Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 – Smartphone de $200 com câmera versátil
Test Group
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Motorola Moto G8 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1560x720 | |
84.7 % v6 (old) | v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Motorola Moto G7 SD 632, Adreno 506 | 172 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 2270x1080 | |
76.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi 8 SD 439, Adreno 505 | 188 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.22" | 1520x720 | |
79.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A30s Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 166 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1560x720 | |
75.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Honor 9X Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Honor 9X | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Honor 9X | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Motorola Moto G8 |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 504 cd/m²
Contraste: 1800:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.235
Motorola Moto G8 IPS, 1560x720, 6.4" | Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | Xiaomi Redmi 8 IPS LCD, 1520x720, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy A30s Super AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.4" | Honor 9X LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -35% | 15% | 24% | -50% | |
Brightness middle | 504 | 471 -7% | 554 10% | 488 -3% | 494 -2% |
Brightness | 452 | 453 0% | 516 14% | 489 8% | 483 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 94 13% | 85 2% | 93 12% | 94 13% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.5 -79% | 0.24 14% | 0.51 -82% | |
Contrast | 1800 | 942 -48% | 2308 28% | 969 -46% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.84 | 5.5 -43% | 2.6 32% | 1.7 56% | 5.74 -49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 7.95 -30% | 4.9 20% | 3.3 46% | 10.26 -68% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 5 -85% | 2.7 -0% | 2 26% | 7.3 -170% |
Gamma | 2.235 98% | 2.326 95% | 2.17 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.086 105% |
CCT | 7125 91% | 7654 85% | 6814 95% | 6506 100% | 8572 76% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 625 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 625 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 625 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1495 - 1536, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5134 - 5663, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=173, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=173, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G8 | Motorola Moto G7 | Xiaomi Redmi 8 | Samsung Galaxy A30s | Honor 9X | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | -3% | -7% | 65% | -12% | 394% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 301 | 297 -1% | 285.7 -5% | 291.8 -3% | 860 186% | 274 ? -9% | 1894 ? 529% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 239 | 216 -10% | 202.6 -15% | 101.7 -57% | 196.1 -18% | 176.6 ? -26% | 1476 ? 518% |
Random Read 4KB | 57.3 | 69.3 21% | 79 38% | 93.2 63% | 142.3 148% | 59.4 ? 4% | 278 ? 385% |
Random Write 4KB | 128.1 | 75.6 -41% | 7.33 -94% | 13.95 -89% | 159.3 24% | 32.2 ? -75% | 312 ? 144% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 68.7 ? | 86.9 ? 26% | 86.9 ? 26% | 80 ? 16% | 76.2 ? 11% | 77.4 ? 13% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 48.7 ? | 66.8 ? 37% | 63.6 ? 31% | 64 ? 31% | 67.1 ? 38% | 58.3 ? 20% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.3 / 2 / 2.8 Watt |
Carga |
3.9 / 7.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 8 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | 36% | 31% | -49% | 11% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 1.1 15% | 0.57 56% | 0.79 39% | 2.3 -77% | 1.017 ? 22% | 0.883 ? 32% |
Idle Average * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 1.8 10% | 1.98 1% | 3 -50% | 1.893 ? 5% | 1.467 ? 27% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.8 | 2.6 7% | 1.82 35% | 2.03 27% | 4.2 -50% | 2.36 ? 16% | 1.621 ? 42% |
Load Average * | 3.9 | 4.2 -8% | 2.57 34% | 2.37 39% | 5.3 -36% | 3.77 ? 3% | 6.58 ? -69% |
Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 6.8 6% | 4.12 43% | 3.68 49% | 9.4 -31% | 6.66 ? 7% | 9.91 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 8 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | 9% | -9% | -16% | |
Reader / Idle | 1953 | 1548 -21% | 2521 29% | ||
H.264 | 1048 | 819 -22% | 798 -24% | 982 -6% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 988 | 798 -19% | 1157 17% | 634 -36% | 832 -16% |
Load | 276 | 219 -21% | 308 12% | 317 15% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Câmera com benefício real
O Motorola Moto G8 é um smartphone de gama média decente para orçamentos apertados. Oferece uma configuração de câmera mais convencional e, portanto, mais útil do que a do Moto G8 Plus. As câmeras tiveram um desempenho muito bom para sua classe e inclusive suportam o zoom. Em troca, a razão de contraste era muito baixa ocasionalmente.
Também gostamos da duração da bateria do G8, do desempenho acima da média e da carcaça robusta. O leitor de digitais dedicado é um prazer para usar, o dispositivo permanece relativamente frio e o alto-falante é bom.
O Motorola Moto G8 é bastante acessível e oferece várias câmeras e, portanto, uma vantagem real sobre seus rivais.
Os cortes de preços em relação ao seu antecessor se manifestaram em uma tela com resolução mais baixa. Felizmente, permaneceu bom o suficiente e continua a oferecer uma imagem de qualidade decente. Comparado aos seus concorrentes, o principal benefício do G8 são sem dúvida suas câmeras versáteis. Uma razão para isso pode ser que a maioria dos smartphones de médio porte para 2020 ainda nem foi lançada. No entanto, em seu atual preço acessível, o Moto G8 oferece um pacote geral decente, sem grandes falhas.
Motorola Moto G8
- 05/12/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt