Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G Pro - Smartphone com Stylus barato

Name: Motorola Moto G Pro
Brand: Motorola

O primeiro telefone com caneta da Motorola.

Um smartphone acessível com uma caneta - geralmente, essa combinação é rara. No entanto, a Motorola está agitando o pote ao tornar o Moto G Pro uma proposta interessante: Por 330 euros (~$ 390), os compradores obtêm um smartphone de gama média de 6,4 polegadas com uma caneta integrada e Android One.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/06/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G Pro (Moto G Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.40 polegadas 19.2:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, FHD+, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 109.2 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giróscopio, sensor de proximidade, sensor de luz ambiente, sensor hub, sensor de digitais, Wi-Fi Direct

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (banda 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (banda 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (banda 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), head SAR 1.52 W/kg, body SAR 1.58 W/kg, Dual SIM, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.2 x 158.6 x 75.8

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1.7, 1.6 µm) + 16 MP wide-angle lens (f/2.2, 2.0 µm) + 2-MP macro lens (f/2.2), laser autofocus, videos at up to UHD@30FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1 µm, vídeos de até Full HD@30FPS

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo Dolby, Teclado: virtual, Stylus, carregador modular de 18-watts, cabo USB (Type-C para Type-A), SIM tool, guia de início rápido, informação de garantia, Android One, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

192 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g

Links

Motorola página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
77.2 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Motorola Moto G Pro SD 665, Adreno 610	192 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	2300x1080
79.3 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T SD 665, Adreno 610	200 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
78.1 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610	197 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	2300x1080
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18	199 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
80.3 % v6 ^(old)	10/2018	LG Q Stylus MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2	172 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	2160x1080

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T LG Q Stylus Motorola Moto G Pro Motorola Moto G8 Power DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	415 (295^min - 452^max) MBit/s +24%
Motorola Moto G Pro Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 340^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	278 (218^min - 305^max) MBit/s -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 (2^min - 75^max) MBit/s -87%
LG Q Stylus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash	36 (2^min - 52^max) MBit/s -89%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	370 (342^min - 372^max) MBit/s +12%
Motorola Moto G Pro Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	329 (313^min - 345^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	315 (157^min - 352^max) MBit/s -4%
LG Q Stylus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash	61.5 (43^min - 58^max) MBit/s -81%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	56.5 (11^min - 75^max) MBit/s -83%

Motorola Moto G Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-345)

Motorola Moto G Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (326-340)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1 Daylight scene 2 Low-light environment

click to load images

Motorola Moto G Pro

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

click to load images

Motorola Moto G Pro

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

click to load images

Motorola Moto G Pro

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 10.72 ∆E min: 1.62 - max: 17.25 ∆E


723 cd/m²	720 cd/m²	743 cd/m²
730 cd/m²	735 cd/m²	739 cd/m²
725 cd/m²	732 cd/m²	738 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 743 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 731.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 735 cd/m²
Contraste: 1470:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342

	Motorola Moto G Pro IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	LG Q Stylus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2"
Screen		11%	-19%	-16%	-7%
Brightness middle	735	628 -15%	462 -37%	510 -31%	458 -38%
Brightness	732	631 -14%	483 -34%	536 -27%	441 -40%
Brightness Distribution	97	93 -4%	93 -4%	91 -6%	94 -3%
Black Level *	0.5	0.54 -8%	0.65 -30%		0.51 -2%
Contrast	1470	1163 -21%	711 -52%		898 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.84	2 66%	5.7 2%	6.6 -13%	4.5 23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.2	5.1 50%	8.9 13%	17.56 -72%	7.1 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.9	3.7 37%	6.5 -10%	2.9 51%	5.1 14%
Gamma	2.342 ^94%	2.17 ^101%	2.303 ^96%	2.242 ^98%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	7897 ^82%	6230 ^104%	8073 ^81%	6989 ^93%	7381 ^88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

