Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G5s
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 490 cd/m²
Contraste: 1140:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4
| Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | BQ Aquaris X LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2" | Nokia 5 IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Motorola Moto G5s Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 1% | -4% | 12% | 26% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 490 | 675 38% | 630 29% | 448 -9% | 660 35% | 512 4% |
| Brightness | 502 | 702 40% | 635 26% | 451 -10% | 625 25% | 500 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 91 -1% | 90 -2% | 91 -1% | 92 0% | 90 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.59 -37% | 0.57 -33% | 0.29 33% | 0.35 19% | |
| Contrast | 1140 | 1144 0% | 1105 -3% | 2276 100% | 1463 28% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 4.5 21% | 5 12% | 2.7 53% | 4.9 14% | 4.6 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.8 | 9.1 -17% | 8.7 -12% | 9.8 -26% | 7.6 3% | 7.6 3% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 6.4 -36% | 6.9 -47% | 1.6 66% | 4.8 -2% | 3.8 19% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.37 93% | 2.06 107% | 2.18 101% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 7526 86% | 7478 87% | 8736 74% | 6557 99% | 7357 88% | 6952 93% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 6 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 6 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G5s | BQ Aquaris X | Nokia 5 | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | Lenovo Moto G5 | Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | -14% | -36% | -15% | -5% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 259 | 266.4 3% | 255.6 -1% | 204.4 -21% | 230.6 -11% | 237.4 -8% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 77.5 | 75.3 -3% | 74.9 -3% | 52 -33% | 45.6 -41% | 75.7 -2% |
| Random Read 4KB | 40.6 | 37.47 -8% | 40.54 0% | 24.07 -41% | 37.6 -7% | 37.94 -7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 46.2 | 11.85 -74% | 8.39 -82% | 9.9 -79% | 37.9 -18% | 44.89 -3% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.1 ? | 84.3 ? 0% | 83.9 0% | 72.2 ? -14% | 78.5 ? -7% | 79.6 ? -5% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.3 ? | 62.6 ? 0% | 62 0% | 44.21 ? -29% | 58 ? -7% | 58.8 ? -6% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G5s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto G5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.23 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.67 / 1.4 / 1.52 Watt |
| Carga |
4.56 / 7.05 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | Nokia 5 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | 5% | 36% | 0% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 1.12 -67% | 0.52 22% | 0.52 22% | 0.73 -9% | 0.83 -24% |
| Idle Average * | 1.4 | 2.16 -54% | 1.78 -27% | 1.17 16% | 1.64 -17% | 1.67 -19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.52 | 2.18 -43% | 1.96 -29% | 1.24 18% | 1.68 -11% | 1.85 -22% |
| Load Average * | 4.56 | 2.94 36% | 3.23 29% | 1.66 64% | 3.46 24% | 3.47 24% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.05 | 5.1 28% | 4.88 31% | 2.94 58% | 6.13 13% | 5.41 23% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | Nokia 5 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 14% | 37% | 53% | -1% | 65% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1233 | 1772 44% | 1564 27% | 1243 1% | 1496 21% | |
| H.264 | 645 | 790 22% | 917 42% | 616 -4% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 518 | 592 14% | 713 38% | 738 42% | 561 8% | 974 88% |
| Load | 225 | 323 44% | 449 100% | 207 -8% | 419 86% |
Pro
Contra
O Moto G5s é uma evolução bem sucedida do seu antecessor e mudou menos do que parece à primeira vista: mais memória, câmera melhorada, tela maior e um novo alto-falante. Além disso, os novos sensores da câmera funcionam de forma muito decente: as fotos tiradas com a câmera principal estão no lado frio, mas o sensor corrige bem as condições de iluminação adversas. A câmera frontal confirma essas descobertas.
O smartphone não apresenta falhas graves: a tela é mais escura do que a do antecessor e seu consumo de energia é um pouco alto demais. Além disso, o alto-falante respeitável deve ser ajustado com um equalizador para corrigir os altos enfatizados demais. O microfone também é bastante medíocre. Em troca, o software funciona sem problemas e vem sem bloatware. O dispositivo também permanece frio.
Mesmo com a bateria maior, a duração da bateria não melhorou e, considerando tudo, uma atualização desde o Moto G5 não vale a pena. Se você estiver, no entanto, decidindo entre optar pelo G5 e o G5s, depende da importância da bateria removível do G5 para você. Caso contrário, optar pelo G5 é certamente uma boa, pois vem com mais memória e uma câmera melhorada. O G5s Plus vem com uma câmera dupla que não constitui uma vantagem drástica, embora a CPU e GPU notavelmente mais rápidas possam justificar a diferença no preço.
O Motorola Moto G5s é um produto intermediário de sucesso que não oferece inovação revolucionária. Em vez disso, ele vem com melhorias de alguns detalhes, mas uma ou outra mudança para pior também: sua tela, por exemplo, é mais escura do que a do antecessor. Tudo considerado, o Moto G5s parece ser um negócio bem equilibrado que encontra seu lugar no gama média baixa.
No geral, o Moto G5s ganhou o seu lugar na família da série Moto G e pode manter o nível contra smartphones com preços similares de outros fabricantes.
Motorola Moto G5s
- 12/07/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
