Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 3
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL (AVM FritzBox 6490) | |
Sony Xperia E5 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
Nokia 3 (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz) | |
LG K8 2017 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
Gigaset GS160 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL (AVM FritzBox 6490) | |
Nokia 3 (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz) | |
Sony Xperia E5 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
LG K8 2017 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
Gigaset GS160 (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) |
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 481 cd/m²
Contraste: 2186:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Nokia 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gigaset GS160 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | LG K8 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Sony Xperia E5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -6% | -24% | -24% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 481 | 459 -5% | 489 2% | 358 -26% | 538 12% |
Brightness | 469 | 452 -4% | 479 2% | 351 -25% | 534 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 84 0% | 95 13% | 93 11% | 96 14% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.42 -91% | 0.55 -150% | 0.49 -123% | 0.33 -50% |
Contrast | 2186 | 1093 -50% | 889 -59% | 731 -67% | 1630 -25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.1 | 4.5 44% | 8.3 -2% | 7.1 12% | 5.7 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.4 | 10.6 31% | 14.4 6% | 14.9 3% | 11 29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.5 | 6.5 24% | 8.7 -2% | 6.5 24% | 4.7 45% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.08 106% | 2.12 104% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 9014 72% | 7791 83% | 9034 72% | 8166 80% | 7264 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Nokia 3 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia 3 | |
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | |
Gigaset GS160 | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
LG K8 2017 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Nokia 3 | |
Gigaset GS160 |
* ... smaller is better
Nokia 3 | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL | Gigaset GS160 | LG K8 2017 | Sony Xperia E5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | -7% | 78% | 43% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 181 | 143 -21% | 200.5 11% | 270.8 50% | 209.7 16% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 34 | 42.4 25% | 46.6 37% | 84.6 149% | 83.1 144% |
Random Read 4KB | 17.7 | 19.7 11% | 18.5 5% | 41.6 135% | 26.04 47% |
Random Write 4KB | 5.5 | 6.9 25% | 6.8 24% | 12.5 127% | 9.84 79% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 64.3 | 17.7 -72% | 30.71 -52% | 78.6 22% | 65 1% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.9 | 14.4 -77% | 19.19 -69% | 52.2 -17% | 45.56 -28% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 13 fps | ||
very low | 28 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 29 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.11 / 0.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.67 / 1.35 / 1.39 Watt |
Carga |
3.1 / 4.02 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh | Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh | LG K8 2017 2500 mAh | Sony Xperia E5 2300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -23% | -19% | -7% | -49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.92 -37% | 0.56 16% | 0.65 3% | 1.03 -54% |
Idle Average * | 1.35 | 1.76 -30% | 1.7 -26% | 1.6 -19% | 2.06 -53% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.39 | 1.85 -33% | 1.75 -26% | 1.62 -17% | 2.12 -53% |
Load Average * | 3.1 | 3.47 -12% | 4.17 -35% | 2.97 4% | 5.01 -62% |
Load Maximum * | 4.02 | 4.22 -5% | 5.07 -26% | 4.34 -8% | 5.04 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh | Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh | LG K8 2017 2500 mAh | Sony Xperia E5 2300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | 4% | 4% | -24% | |
Reader / Idle | 1258 | 1224 -3% | 1326 5% | ||
H.264 | 628 | 617 -2% | 702 12% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 552 | 572 4% | 615 11% | 594 8% | 422 -24% |
Load | 283 | 277 -2% | 244 -14% | 280 -1% |
Pro
Contra
O Nokia 3 é quase um smartphone de nível básico de entrada, o que provavelmente seria suficiente para um início bem sucedido do mercado nesta categoria. No entanto, o dispositivo também nos surpreende com taxas realmente boas em algumas áreas, como brilho da tela, contraste, consumo de energia ou muitas bandas LTE.
Isso permite que se destaque na categoria, mas também há algumas deficiências que devem ser mantidas em mente. Existem câmeras consideravelmente melhores nesta faixa de preços e, em termos de desempenho, existe um dispositivo mais forte no mercado - oXperia E5. Além disso, o som do alto-falante e a precisão do GPS não são estelares, mas isso não pode ser esperado desta faixa de preços.
Tela brilhante e de alto contraste, baixo consumo de energia, carcaça elegante - o Nokia 3 tem uma boa posição na categoria de nível de entrada. No entanto, não deve haver muito valor em uma boa câmera, pois o smartphone só pode oferecer isso de forma condicional.
A elegante carcaça e os resultados de teste decentes em muitas áreas conferem ao Nokia 3 um bom início de mercado no setor de nível de entrada. Agora, estamos antecipando os testes de seu irmão maior, porque a Nokia precisa vir com mais para convencer os compradores na gama média.
Nokia 3
-
07/28/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer