Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola One
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Motorola One | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Motorola One | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 1229:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.376
| Motorola One IPS, 1520x720, 5.9" | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2" | Honor Play IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Motorola Moto G6 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 31% | 12% | 8% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 467 | 597 28% | 489 5% | 435 -7% | 488 4% |
| Brightness | 452 | 592 31% | 486 8% | 426 -6% | 478 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 92 6% | 93 7% | 89 2% | 95 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.32 16% | 0.34 11% | 0.39 -3% | 0.42 -11% |
| Contrast | 1229 | 1866 52% | 1438 17% | 1115 -9% | 1162 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.29 | 2.4 55% | 3.8 28% | 2.89 45% | 3.9 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.71 | 5.3 31% | 7.1 8% | 6.03 22% | 6.8 12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 3.4 32% | 4.4 12% | 4.1 18% | 5.3 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.376 93% | 2.2 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.251 98% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 7583 86% | 7172 91% | 7213 90% | 7408 88% | 7146 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2451 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2451 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2451 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola One | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola One | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola One | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola One | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola One | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=6) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola One | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Honor Play | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17) | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (35 - 38, n=2) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Honor Play (Chrome 68) | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola One | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | Xiaomi Poco F1 | Honor Play | Motorola Moto G6 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | 21% | 80% | -11% | -14% | 463% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 280.2 | 281.1 0% | 705 152% | 895 219% | 238.2 -15% | 274 ? -2% | 1882 ? 572% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 214.9 | 146.2 -32% | 155.6 -28% | 188.3 -12% | 117.2 -45% | 176.6 ? -18% | 1467 ? 583% |
| Random Read 4KB | 61.9 | 77.4 25% | 101 63% | 142.4 130% | 69.9 13% | 59.4 ? -4% | 278 ? 349% |
| Random Write 4KB | 69.1 | 10.5 -85% | 17.81 -74% | 155.5 125% | 59.9 -13% | 32.2 ? -53% | 310 ? 349% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.8 ? | 86 ? 6% | 85.3 ? 6% | 82.8 ? 2% | 75.3 ? -7% | 77.4 ? -4% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.9 ? | 67 ? 10% | 65.6 ? 8% | 71.9 ? 18% | 61.5 ? 1% | 58.3 ? -4% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 31 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 54 fps | ||
| minimal | 57 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola One audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco F1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.05 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 1.6 / 2 Watt |
| Carga |
3.3 / 5.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola One 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Honor Play 3750 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -19% | -75% | 14% | -9% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.35 65% | 0.65 35% | 1.4 -40% | 0.6 40% | 0.981 ? 2% | 0.882 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.6 | 1.81 -13% | 1.97 -23% | 2.6 -63% | 1.81 -13% | 1.985 ? -24% | 1.448 ? 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 1.83 8% | 2.01 -1% | 4.3 -115% | 1.86 7% | 2.27 ? -14% | 1.603 ? 20% |
| Load Average * | 3.3 | 3.31 -0% | 4.29 -30% | 6.5 -97% | 2.78 16% | 3.51 ? -6% | 6.57 ? -99% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.1 | 4.97 3% | 9.05 -77% | 8.2 -61% | 4.04 21% | 5.38 ? -5% | 9.92 ? -95% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola One 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Honor Play 3750 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 78% | 10% | -6% | -13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1652 | 4682 183% | 2088 26% | 1723 4% | 1170 -29% |
| H.264 | 769 | 893 16% | 936 22% | 759 -1% | 600 -22% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 735 | 837 14% | 808 10% | 710 -3% | 553 -25% |
| Load | 268 | 529 97% | 220 -18% | 204 -24% | 338 26% |
Pro
Contra
Existe um conceito claro no Motorola One: Por um lado, a Motorola quer oferecer um dispositivo sem frescuras para todos aqueles para quem o design mais organicamente arredondado do fabricante é muito brincalhão. Por outro lado, o Android One deve garantir que as correções de segurança mais atuais sempre cheguem ao dispositivo rapidamente e que o sistema operacional permaneça atualizado pelo menos nos próximos anos. No entanto, particularmente em termos de software, existem duas ressalvas: Primeiro, a Motorola ainda está demorando muito até que as atualizações cheguem ao dispositivo (a atualização de setembro foi completamente omitida e a atualização de outubro chegou em novembro), e os usuários também precisam ter paciência até receber o patch do Android-9. Em segundo lugar, o Android 9 já é contado como uma das duas atualizações prometidas do Android One, de modo que apenas o Android 10 ainda é garantido aos usuários.
O que mais o Motorola One pode oferecer? Uma duração de bateria aceitável e uma câmera decente, uma carcaça robusta e um desempenho confiável mesmo sob cargas pesadas prolongadas.
O Motorola One é um smartphone que resulta muito sólido em muitas áreas. No entanto, neste ponto, há uma forte concorrência em sua faixa de preço.
Aqueles que podem pagar 50 Euros (~$56) a mais podem obter muito mais desempenho e uma duração de bateria significativamente maior com o Honor Play o Xiaomi Pocophone. Sob esta luz, a relação preço-desempenho do Motorola One parece duvidosa. No entanto, qualquer pessoa para quem as atualizações garantidas para os próximos dois anos são importantes e que não se importam com a frequência de atualização de dois meses terá um smartphone que é sólido.
Motorola One
- 11/07/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
