Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 Power: Bastante duração da bateria e boas câmeras

Name: Motorola Moto G8 Power
Brand: Motorola

Duração de bateria sem fim.

Com o Moto G8 Power, a Motorola refinou o conceito de um smartphone barato com bateria de longa duração. Seu hardware não é apenas adequado para o uso diário, mas também possui câmeras surpreendentemente boas. Continue lendo para descobrir o que mais o Moto G8 Power oferece além da duração da bateria e câmeras decentes.

Mike Wobker, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/25/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G8 Power (Moto G8 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.40 polegadas 19:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 397 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD (até 512 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (2/3/5/8), 3G, Dual SIM, LTE

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10 x 156 x 76

Bateria

5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP (ƒ/1.7, 1.12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.75 µm) macro + 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.12 µm) ultra-wide angle, 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.12 µm) telephoto 2x optical zoom
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , ƒ/2.0, 1 µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Adaptador de força USB, cabo USB Type-C, SIM tool, capa protetora, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.914 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.79 W/kg, LTE speeds: 400 MBit/s (download), 75 MBit/s (upload)

peso

197 g, Suprimento de energia: 80 g

Preço

230 Euro

Links

Motorola página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
78.1 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610	197 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	2300x1080
80.6 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Sharp Aquos V SD 835, Adreno 540	173 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.90"	2160x1080
77.6 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Nokia 6.2 SD 636, Adreno 509	180 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
78.4 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	Xiaomi Mi A3 SD 665, Adreno 610	173.8 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.09"	1560x720
80.2 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	TCL Plex SD 675, Adreno 612	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Sharp Aquos V Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	409 (342^min - 464^max) MBit/s +811%
TCL Plex Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	287 (250^min - 308^max) MBit/s +539%
Nokia 6.2 Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	284 (240^min - 307^max) MBit/s +533%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	172 (2^min - 282^max) MBit/s +283%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 (2^min - 75^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Sharp Aquos V Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	468 (406^min - 517^max) MBit/s +728%
TCL Plex Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	359 (330^min - 369^max) MBit/s +535%
Nokia 6.2 Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	325 (280^min - 342^max) MBit/s +475%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	158 (18^min - 227^max) MBit/s +180%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	56.5 (11^min - 75^max) MBit/s

Motorola Moto G8 Power; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.4 (11-75)

Motorola Moto G8 Power; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.8 (2-75)

GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Overview

GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Bridge

GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Crossing

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Motorola Moto G8 Power

Olympus E M10 II

OnePlus 6T

Apple iPhone Pro 11 Max

click to load images

Motorola Moto G8 Power

Olympus E M10 II

OnePlus 6T

Apple iPhone Pro 11 Max

click to load images

Motorola Moto G8 Power

Olympus E M10 II

OnePlus 6T

Apple iPhone Pro 11 Max

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 7.58 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 12.84 ∆E


490 cd/m²	470 cd/m²	491 cd/m²
486 cd/m²	462 cd/m²	494 cd/m²
495 cd/m²	467 cd/m²	493 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 495 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 483.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 462 cd/m²
Contraste: 711:1 (Preto: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303

	Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4"	Sharp Aquos V IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9"	Nokia 6.2 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.1"	TCL Plex IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Screen		15%	25%	-15%	21%
Brightness middle	462	507 10%	611 32%	348 -25%	432 -6%
Brightness	483	486 1%	582 20%	355 -27%	418 -13%
Brightness Distribution	93	91 -2%	91 -2%	91 -2%	93 0%
Black Level *	0.65	0.55 15%	0.4 38%		0.43 34%
Contrast	711	922 30%	1528 115%		1005 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.7	4.43 22%	5.2 9%	5.86 -3%	3.4 40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.9	7.13 20%	10.2 -15%	15.6 -75%	6 33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.5	5 23%	6.1 6%	3.6 45%	3.8 42%
Gamma	2.303 ^96%	2.18 ^101%	2.21 ^100%	2.232 ^99%	2.14 ^103%
CCT	8073 ^81%	7739 ^84%	8100 ^80%	7051 ^92%	6151 ^106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

