Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 1

Name: Nokia 1
Brand: Nokia

Pequeno número 1. O Nokia 1 é o modelo básico para o mundo dos smartphones: menos de 100 Euros (~$115), um formato pequeno e até mesmo uma bateria substituível. Descubra nesta análise se o Nokia 1 é bom o suficiente para o uso diário.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/03/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 1 (1 Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memória

1024 MB

Pantalha

4.50 polegadas 16:9, 854 x 480 pixel 218 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB

, 5.2 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, Rádio FM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 133.6 x 67.8

Bateria

8.2 Wh, 2150 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 9 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 360 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix Contrast autofocus (AF), LED flash, Videos em até 720p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na traseira do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, fones, 24 Meses Garantia, Bandwidth Download/Upload: 150 Mbps / 50 Mbps LTE; IP52 certified, SAR value: 0.66 W/kg Head, 1.2 W/kg Body, fanless

peso

131 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g

Preço

100 Euro

Links

Nokia página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	54.2 MBit/s +6%
Nokia 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash	51.2 MBit/s
Gigaset GS170 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.9 MBit/s -3%
Lenovo B Mali-T720, MT6735M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	47.7 MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Moto C Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.2 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 MBit/s +13%
Gigaset GS170 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.4 MBit/s +1%
Nokia 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash	49.1 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto C Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	43.7 MBit/s -11%
Lenovo B Mali-T720, MT6735M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	39.5 MBit/s -20%

GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route through a wooded area

GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route across a bridge

GPS test – Nokia 1: Route through a wooded area

GPS test – Nokia 1: Route across a bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


247 cd/m²	234 cd/m²	253 cd/m²
252 cd/m²	256 cd/m²	255 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	249 cd/m²	255 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 262 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 251.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 257 cd/m²
Contraste: 2133:1 (Preto: 0.12 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3

