Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 2.1

Name: Nokia 2.1
Brand: Nokia

Budget 2.1.

O Nokia 2.1 é o sucessor do Nokia 2 e consegue ser mais barato e mais poderoso que seu antecessor. A quantidade de memória RAM e armazenamento flash ainda é escassa, mas o dispositivo roda o Android One Oreo Edition, o que significa que ele permanece atualizado com as últimas correções de segurança. Descubra em nosso teste para quem o Nokia 2.1 é adequado e o que os compradores podem esperar do dispositivo.

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/06/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 2.1 (2 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 308

Memória

1024 MB

, LPDDR3

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB

, 6 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de Proximidader, micro USB

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz. 3G/HSPA: B1, B5, B8. LTE: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.7 x 153.6 x 77.6

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo frontais, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-A para micro USB, fones, Android One, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Head - 0.793 W/kg, Body - 1.427 W/kg, fanless

peso

174 g, Suprimento de energia: 58 g

Preço

100 Euro

Links

Nokia página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Gigaset GS100 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash	99.6 MBit/s +89%
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	54.2 MBit/s +3%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 (27^min - 58^max) MBit/s
Honor 7A Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.7 MBit/s -11%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	14.6 MBit/s -72%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigaset GS100 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash	97.9 MBit/s +101%
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 MBit/s +14%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 (29^min - 54^max) MBit/s
Honor 7A Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	45 MBit/s -8%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	12.5 MBit/s -74%

Nokia 2.1; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø48.2 (29-54)

Nokia 2.1; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.7 (27-58)

GPS test: Nokia 2.1 – Cycling through a grove

GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Cycling through a grove

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


341 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	288 cd/m²
348 cd/m²	338 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
341 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	305 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 350 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 326.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 338 cd/m²
Contraste: 1252:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.345

	Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Gigaset GS100 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Nokia 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Honor 7A IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Wiko Jerry 3 IPS, 960x480, 5.5"
Screen		-17%	-7%	18%	-28%
Brightness middle	338	442 31%	527 56%	417 23%	370 9%
Brightness	327	446 36%	503 54%	395 21%	367 12%
Brightness Distribution	82	86 5%	91 11%	88 7%	90 10%
Black Level *	0.27	0.35 -30%	0.68 -152%	0.18 33%	0.4 -48%
Contrast	1252	1263 1%	775 -38%	2317 85%	925 -26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.36	8.03 -50%	5.3 1%	6.46 -21%	8.58 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.77	15.81 -62%	9.2 6%	10.72 -10%	16.5 -69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.2	10.4 -68%	5.8 6%	5.8 6%	9.3 -50%
Gamma	2.345 ^94%	2.02 ^109%	2.12 ^104%	2.423 ^91%	2.083 ^106%
CCT	8460 ^77%	10070 ^65%	7894 ^82%	7839 ^83%	9315 ^70%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2273 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	636 Points
Gigaset GS100	579 Points -9%
Nokia 2	423 Points -33%
Honor 7A	675 Points +6%
Wiko Jerry 3	431 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=18)	654 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +782%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	1602 Points
Gigaset GS100	1418 Points -11%
Nokia 2	1118 Points -30%
Honor 7A	2820 Points +76%
Wiko Jerry 3	1136 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=18)	1761 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +884%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	1405 Points
Honor 7A	2127 Points +51%
Wiko Jerry 3	875 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=16)	1345 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +794%

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	3146 Points
Gigaset GS100	2630 Points -16%
Nokia 2	2304 Points -27%
Honor 7A	3892 Points +24%
Wiko Jerry 3	0 Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3831, n=18)	3299 Points +5%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	6133 Points
Gigaset GS100	3395 Points -45%
Nokia 2	4577 Points -25%
Honor 7A	9584 Points +56%
Wiko Jerry 3	2915 Points -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6526, n=18)	5908 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	5487 Points
Gigaset GS100	2878 Points -48%
Nokia 2	4150 Points -24%
Honor 7A	9684 Points +76%
Wiko Jerry 3	2465 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5778, n=18)	5330 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	10427 Points
Gigaset GS100	9159 Points -12%
Nokia 2	7150 Points -31%
Honor 7A	9249 Points -11%
Wiko Jerry 3	8065 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3958 - 11927, n=18)	9933 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	58 Points
Gigaset GS100	127 Points +119%
Nokia 2	120 Points +107%
Honor 7A	613 Points +957%
Wiko Jerry 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 350, n=18)	86 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +7148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	46 Points
Gigaset GS100	104 Points +126%
Nokia 2	120 Points +161%
Honor 7A	535 Points +1063%
Wiko Jerry 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 297, n=18)	69.7 Points +52%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +10204%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	892 Points
Gigaset GS100	532 Points -40%
Nokia 2	539 Points -40%
Honor 7A	1259 Points +41%
Wiko Jerry 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 944, n=18)	869 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +270%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	297 Points
Gigaset GS100	159 Points -46%
Honor 7A	610 Points +105%
Wiko Jerry 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (145 - 354, n=17)	288 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +3640%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	250 Points
Gigaset GS100	131 Points -48%
Honor 7A	530 Points +112%
Wiko Jerry 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (118 - 301, n=17)	244 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +7783%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	885 Points
Gigaset GS100	611 Points -31%
Honor 7A	1285 Points +45%
Wiko Jerry 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (375 - 916, n=17)	843 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +465%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	14 fps
Gigaset GS100	8.2 fps -41%
Nokia 2	9.6 fps -31%
Honor 7A	27 fps +93%
Wiko Jerry 3	12 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 20, n=18)	13.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +519%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	7.6 fps
Gigaset GS100	5 fps -34%
Nokia 2	5.4 fps -29%
Honor 7A	16 fps +111%
Wiko Jerry 3	4.4 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=18)	7.42 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +3795%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	6.1 fps
Gigaset GS100	4.4 fps -28%
Nokia 2	4.4 fps -28%
Honor 7A	14 fps +130%
Wiko Jerry 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 11, n=18)	5.97 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +1148%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	2.7 fps
Nokia 2	1.6 fps -41%
Honor 7A	7.1 fps +163%
Wiko Jerry 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 3, n=17)	2.71 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +6381%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	37484 Points
Gigaset GS100	30702 Points -18%
Nokia 2	24924 Points -34%
Honor 7A	46126 Points +23%
Wiko Jerry 3	23916 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (29054 - 39106, n=17)	36278 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	643 Points
Gigaset GS100	162 Points -75%
Nokia 2	149 Points -77%
Honor 7A	1055 Points +64%
Wiko Jerry 3	150 Points -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (207 - 891, n=17)	642 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +911%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	1228 Points
Gigaset GS100	1115 Points -9%
Nokia 2	901 Points -27%
Honor 7A	1962 Points +60%
Wiko Jerry 3	963 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=17)	1274 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +743%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	502 Points
Gigaset GS100	431 Points -14%
Nokia 2	233 Points -54%
Honor 7A	1209 Points +141%
Wiko Jerry 3	373 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (363 - 1372, n=17)	678 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +1306%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	428 Points
Gigaset GS100	149 Points -65%
Nokia 2	251 Points -41%
Honor 7A	739 Points +73%
Wiko Jerry 3	145 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (418 - 447, n=17)	437 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +4105%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 2.1	649 Points
Gigaset GS100	10 Points -98%
Nokia 2	9 Points -99%
Honor 7A	705 Points +9%
Wiko Jerry 3	10 Points -98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10 - 802, n=17)	611 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +143%