714 Hz

≤ 15 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 714 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 714 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	311 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	386 Points +24%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	486 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (309 - 314, n=8)	311 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +220%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1385 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	1669 Points +21%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	924 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1256 - 1421, n=8)	1356 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +139%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	368 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	1908 Points +418%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	351 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 368, n=5)	366 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points +1933%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	464 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	369 Points -20%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	487 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (432 - 483, n=5)	455 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points +1614%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8804 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	9927 Points +13%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6696 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7984 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10)	8163 Points -7%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6963 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	7510 Points +8%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5965 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6396 Points -8%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	7950 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12)	6985 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25046 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19635 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23693 Points -5%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	22767 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22445 - 25046, n=11)	23846 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25161 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	21067 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25219 Points 0%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	26320 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15403 - 25351, n=11)	24085 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24652 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15876 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19552 Points -21%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	15461 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17865 - 24652, n=11)	20749 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1764 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	5022 Points +185%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1467 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points +1%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1618 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1675 - 1795, n=12)	1751 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +138%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1626 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	6208 Points +282%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1322 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1651 Points +2%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1594 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1564 - 1663, n=12)	1623 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +192%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2507 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3009 Points +20%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2339 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2471 Points -1%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1708 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2282 - 2596, n=12)	2427 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1809 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	5151 Points +185%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1568 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1787 Points -1%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1621 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1754 - 1810, n=12)	1787 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +514%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1678 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	6417 Points +282%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1389 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1674 Points 0%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1611 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1650 - 1692, n=12)	1669 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1074%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3047 Points +22%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2288 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2343 Points -6%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1657 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2199 - 2503, n=12)	2369 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1137 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3751 Points +230%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	945 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1081 Points -5%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	937 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1076 - 1152, n=12)	1119 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	984 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	4031 Points +310%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	809 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	931 Points -5%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	829 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (927 - 999, n=12)	970 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +232%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3018 Points +21%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2335 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2477 Points -1%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1724 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2212 - 2580, n=12)	2418 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1151 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	4054 Points +252%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	977 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1135 Points -1%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1057 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1097 - 1151, n=11)	1135 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +575%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	988 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	4468 Points +352%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	855 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points 0%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	955 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 999, n=11)	988 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1068%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2488 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3062 Points +23%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2337 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2387 Points -4%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1684 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2154 - 2541, n=11)	2377 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1047 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3288 Points +214%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	926 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1049 Points 0%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1038 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1035 - 1140, n=12)	1074 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	904 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3580 Points +296%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	789 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points 0%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	916 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (897 - 995, n=12)	933 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +242%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2354 Points
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	2559 Points +9%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2175 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2300 Points -2%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1952 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2185 - 2444, n=12)	2281 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	33 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	32 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	52 fps +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10)	35.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +162%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10)	35.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +678%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	18 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10)	20.7 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +319%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10)	19.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +770%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	12 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.7 fps -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	26 fps +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10)	14.6 fps +22%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +448%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10)	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +802%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.6 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5.7 - 13, n=10)	7.69 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +624%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)	7.07 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +894%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	24 fps +216%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps +97%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	8.3 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12)	9.14 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +551%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	26 fps +221%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -26%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.4 fps +4%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	9.1 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)	8.13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +885%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.5 fps
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	15 fps +233%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps -49%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9.1 fps +102%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	4.9 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)	5.53 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +731%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps
Sharp Aquos V Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	9.7 fps +246%
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	3.5 fps +25%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	3 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)	2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +1043%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	168901 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	145220 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9)	171951 Points +2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2238 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1907 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2556 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2001 - 2556, n=9)	2271 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +181%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4848 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4498 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5089 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4391 - 5089, n=9)	4825 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +110%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2864 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2024 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	3174 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1804 - 3174, n=9)	2681 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +136%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1931 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1632 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1886 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1881 - 1932, n=9)	1906 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +776%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	935 Points
Nokia 6.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	876 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1400 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (926 - 1400, n=9)	1101 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +67%

JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	51 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	48.11 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)	47.5 Points -1%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)	44.44 Points -8%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +166%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	58 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	56 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)	50.9 Points -9%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)	46 Points -18%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +328%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	9260 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)	8901 Points +3%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)	8756 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	8675 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)	5066 ms * -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)	4783 ms * -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	4664 ms *
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	4584 ms * +2%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G8 Power	Sharp Aquos V	Nokia 6.2	Xiaomi Mi A3	TCL Plex	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		40%	-4%	29%	38%	-9%	427%
Sequential Read 256KB	300.9	651 116%	296.8 -1%	502 67%	522 73%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -9%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 511%
Sequential Write 256KB	181.9	206.2 13%	158.5 -13%	184 1%	199.7 10%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -3%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 683%
Random Read 4KB	57.7	157.2 172%	78.8 37%	126.9 120%	130.8 127%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) 3%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 380%
Random Write 4KB	132.6	16.8 -87%	14.88 -89%	117.4 -11%	130.1 -2%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) -76%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 133%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	69.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	78.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 20%	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	74.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) 12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	49.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	54.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	61.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 24%	50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	56.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) 17%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.3 °C	38.3 °C	37.4 °C
41.5 °C	38.3 °C	37.6 °C
40 °C	37.8 °C	37.4 °C

Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C


36.5 °C	38.2 °C	41.6 °C
36.2 °C	38.4 °C	41.1 °C
36 °C	38.2 °C	40.2 °C

Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 6.2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Carga	3.2 / 7.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Nokia 6.2 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	TCL Plex 3820 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-22%	-37%	-21%	-24%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.72 20%	0.8 11%	0.73 19%	1.017 ?(0.62 - 1.7, n=11) -13%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.3	2.22 -71%	2 -54%	2.17 -67%	1.893 ?(1.3 - 2.3, n=11) -46%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	2.23 -39%	3.3 -106%	2.23 -39%	2.36 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=11) -48%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -1%
Load Average *	3.2	3.98 -24%	4.1 -28%	4.56 -43%	3.77 ?(2.61 - 4.7, n=11) -18%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -102%
Load Maximum *	7.1	6.86 3%	7.7 -8%	5.22 26%	6.66 ?(5.12 - 7.7, n=11) 6%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -38%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		16h 42min

	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Sharp Aquos V 3160 mAh	Nokia 6.2 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	TCL Plex 3820 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	1002	718 -28%	611 -39%	985 -2%	616 -39%

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Boas câmeras

+ Design robusto

+ Android quase puro

Contra

- Wi-Fi lento

- Tela de baixo contraste

Veredicto - Bom valor pelo dinheiro:

The Motorola Moto G8 Power smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.

Com o Moto G8 Power, os usuários devem esperar um smartphone com grande duração da bateria acima de tudo. O dispositivo não pode ser criticado a esse respeito, pois durou mais de 16 horas em nossos testes práticos de Wi-Fi. No entanto, o Moto G8 Power oferece mais do que apenas a duração da bateria. Suas câmeras são surpreendentemente boas, por exemplo, assim como sua experiência Android quase puro. No geral, o Moto G8 Power tem um conjunto sólido de hardware para um dispositivo a esse preço.

O Motorola Moto G8 Power convencerá particularmente as pessoas com sua capacidade de duração da bateria.

Enquanto o dispositivo é bem construído, sua bateria grande o torna bastante grosso. Se isso incomoda você é uma questão de gosto, mas o dispositivo fica aquém dos seus concorrentes na conectividade Wi-Fi. A inclusão de suporte apenas para o padrão Wi-Fi 4 é suficiente para a maioria das redes domésticas, mas significa que o Moto G8 Power é superado pela concorrência a esse respeito. No final, o Motorola Moto G8 Power é um aparelho bom e acessível, mas se suas deficiências o incomodam, você dependerá do que você valoriza em um smartphone.

Motorola Moto G8 Power - 03/21/2020 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

95%

Conectividade

41 / 70 → 59%

Peso

88%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

13 / 64 → 21%

Desempenho da aplicação

59 / 86 → 68%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 84%

Camera

59%

Médio

72%

78%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11233 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 Power: Bastante duração da bateria e boas câmeras

Mike Wobker, 2020-03-25 (Update: 2020-04- 3)

Comparison Devices

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

Nokia 6.2 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Bom valor pelo dinheiro:

More articles related to this device

Price comparison