Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G7
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Honor 10 Lite |
|
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 471 cd/m²
Contraste: 942:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.326
Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Motorola Moto G6 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Nokia 7.1 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | Honor 10 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 15% | 11% | -11% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 471 | 421 -11% | 488 4% | 577 23% | 467 -1% |
Brightness | 453 | 389 -14% | 478 6% | 550 21% | 446 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 85 -10% | 95 1% | 91 -3% | 89 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.33 34% | 0.42 16% | 0.36 28% | 0.58 -16% |
Contrast | 942 | 1276 35% | 1162 23% | 1603 70% | 805 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 3.4 38% | 3.9 29% | 7.4 -35% | 1.5 73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.95 | 5.9 26% | 6.8 14% | 15 -89% | 4.5 43% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 3.9 22% | 5.3 -6% | 10.2 -104% | 2.4 52% |
Gamma | 2.326 95% | 2.26 97% | 2.41 91% | 2.29 96% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 7654 85% | 7330 89% | 7146 91% | 9657 67% | 6387 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 100 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6566 - 7498, n=6) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (5785 - 6076, n=6) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (9.9 - 20, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (10 - 11, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6.5 - 15, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6.9 - 7, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Honor 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (97294 - 108408, n=5) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G6 | |
Nokia 7.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (76724 - 87883, n=4) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (42.6 - 45.5, n=5) | |
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (8185 - 8420, n=6) | |
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (4806 - 5037, n=5) | |
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (50 - 58, n=3) | |
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (163 - 171, n=2) | |
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G7 | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | Motorola Moto G6 | Nokia 7.1 | Honor 10 Lite | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -15% | -18% | -32% | -13% | -20% | 422% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 297 | 282.6 -5% | 238.2 -20% | 250.9 -16% | 288.5 -3% | 274 ? -8% | 1839 ? 519% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 216 | 172.4 -20% | 117.2 -46% | 126 -42% | 190.6 -12% | 176.2 ? -18% | 1425 ? 560% |
Random Read 4KB | 69.3 | 81.3 17% | 69.9 1% | 44.9 -35% | 45.15 -35% | 59.4 ? -14% | 277 ? 300% |
Random Write 4KB | 75.6 | 18.75 -75% | 59.9 -21% | 11.93 -84% | 66.1 -13% | 32 ? -58% | 309 ? 309% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 86.9 ? | 85.9 ? -1% | 75.3 ? -13% | 83.5 ? -4% | 75.8 ? -13% | 77.4 ? -11% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 66.8 ? | 64 ? -4% | 61.5 ? -8% | 61.2 ? -8% | 67 ? 0% | 58.3 ? -13% |
Arena of Valor | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
min | 31 fps | ||
high HD | 31 fps |
Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
High Quality | 28 fps | ||
Standard / low | 26 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.1 / 1.8 / 2.6 Watt |
Carga |
4.2 / 6.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 4% | 29% | 5% | -4% | 6% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.1 | 0.56 49% | 0.6 45% | 1.01 8% | 1 9% | 0.924 ? 16% | 0.894 ? 19% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 1.99 -11% | 1.81 -1% | 2.2 -22% | 2.19 -22% | 1.748 ? 3% | 1.456 ? 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.6 | 2.05 21% | 1.86 28% | 2.25 13% | 2.2 15% | 2.36 ? 9% | 1.616 ? 38% |
Load Average * | 4.2 | 4.62 -10% | 2.78 34% | 3.76 10% | 4.64 -10% | 4.18 ? -0% | 6.45 ? -54% |
Load Maximum * | 6.8 | 8.94 -31% | 4.04 41% | 5.56 18% | 7.7 -13% | 6.6 ? 3% | 9.8 ? -44% |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | -7% | -40% | -25% | |
Reader / Idle | 1548 | 1678 8% | 1170 -24% | 983 -36% | 1533 -1% |
H.264 | 819 | 662 -19% | 600 -27% | 507 -38% | 502 -39% |
WiFi v1.3 | 798 | 547 -31% | 553 -31% | 346 -57% | 484 -39% |
Load | 219 | 150 -32% | 338 54% | 156 -29% | 178 -19% |
Pro
Contra
Com seu SoC mais potente e a boa qualidade da câmera, o Moto G7 salta um pouco à frente de sua classe, sendo capaz de acompanhar dispositivos ainda mais caros. Como a tela também continua a oferecer um desempenho decente, a carcaça com suas superfícies de vidro toma emprestado da gama alta, e o equipamento de armazenamento é generoso, atestamos o smartphone Motorola com uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.
Temos que procurar pontos fracos: particularmente durante a operação viva voz, o microfone não é muito preciso, a estabilidade da carcaça poderia ter sido melhor, e as velocidades de WLAN e a adequação para jogos são apenas medíocres. Por uma quantidade semelhante de dinheiro, você pode obter dispositivos ainda mais poderosos, como o Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite ou o Nokia 7.1.
No ano passado, teríamos procurado mais na gama alta para muitos detalhes do Motorola Moto G7. Juntamente com o seu baixo preço, isso resulta em muito smartphone por pouco dinheiro.
Nem todos os dispositivos de gama média acessíveis podem oferecer vídeos em 4K, um SoC que não seja limitado, uma bateria de longa duração no teste de WLAN e recursos de localização decentes. Por isso, o Moto G7 recebe uma recomendação clara de nós para todos aqueles que estão procurando um smartphone de gama média confiável e poderoso.
Motorola Moto G7
- 04/02/2019 v6 (old)
Florian Schmitt