Legend

Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)	18.39 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16)	17.5 Points +10%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	15.85 Points
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	13.38 Points -16%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	11.61 Points -27%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)	10.83 Points -32%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +1440%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)	3389 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17)	2952 Points +18%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	2503 Points
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	2093 Points -16%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	1948 Points -22%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)	1645 Points -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)	19458 ms * -41%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	19275 ms * -39%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	15962 ms * -15%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)	14709 ms * -6%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	13821 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17)	13125 ms * +5%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 2.1	Gigaset GS100	Nokia 2	Honor 7A	Wiko Jerry 3	Average 8 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-40%	-27%	-2%	-50%	-56%	1498%
Sequential Read 256KB	288.3	97.2 -66%	131.1 -55%	254.8 -12%	117.1 -59%	128.8 ?(38.1 - 289, n=51) -55%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 555%
Sequential Write 256KB	51.2	24 -53%	50.8 -1%	72.5 42%	50.8 -1%	22.1 ?(6.22 - 54.8, n=51) -57%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 2773%
Random Read 4KB	50.5	17.6 -65%	17.44 -65%	39.2 -22%	24.18 -52%	18.1 ?(8 - 50.5, n=51) -64%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 450%
Random Write 4KB	13.45	6.2 -54%	8.1 -40%	9.4 -30%	11.23 -17%	5.35 ?(1.08 - 14, n=51) -60%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 2212%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	79.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	81.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	16 ?(Kingston 32GB) -80%	43.1 ?(16.3 - 84.2, n=21) -46%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	65.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	7.4 ?(Kingston 32GB) -88%	29.1 ?(11.2 - 63.4, n=21) -53%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


31.5 °C	29.4 °C	30.4 °C
32.3 °C	29.8 °C	30.8 °C
33.5 °C	29.8 °C	29.8 °C

Máximo: 33.5 °C
Médio: 30.8 °C


28.2 °C	28.3 °C	29.4 °C
27.8 °C	28 °C	31.2 °C
28.8 °C	28.7 °C	31.5 °C

Máximo: 31.5 °C
Médio: 29.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia 2.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.2 / 1.9 Watt
Carga	3.2 / 4.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Honor 7A 3000 mAh	Wiko Jerry 3 2500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-52%	6%	-44%	-35%	-45%	-48%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	1.3 -86%	0.55 21%	1.3 -86%	1 -43%	1.113 ?(0.54 - 4.02, n=17) -59%	0.88 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=158, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Average *	1.2	2.1 -75%	1.02 15%	1.6 -33%	1.5 -25%	2.19 ?(1.2 - 6, n=17) -83%	1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=158, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Maximum *	1.9	2.9 -53%	1.09 43%	2.9 -53%	2.3 -21%	2.55 ?(1.62 - 6.64, n=17) -34%	1.6 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=158, last 2 years) 16%
Load Average *	3.2	4.4 -38%	4.48 -40%	3.7 -16%	5 -56%	4.32 ?(2.9 - 9.6, n=17) -35%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years) -105%
Load Maximum *	4.8	5.3 -10%	5.32 -11%	6.4 -33%	6.3 -31%	5.5 ?(4.3 - 7.34, n=17) -15%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years) -106%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		13h 29min

	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Honor 7A 3000 mAh	Wiko Jerry 3 2500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	809	532 -34%	840 4%	657 -19%	394 -51%

Pro

+ Funcionalidade simultânea dual-SIM e microSD

+ Bem construído

+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- RAM e memória flash pequenas

- O sistema é irregular após uma reinicialização

The Nokia 2.1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of:

O Nokia 2.1 é um smartphone econômico com uma ótima duração de bateria e um sistema operacional enxuto. O dispositivo é poderoso o suficiente para a maioria das aplicações diárias, como WhatsApp e até mesmo alguns jogos leves. No entanto, os compradores devem estar cientes de que há apenas 8 GB de armazenamento interno e os aplicativos não podem ser armazenados em um cartão microSD. Isso significa que as pessoas só poderão instalar poucos aplicativos antes que o Nokia 2.1 fique sem espaço.

O Nokia 2.1 é bom valor pelo dinheiro e é um dispositivo potente pelo dinheiro. Em suma, é um smartphone ideal para iniciantes.

O dispositivo tem funcionalidade dual SIM e possui um slot para cartão microSD dedicado e possui câmeras surpreendentemente boas. Infelizmente, a tela é decepcionante. No geral, a funcionalidade dual SIM abre a possibilidade de adicionar o SIM do seu dispositivo principal para situações em que você preferiria usar um smartphone secundário mais barato.

Nokia 2.1 - 11/29/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

72%

Teclado

62 / 75 → 82%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

35 / 60 → 59%

Peso

90%

Bateria