	Nokia 1 IPS, 854x480, 4.5"	Nokia 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Gigaset GS170 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo Moto C TFT, 854x480, 5"	Lenovo B TN LED, 854x480, 4.5"
Screen		-40%	-60%	-54%	-74%
Brightness middle	256	527 106%	418 63%	364 42%	309 21%
Brightness	251	503 100%	418 67%	355 41%	302 20%
Brightness Distribution	89	91 2%	92 3%	92 3%	96 8%
Black Level *	0.12	0.68 -467%	0.45 -275%	0.31 -158%	0.46 -283%
Contrast	2133	775 -64%	929 -56%	1174 -45%	672 -68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.82	5.3 -10%	9.7 -101%	10.4 -116%	9.8 -103%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.75	9.2 22%	18.9 -61%	18 -53%	19.7 -68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	5.8 -12%	11.3 -117%	12.7 -144%	11.5 -121%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.12 ^104%	2.27 ^97%	2.04 ^108%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	7107 ^91%	7894 ^82%	10414 ^62%	12904 ^50%	12460 ^52%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	3054 Points
Nokia 2	3109 Points +2%
Gigaset GS170	3344 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto C	2877 Points -6%
Lenovo B	2125 Points -30%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2415 - 3624, n=18)	3155 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	2335 Points
Nokia 2	2304 Points -1%
Gigaset GS170	2600 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto C	2313 Points -1%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2313 - 2768, n=13)	2543 Points +9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 1	457 Points
Nokia 2	149 Points -67%
Gigaset GS170	538 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto C	432 Points -5%
Lenovo B	136 Points -70%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (176 - 588, n=17)	391 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +1269%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 1	859 Points
Nokia 2	901 Points +5%
Gigaset GS170	1170 Points +36%
Lenovo Moto C	883 Points +3%
Lenovo B	799 Points -7%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (859 - 1394, n=17)	1073 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +1079%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 1	505 Points
Nokia 2	233 Points -54%
Gigaset GS170	610 Points +21%
Lenovo Moto C	419 Points -17%
Lenovo B	311 Points -38%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (419 - 942, n=17)	622 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +1230%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	176 Points
Nokia 2	251 Points +43%
Gigaset GS170	210 Points +19%
Lenovo Moto C	177 Points +1%
Lenovo B	145 Points -18%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (176 - 384, n=17)	216 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +9423%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 1	571 Points
Nokia 2	9 Points -98%
Gigaset GS170	558 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto C	534 Points -6%
Lenovo B	9 Points -98%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (9 - 703, n=17)	353 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +173%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	492 Points
Nokia 2	423 Points -14%
Gigaset GS170	581 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto C	450 Points -9%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (450 - 581, n=11)	533 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +1002%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	1252 Points
Nokia 2	1118 Points -11%
Gigaset GS170	1595 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto C	1254 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1252 - 1595, n=11)	1465 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +1089%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	943 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (938 - 1065, n=7)	988 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +1164%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2	4577 Points
Gigaset GS170	3666 Points
Lenovo Moto C	3142 Points
Lenovo B	2640 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (3142 - 6843, n=17)	3861 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2	4150 Points
Gigaset GS170	3167 Points
Lenovo Moto C	2706 Points
Lenovo B	2239 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2706 - 6147, n=17)	3356 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2	7150 Points
Gigaset GS170	8178 Points
Lenovo Moto C	7209 Points
Lenovo B	7072 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (5462 - 11340, n=17)	8181 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 1	76 Points
Nokia 2	120 Points +58%
Gigaset GS170	152 Points +100%
Lenovo B	Points -100%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (68 - 164, n=14)	140 Points +84%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +5432%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	61 Points
Nokia 2	120 Points +97%
Gigaset GS170	227 Points +272%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (54 - 227, n=14)	121.2 Points +99%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +7670%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	663 Points
Nokia 2	539 Points -19%
Gigaset GS170	781 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (663 - 781, n=14)	738 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +398%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 1	75 Points
Gigaset GS170	93 Points +24%
Lenovo B	Points -100%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (75 - 265, n=15)	108.3 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +4003%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	60 Points
Gigaset GS170	74 Points +23%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (60 - 220, n=15)	87.3 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +5320%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	666 Points
Gigaset GS170	772 Points +16%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (666 - 946, n=15)	749 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +394%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	14 fps
Nokia 2	9.6 fps -31%
Gigaset GS170	11 fps -21%
Lenovo Moto C	13 fps -7%
Lenovo B	11 fps -21%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (6 - 14, n=17)	10.4 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +512%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	5.1 fps
Nokia 2	5.4 fps +6%
Gigaset GS170	6 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto C	5.1 fps 0%
Lenovo B	4.1 fps -20%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (5.1 - 10, n=17)	6.11 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +5371%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 1	8 fps
Nokia 2	4.4 fps -45%
Gigaset GS170	4.8 fps -40%
Lenovo Moto C	7.8 fps -2%
Lenovo B	5.5 fps -31%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2.1 - 8, n=17)	4.7 fps -41%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +838%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	1.9 fps
Nokia 2	1.6 fps -16%
Gigaset GS170	2.2 fps +16%
Lenovo Moto C	1.6 fps -16%
Lenovo B	1.5 fps -21%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.6 - 4.5, n=17)	2.42 fps +27%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +8537%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	6 fps
Gigaset GS170	3.4 fps -43%
Lenovo Moto C	1.2 fps -80%
Lenovo B	4.2 fps -30%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 14, n=17)	3.92 fps -35%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +987%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	1.2 fps
Gigaset GS170	1.4 fps +17%
Lenovo Moto C	5.5 fps +358%
Lenovo B	1 fps -17%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 5.5, n=17)	1.629 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +9608%

Legend

Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto C Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo B Mediatek MT6735M, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6737

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek MT6737 (11.6 - 21.9, n=17)	15.2 Points +32%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)	14.34 Points +24%
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)	12.64 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)	11.68 Points +1%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	11.61 Points +1%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	11.55 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +1826%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1730 - 3383, n=17)	2386 Points +25%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)	2284 Points +20%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	1948 Points +2%
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)	1929 Points +1%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	1907 Points
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)	1730 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)	19879 ms * -5%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	19275 ms * -2%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	18927 ms *
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)	18130 ms * +4%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (10615 - 30114, n=17)	17043 ms * +10%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)	16723 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +92%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 1	Nokia 2	Gigaset GS170	Lenovo Moto C	Lenovo B	Average 8 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-21%	-8%	-9%	-59%	-42%	1931%
Sequential Read 256KB	208.3	131.1 -37%	197.9 -5%	179.3 -14%	115.6 -45%	128.8 ?(38.1 - 289, n=51) -38%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 780%
Sequential Write 256KB	51.8	50.8 -2%	44.79 -14%	44.55 -14%	8.1 -84%	22.1 ?(6.22 - 54.8, n=51) -57%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 2653%
Random Read 4KB	25.7	17.44 -32%	18.34 -29%	18.37 -29%	12.4 -52%	18.1 ?(8 - 50.5, n=51) -30%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 982%
Random Write 4KB	9.1	8.1 -11%	10.45 15%	10.9 20%	4.2 -54%	5.35 ?(1.08 - 14, n=51) -41%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 3307%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		81.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	37.41 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	13.5	24.16 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	43.1 ?(16.3 - 84.2, n=21)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	21.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	10.7	16.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	29.1 ?(11.2 - 63.4, n=21)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.3 °C	28.9 °C	27.5 °C
34.3 °C	28.8 °C	27.6 °C
32.7 °C	28.5 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 34.3 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C


