Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 5

Retorno bem sucedido. Após o divórcio com a Microsoft, a Nokia já voltou com vários novos smartphones. Com o modelo Nokia 5 de 5,5 polegadas de gama média, o fabricante ganhou pontos, dado que há muito do que gostar e apenas pouco do que não gostar em suas ofertas.
Nokia 5 (5 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505 - 2048 MB VRAM
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 2.5D Corning Gorilla glass, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 8.47 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: cartões microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração (G-Sensor), surrounding light sensor, e-compass, sensor de digitais, giroscópio, proximidade, USB OTG, App2SD
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40), downloads up to 150 MBit/s, uploads up to 50 MBit/s , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.05 x 149.7 x 72.5
Bateria
3000 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix PDAF, 1,12 µm, f/2, flash de dois tons
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix AF, 1,12 µm, f/2, 84 graus de campo de visão
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Cabo USB, carregador modular, fones, instruções de início rápido, ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
148 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

149.7 mm 72.5 mm 8.05 mm 148 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g144.3 mm 73 mm 9.5 mm 144.5 g142.5 mm 69.9 mm 8.7 mm 150 g141.9 mm 70.3 mm 8.2 mm 140 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s -52%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s -55%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 MBit/s -57%
Nokia 5: overall route
Nokia 5: overall route
Nokia 5: forested area
Nokia 5: forested area
Nokia 5: bridge
Nokia 5: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: forested area
Garmin Edge 500: forested area
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
652
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
661
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 667 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 634.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.59 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 630 cd/m²
Contraste: 1105:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37
Nokia 5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2"
Lenovo K6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Wiko U Feel Prime
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen
-0%
-4%
26%
6%
Brightness middle
630
470
-25%
289
-54%
660
5%
411
-35%
Brightness
635
461
-27%
291
-54%
625
-2%
386
-39%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
96
7%
92
2%
86
-4%
Black Level *
0.57
0.38
33%
0.29
49%
0.36
37%
Contrast
1105
1237
12%
2276
106%
1142
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5
5.2
-4%
4.7
6%
4.9
2%
4.3
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.7
9.5
-9%
7.3
16%
7.6
13%
7.9
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.9
5.6
19%
3
57%
4.8
30%
2.8
59%
Gamma
2.37 93%
2.24 98%
2.03 108%
2.18 101%
2.53 87%
CCT
8736 74%
7924 82%
6291 103%
7357 88%
6589 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
45274 Points
Lenovo K6
43673 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points -40%
Lenovo Moto G5
44653 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points -2%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
5060 Points
Lenovo K6
3387 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G5
4730 Points -7%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points -34%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
3807 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2913 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto G5
3583 Points -6%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 5
958 Points
Lenovo K6
263 Points -73%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points -39%
Lenovo Moto G5
815 Points -15%
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points -70%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 5
2154 Points
Lenovo K6
1282 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points -51%
Lenovo Moto G5
1656 Points -23%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points -41%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 5
788 Points
Lenovo K6
530 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G5
538 Points -32%
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
740 Points
Lenovo K6
732 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points -58%
Lenovo Moto G5
722 Points -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points 0%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 5
671 Points
Lenovo K6
10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G5
686 Points +2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points -99%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
671 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
517 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto G5
619 Points -8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
2849 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1261 Points -56%
Lenovo Moto G5
2563 Points -10%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
974 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
1731 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
9529 Points
Lenovo K6
9537 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points -54%
Lenovo Moto G5
9494 Points 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
9684 Points
Lenovo K6
9691 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points -60%
Lenovo Moto G5
9617 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
9023 Points
Lenovo K6
9034 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G5
9089 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 5
581 Points
Lenovo K6
554 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points -91%
Lenovo Moto G5
572 Points -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
503 Points
Lenovo K6
491 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points -92%
Lenovo Moto G5
496 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
1268 Points
Lenovo K6
1002 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points -44%
Lenovo Moto G5
1243 Points -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 5
298 Points
Lenovo K6
290 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto G5
296 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
245 Points
Lenovo K6
240 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G5
243 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
1227 Points
Lenovo K6
1047 Points -15%
Lenovo Moto G5
1245 Points +1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points -16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
27 fps
Lenovo K6
15 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps -64%
Lenovo Moto G5
14 fps -48%
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps -41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
17 fps
Lenovo K6
16 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps -69%
Lenovo Moto G5
16 fps -6%
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 5
14 fps
Lenovo K6
7 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps -73%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.4 fps -47%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps -46%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
7.2 fps
Lenovo K6
7.1 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps -75%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.1 fps -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
10 fps
Lenovo K6
4.4 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
5 fps -50%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps -52%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
4.6 fps
Lenovo K6
4.4 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
4.6 fps 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps -4%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
5.2 fps
Lenovo K6
2.4 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.7 fps -48%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2.7 fps -48%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
2.5 fps
Lenovo K6
2.5 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.5 fps 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2.5 fps 0%

Legend

 
Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 5
21.48 Points
Lenovo K6
21.44 Points 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
21.4 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G5
20.36 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo K6
3438 Points +10%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3383 Points +8%
Nokia 5
3138 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto G5
2604 Points -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * -25%
Lenovo Moto G5
11358 ms * -9%
Lenovo K6
10850 ms * -4%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10826 ms * -4%
Nokia 5
10396 ms *
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Lenovo Moto G5
57 Points 0%
Nokia 5
57 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points -18%
Lenovo K6
42 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 5Lenovo K6Samsung Galaxy J5 2016Lenovo Moto G5Wiko U Feel Prime
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-14%
47%
7%
Sequential Read 256KB
255.6
262.6
3%
147
-42%
230.6
-10%
270.9
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
74.9
46.66
-38%
72
-4%
45.6
-39%
137.3
83%
Random Read 4KB
40.54
32.01
-21%
21
-48%
37.6
-7%
55
36%
Random Write 4KB
8.39
10.5
25%
11.6
38%
37.9
352%
9.4
12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.9
78.2
-7%
79.8
-5%
78.5
-6%
41.98
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62
50.4
-19%
46.61
-25%
58
-6%
35.21
-43%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high54 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.8 °C34.1 °C34.3 °C 
 33.6 °C34.3 °C36.9 °C 
 33.9 °C34 °C34.3 °C 
Máximo: 36.9 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C
34.6 °C35.2 °C34.6 °C
34.7 °C34.7 °C35 °C
34.7 °C35 °C34.7 °C
Máximo: 35.2 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.131.129.12529.330.129.33129.929.929.94038.634.438.65028.234.628.26326.829.326.88028.632.228.610030.234.130.212538.836.938.816043.923.843.920051.521.551.525055.620.955.63155921.35940061.419.761.450063.520.163.563063.918.563.980067.519.367.5100070.417.870.4125071.217.471.2160072.916.472.9200072.816.472.8250072.416.672.4315075.416.175.4400074.816.174.8500070.716.170.7630068.11668.1800067.316.167.3100006616.1661250058.81658.81600049.21649.2SPL83.630.183.6N55.71.455.7median 66median 17.4median 66Delta7.72.97.737.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2median 42.6median 17.7median 65.212.912.11.712.928.227.428.225.627.925.624.125.224.125.728.725.724.726.424.723.622.923.624.623.624.625.224.325.234.325.134.340.319.740.347.818.647.850.519.750.55219.95249.918.949.949.818.949.854.819.854.863.220.863.271.317.271.372.617.172.674.414.474.473.413.973.471.913.271.970.212.970.267.51367.568.412.868.473.812.773.875.712.775.772.512.872.569.112.869.159.913.159.983.62883.653.6153.6median 67.5median 17.1median 67.511.13.911.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 5Samsung Galaxy J5 2016Lenovo K6
Nokia 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo K6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.12 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.52 / 1.78 / 1.96 Watt
Carga midlight 3.23 / 4.88 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
17%
-10%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
0.52
0.65
-25%
0.61
-17%
0.73
-40%
0.66
-27%
Idle Average *
1.78
1.65
7%
1.41
21%
1.64
8%
1.66
7%
Idle Maximum *
1.96
1.67
15%
1.51
23%
1.68
14%
1.76
10%
Load Average *
3.23
3.58
-11%
2.56
21%
3.46
-7%
2.85
12%
Load Maximum *
4.88
5.58
-14%
3.1
36%
6.13
-26%
5.01
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
29h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 23min
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
-3%
-27%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1772
1626
-8%
1599
-10%
1243
-30%
1254
-29%
H.264
790
633
-20%
658
-17%
616
-22%
WiFi v1.3
713
715
0%
643
-10%
561
-21%
575
-19%
Load
323
350
8%
402
24%
207
-36%

Pro

+ Carcaça de alta qualidade
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Slot dual-SIM
+ Android 7.1
+ Sensor de digitais
+ Boa câmera de 13 MP
+ Tela HD brilhante
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Baixa temperatura

Contra

- Apenas 16 GB de armazenamento
- Sem conexão USB Type-C
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul
- Halos de luz em uma tela preta
In the test: Nokia 5. Test unit provided by cyberport
In the test: Nokia 5. Test unit provided by cyberport

Você não pode esperar muito de um smartphone listado por 200 Euros (~ $236), ou pode? O Nokia 5 prova exatamente o contrário, oferecendo bastante em termos de recursos e desempenho. Você recebe um veloz SoC octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, uma tela HD muito brilhante, LTE Cat.4 cobrindo uma ampla gama de bandas de frequência e uma boa câmera de 13 MP. A versão atual do Android 7.1, uma longa duração da bateria e a elegante carcaça de alumínio, incluindo um sensor de digitais, também falam pelo Nokia 5.

O rápido, bem construído e elegante Nokia 5 é um bom smartphone de gama média, que oferece muito por um preço relativamente baixo.

Em termos de armazenamento de memória, os compradores devem diminuir as suas expectativas, dado que infelizmente não são possíveis mais de 16 GB. O fabricante também não incluiu um conector USB Type-C que teria evitado inseri-lo da maneira errada. Além disso, o Nokia 5 adiciona um leve matiz azul à sua tela nítida e mostra alguns halos de luz na parte inferior e bordas em particular com o brilho máximo da tela. No entanto, no geral, a Nokia acerta em mais coisas das que erra e, portanto, merece uma recomendação.

Nokia 5 - 08/01/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
93%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
20 / 63 → 31%
Desempenho da aplicação
42 / 70 → 61%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
80%
Médio
73%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 5
Manuel Masiero, 2017-08-15 (Update: 2017-08-25)