59.5 Hz

≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	310 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	313 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	311 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (309 - 314, n=8)	311 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=177, last 2 years)	1045 Points +237%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1358 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1390 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1385 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1256 - 1421, n=8)	1356 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=177, last 2 years)	3488 Points +157%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	365 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	368 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	368 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 368, n=5)	366 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points +1950%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	450 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	432 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	464 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (432 - 483, n=5)	455 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points +1667%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8952 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8804 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6571 Points -27%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	4101 Points -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10)	8163 Points -9%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6962 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6587 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6963 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5851 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12)	6985 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24593 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23388 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25046 Points +2%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	9905 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22445 - 25046, n=11)	23846 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24804 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24871 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25161 Points +1%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	9864 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15403 - 25351, n=11)	24085 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23884 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19349 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24652 Points +3%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	10050 Points -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17865 - 24652, n=11)	20749 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1734 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1744 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1764 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4734 Points +173%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	123 Points -93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1675 - 1795, n=12)	1751 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=25, last 2 years)	4239 Points +144%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1607 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1616 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1626 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5586 Points +248%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	98 Points -94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1564 - 1663, n=12)	1623 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=25, last 2 years)	4795 Points +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2395 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2412 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2507 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3087 Points +29%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1172 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2282 - 2596, n=12)	2427 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=25, last 2 years)	3303 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1785 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1809 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3744 Points +110%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	565 Points -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1754 - 1810, n=12)	1787 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=72, last 2 years)	11215 Points +529%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1668 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1663 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1678 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3958 Points +137%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	495 Points -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1650 - 1692, n=12)	1669 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=72, last 2 years)	19933 Points +1095%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2344 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2399 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3148 Points +34%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1112 Points -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2199 - 2503, n=12)	2369 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=72, last 2 years)	5021 Points +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1126 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1076 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1137 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4022 Points +257%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	112 Points -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1076 - 1152, n=12)	1119 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=69, last 2 years)	3014 Points +168%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	978 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	927 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	984 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4422 Points +352%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	89 Points -91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (927 - 999, n=12)	970 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=69, last 2 years)	3179 Points +225%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2399 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2468 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3056 Points +27%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1172 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2212 - 2580, n=12)	2418 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=69, last 2 years)	3259 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1137 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1139 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1151 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4291 Points +277%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	379 Points -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1097 - 1151, n=11)	1135 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=165, last 2 years)	8287 Points +629%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	988 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4806 Points +385%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	319 Points -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 999, n=11)	988 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=165, last 2 years)	12507 Points +1163%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2369 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2410 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2488 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3120 Points +32%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1110 Points -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2154 - 2541, n=11)	2377 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=165, last 2 years)	4769 Points +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1044 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1035 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1047 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3613 Points +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1035 - 1140, n=12)	1074 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2785 Points +167%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	897 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	904 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4201 Points +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (897 - 995, n=12)	933 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3011 Points +232%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2185 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2232 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2354 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3120 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2185 - 2444, n=12)	2281 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2683 Points +23%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	35 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	33 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	58 fps +66%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	16 fps -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10)	35.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=176, last 2 years)	86.5 fps +147%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	80 fps +122%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	17 fps -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10)	35.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=176, last 2 years)	297 fps +725%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	18 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	57 fps +185%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	6.7 fps -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10)	20.7 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=176, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +281%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	73 fps +284%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	7.1 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10)	19.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=176, last 2 years)	175.5 fps +824%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	14 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	12 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	46 fps +229%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	4.5 fps -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10)	14.6 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=176, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +377%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	24 fps +85%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	4.7 fps -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10)	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=176, last 2 years)	124.7 fps +859%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.7 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.6 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	25 fps +225%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2.4 fps -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5.7 - 13, n=10)	7.69 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=177, last 2 years)	49.6 fps +544%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	29 fps +308%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2.5 fps -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)	7.07 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=176, last 2 years)	75.2 fps +959%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.4 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	28 fps +226%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2 fps -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12)	9.14 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=209, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +492%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	31 fps +283%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	2.3 fps -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)	8.13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=209, last 2 years)	85.5 fps +956%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.4 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.5 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	17 fps +233%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1.3 fps -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)	5.53 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=210, last 2 years)	39.4 fps +673%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	11 fps +293%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	0.86 fps -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)	2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=210, last 2 years)	34.5 fps +1132%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	173930 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	168901 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	329860 Points +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9)	171951 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2315 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2238 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3393 Points +47%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	882 Points -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2001 - 2556, n=9)	2271 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=161, last 2 years)	6467 Points +179%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4666 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4848 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5707 Points +22%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	1868 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4391 - 5089, n=9)	4825 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=161, last 2 years)	10321 Points +121%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2765 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2864 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2771 Points 0%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	778 Points -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1804 - 3174, n=9)	2681 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=161, last 2 years)	7017 Points +154%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1907 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1931 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6444 Points +238%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	633 Points -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1881 - 1932, n=9)	1906 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)	17962 Points +842%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1168 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	935 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	1300 Points +11%
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072	657 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (926 - 1400, n=9)	1101 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=161, last 2 years)	1572 Points +35%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)	125.2 Points +301%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	32.26 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	31.22 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)	29.2 Points -6%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	62.9 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	48.85 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	48.11 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)	47.5 Points -3%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	19.17 Points -61%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=153, last 2 years)	143.5 runs/min +399%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)	39 runs/min +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)	28.9 runs/min +1%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	28.73 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=80, last 2 years)	149.9 Points +173%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	72 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	56 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	55 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)	50.9 Points -7%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)	25 Points -55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=213, last 2 years)	38624 Points +322%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	12933 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	9153 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)	8901 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	8675 Points -5%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	3474 Points -62%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	13203 ms * -198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)	4783 ms * -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	4664 ms * -5%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	4434 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	3189 ms * +28%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)	1515 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G Pro	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T	Motorola Moto G8 Power	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite	LG Q Stylus	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		2%	0%	52%	-30%	-3%	413%
Sequential Read 256KB	294.1	315.8 7%	300.9 2%	777 164%	241.7 -18%	284 ?(106.7 - 511, n=77) -3%	1893 ?(226 - 4512, n=200, last 2 years) 544%
Sequential Write 256KB	233.6	173.9 -26%	181.9 -22%	190.8 -18%	121.4 -48%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=77) -17%	1478 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=200, last 2 years) 533%
Random Read 4KB	65.5	90.4 38%	57.7 -12%	132 102%	31.45 -52%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=77) 26%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=200, last 2 years) 324%
Random Write 4KB	89.4	91.2 2%	132.6 48%	142 59%	12.07 -86%	55.4 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=77) -38%	312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=200, last 2 years) 249%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	69.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	73.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	83.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	55.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	52.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	49.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%	59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	63.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) 11%

Motorola Moto G Pro; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø24.8 (16-27)

Motorola Moto G Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø11.6 (4-25)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


43.7 °C	39.9 °C	38.2 °C
43.9 °C	39.6 °C	38.4 °C
42.1 °C	39 °C	38.4 °C

Máximo: 43.9 °C
Médio: 40.4 °C


37.6 °C	39.7 °C	44.1 °C
36.8 °C	39.7 °C	42.6 °C
35.9 °C	38.9 °C	41.3 °C

Máximo: 44.1 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	1.6 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watt
Carga	4.2 / 6.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh	LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		30%	30%	-9%	34%	17%	4%
Idle Minimum *	1.6	0.62 61%	0.9 44%	0.9 44%	0.69 57%	1.017 ?(0.62 - 1.7, n=11) 36%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years) 45%
Idle Average *	2.3	1.77 23%	1.3 43%	1.6 30%	1.7 26%	1.893 ?(1.3 - 2.3, n=11) 18%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) 36%
Idle Maximum *	2.8	1.8 36%	1.6 43%	1.9 32%	1.73 38%	2.36 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=11) 16%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) 42%
Load Average *	4.2	3.42 19%	3.2 24%	8.4 -100%	3.21 24%	3.77 ?(2.61 - 4.7, n=11) 10%	6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) -57%
Load Maximum *	6.9	6.14 11%	7.1 -3%	10.3 -49%	5.31 23%	6.66 ?(5.12 - 7.7, n=11) 3%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) -44%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		40h 50min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 50min

	Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh	LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-4%	27%	5%	-39%
Reader / Idle	2450			2205 -10%	1529 -38%
H.264	882			1071 21%	527 -40%
WiFi v1.3	792	764 -4%	1002 27%	904 14%	419 -47%
Load	290			274 -6%	200 -31%

Pro

+ Stylus integrado

+ Android One

+ NFC

+ Wi-Fi rápido

+ Boa câmera

+ Tela IPS brilhante

+ Bons alto-falantes Dolby

Contra

- Apenas um slot dual SIM híbrido

- PWM

- Capacidade limitada para os jogos

Veredicto - O Motorola Moto G Pro é uma força a ser avaliada

In review: Motorol Moto G Pro. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany

Um smartphone barato com uma caneta - com o Moto G Pro, a Motorola preencheu esse nicho e lançou um concorrente sério para a série Galaxy Note da Samsung.

Por 330 euros (~$ 390), os compradores obtêm um smartphone de gama média bem equipado com uma caneta que, embora não possa corresponder à precisão do seu homólogo da Samsung, é adequado para o uso diário.

Se você está procurando um smartphone barato com uma caneta, o Motorola Moto G Pro definitivamente vale a pena considerar.

Nossa única reclamação em relação à caneta está relacionada ao nome do telefone - "Moto G Pro" não sugere de forma alguma que os usuários do smartphone se beneficiem das vantagens que as entradas da caneta podem oferecer. Embora seja interessante que a versão americana do Moto G Pro seja chamada de "Moto G Stylus", seu conjunto de recursos é pior: Não há suporte para dual SIM nem NFC e, em vez do carregador de 18 watts, ele vem apenas com um modelo de 10 watts.

De volta ao Moto G Pro: Além de sua caneta e das outras vantagens mencionadas, a experiência do usuário é aprimorada por recursos como alto-falantes Dolby, uma tela IPS brilhante, uma boa câmera e Wi-Fi rápido. Como um dispositivo Android One, é garantido o recebimento de atualizações de software nos próximos dois anos.

Motorola Moto G Pro - 07/14/2020 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

82%

Teclado

60 / 75 → 81%

Mouse

87%

Conectividade

43 / 70 → 61%

Peso

89%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

13 / 64 → 20%

Desempenho da aplicação

59 / 86 → 68%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

63%

Médio

72%

77%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G Pro - Smartphone com Stylus barato

Manuel Masiero, 2020-08- 6 (Update: 2020-08-10)

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - O Motorola Moto G Pro é uma força a ser avaliada

More articles related to this device

Price comparison