Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Sharp competition.

Nem sempre é necessário gastar $ 800 para comprar um smartphone que tire boas fotos. Pelo menos é isso o que a Motorola afirma com o Moto G7 Plus, que custa cerca de € 300 (~$339). O G7 Plus também possui uma câmera de 16 MP oticamente estabilizada e recursos de software inteligentes.

Stefan Schomberg, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/25/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Motorola Moto G7 Plus (Moto G7 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 8 x 1.8 GHz, Kryo 260

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 509

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.20 polegadas 19:9, 2270 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 47.4 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, Porta USB 3.0 Type-C, fornecimento OTG e de energia (PD)

Funcionamento em rede

Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B19. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B18, B19, B20, B26, B28, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 157 x 75.3

Bateria

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Camera

Webcam: 12 MP, 1.25 μm, LED flash
Primary Camera: 16 MPix , f/1.7, Phase Detection Autofocus, OIS, Dual LED Flash, vídeos de até 2160p/30 FPS. Câmera principal: 5.0 MP, f/2.2, Depth of Field (Secondary Camera)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , 12.0 MPix, vídeos em até 1080p/30 FPS

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo – Fone de ouvido abaixo do dispositivo, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 13/5 – 400 Mbps/75 Mbps. SAR values: Head - 0.788 W/kg. ExFAT support. DRM Widevine L1 certification, fanless

peso

176 g, Suprimento de energia: 88 g

Preço

299 Euro

Links

Motorola página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 (164^min - 362^max) MBit/s +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	311 MBit/s +8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (138^min - 294^max) MBit/s
HTC U12 Life Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	259 (252^min - 263^max) MBit/s -10%
Honor 8X Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	182 (136^min - 231^max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	332 (314^min - 341^max) MBit/s
HTC U12 Life Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	330 (63^min - 342^max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	310 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	279 (265^min - 284^max) MBit/s -16%
Honor 8X Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	207 (162^min - 243^max) MBit/s -38%

Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (314-341)

HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (314-342)

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (265-284)

Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø207 (162-243)

Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø288 (268-294)

HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø259 (252-263)

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø320 (164-362)

Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø182 (136-231)

GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Overview

GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 5T

Olympus Pen E-PL 9

click to load images

Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 5T

Olympus Pen E-PL 9

click to load images

Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 5T

Olympus Pen E-PL 9

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


536 cd/m²	573 cd/m²	527 cd/m²
489 cd/m²	537 cd/m²	514 cd/m²
501 cd/m²	533 cd/m²	515 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 573 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 525 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 537 cd/m²
Contraste: 926:1 (Preto: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.099

	Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	HTC U12 Life IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"	Honor 8X LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9"
Screen		-5%	42%	-5%	34%
Brightness middle	537	468 -13%	570 6%	484 -10%	761 42%
Brightness	525	452 -14%	565 8%	469 -11%	723 38%
Brightness Distribution	85	90 6%	93 9%	93 9%	90 6%
Black Level *	0.58	0.62 -7%		0.55 5%	0.69 -19%
Contrast	926	755 -18%		880 -5%	1103 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.41	6.09 5%	1.5 77%	7.3 -14%	2.4 63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.86	10.23 6%	3.6 67%	11.1 -2%	5.2 52%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.7	6.8 -1%	1.2 82%	7.4 -10%	1.8 73%
Gamma	2.099 ^105%	2.708 ^81%	2.07 ^106%	2.16 ^102%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	8310 ^78%	6972 ^93%	6504 ^100%	8534 ^76%	6312 ^103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2315 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1337 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1338 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1525 Points +14%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1614 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	822 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1323 - 1506, n=11)	1351 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +306%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4992 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4914 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4429 Points -11%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5557 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	4011 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4781 - 5426, n=11)	4960 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +198%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4287 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4465 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4026 Points -6%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4083 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	3763 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4278 - 5041, n=11)	4505 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +178%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7618 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6412 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5625 Points -26%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8939 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5712 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6040 - 7618, n=11)	6624 Points -13%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6277 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5730 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5387 Points -14%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7141 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	4875 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5611 - 6277, n=11)	5833 Points -7%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19525 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19777 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15167 Points -22%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	20468 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	16818 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (19525 - 20404, n=11)	19846 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20953 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20778 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15567 Points -26%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21533 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	18449 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (20610 - 21067, n=11)	20839 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15766 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16924 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13914 Points -12%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17450 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	12845 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (15766 - 19365, n=11)	17020 Points +8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	36 fps +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	28 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (30 - 40, n=12)	34.3 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +145%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	39 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	30 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (35 - 36, n=12)	35.6 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +675%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19 fps +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	13 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (13 - 18, n=12)	15 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +400%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21 fps +31%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	14 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (16 - 16, n=12)	16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +926%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	13 fps +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	9.4 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.7 - 12, n=12)	9.47 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +565%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	14 fps +40%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	9.8 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 10, n=12)	9.68 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +1065%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5.3 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.1 - 7.4, n=12)	5.96 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +692%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps 0%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7.6 fps +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	5.6 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 6.3, n=12)	6.3 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +1016%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.6 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.7 fps +2%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5.2 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4.9 - 6.9, n=9)	5.59 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +780%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps +11%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.6 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.4 - 6.1, n=9)	5.93 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +1370%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	3.6 fps +80%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.1 fps +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2 - 4.4, n=9)	3.27 fps +64%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +1755%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.2 fps -4%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2.2 - 3.5, n=9)	2.36 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +1274%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117557 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	116595 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	122826 Points +4%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	140188 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	90347 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (115565 - 138661, n=11)	118863 Points +1%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	92015 Points
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	95287 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	87728 Points -5%
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	112870 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096	71635 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (92015 - 125213, n=10)	98051 Points +7%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	47.99 Points +5%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)	47.01 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	45.78 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=11)	45.3 Points -1%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)	44.31 Points -3%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +339%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	9165 Points +10%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)	9121 Points +9%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)	9095 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=12)	8665 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	8368 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	4776 ms *
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)	4758 ms * -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 5066, n=12)	4688 ms * +2%
Honor 8X	4248 ms * +11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	4123 ms * +14%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +67%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +172%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)	58 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	57 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (46 - 61, n=9)	54.4 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	54 Points

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	168 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=8)	158 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	156 Points
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)	147 Points -6%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G7 Plus	HTC U12 Life	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018	Honor 8X	Motorola Moto G6 Plus	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-19%	-20%	-12%	-5%	-18%	429%
Sequential Read 256KB	283.6	272.8 -4%	295.8 4%	283.9 0%	286.6 1%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -3%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 547%
Sequential Write 256KB	208.7	209.4 0%	104.9 -50%	170 -19%	216.1 4%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -16%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 583%
Random Read 4KB	76.6	56.7 -26%	84 10%	49.54 -35%	58.4 -24%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -22%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 263%
Random Write 4KB	73.1	16.2 -78%	15.45 -79%	59.9 -18%	62.8 -14%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) -56%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 324%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	82.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	68.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -6%

Game Compare - Asphalt 9: Legends

Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)

Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26 (3-60)

Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)

Game Compare - Shadow Fight 3

Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 1.16.1: Ø47.1 (1-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32 °C	33 °C	34 °C
32 °C	32.6 °C	34.6 °C
32.2 °C	32.5 °C	34.1 °C

Máximo: 34.6 °C
Médio: 33 °C


31.6 °C	33.3 °C	33 °C
31.6 °C	33 °C	33.4 °C
32.2 °C	32.6 °C	32.2 °C

Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 8X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.1 / 1.7 / 2.1 Watt
Carga	5.1 / 7.9 Watt




Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	HTC U12 Life 3600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Honor 8X 3750 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		9%	17%	1%	27%	-4%	2%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.7 36%	0.71 35%	0.92 16%	0.5 55%	0.944 ?(0.6 - 1.75, n=12) 14%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Average *	1.7	1.5 12%	1.36 20%	2.3 -35%	1.78 -5%	2.22 ?(1.4 - 4.48, n=12) -31%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	2.1	2.5 -19%	1.47 30%	2.32 -10%	1.81 14%	2.54 ?(2 - 4.5, n=12) -21%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 23%
Load Average *	5.1	4.7 8%	5.13 -1%	4.37 14%	3.3 35%	4.51 ?(3.65 - 7.92, n=12) 12%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -26%
Load Maximum *	7.9	7.4 6%	7.89 -0%	6.13 22%	5.14 35%	7.37 ?(5.1 - 13.6, n=12) 7%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing		11h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 16min

	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	HTC U12 Life 3600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Honor 8X 3750 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh
Battery Runtime		-16%	9%	19%	24%
H.264	809		836 3%		542 -33%
WiFi v1.3	715	603 -16%	605 -15%	852 19%	702 -2%
Load	196		273 39%		404 106%
Reader / Idle			1467		1846

Pro

+ Excelentes câmeras

+ Suporta vídeos em 4K

+ Transmissão de vídeos em HD

+ Velocidades decentes do Wi-Fi

+ Sem afogamentos no SoC

+ Design premium

+ Ótimo valor pelo dinheiro

Contra

- A tela táctil soa oca

- Tonalidade azul na tela

- A GPU poderia ser mais poderosa

The Motorola Moto G7 Plus smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.

O Motorola Moto G7 Plus é um dispositivo fantástico que redefine o que se espera dos smartphones de gama média. Por pouco menos de € 300 (~$340), a Motorola criou um smartphone com uma excelente câmera, uma tela decente e quase todos os recursos dos carros-chefe modernos. O G7 Plus também tem um visual elegante graças ao seu design contemporâneo e também é bem feito.

O Motorola Moto G7 Plus é um excelente smartphone que pode levar as pessoas a pensar duas vezes antes de comprar um carro-chefe caro. É simplesmente assim de bom.

Infelizmente, o G7 Plus tem seus pontos fracos. A tela táctil soa bastante oca, embora isso possa ser apenas um problema com nossa unidade de análise. A GPU também é fraca, e a Motorola parece ter equipado o dispositivo com uma tela de menor qualidade do que a do seu antecessor. Igualmente, gostaríamos de ver uma bateria maior, mas o carregador incluído recarregará o dispositivo completamente em menos de uma hora. Em suma, o Motorola Moto G7 Plus é um smartphone excepcional pelo preço, e é uma ótima alternativa para os carros-chefe modernos e consideravelmente mais caros.price that is a great alternative to modern, and considerably more expensive, flagships.

Atenção: Publicaremos nossas avaliações finais assim que finalizarmos nossa seção da duração de bateria.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11127 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Stefan Schomberg, 2019-02-25 (Update: 2019-02-27)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Game Compare - Asphalt 9: Legends

Game Compare - Shadow Fight 3

Motorola Moto G7 Plus audio analysis

Honor 8X audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison