Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G9 Plus - Gigante da bateria com problemas de brilho

Name: Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Brand: Motorola

Ajuda com o apertar de um botão.

A Motorola está lançando o Moto G9 Plus, um novo smartphone de gama média com uma grande bateria de 5.000 mAh e um botão Google Assistant dedicado. A tela Max Vision de 6,8 polegadas do acessível telefone Moto revela não apenas vantagens em nossa análise - especialmente em termos de brilho.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Notebookcheck), Published 10/20/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Phablet

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Moto G9 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.81 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 386 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, LTPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSDXC de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, OTG, Rádio FM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 2/3/5/8; 3G: 1/2/4/5/8; 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.7 x 170 x 78.1

Bateria

5000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (ƒ/1,8) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,75 µm) +2 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,75 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Onscreen, carregador, cabo USB C (USB C para USB C), guia de início rápido, SIM toolkit, My UX, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR: 0,76 W/kg, Widevine L1, fanless

peso

223 g, Suprimento de energia: 79 g

Preço

286 Euro

Links

Motorola página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Motorola Moto G9 Plus SD 730G, Adreno 618	223 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.81"	2400x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
81.3 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Samsung Galaxy M51 SD 730, Adreno 618	213 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
79.6 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618	215 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	633 (589^min - 676^max) MBit/s +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	551 (465^min - 583^max) MBit/s +69%
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	332 (312^min - 337^max) MBit/s +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	326 (309^min - 343^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy M51 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	325 (318^min - 330^max) MBit/s 0%
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	290 (137^min - 336^max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	636 (500^min - 675^max) MBit/s +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	619 (283^min - 670^max) MBit/s +100%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	337 (270^min - 351^max) MBit/s +9%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	309 (140^min - 360^max) MBit/s
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	294 (80^min - 338^max) MBit/s -5%
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	292 (145^min - 352^max) MBit/s -6%

Motorola Moto G9 Plus; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (140-360)

Motorola Moto G9 Plus; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (309-343)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light Wide angle

click to load images

Motorola Moto G9 Plus

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G9 Plus

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G9 Plus

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G9 Plus

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Plus: 12.52 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 20.18 ∆E


362 cd/m²	389 cd/m²	375 cd/m²
373 cd/m²	390 cd/m²	377 cd/m²
377 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	370 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 390 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 377.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 390 cd/m²
Contraste: 591:1 (Preto: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.506