28 °C	28.9 °C	36 °C
28.3 °C	29.2 °C	35.6 °C
27.7 °C	29.3 °C	33.7 °C

Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia 1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (127.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.2 / 0.5 Watt
Ocioso	0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Carga	3.5 / 4.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 1 2150 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh	Lenovo B 2000 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6737	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		13%	12%	12%	-14%	-36%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.55 39%	0.54 40%	0.64 29%	0.869 ?(0.54 - 2.2, n=16) 3%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.02 32%	1.56 -4%	0.96 36%	1.987 ?(1.35 - 3.4, n=16) -32%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	2	1.09 45%	1.6 20%	1.33 33%	2.11 ?(1.39 - 3.5, n=16) -6%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 20%
Load Average *	3.5	4.48 -28%	3.18 9%	4.59 -31%	4.14 ?(2.18 - 6.51, n=16) -18%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -83%
Load Maximum *	4.3	5.32 -24%	4.42 -3%	4.63 -8%	4.94 ?(3.61 - 6.96, n=16) -15%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -123%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		9h 12min

	Nokia 1 2150 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh	Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh	Lenovo B 2000 mAh
Battery Runtime		52%	-20%	-6%	-20%
WiFi v1.3	552	840 52%	442 -20%	517 -6%	442 -20%
Reader / Idle				1159
H.264				529
Load				278

Pro

+ Bateria removível

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Tampas traseira trocáveis

+ Preço acessível

+ SO fino

+ Muitas bandas LTE

+ Bom GPS

+ Tela com alto contraste e precisão de cores

+ Dual SIM

+ Slot para cartões microSD dedicado

Contra

- Problemas com a transferência de dados do PC

- Nem todos os cartões microSD são compatíveis

- Engasgos frequentes notórios

- Reação ligeiramente atrasada às entradas

The Nokia 1 in review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

O que você pode esperar de um smartphone que custa menos de 100 euros (~$115)? O Nokia 1 não oferece um desempenho de primeira, mas a Nokia produziu um smartphone faz um bom trabalho pelo valor pagado. O Nokia 1 é para aqueles que não exigem muito de um smartphone. Em compensação, você recebe um smartphone com muitos pontos positivos. O Nokia 1 tem uma tela decente com uma relação de contraste impressionante e boa precisão de cores. O GPS é preciso, os alto-falantes soam bem e as câmeras são aceitáveis, embora o desempenho com pouca luz seja ruim.

Os retardos e gaguejos ocasionais são irritantes e levarão algum tempo para se acostumar. No entanto, esse nível de desempenho deve ser esperado de um smartphone de menos de 100 euros (~$115). A boa duração da bateria e a bateria substituível podem compensar um pouco o baixo desempenho.

O Nokia 1 é um smartphone de baixo custo que tira o máximo proveito de seus recursos limitados. A bateria removível, boa tela e capas intercambiáveis nos impressionaram.

O armazenamento interno limitado e a RAM são compensados pelo Android Oreo (Go Edition), que oferece aos usuários mais espaço de armazenamento e memória do que o Android tradicional. Pode haver problemas com a troca de dados com um computador do qual você deve estar ciente. Sempre haverá comprometimentos nesta faixa de preços, mas este é frustrante, no entanto. O Nokia 1 é apenas cerca de 20 Euros (~$23) mais barato, mas oferece muito do que o Nokia 2, embora com uma tela menor e menor resolução óptica.

Nokia 1 - 2018-05-18 05/18/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

68%

Teclado

63 / 75 → 84%

Mouse

74%

Conectividade

33 / 60 → 55%

Peso

94%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

81%

Desempenho do jogos

5 / 63 → 7%

Desempenho da aplicação

27 / 70 → 39%

Temperatura

93%

Ruído

100%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

46%

Médio

64%

75%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11135 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 1

Florian Wimmer, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06-21)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Nokia 1 audio analysis

Nokia 2 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison