Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G7

Name: Motorola Moto G7
Brand: Motorola

A jump ahead of its class.

Comparado ao seu antecessor, o Motorola Moto G7 atinge novas alturas com mais desempenho e mais armazenamento. O preço continua o mesmo, o que torna o novo smartphone de gama média da Motorola muito atraente.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/16/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G7 (Moto G7 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 8 x 1.8 GHz, Kryo 250

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 506

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.20 polegadas 19:9, 2270 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 52 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 400 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 157 x 75.3

Bateria

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/30fps (main camera); 5.0 MP, f/2.2, depth sharpness (secondary camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix videos @1080p/30fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante na parte inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, USB-C; LTE Cat 4 (150Mbps/50Mbps); SAR value: 0.45 W/kg (head), 1.376 W/kg (body); support for ExFAT, DRM Widevine L1, fanless

peso

172 g, Suprimento de energia: 77 g

Preço

249 Euro

Links

Motorola página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash	285 (142^min - 294^max) MBit/s +154%
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	232 (217^min - 244^max) MBit/s +107%
Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 MBit/s +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash	112 (107^min - 117^max) MBit/s
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	41.3 (29^min - 56^max) MBit/s -63%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash	356 (342^min - 371^max) MBit/s +218%
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	334 (311^min - 342^max) MBit/s +198%
Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 MBit/s +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash	112 (94^min - 118^max) MBit/s
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	48.4 (42^min - 52^max) MBit/s -57%

Motorola Moto G7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø112 (94-118)

Motorola Moto G7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø112 (107-117)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.


455 cd/m²	463 cd/m²	450 cd/m²
452 cd/m²	471 cd/m²	449 cd/m²
442 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	445 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 471 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 453.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 471 cd/m²
Contraste: 942:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.326

	Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3"	Motorola Moto G6 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7"	Nokia 7.1 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"	Honor 10 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Screen		15%	11%	-11%	16%
Brightness middle	471	421 -11%	488 4%	577 23%	467 -1%
Brightness	453	389 -14%	478 6%	550 21%	446 -2%
Brightness Distribution	94	85 -10%	95 1%	91 -3%	89 -5%
Black Level *	0.5	0.33 34%	0.42 16%	0.36 28%	0.58 -16%
Contrast	942	1276 35%	1162 23%	1603 70%	805 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.5	3.4 38%	3.9 29%	7.4 -35%	1.5 73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.95	5.9 26%	6.8 14%	15 -89%	4.5 43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5	3.9 22%	5.3 -6%	10.2 -104%	2.4 52%
Gamma	2.326 ^95%	2.26 ^97%	2.41 ^91%	2.29 ^96%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7654 ^85%	7330 ^89%	7146 ^91%	9657 ^67%	6387 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

100 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1256 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1621 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	743 Points -41%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1333 Points +6%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1523 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (1194 - 1256, n=5)	1236 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +332%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4765 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5893 Points +24%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3868 Points -19%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4902 Points +3%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5266 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (4179 - 4765, n=5)	4497 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +213%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4006 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5640 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	2777 Points -31%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4560 Points +14%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	3157 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (3628 - 4058, n=5)	3860 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +198%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	7187 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6274 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	5321 Points -26%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6343 Points -12%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7160 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6566 - 7498, n=6)	7099 Points -1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6038 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6052 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	4552 Points -25%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5663 Points -6%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5803 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (5785 - 6076, n=6)	5942 Points -2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	14907 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	26605 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12756 Points -14%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	19762 Points +33%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	16775 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (14577 - 15000, n=6)	14826 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	14475 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29116 Points +101%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12441 Points -14%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	20610 Points +42%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	19546 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (14395 - 14741, n=6)	14546 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	16647 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	20437 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13997 Points -16%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	17274 Points +4%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	11211 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (15123 - 16647, n=6)	15916 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	913 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2062 Points +126%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	800 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1462 Points +60%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1280 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (913 - 936, n=5)	926 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +360%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	780 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1929 Points +147%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	690 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1323 Points +70%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1137 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (780 - 807, n=5)	793 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +508%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2273 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2719 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1803 Points -21%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2316 Points +2%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2282 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (2132 - 2341, n=5)	2238 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	941 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2142 Points +128%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	824 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1534 Points +63%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1367 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (941 - 951, n=4)	944 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +1086%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	809 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2015 Points +149%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	713 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1396 Points +73%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1246 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (809 - 814, n=4)	812 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +2349%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2201 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2751 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1816 Points -17%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2347 Points +7%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2067 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (2130 - 2323, n=4)	2200 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +128%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	512 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1365 Points +167%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	442 Points -14%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	945 Points +85%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	810 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (512 - 523, n=5)	516 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +501%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	419 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1193 Points +185%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	363 Points -13%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	811 Points +94%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	683 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (419 - 430, n=5)	423 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +676%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2251 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2759 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1834 Points -19%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2251 Points 0%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2326 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (2119 - 2363, n=5)	2232 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	566 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1438 Points +154%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	498 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1009 Points +78%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	967 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (516 - 576, n=5)	559 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +1257%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	467 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1265 Points +171%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	413 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	869 Points +86%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	839 Points +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (423 - 477, n=5)	461 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +2343%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2206 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2758 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1786 Points -19%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2310 Points +5%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2070 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (2132 - 2281, n=5)	2202 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +108%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	23 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	47 fps +104%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	20 fps -13%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	34 fps +48%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	36 fps +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (23 - 37, n=6)	32.2 fps +40%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +273%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	24 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps +108%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	22 fps -8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	35 fps +46%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	39 fps +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (24 - 25, n=6)	24.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +1063%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	9.9 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps +112%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	8.9 fps -10%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	15 fps +52%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	19 fps +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (9.9 - 20, n=6)	16.1 fps +63%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +658%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	10 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	22 fps +120%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	9.4 fps -6%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	16 fps +60%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	21 fps +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (10 - 11, n=6)	10.3 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +1541%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6.5 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps +115%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	5.8 fps -11%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	9.6 fps +48%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	13 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6.5 - 15, n=6)	11.8 fps +82%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +903%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6.9 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps +117%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.1 fps -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	10 fps +45%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	14 fps +103%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6.9 - 7, n=6)	6.93 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +1588%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.6 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.4 fps +133%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.3 fps -8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5.9 fps +64%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	6.8 fps +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (3.6 - 7.9, n=6)	6.4 fps +78%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +1219%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.9 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9 fps +131%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.4 fps -13%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6.3 fps +62%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7.6 fps +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (3.9 - 3.9, n=6)	3.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +1703%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.6 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.1 fps +125%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5.5 fps +53%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	6.4 fps +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (3.6 - 7, n=5)	5.56 fps +54%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +1269%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.9 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.5 fps +118%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6 fps +54%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7 fps +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (3.8 - 3.9, n=5)	3.88 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +1936%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5.1 fps +155%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	3.5 fps +75%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	4 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (2 - 4.3, n=5)	3.36 fps +68%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +1755%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1.2 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3.2 fps +167%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2.2 fps +83%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2.6 fps +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (1.2 - 1.3, n=5)	1.28 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +2533%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	108408 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	143551 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	71352 Points -34%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	116496 Points +7%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	129928 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (97294 - 108408, n=5)	103607 Points -4%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	87883 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	118773 Points +35%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	59454 Points -32%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	95013 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (76724 - 87883, n=4)	83178 Points -5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1747 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2332 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1069 Points -39%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1941 Points +11%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2167 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (1465 - 1800, n=6)	1676 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +258%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4378 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5237 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	2560 Points -42%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4457 Points +2%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5026 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (3865 - 4430, n=6)	4245 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +131%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1963 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2269 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	770 Points -61%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1917 Points -2%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2969 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (1068 - 2049, n=6)	1742 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +242%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1075 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2293 Points +113%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	965 Points -10%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1590 Points +48%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1470 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (1069 - 1091, n=6)	1076 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +1459%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1008 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1086 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	688 Points -32%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1046 Points +4%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1004 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (820 - 1078, n=6)	1009 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +54%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	52.9 Points +16%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	49.22 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	45.54 Points
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	45.08 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (42.6 - 45.5, n=5)	44.5 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	22.56 Points -50%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +340%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	10378 Points +24%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	9423 Points +13%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	8627 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	8351 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (8185 - 8420, n=6)	8287 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	3943 Points -53%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	11751 ms * -140%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	4900 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (4806 - 5037, n=5)	4899 ms * -0%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	4562 ms * +7%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	4120 ms * +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	3880 ms * +21%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +68%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +154%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	62 Points +7%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	62 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	58 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (50 - 58, n=3)	55.3 Points -5%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	54 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	31 Points -47%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	178 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	171 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	171 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (163 - 171, n=2)	167 Points -2%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	147 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)	90 Points -47%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G7	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite	Motorola Moto G6	Nokia 7.1	Honor 10 Lite	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-15%	-18%	-32%	-13%	-20%	423%
Sequential Read 256KB	297	282.6 -5%	238.2 -20%	250.9 -16%	288.5 -3%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -8%	1838 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 519%
Sequential Write 256KB	216	172.4 -20%	117.2 -46%	126 -42%	190.6 -12%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -18%	1430 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 562%
Random Read 4KB	69.3	81.3 17%	69.9 1%	44.9 -35%	45.15 -35%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -14%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=192, last 2 years) 301%
Random Write 4KB	75.6	18.75 -75%	59.9 -21%	11.93 -84%	66.1 -13%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) -58%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 310%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	86.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	75.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	75.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	61.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -13%

Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26.2 (18-30)

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø28.3 (24-30)

Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (27-31)

Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø29.9 (29-31)

Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø28.1 (24-31)

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø28.2 (25-31)

Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø29.4 (23-31)

Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø29.8 (28-31)

Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø31.2 (30-32)

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø59.9 (55-60)

Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.21.1.2: Ø30.7 (12-32)

Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø30.9 (29-32)

Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø31.2 (29-32)

Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø30.7 (29-31)

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø59.5 (49-60)

Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.21.1.2: Ø29.7 (22-31)

Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø30.4 (29-31)

Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø30.7 (27-32)

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	31 fps
	high HD	31 fps

Asphalt 9: Legends
	Configurações	Valor
	High Quality	28 fps
	Standard / low	26 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32.4 °C	33.5 °C	34.4 °C
32.5 °C	33 °C	34.4 °C
31.9 °C	32.5 °C	34.2 °C

Máximo: 34.4 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C


32.5 °C	33.4 °C	33.1 °C
32.4 °C	32.7 °C	33.1 °C
32.4 °C	32.7 °C	32.1 °C

Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.1 / 1.8 / 2.6 Watt
Carga	4.2 / 6.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh	Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh	Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		4%	29%	5%	-4%	6%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.56 49%	0.6 45%	1.01 8%	1 9%	0.924 ?(0.42 - 1.1, n=5) 16%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Average *	1.8	1.99 -11%	1.81 -1%	2.2 -22%	2.19 -22%	1.748 ?(1.64 - 1.9, n=5) 3%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	2.6	2.05 21%	1.86 28%	2.25 13%	2.2 15%	2.36 ?(1.69 - 2.8, n=5) 9%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 38%
Load Average *	4.2	4.62 -10%	2.78 34%	3.76 10%	4.64 -10%	4.18 ?(3.3 - 5.19, n=5) -0%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -53%
Load Maximum *	6.8	8.94 -31%	4.04 41%	5.56 18%	7.7 -13%	6.6 ?(5.6 - 7.2, n=5) 3%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -41%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 48min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 39min

	Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh	Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh	Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime		-19%	-7%	-40%	-25%
Reader / Idle	1548	1678 8%	1170 -24%	983 -36%	1533 -1%
H.264	819	662 -19%	600 -27%	507 -38%	502 -39%
WiFi v1.3	798	547 -31%	553 -31%	346 -57%	484 -39%
Load	219	150 -32%	338 54%	156 -29%	178 -19%

Pro

+ Boas câmeras

+ Gravação de vídeo em 4K

+ É possível a transmissão em HD

+ Boa duração da bateria WLAN

+ SoC sem limitação de desempenho

+ Carcaça de alta qualidade

Contra

- Estabilidade da carcaça menos que perfeita

- WLAN lento

- Microfone com cortes

- Não muito fluente durante os jogos

- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul

Testing the Motorola Moto G7. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.

Com seu SoC mais potente e a boa qualidade da câmera, o Moto G7 salta um pouco à frente de sua classe, sendo capaz de acompanhar dispositivos ainda mais caros. Como a tela também continua a oferecer um desempenho decente, a carcaça com suas superfícies de vidro toma emprestado da gama alta, e o equipamento de armazenamento é generoso, atestamos o smartphone Motorola com uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.

Temos que procurar pontos fracos: particularmente durante a operação viva voz, o microfone não é muito preciso, a estabilidade da carcaça poderia ter sido melhor, e as velocidades de WLAN e a adequação para jogos são apenas medíocres. Por uma quantidade semelhante de dinheiro, você pode obter dispositivos ainda mais poderosos, como o Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite ou o Nokia 7.1.

No ano passado, teríamos procurado mais na gama alta para muitos detalhes do Motorola Moto G7. Juntamente com o seu baixo preço, isso resulta em muito smartphone por pouco dinheiro.

Nem todos os dispositivos de gama média acessíveis podem oferecer vídeos em 4K, um SoC que não seja limitado, uma bateria de longa duração no teste de WLAN e recursos de localização decentes. Por isso, o Moto G7 recebe uma recomendação clara de nós para todos aqueles que estão procurando um smartphone de gama média confiável e poderoso.

Motorola Moto G7 - 2019-04-02 04/02/2019 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

89%

Teclado

69 / 75 → 92%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

41 / 60 → 68%

Peso

90%

Bateria

95%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

30 / 63 → 47%

Desempenho da aplicação

61 / 70 → 87%

Temperatura

93%

Ruído

100%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

73%

Médio

75%

85%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G7

Florian Schmitt, 2019-02-16 (Update: 2019-02-19)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison