Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 Plus – Telefone móvel com câmera de ação
Comparison devices
Score | Rating Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Motorola Moto G8 Plus SD 665, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2280x1080 | |
| 85 % v6 (old) | v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Motorola Moto G7 Plus SD 636, Adreno 509 | 176 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 2270x1080 | |
| 75.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Honor 9X Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 | |
| 77.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06/2019 | HTC Desire 19+ Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 170 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 1520x720 | |
| 79.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A40 Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 140 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 5.90" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 597 cd/m²
Contraste: 1148:1 (Preto: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.232
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | Honor 9X LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.6" | HTC Desire 19+ IPS, 1520x720, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy A40 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -14% | -12% | 10% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 597 | 537 -10% | 494 -17% | 491 -18% | 358 -40% |
| Brightness | 596 | 525 -12% | 483 -19% | 470 -21% | 370 -38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 94 1% | 84 -10% | 94 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.58 -12% | 0.51 2% | 0.33 37% | |
| Contrast | 1148 | 926 -19% | 969 -16% | 1488 30% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.93 | 6.41 -8% | 5.74 3% | 4.34 27% | 7.4 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.42 | 10.86 -15% | 10.26 -9% | 8.17 13% | 12.5 -33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 6.7 -26% | 7.3 -38% | 4.3 19% | 4 25% |
| Gamma | 2.232 99% | 2.099 105% | 2.086 105% | 2.302 96% | 2.084 106% |
| CCT | 7632 85% | 8310 78% | 8572 76% | 7214 90% | 7078 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 463 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 463 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 463 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Honor 9X | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78) | |
| Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | Motorola Moto G7 Plus | Honor 9X | HTC Desire 19+ | Samsung Galaxy A40 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 2% | 62% | -6% | -14% | -14% | 405% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 302.5 | 283.6 -6% | 860 184% | 288 -5% | 295 -2% | 274 ? -9% | 1894 ? 526% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 217.4 | 208.7 -4% | 196.1 -10% | 210.8 -3% | 99.6 -54% | 176.6 ? -19% | 1476 ? 579% |
| Random Read 4KB | 59.9 | 76.6 28% | 142.3 138% | 76.5 28% | 75.7 26% | 59.4 ? -1% | 278 ? 364% |
| Random Write 4KB | 124.9 | 73.1 -41% | 159.3 28% | 20.4 -84% | 13.2 -89% | 32.2 ? -74% | 312 ? 150% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 72.6 ? | 82.8 ? 14% | 76.2 ? 5% | 81.8 ? 13% | 81.2 ? 12% | 77.4 ? 7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 52.2 ? | 62.1 ? 19% | 67.1 ? 29% | 61.8 ? 18% | 65.2 ? 25% | 58.3 ? 12% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G8 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 1.4 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.7 / 2.3 / 3.5 Watt |
| Carga |
4.7 / 7.5 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 19+ 3850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | -25% | 22% | 11% | 24% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.7 | 1.1 35% | 2.3 -35% | 1.3 24% | 0.8 53% | 1.017 ? 40% | 0.883 ? 48% |
| Idle Average * | 2.3 | 1.7 26% | 3 -30% | 2 13% | 1.4 39% | 1.893 ? 18% | 1.467 ? 36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.5 | 2.1 40% | 4.2 -20% | 2.9 17% | 2.3 34% | 2.36 ? 33% | 1.621 ? 54% |
| Load Average * | 4.7 | 5.1 -9% | 5.3 -13% | 3.6 23% | 7.4 -57% | 3.77 ? 20% | 6.58 ? -40% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.5 | 7.9 -5% | 9.4 -25% | 5 33% | 8.6 -15% | 6.66 ? 11% | 9.91 ? -32% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 19+ 3850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -27% | -15% | -19% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2002 | 1689 -16% | |||
| H.264 | 996 | 809 -19% | 825 -17% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 980 | 715 -27% | 832 -15% | 795 -19% | 643 -34% |
| Load | 302 | 196 -35% | 277 -8% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Câmeras incomuns, mas boas
O Moto G8 Plus é melhor que o Moto G7 Plus? Essa é uma pergunta difícil de responder: Primeiro que nada, há muitos aspectos que falam pelo modelo mais recente, como a maior duração da bateria, a câmera grande angular adicional ou o desempenho superior. O preço mais baixo de entrada também é algo para se alegrar pela primeira vez.
Em uma inspeção mais detalhada, no entanto, você pode ver que algumas das vantagens são menos significativas na prática do que na publicidade: Você só pode usar a câmera grande angular para vídeos. É ótimo aqui que você pode segurar o smartphone na vertical, mas ainda assim conseguir vídeos em formato paisagem; que facilita a filmagem com uma mão. Em troca, você precisa prescindir da estabilização de imagem óptica do Moto G8 Plus. A diferença no desempenho não é realmente decisiva e é quase imperceptível na prática.
As velocidades de Wi-Fi flutuantes representam outra limitação, bem como a carcaça, que simplesmente gostamos mais da do antecessor, e parecia um pouco mais de alta qualidade também.
O Moto G8 Plus é recomendável, principalmente devido à câmera de alta qualidade e à bateria de longa duração.
Finalmente, a questão de qual geração do Moto G você acha melhor provavelmente se reduz ao preço e às suas próprias necessidades. De qualquer forma, o Moto G8 Plus é um smartphone de gama média recomendável que oferece muito desempenho e equipamento pelo preço de compra.
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- 11/16/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
