Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G6 Plus
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 761 cd/m²
Contraste: 1103:1 (Preto: 0.69 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Motorola Moto G5s Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia XA2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -29% | -71% | -85% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 761 | 512 -33% | 513 -33% | 417 -45% | 482 -37% |
| Brightness | 723 | 500 -31% | 506 -30% | 421 -42% | 472 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 90 0% | 93 3% | 88 -2% | 90 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.69 | 0.35 49% | 0.42 39% | 0.61 12% | 0.33 52% |
| Contrast | 1103 | 1463 33% | 1221 11% | 684 -38% | 1461 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 4.6 -92% | 5 -108% | 6.1 -154% | 3.2 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 7.6 -46% | 11.4 -119% | 11.2 -115% | 5.4 -4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.8 -111% | 7.8 -333% | 7.1 -294% | 2.2 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.11 104% | 2.2 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6312 103% | 6952 93% | 7964 82% | 8362 78% | 6581 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2336 Hz | ≤ 6 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 6 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11) | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 () | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Motorola Moto G5s Plus | Sony Xperia XA2 | Nokia 6 2018 | HTC U11 | Motorola Moto G6 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -26% | -24% | -27% | 31% | -10% | -14% | 479% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 286.6 | 237.4 -17% | 271.5 -5% | 272.6 -5% | 717 150% | 238.2 -17% | 274 ? -4% | 1894 ? 561% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 216.1 | 75.7 -65% | 127.4 -41% | 118.3 -45% | 206.4 -4% | 117.2 -46% | 176.6 ? -18% | 1476 ? 583% |
| Random Read 4KB | 58.4 | 37.94 -35% | 43.07 -26% | 38.78 -34% | 91.4 57% | 69.9 20% | 59.4 ? 2% | 278 ? 376% |
| Random Write 4KB | 62.8 | 44.89 -29% | 13.82 -78% | 15.3 -76% | 80 27% | 59.9 -5% | 32.2 ? -49% | 312 ? 397% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.7 ? | 79.6 ? -5% | 86 ? 3% | 83.4 ? 0% | 68.8 ? -18% | 75.3 ? -10% | 77.4 ? -8% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.1 ? | 58.8 ? -5% | 64.8 ? 4% | 61.3 ? -1% | 46.25 ? -26% | 61.5 ? -1% | 58.3 ? -6% |
| Temple Run 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| default | 60 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.5 / 1.78 / 1.81 Watt |
| Carga |
3.3 / 5.14 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | 10% | -1% | -30% | 2% | -18% | -48% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.5 | 0.83 -66% | 0.39 22% | 0.67 -34% | 0.73 -46% | 0.6 -20% | 0.732 ? -46% | 0.883 ? -77% |
| Idle Average * | 1.78 | 1.67 6% | 1.61 10% | 1.76 1% | 1.96 -10% | 1.81 -2% | 1.835 ? -3% | 1.467 ? 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.81 | 1.85 -2% | 1.62 10% | 1.78 2% | 1.98 -9% | 1.86 -3% | 2.16 ? -19% | 1.621 ? 10% |
| Load Average * | 3.3 | 3.47 -5% | 3.12 5% | 2.82 15% | 4.82 -46% | 2.78 16% | 3.81 ? -15% | 6.58 ? -99% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.14 | 5.41 -5% | 4.92 4% | 4.56 11% | 7.15 -39% | 4.04 21% | 5.62 ? -9% | 9.91 ? -93% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 19% | 12% | -27% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1846 | 1496 -19% | 2503 36% | 1833 -1% | 1250 -32% | 1170 -37% |
| H.264 | 542 | 766 41% | 675 25% | 498 -8% | 600 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 702 | 974 39% | 886 26% | 942 34% | 560 -20% | 553 -21% |
| Load | 404 | 419 4% | 298 -26% | 362 -10% | 212 -48% | 338 -16% |
Pro
Contra
O Moto G6 Plus é a culminação da atual série Moto G6 da Motorola. Assim, o hardware está em forte contraste com o dos outros modelos G6. Em comparação com outros smartphones por cerca de 300 Euros (~$355), o G6 Plus se destaca em pouquíssimas áreas, consistindo principalmente da câmera e dos recursos adicionais do software Moto. Os valores de desempenho puro infelizmente não são suficientes para colocar os rivais em algum tipo de predicamento.
Com o Moto G6 Plus, a Motorola está oferecendo um poderoso smartphone de gama média. No entanto, é cercado não apenas por rivais externos, mas também pelas boas alternativas das próprias fileiras da Motorola.
Os compradores do G6 Plus receberão um smartphone que certamente atende às expectativas de um dispositivo de gama média. Compradores potenciais orientados para o orçamento podem ser melhor atendidos com o Moto G5. Se a câmera inferior não tiver alta relevância, o desempenho deste smartphone é quase o mesmo que o do modelo do sucessor. Além disso, outros fabricantes também oferecem smartphones poderosos na faixa de 300 euros. No final, a preferência pessoal será o fator decisivo em qual dispositivo escolher.
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
- 06/04/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
