Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto E4

Removível. Neste caso, queremos dizer isso de forma positiva, dado que a bateria pode ser removida no Moto E4. O smartphone também é bastante acessível e oferece um sensor de digitais. No teste você descobrirá se a concorrência precisa se preparar para ele.
Lenovo Moto E4 (Moto E Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD de até 32 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 144 x 72.9
Bateria
10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @720p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante na borda inferior, Teclado: teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat.4 (150 MBit/s download, 50 MBit/s upload); SAR value: 0,553 W/kg (head), 1,27 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
151 g, Suprimento de energia: 56 g
Preço
159 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4

Size Comparison

144 mm 72.3 mm 9.5 mm 139 g144 mm 72.9 mm 8.9 mm 151 g144.8 mm 72.1 mm 8.1 mm 142 g143.8 mm 72.2 mm 8.85 mm 150 g143.8 mm 71.6 mm 8.5 mm 141 g143.2 mm 70.3 mm 8.2 mm 148 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s +16%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s +8%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s +7%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s +7%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s +6%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.1 MBit/s +26%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s +15%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47 MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s +9%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s +1%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – crossroads
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – crossroads
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – woods
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – woods

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Picture taken of reference card
Picture taken of reference card
Detail of reference card
Detail of reference card
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
511
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 511 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 474 cd/m² Minimum: 7.21 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 488 cd/m²
Contraste: 1627:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Lenovo Moto E4
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5"
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Lenovo Moto E3
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen
22%
8%
-51%
-35%
-16%
Brightness middle
488
438
-10%
502
3%
418
-14%
358
-27%
436
-11%
Brightness
474
432
-9%
494
4%
418
-12%
351
-26%
420
-11%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
89
2%
92
6%
93
7%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.3
0.13
57%
0.35
-17%
0.45
-50%
0.49
-63%
0.41
-37%
Contrast
1627
3369
107%
1434
-12%
929
-43%
731
-55%
1063
-35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.4
4.8
11%
4.6
15%
9.7
-80%
7.1
-31%
5.4
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9
11.4
-27%
8
11%
18.9
-110%
14.9
-66%
10
-11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
3.2
42%
2.5
55%
11.3
-105%
6.5
-18%
7
-27%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.23 99%
2.29 96%
2.27 97%
2.12 104%
2.13 103%
CCT
7397 88%
7090 92%
6351 102%
10414 62%
8166 80%
8318 78%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
30856 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points +16%
Gigaset GS170
30144 Points -2%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto E3
20542 Points -33%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
3518 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points +31%
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points -5%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points +33%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
2674 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points +28%
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points -3%
LG K8 2017
2986 Points +12%
Lenovo Moto E3
2087 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
531 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points +33%
Gigaset GS170
538 Points +1%
LG K8 2017
371 Points -30%
Lenovo Moto E3
418 Points -21%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
1077 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points +30%
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points +9%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto E3
817 Points -24%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
576 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points +83%
Gigaset GS170
610 Points +6%
LG K8 2017
634 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto E3
401 Points -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
208 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points +21%
Gigaset GS170
210 Points +1%
LG K8 2017
436 Points +110%
Lenovo Moto E3
177 Points -15%
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
617 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points +7%
Gigaset GS170
558 Points -10%
LG K8 2017
616 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto E3
528 Points -14%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
530 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points +20%
Gigaset GS170
581 Points +10%
LG K8 2017
642 Points +21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
1532 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points +21%
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points +4%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points +13%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
938 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1135 Points +21%
LG K8 2017
1203 Points +28%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
3671 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points +19%
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points 0%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points -20%
Lenovo Moto E3
3127 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
3168 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points +18%
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points 0%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points -20%
Lenovo Moto E3
2694 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
8266 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points +38%
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points -1%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto E3
7156 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
155 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points -26%
Gigaset GS170
152 Points -2%
LG K8 2017
39 Points -75%
Lenovo Moto E3
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
126 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points -27%
Gigaset GS170
227 Points +80%
LG K8 2017
31 Points -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
774 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points +20%
Gigaset GS170
781 Points +1%
LG K8 2017
622 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
106 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
79 Points -25%
Gigaset GS170
93 Points -12%
LG K8 2017
Points -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
85 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
63 Points -26%
Gigaset GS170
74 Points -13%
LG K8 2017
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
783 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
923 Points +18%
Gigaset GS170
772 Points -1%
LG K8 2017
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
11 fps
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps 0%
Gigaset GS170
11 fps 0%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps -42%
Lenovo Moto E3
9 fps -18%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
6 fps
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps +13%
Gigaset GS170
6 fps 0%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps -43%
Lenovo Moto E3
5 fps -17%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
4.8 fps
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps +13%
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps 0%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps -23%
Lenovo Moto E3
4 fps -17%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
2.2 fps
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps +18%
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps 0%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps -41%
Lenovo Moto E3
1.8 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
14 fps
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3.8 fps -73%
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps -76%
LG K8 2017
fps -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
2.9 fps -79%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
1.4 fps
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1.7 fps +21%
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps 0%
LG K8 2017
fps -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
1.2 fps -14%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto E4 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E3 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.64 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points +18%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
17.12 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
14.57 Points
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
14.34 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
12.43 Points -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points +36%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
3052 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points +29%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
2284 Points +1%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
2270 Points
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
2077 Points -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
17185 ms *
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
16744 ms * +3%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
16723 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * +26%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12255 ms * +29%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
10742 ms * +37%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
60 Points +25%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
48 Points
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
38 Points -21%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Moto E4Huawei Y6 2017Samsung Galaxy J3 2017Gigaset GS170LG K8 2017Lenovo Moto E3
AndroBench 3-5
-0%
2%
-26%
39%
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
187.6
202.6
8%
177.7
-5%
197.9
5%
270.8
44%
141.4
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB
45.3
66.9
48%
51
13%
44.79
-1%
84.6
87%
37.3
-18%
Random Read 4KB
18.7
25.93
39%
24
28%
18.34
-2%
41.6
122%
16
-14%
Random Write 4KB
29.2
20.54
-30%
9.5
-67%
10.45
-64%
12.5
-57%
8
-73%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.4
48.4
-26%
70.3
7%
37.41 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-43%
78.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
29.78 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
44.9
26.4
-41%
59.6
33%
21.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
52.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16%
17.49 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-61%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high13 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.8 °C31.5 °C30.5 °C 
 35 °C32 °C30.9 °C 
 34.7 °C32 °C30.9 °C 
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C
31.4 °C32.3 °C33 °C
31.8 °C33 °C33.9 °C
32 °C33 °C34.5 °C
Máximo: 34.5 °C
Médio: 32.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.129.231.12527.128.627.13128.328.728.34032.734.632.75028.227.728.26326.124.826.18026.531.526.510026.133.826.112531.228.331.216023.522.923.520027.521.127.525035.42035.431545.82045.840054.32254.350062.822.962.86306819.36880071.118.371.1100073.618.373.6125072.717.972.7160075.716.475.720007516.575250075.316.775.3315075.616.275.6400074.316.174.3500072.816.272.8630072.816.172.8800071.416.171.41000074.316.174.31250071.51671.51600061.316.161.3SPL85.629.985.6N62.31.462.3median 71.4median 17.9median 71.4Delta12.32.912.329.629.929.627.928.927.928.83028.836.647.836.630.534.230.525.726.325.724.528.524.528.131.728.138.536.238.530.423.430.436.121.736.14020.74043.919.643.947.52147.553.820.253.859.818.759.864.718.864.765.717.665.767.117.667.169.516.869.570.116.370.172.816.472.873.916.173.975.916.275.973.81673.870.315.970.370.216.170.273.61673.668.815.868.853.815.953.883.429.983.452.11.452.1median 65.7median 17.6median 65.711.52.811.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Moto E4Huawei Y6 2017
Lenovo Moto E4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.11 / 0.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.38 / 2.47 Watt
Carga midlight 2.63 / 3.86 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Power Consumption
3%
14%
13%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.82
6%
0.54
38%
0.65
25%
0.79
9%
Idle Average *
2.38
1.94
18%
1.56
34%
1.6
33%
1.7
29%
Idle Maximum *
2.47
2.06
17%
1.6
35%
1.62
34%
1.72
30%
Load Average *
2.63
3.31
-26%
3.18
-21%
2.97
-13%
2.65
-1%
Load Maximum *
3.86
3.89
-1%
4.42
-15%
4.34
-12%
3.16
18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 16min
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Battery Runtime
13%
20%
-15%
2%
7%
Reader / Idle
1302
1522
17%
1425
9%
1325
2%
H.264
608
693
14%
819
35%
649
7%
WiFi v1.3
522
654
25%
722
38%
442
-15%
594
14%
621
19%
Load
316
302
-4%
305
-3%
280
-11%
315
0%

Pro

+ Bateria removível
+ Slot microSD dedicado
+ Não sensível à pressão
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Sensor de digitais
+ Android puro
+ Tela brilhante, bom contraste
+ Dificilmente esquenta
+ Boa qualidade de voz

Contra

- A tampa é muito apertada
- A tampa traseira se flexiona facilmente
- Correções de segurança desatualizadas
- WLAN lento
- GPS muito inexato
- As imagens da câmera são embaçadas em algumas partes
- Alto consumo de energia
In the test: Lenovo Moto E4. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany.
In the test: Lenovo Moto E4. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany.

O Moto E4 é um smartphone acessível que oferece alguns destaques, como um sensor de digitais, Android puro e bateria removível. Se você não estiver considerando a câmera como a característica mais importante em um smartphone ou depender de uma navegação exata, então você obtém o desempenho típico dessa classe de preço em todas as outras áreas: a qualidade da voz é decente, o desempenho apropriado e a duração da bateria adequada na prática.

Em comparação com o antecessor, o preço mais alto está sendo justificado pela carcaça de metal, o maior desempenho e o armazenamento adicional. A razão pela qual os telefones de nível de entrada, em particular, custam alguns euros a mais este ano, está, em grande medida, nos chips de armazenamento que atualmente são muito caros. O Moto E3, por exemplo, oferecia uma duração de bateria mais longa, o que faz com que valha a pena dar uma olhada. E como uma nota para qualquer um que atualmente olhe para o Moto E4 Plus: ele é muito maior e mais pesado, e a bateria não é removível, mas também tem uma capacidade muito maior. Comparado com o Moto E4, o desempenhio é quase o mesmo. Para qualquer um que gostaria de saber mais, temos uma análise do Moto E4 Plus.

O Moto E4 é um smartphone sólido de nível de entrada que possui apenas algumas fraquezas essenciais e convence com uma bateria removível e sensor de digitais. No entanto, a câmera não deve ser muito importante para o usuário, uma vez que a qualidade da imagem é bastante baixa.

Ao comprar um smartphone, você sempre deve pesar quais recursos são realmente importantes para você. Se uma bateria removível e um sensor de digitais pertencem a esses recursos, o Moto E4 certamente é um dispositivo que você deve considerar. Mas qualquer um que espera uma longa duração da bateria incorporada deve considerar o Samsung Galaxy J3, que neste ponto está na mesma faixa de preços do Moto E4. O Huawei Y6 oferece mais desempenho pelo seu dinheiro.

Lenovo Moto E4 - 09/08/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
64 / 75 → 86%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 60%
Peso
92%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
55%
Médio
68%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto E4
Florian Wimmer, 2017-09-13 (Update: 2017-09-22)