	Motorola Moto G9 Plus LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.8"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy M51 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		58%	19%	-5%	-23%	39%
Brightness middle	390	610 56%	626 61%	442 13%	594 52%	623 60%
Brightness	377	579 54%	632 68%	419 11%	613 63%	600 59%
Brightness Distribution	93	92 -1%	94 1%	90 -3%	89 -4%	93 0%
Black Level *	0.66	0.37 44%		0.37 44%		0.54 18%
Contrast	591	1649 179%		1195 102%		1154 95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.39	1.8 47%	2.88 15%	6.1 -80%	6.1 -80%	1.8 47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.22	3 43%	4.97 5%	9.7 -86%	10.6 -103%	4.7 10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	2.5 42%	5.9 -37%	5.9 -37%	7 -63%	3.3 23%
Gamma	2.506 ^88%	2.31 ^95%	3.441 ^64%	2.35 ^94%	2.28 ^96%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6033 ^108%	6864 ^95%	6415 ^101%	7631 ^85%	7370 ^88%	6712 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	551 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	569 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	548 Points -1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	567 Points +3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	320 Points -42%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	282 Points -49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	567 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (523 - 551, n=6)	543 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +81%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	1786 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1771 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1780 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1759 Points -2%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1475 Points -17%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1430 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1787 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1646 - 1786, n=6)	1729 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +85%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	987 Points
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1007 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (881 - 1030, n=3)	966 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)	6763 Points +585%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	1113 Points
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1149 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1291 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1092 - 1113, n=2)	1103 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)	7074 Points +536%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2556 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2638 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G ()	2556 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +115%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	6987 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7130 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G ()	6987 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +116%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	8411 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8962 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G ()	8411 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +43%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	9956 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9091 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9075 Points -9%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	13777 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8773 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=7)	9376 Points -6%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	7737 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7829 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7913 Points +2%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	10106 Points +31%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8185 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8101 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=7)	7679 Points -1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	39572 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38315 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	39944 Points +1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	33926 Points -14%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23447 Points -41%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	40955 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (33007 - 39608, n=5)	37271 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	53182 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	51789 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	52736 Points -1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	53600 Points +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23159 Points -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	56640 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (50829 - 53548, n=5)	52404 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	20382 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20054 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	21603 Points +6%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	14849 Points -27%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	24514 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20797 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (14820 - 22054, n=5)	18710 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3556 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3534 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3547 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3528 Points -1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1899 Points -47%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3784 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3399 - 3594, n=7)	3490 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3678 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3620 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3604 Points -2%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3683 Points 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1767 Points -52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3917 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3485 - 3678, n=7)	3561 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3349 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3263 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3362 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3076 Points -8%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2568 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3382 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3075 - 3371, n=7)	3254 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3704 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3645 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3644 Points -2%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3651 Points -1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1885 Points -49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3918 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3513 - 3704, n=7)	3598 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3773 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3785 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3741 Points -1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3835 Points +2%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1747 Points -54%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4086 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3646 - 3773, n=7)	3710 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +422%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3352 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3226 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3339 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3125 Points -7%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2606 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3112 - 3390, n=7)	3238 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2489 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2499 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2469 Points -1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2514 Points +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1276 Points -49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2713 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2388 - 2489, n=7)	2434 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2293 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2356 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2299 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points +4%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1117 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2559 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2237 - 2310, n=7)	2270 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3328 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3170 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3331 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3083 Points -7%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2550 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3436 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3088 - 3350, n=7)	3235 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2701 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2667 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2619 Points -3%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2656 Points -2%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1265 Points -53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2865 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2561 - 2701, n=7)	2602 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +188%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2471 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2539 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2465 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2558 Points +4%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1102 Points -55%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2735 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2425 - 2492, n=7)	2461 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +367%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3391 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3236 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3349 Points -1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3067 Points -10%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2621 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3438 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3058 - 3391, n=7)	3241 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2310 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2340 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2302 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2317 Points 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1248 Points -46%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2506 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2244 - 2310, n=7)	2267 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2199 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2250 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2180 Points -1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2255 Points +3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1103 Points -50%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2427 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2143 - 2199, n=7)	2162 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2775 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2721 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2862 Points +3%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2562 Points -8%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2304 Points -17%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2827 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2621 - 2775, n=7)	2727 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -3%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	57 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	55 fps -4%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (55 - 60, n=6)	58.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +51%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	86 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	85 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	67 fps -22%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	91 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (83 - 86, n=6)	84.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +226%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	38 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	31 fps -18%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	38 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (25 - 39, n=6)	35.7 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +99%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	42 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps -19%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	41 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	45 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (41 - 42, n=6)	41.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +294%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	27 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	22 fps -19%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	27 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 29, n=6)	25.5 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +143%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	30 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps -20%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	33 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (30 - 30, n=6)	30 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +291%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	12 fps -25%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (9.7 - 17, n=6)	14.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +199%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	14 fps -18%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	19 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (17 - 17, n=6)	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +315%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps -19%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps +6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	7.5 fps -53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (10 - 17, n=7)	15.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +209%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -17%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	19 fps +6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8.8 fps -51%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 18, n=7)	17.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +343%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	10 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	8.3 fps -17%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	11 fps +10%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	4.5 fps -55%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.5 - 11, n=7)	9.79 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +274%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	6.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.9 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	5.4 fps -14%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	7 fps +11%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2.9 fps -54%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7.5 fps +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.3 - 10, n=7)	7.09 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +408%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	251673 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	271934 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	247877 Points -2%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	275464 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	279048 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (251673 - 275660, n=6)	266066 Points +6%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3412 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3444 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3539 Points +4%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3481 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3477 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3268 - 3512, n=6)	3391 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +85%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	6612 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6856 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6606 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	6908 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	6542 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6305 - 6796, n=6)	6610 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +54%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	4029 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4452 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4482 Points +11%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	4573 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4041 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3678 - 4544, n=6)	4056 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +68%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3984 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3757 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3875 Points -3%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3768 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3960 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3840 - 3984, n=6)	3883 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +324%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	1347 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1226 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1366 Points +1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1233 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1395 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1190 - 1365, n=6)	1286 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +16%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +138%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	52.6 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	50.6 Points
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	50.1 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	47.9 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6)	47.3 Points -7%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	90.6 Points +5%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	89.6 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	86.8 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	86.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6)	84 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	66.3 Points -23%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +215%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	45.2 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	43.9 runs/min +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	43.3 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6)	42.7 runs/min -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85)	41.3 runs/min -5%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +119%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	72 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	71 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6)	69.8 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	69 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	68 Points
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	67 Points -1%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +122%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	17398 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	17265 Points +3%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	17157 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6)	16793 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	16729 Points
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	16399 Points -2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	3033 ms * -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6)	2898 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	2850 ms * -2%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	2783 ms *
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	2774 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	2673 ms * +4%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G9 Plus	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro	Samsung Galaxy M51	Realme 6 Pro	Oppo A91	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-4%	-2%	15%	-13%	-4%	24%	315%
Sequential Read 256KB	489.4	498.1 2%	491.7 0%	513 5%	505 3%	506 3%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) 55%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 276%
Sequential Write 256KB	186.2	171.1 -8%	189.8 2%	203.3 9%	185.3 0%	173.1 -7%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 60%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 665%
Random Read 4KB	134.8	122.6 -9%	123.6 -8%	158.7 18%	145.6 8%	123.4 -8%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 13%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 105%
Random Write 4KB	98.1	112.9 15%	114.5 17%	154 57%	28.55 -71%	112.6 15%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 34%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 215%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	76.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	74.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -12%	86.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -9%	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -12%	76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) -11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	65.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -16%	59.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	63.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	60.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -8%	55.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -15%	59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) -9%

PUBG mobile

Motorola Moto G9 Plus; Smooth: Ø39.9 (38-41)

Motorola Moto G9 Plus; Balanced: Ø39.9 (38-41)

Motorola Moto G9 Plus; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Asphalt 9 Legends

Motorola Moto G9 Plus: Ø29.4 (20-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


42.2 °C	39.6 °C	37.6 °C
41.7 °C	39.4 °C	37.9 °C
41.4 °C	39.4 °C	37.5 °C

Máximo: 42.2 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C


34.9 °C	37.8 °C	39.4 °C
34.8 °C	38.3 °C	41.4 °C
36.6 °C	38.9 °C	39.4 °C

Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (130.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	0.8 / 1.7 / 2.2 Watt
Carga	5.3 / 7.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M51 7000 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		4%	11%	-2%	18%	-15%	0%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.75 6%	0.8 -0%	0.92 -15%	0.82 -3%	0.93 -16%	0.84 ?(0.49 - 1.55, n=6) -5%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.7	2.19 -29%	1.3 24%	1.79 -5%	1.73 -2%	2.47 -45%	1.953 ?(0.96 - 4.91, n=6) -15%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	2.2	2.24 -2%	1.8 18%	1.88 15%	1.75 20%	2.51 -14%	2.26 ?(1 - 5.02, n=6) -3%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 27%
Load Average *	5.3	3.88 27%	4.8 9%	5.41 -2%	2.33 56%	5.62 -6%	4.51 ?(3.11 - 5.38, n=6) 15%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -22%
Load Maximum *	7.4	5.97 19%	7 5%	7.59 -3%	5.97 19%	6.93 6%	6.63 ?(5.23 - 7.5, n=6) 10%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		45h 32min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		22h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 27min

	Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M51 7000 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh
Battery Runtime		0%	29%	7%	-37%	-1%
Reader / Idle	2732	2336 -14%	2642 -3%			2427 -11%
H.264	1352	1096 -19%	1685 25%			1188 -12%
WiFi v1.3	968	1175 21%	1508 56%	1031 7%	605 -37%	1116 15%
Load	267	303 13%	365 37%			280 5%

Pro

+ Longas durações

+ Carga rápida

+ Bom desempenho

Contra

- Sensação táctil

- Painel LC escuro e de baixo contraste

- Câmeras

Veredicto sobre o Moto G9 Plus - o celular Motorola não tem aquele pequeno extra

Reviewing the Motorola Moto G9 Plus: test device provided by Motorola Germany

Em nossa análise, o G9 Plus deixa uma impressão mista. Por um lado, o modelo de gama média da Motorola oferece uma qualidade de som muito boa, tempos de carregamento rápidos e um desempenho adequado para a sua faixa de preço. A qualidade de construção também está no lado positivo do celular Moto.

O Moto G9 Plus é um sólido telefone móvel de gama média - nada mais, mas também nada menos.

Por outro lado, o Moto-G decepciona em uma área que é importante para um smartphone: a tela - e também o desempenho da câmera não é totalmente convincente. O painel LTPS tem apenas 60 Hz, não é muito brilhante e em combinação com os altos níveis de preto isso resulta em um contraste bem abaixo da média. Além disso, existem fenômenos típicos do LCD, como halos e distribuição desigual de brilho nas bordas da tela.

Embora o Moto G9 Plus tenha um preço baixo de cerca de 289 dólares, agora também existem telas LC com uma alta taxa de atualização (por exemplo, Poco X3 NFC) ou paineis OLED (como o Samsung Galaxy M51) disponíveis no segmento da gama média.

Motorola Moto G9 Plus - 10/13/2020 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

79%

Teclado

68 / 75 → 91%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

47 / 70 → 68%

Peso

88%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

29 / 64 → 45%

Desempenho da aplicação

67 / 86 → 78%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

60%

Médio

75%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G9 Plus - Gigante da bateria com problemas de brilho

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-10-20 (Update: 2020-10-21)

Comparison devices

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG mobile

Asphalt 9 Legends

Motorola Moto G9 Plus audio analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto sobre o Moto G9 Plus - o celular Motorola não tem aquele pequeno extra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison