Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto X4
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 469 cd/m²
Contraste: 1268:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.1
| Motorola Moto X4 LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7" | Honor 9 IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Xiaomi Mi 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 41% | 21% | 26% | 19% | |
| Brightness middle | 469 | 545 16% | 574 22% | 550 17% | 620 32% | 656 40% |
| Brightness | 479 | 526 10% | 576 20% | 535 12% | 586 22% | 634 32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 94 9% | 92 7% | 89 3% | 93 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.42 -14% | 0.42 -14% | 0.28 24% | 0.4 -8% | |
| Contrast | 1268 | 1298 2% | 1310 3% | 2214 75% | 1640 29% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 4.9 11% | 2.4 56% | 3.3 40% | 4.8 13% | 5.3 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.7 | 8.5 21% | 3.8 64% | 4.5 58% | 8.8 18% | 7.8 27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 5.4 19% | 1.9 72% | 3.6 46% | 5.3 21% | 5.2 22% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.31 95% | 2.09 105% | 2.38 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 8064 81% | 7610 85% | 6502 100% | 7226 90% | 7473 87% | 7905 82% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 3 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto X4 | HTC U11 Life | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | Honor 9 | Xiaomi Mi 6 | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -5% | -42% | -1% | 96% | 9% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 281.6 | 268 -5% | 199.7 -29% | 293 4% | 728 159% | 287.4 2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 120.5 | 120 0% | 45.96 -62% | 204 69% | 196.7 63% | 205.3 70% |
| Random Read 4KB | 45.4 | 39.3 -13% | 22.32 -51% | 55.7 23% | 143.5 216% | 68.6 51% |
| Random Write 4KB | 55.3 | 50.2 -9% | 9.62 -83% | 32.7 -41% | 25.19 -54% | 7.59 -86% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.9 ? | 82.8 ? -1% | 75.5 ? -10% | 68 ? -19% | 86.9 ? 4% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60 ? | 59.8 ? 0% | 50.1 ? -16% | 34.64 ? -42% | 66.5 ? 11% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto X4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U11 Life audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.04 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.65 / 1.51 / 1.57 Watt |
| Carga |
3.88 / 5.47 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 2350 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | 50% | -48% | -10% | -34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.65 | 0.63 3% | 0.37 43% | 1.13 -74% | 0.45 31% | 0.84 -29% |
| Idle Average * | 1.51 | 2.1 -39% | 0.78 48% | 2.25 -49% | 1.67 -11% | 2.31 -53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 2.15 -37% | 0.84 46% | 2.3 -46% | 1.69 -8% | 2.33 -48% |
| Load Average * | 3.88 | 3.34 14% | 1.52 61% | 4.89 -26% | 4.07 -5% | 4.76 -23% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.47 | 4.83 12% | 2.75 50% | 7.99 -46% | 8.54 -56% | 6.39 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 2350 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 10% | 51% | -15% | 12% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1652 | 1820 10% | 2862 73% | 1399 -15% | 1665 1% | |
| H.264 | 688 | 798 16% | 988 44% | 564 -18% | 698 1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 659 | 725 10% | 668 1% | 516 -22% | 739 12% | 562 -15% |
| Load | 289 | 303 5% | 532 84% | 278 -4% | 286 -1% |
Pro
Contra
A Motorola introduziu um smartphone de gama média elegante e de alta qualidade para o mercado, que surpreende com várias ideias novas, como é comum para a Motorola: É bastante inovador que o usuário possa criar um sistema de som Bluetooth de vários alto-falantes através de Wi-Fi de 5 GHz e que o usuário seja assistido não por um, mas por vários assistentes de voz. No entanto, o suporte prometido para Alexa junto com o aplicativo que não foi pré-instalado em nosso dispositivo de teste causou alguma confusão.
Wi-Fi rápido, GPS confiável, carcaça estável, controles fáceis, porém versáteis, câmera decente em boas condições de iluminação, desempenho adequado, bom alto-falante e durações da bateria adequados para uso diário. É assim que os pros deste dispositivo de teste podem ser resumidos, enquanto o Moto X4 tem poucos contras reais: A tela tem uma tonalidade azul visível, o brilho das imagens da câmera tomadas em condições de iluminação ruim é medíocre e o fabricante deve ficar envergonhado pelo fato de que, 6 meses após o lançamento do Android Oreo, ainda existem dispositivos lançados com a versão anterior.
O Motorola X4 é um bom dispositivo de gama média com vários pros e várias ideias inovadoras.
Podemos definitivamente pronunciar uma recomendação de compra para o Moto X4. Os usuários que usam seu smartphone para navegar regularmente estarão particularmente felizes com este dispositivo. Não só isso, mas também os inúmeros outros pros provavelmente fariam a Alexa dizer: "De acordo com a notebookcheck.com, o Motorola Moto X4 é uma recomendação de compra".
Motorola Moto X4
- 01/18/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
