Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto E5 Plus
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Ulefone Armor X | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Ulefone Armor X | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
Contraste: 609:1 (Preto: 0.85 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.318
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Ulefone Armor X IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Umidigi S2 Lite IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 25% | 27% | -1% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 518 | 564 9% | 701 35% | 417 -19% | 425 -18% |
| Brightness | 481 | 541 12% | 720 50% | 394 -18% | 425 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 87 0% | 87 0% | 93 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.85 | 0.37 56% | 0.5 41% | 0.52 39% | 0.37 56% |
| Contrast | 609 | 1524 150% | 1402 130% | 802 32% | 1149 89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.47 | 5.1 -14% | 4.97 -11% | 5.8 -30% | 4.7 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.04 | 9.6 -19% | 13.31 -66% | 9.5 -18% | 8.3 -3% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 5.4 -0% | 3.3 39% | 5.2 4% | 4.6 15% |
| Gamma | 2.318 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.2 100% | 2.76 80% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7134 91% | 7755 84% | 8056 81% | 7467 87% | 7445 87% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2294 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2294 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2294 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor X | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor X | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus | |
| Ulefone Armor X | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=10) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus | |
| Ulefone Armor X | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (29054 - 39106, n=17) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus | Ulefone Armor X | Umidigi S2 Lite | Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -33% | -29% | -26% | -42% | -25% | 606% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 248.5 | 255.3 3% | 271 9% | 273 10% | 194.4 -22% | 242 ? -3% | 1887 ? 659% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 137.9 | 82.8 -40% | 75 -46% | 70.8 -49% | 42 -70% | 100.5 ? -27% | 1471 ? 967% |
| Random Read 4KB | 62.7 | 14.7 -77% | 36.4 -42% | 39.3 -37% | 19.15 -69% | 43.2 ? -31% | 278 ? 343% |
| Random Write 4KB | 56.1 | 10.17 -82% | 11.6 -79% | 12.3 -78% | 29.4 -48% | 22.4 ? -60% | 311 ? 454% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.9 ? | 81.5 ? -3% | 77.5 -8% | 84.4 ? 1% | 66.3 -21% | 71.8 ? -14% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.7 ? | 62.6 ? 3% | 56.5 -7% | 57.8 ? -5% | 46.6 -23% | 52.9 ? -13% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto E5 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt |
| Carga |
3.2 / 4.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus 5000 mAh | Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh | Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL 5000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | -30% | -1% | 0% | -29% | -36% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 1.22 -36% | 0.8 11% | 0.67 26% | 0.89 1% | 1.113 ? -24% | 0.88 ? 2% |
| Idle Average * | 1.5 | 2.07 -38% | 1.6 -7% | 1.63 -9% | 1.87 -25% | 2.19 ? -46% | 1.444 ? 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 2.14 -7% | 3.5 -75% | 1.77 11% | 1.98 1% | 2.55 ? -28% | 1.6 ? 20% |
| Load Average * | 3.2 | 4.92 -54% | 4.6 -44% | 3.68 -15% | 3.04 5% | 4.32 ? -35% | 6.57 ? -105% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.9 | 5.4 -10% | 6.5 -33% | 5.84 -19% | 4.01 18% | 5.5 ? -12% | 9.91 ? -102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus 5000 mAh | Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh | Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL 5000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1078 | 845 -22% | 645 -40% | 952 -12% | 788 -27% |
Pro
Contra
O Motorola Moto E5 Plus é um smartphone grande com uma bateria de longa duração, uma tela grande, desempenho suficiente e um design elegante. Ele herda o lento Wi-Fi de seu predecessor, e agora ele também vem com aplicativos bloatware. O brilho da tela é distribuído de forma desigual e o valor de preto é atrozmente alto. O trem da negatividade para neste lugar: O armazenamento interno é rápido, o smartphone nunca superaquece e o consumo de energia está dentro da norma. Quando comparado com o predecessor Moto E4 Plus, nosso dispositivo de análise oferece melhor duração da bateria e mais desempenho. O Moto E5 Plus também possui boas câmeras, quando comparado a outros smartphones nessa faixa de preço.
Aqueles que precisam de um smartphone com um longo tempo de duração da bateria não ficarão decepcionados com o Moto E5 Plus. No entanto, o fabricante deve fazer algumas melhorias na tela na próxima geração.
É difícil encontrar um smartphone que dure tanto quanto o Motorola Moto E5 Plus. No entanto, a longa duração da bateria tem um custo associado a ela: O smartphone pesa um pouco. Tudo somado, o Moto E5 Plus oferece não apenas uma boa relação preço-bateria, mas também uma boa relação preço-desempenho.
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
- 11/07/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
