Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Analise do Smartphone Motorola Edge Plus – Até que enfim Gama Alta
Vergleichsgeräte
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.8 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Motorola Edge Plus SD 865, Adreno 650 | 203 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2340x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 3200x1440 | |
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 226 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.50" | 2688x1242 | |
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 209 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 208 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2340x1080 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 199 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.78" | 3168x1440 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 549 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.301
| Motorola Edge Plus AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S20+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6" | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 30% | 41% | 33% | 48% | 52% | |
| Brightness middle | 549 | 740 35% | 790 44% | 584 6% | 753 37% | 796 45% |
| Brightness | 582 | 747 28% | 790 36% | 576 -1% | 762 31% | 779 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 97 8% | 95 6% | 96 7% | 94 4% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.16 | 2.6 18% | 1.4 56% | 1.1 65% | 0.9 72% | 0.68 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.58 | 4.57 31% | 3.4 48% | 2.3 65% | 1.6 76% | 1.55 76% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 1.5 64% | 1.9 55% | 1.8 57% | 1.5 64% | 1.1 74% |
| Gamma | 2.301 96% | 2.269 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.237 98% |
| CCT | 7280 89% | 6284 103% | 6466 101% | 6355 102% | 6415 101% | 6310 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 328.9 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 328.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 328.9 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=22) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus (Chome 84) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81) | |
| Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Edge Plus | Samsung Galaxy S20+ | Huawei P40 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | OnePlus 8 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -8% | 7% | -8% | -16% | 38% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1721 | 1603 -7% | 1775 3% | 1739 1% | 1627 -5% | 1547 ? -10% | 1834 ? 7% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 746 | 694 -7% | 395.7 -47% | 750 1% | 730 -2% | 575 ? -23% | 1426 ? 91% |
| Random Read 4KB | 230.9 | 199.6 -14% | 228.1 -1% | 264.9 15% | 208.3 -10% | 210 ? -9% | 278 ? 20% |
| Random Write 4KB | 235.7 | 229.8 -3% | 271.8 15% | 258.5 10% | 197.7 -16% | 188.5 ? -20% | 310 ? 32% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Edge Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.2 / 1.8 / 2.3 Watt |
| Carga |
5.8 / 10.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Edge Plus 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 4500 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | 3% | 33% | 36% | -41% | -1% | 15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 1 17% | 0.92 23% | 0.92 23% | 0.61 49% | 2.2 -83% | 1.133 ? 6% | 0.895 ? 25% |
| Idle Average * | 1.8 | 1.7 6% | 2.9 -61% | 1.41 22% | 1.19 34% | 3.3 -83% | 2.23 ? -24% | 1.447 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.3 | 2.3 -0% | 2.94 -28% | 1.47 36% | 1.23 47% | 3.7 -61% | 2.45 ? -7% | 1.608 ? 30% |
| Load Average * | 5.8 | 5.8 -0% | 3.65 37% | 3.35 42% | 4.18 28% | 5.9 -2% | 5.26 ? 9% | 6.41 ? -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.9 | 11.8 -8% | 6.18 43% | 6.37 42% | 8.53 22% | 8.3 24% | 9.68 ? 11% | 9.61 ? 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Edge Plus 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 4500 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | 16% | -24% | -16% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2216 | 2041 -8% | 2618 18% | 1474 -33% | 2133 -4% | 2103 -5% |
| H.264 | 1243 | 978 -21% | 1346 8% | 1137 -9% | 973 -22% | 1023 -18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 945 | 794 -16% | 909 -4% | 743 -21% | 865 -8% | 923 -2% |
| Load | 289 | 218 -25% | 408 41% | 198 -31% | 198 -31% | 296 2% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Quão bem se saiu?
Se você cobra mais de US$ 1.000 por um smartphone, você precisa atender as expectativas. Infelizmente, o Motorola Edge+ não consegue fazer exatamente isso em muitas áreas. A câmera oferece alta resolução, mas falta foco nos detalhes e a lente principal teve desempenho medíocre com pouca luz, na melhor das hipóteses. A carcaça é elegante e moderna, mas pode ser pressionada e não é à prova d'água.
O carregamento é outra área em que seus concorrentes oferecem mais retorno pelo investimento, a qualidade da chamada deveria ser melhor e os alto-falantes não estão entre os melhores que os smartphones de ponta tinham a oferecer no momento em que este artigo foi escrito. A tela não é tão brilhante e com cores precisas como em outros smartphones na faixa de preço do Edge+, e o dispositivo tende a ter aceleração térmica sob carga sustentada.
Concedido, sua tela sem bordas e traseira elegante fazem o Motorola Edge+ se destacar até certo ponto, os serviços de localização funcionam muito bem uma vez que o bloqueio de localização foi obtido e a Motorola retirou todas as barreiras relacionadas à comunicação sem fio, desde o 5G até o Wi-Fi 6 até Bluetooth 5.1.
O Edge+ significa o retorno da Motorola ao reino dos smartphones de gama alta. Infelizmente, o dispositivo não consegue justificar seu alto preço pedido.
Se você está procurando um smartphone com entrada para fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm, ficará feliz em saber que a Motorola continua a oferecer suporte à saída de áudio analógica. Outro benefício é sua versão pura e limpa do Android, incluindo patches de segurança um tanto atualizados.
O Motorola Edge+ pode não ser o smartphone de gama alta com a melhor relação preço-desempenho, especialmente considerando alternativas mais acessíveis, como o OnePlus 8 Pro ou o Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro. No entanto, consegue oferecer um nível de desempenho muito alto, um design exclusivo e uma bateria com duração muito boa.
Motorola Edge Plus
-
08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
