Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G6
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 488 cd/m²
Contraste: 1162:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.41
| Motorola Moto G6 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Blade V9 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Honor 9 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -7% | -15% | 8% | -34% | 20% | -44% | |
| Brightness middle | 488 | 490 0% | 459 -6% | 627 28% | 417 -15% | 454 -7% | 458 -6% |
| Brightness | 478 | 502 5% | 437 -9% | 622 30% | 421 -12% | 463 -3% | 473 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 90 -5% | 82 -14% | 88 -7% | 86 -9% | 88 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.43 -2% | 0.62 -48% | 0.41 2% | 0.61 -45% | 0.51 -21% | |
| Contrast | 1162 | 1140 -2% | 740 -36% | 1529 32% | 684 -41% | 898 -23% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 5.7 -46% | 4.5 -15% | 4.5 -15% | 6.1 -56% | 2 49% | 7.1 -82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.8 | 7.8 -15% | 7.3 -7% | 7 -3% | 11.2 -65% | 5.3 22% | 14.5 -113% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 4.7 11% | 4.9 8% | 5.1 4% | 7.1 -34% | 1.7 68% | 10.5 -98% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.4 92% | 2.17 101% | 2.26 97% | 2.16 102% | 2.1 105% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7146 91% | 7526 86% | 7261 90% | 7201 90% | 8362 78% | 6394 102% | 8951 73% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2315 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| ZTE Blade V9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.38 - 5.41, n=2) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| ZTE Blade V9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (129 - 129, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13) | |
| ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14) | |
| ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7) | |
| ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (28 - 34, n=8) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G6 | Motorola Moto G5s | ZTE Blade V9 | Honor 9 Lite | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | -19% | 11% | -35% | -18% | -22% | 628% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 238.2 | 259 9% | 265.4 11% | 269.6 13% | 198.5 -17% | 270.5 14% | 242 ? 2% | 1847 ? 675% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 117.2 | 77.5 -34% | 119.4 2% | 138.2 18% | 53 -55% | 139.6 19% | 100.5 ? -14% | 1436 ? 1125% |
| Random Read 4KB | 69.9 | 40.6 -42% | 29.81 -57% | 68.4 -2% | 25.86 -63% | 37.97 -46% | 43.2 ? -38% | 277 ? 296% |
| Random Write 4KB | 59.9 | 46.2 -23% | 12.47 -79% | 66.8 12% | 10.54 -82% | 12.07 -80% | 22.4 ? -63% | 308 ? 414% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.3 ? | 84.1 ? 12% | 83.9 ? 11% | 83.1 ? 10% | 76.1 ? 1% | 78.7 ? 5% | 71.8 ? -5% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.5 ? | 62.3 ? 1% | 62.1 ? 1% | 71.9 ? 17% | 63.9 ? 4% | 49.77 ? -19% | 52.9 ? -14% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 30 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Smooth | 26 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.19 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.6 / 1.81 / 1.86 Watt |
| Carga |
2.78 / 4.04 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V9 3200 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | -3% | -20% | -4% | 35% | -23% | -33% | -59% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.67 -12% | 0.71 -18% | 0.85 -42% | 0.67 -12% | 0.39 35% | 0.67 -12% | 0.794 ? -32% | 0.895 ? -49% |
| Idle Average * | 1.81 | 1.4 23% | 1.73 4% | 2 -10% | 1.76 3% | 1.06 41% | 1.7 6% | 2.27 ? -25% | 1.453 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.86 | 1.52 18% | 1.78 4% | 2.04 -10% | 1.78 4% | 1.08 42% | 1.78 4% | 2.48 ? -33% | 1.613 ? 13% |
| Load Average * | 2.78 | 4.56 -64% | 2.74 1% | 3.23 -16% | 2.82 -1% | 1.82 35% | 4.42 -59% | 3.95 ? -42% | 6.5 ? -134% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.04 | 7.05 -75% | 4.36 -8% | 4.93 -22% | 4.56 -13% | 3.21 21% | 6.3 -56% | 5.38 ? -33% | 9.86 ? -144% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V9 3200 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 43% | -8% | 67% | 18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1170 | 1233 5% | 965 -18% | 1950 67% | 1840 57% | |
| H.264 | 600 | 645 8% | 622 4% | 1096 83% | 644 7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 553 | 518 -6% | 790 43% | 601 9% | 904 63% | 730 32% |
| Load | 338 | 225 -33% | 253 -25% | 525 55% | 254 -25% |
Pro
Contra
Depois de apenas seis meses, a Motorola oferece a mais recente adição da popular série G aos clientes. Com uma nova tela,vidro treseiro, uma câmera dupla e o novo Snapdragon 450, o salto é maior que aquele entre o Moto G5 e o G5s.
Também temos que enfatizar positivamente que o fabricante não aumentou o preço. Com um preço de 249 Euros (~$298; cerca de $250 nos EUA) na introdução no mercado, ainda está bem perto de alguns concorrentes mais poderosos que já estão disponíveis há algum tempo, como o Breve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X Pro ou o Moto X4, por exemplo. No entanto, isso mudará nos próximos meses, quando o preço cair lentamente.
Visualmente, o Motorola Moto G6 parece um Moto X4 Light e mantém muitas características positivas de seu modelo irmão maior.
Motorola Moto G6
- 05/07/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
