 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime	4.4 fps -4%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5	5.2 fps
Lenovo K6	2.4 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5	2.7 fps -48%
Wiko U Feel Prime	2.7 fps -48%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5	2.5 fps
Lenovo K6	2.5 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5	2.5 fps 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime	2.5 fps 0%

Legend

Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 5	21.48 Points
Lenovo K6	21.44 Points 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime	21.4 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G5	20.36 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	16.8 Points -22%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo K6	3438 Points +10%
Wiko U Feel Prime	3383 Points +8%
Nokia 5	3138 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2730 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto G5	2604 Points -17%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	13046 ms * -25%
Lenovo Moto G5	11358 ms * -9%
Lenovo K6	10850 ms * -4%
Wiko U Feel Prime	10826 ms * -4%
Nokia 5	10396 ms *

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Lenovo Moto G5	57 Points 0%
Nokia 5	57 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	47 Points -18%
Lenovo K6	42 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 5	Lenovo K6	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	Lenovo Moto G5	Wiko U Feel Prime
AndroBench 3-5		-10%	-14%	47%	7%
Sequential Read 256KB	255.6	262.6 3%	147 -42%	230.6 -10%	270.9 6%
Sequential Write 256KB	74.9	46.66 -38%	72 -4%	45.6 -39%	137.3 83%
Random Read 4KB	40.54	32.01 -21%	21 -48%	37.6 -7%	55 36%
Random Write 4KB	8.39	10.5 25%	11.6 38%	37.9 352%	9.4 12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.9	78.2 -7%	79.8 -5%	78.5 -6%	41.98 -50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	62	50.4 -19%	46.61 -25%	58 -6%	35.21 -43%

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	54 fps

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.8 °C	34.1 °C	34.3 °C
33.6 °C	34.3 °C	36.9 °C
33.9 °C	34 °C	34.3 °C

Máximo: 36.9 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C


34.6 °C	35.2 °C	34.6 °C
34.7 °C	34.7 °C	35 °C
34.7 °C	35 °C	34.7 °C

Máximo: 35.2 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 36.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Nokia 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo K6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.03 / 0.12 Watt
Ocioso	0.52 / 1.78 / 1.96 Watt
Carga	3.23 / 4.88 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 5 3000 mAh	Lenovo K6 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh	Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-6%	17%	-10%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	0.52	0.65 -25%	0.61 -17%	0.73 -40%	0.66 -27%
Idle Average *	1.78	1.65 7%	1.41 21%	1.64 8%	1.66 7%
Idle Maximum *	1.96	1.67 15%	1.51 23%	1.68 14%	1.76 10%
Load Average *	3.23	3.58 -11%	2.56 21%	3.46 -7%	2.85 12%
Load Maximum *	4.88	5.58 -14%	3.1 36%	6.13 -26%	5.01 -3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		29h 32min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 23min

	Nokia 5 3000 mAh	Lenovo K6 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh	Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-5%	-3%	-27%	-24%
Reader / Idle	1772	1626 -8%	1599 -10%	1243 -30%	1254 -29%
H.264	790	633 -20%	658 -17%	616 -22%
WiFi v1.3	713	715 0%	643 -10%	561 -21%	575 -19%
Load	323	350 8%	402 24%	207 -36%

Pro

+ Carcaça de alta qualidade

+ Muitas bandas LTE

+ Slot dual-SIM

+ Android 7.1

+ Sensor de digitais

+ Boa câmera de 13 MP

+ Tela HD brilhante

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Baixa temperatura

Contra

- Apenas 16 GB de armazenamento

- Sem conexão USB Type-C

- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul

- Halos de luz em uma tela preta

In the test: Nokia 5. Test unit provided by cyberport

Você não pode esperar muito de um smartphone listado por 200 Euros (~ $236), ou pode? O Nokia 5 prova exatamente o contrário, oferecendo bastante em termos de recursos e desempenho. Você recebe um veloz SoC octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, uma tela HD muito brilhante, LTE Cat.4 cobrindo uma ampla gama de bandas de frequência e uma boa câmera de 13 MP. A versão atual do Android 7.1, uma longa duração da bateria e a elegante carcaça de alumínio, incluindo um sensor de digitais, também falam pelo Nokia 5.

O rápido, bem construído e elegante Nokia 5 é um bom smartphone de gama média, que oferece muito por um preço relativamente baixo.

Em termos de armazenamento de memória, os compradores devem diminuir as suas expectativas, dado que infelizmente não são possíveis mais de 16 GB. O fabricante também não incluiu um conector USB Type-C que teria evitado inseri-lo da maneira errada. Além disso, o Nokia 5 adiciona um leve matiz azul à sua tela nítida e mostra alguns halos de luz na parte inferior e bordas em particular com o brilho máximo da tela. No entanto, no geral, a Nokia acerta em mais coisas das que erra e, portanto, merece uma recomendação.

Nokia 5 - 08/01/2017 v6 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

86%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

38 / 60 → 63%

Peso

93%

Bateria

94%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

20 / 63 → 31%

Desempenho da aplicação

42 / 70 → 61%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

66 / 91 → 73%

Camera

80%

Médio

73%

83%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 5

Manuel Masiero, 2017-08-15 (Update: 2017-08-25)

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Nokia 5 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

Lenovo K6 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison