Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Edge – 5G sem marcos
Test Group
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Motorola Edge SD 765, Adreno 620 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2340x1080 | |
| 85.8 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Google Pixel 4 XL SD 855, Adreno 640 | 193 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.30" | 3040x1440 | |
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
| 86 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite SD 855, Adreno 640 | 186 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 194 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 1792x828 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 427 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.315
| Motorola Edge AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Google Pixel 4 XL P-OLED, 3040x1440, 6.3" | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 22% | 15% | 34% | 57% | |
| Brightness middle | 427 | 557 30% | 579 36% | 622 46% | 679 59% |
| Brightness | 438 | 555 27% | 576 32% | 630 44% | 671 53% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 95 1% | 89 -5% | 96 2% | 93 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.34 | 3.9 27% | 4.61 14% | 2.7 49% | 0.8 85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.33 | 6.1 35% | 7.72 17% | 5.9 37% | 2.4 74% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 3.5 12% | 4.2 -5% | 3 25% | 1.1 72% |
| Gamma | 2.315 95% | 2.18 101% | 2.244 98% | 2.09 105% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7221 90% | 6127 106% | 7201 90% | 6246 104% | 6610 98% |
| Contrast | 999 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 355 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 355 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 355 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (9914 - 10045, n=2) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (8336 - 8756, n=2) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (44 - 48, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (50 - 50, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (29 - 32, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (33 - 33, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (279244 - 304120, n=2) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Edge | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (48.3 - 48.6, n=2) | |
| Motorola Edge (Chrome 81) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (87.8 - 88.5, n=2) | |
| Motorola Edge (Chrome 81) | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (26.8 - 45.2, n=2) | |
| Motorola Edge (Chome 81) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (72 - 78, n=2) | |
| Motorola Edge (Chrome 81) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Motorola Edge (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (16302 - 17700, n=2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2754 - 2764, n=2) | |
| Motorola Edge (Chrome 81) | |
| Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Edge | Google Pixel 4 XL | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | -37% | 17% | -14% | 127% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 941 | 871 -7% | 499.2 -47% | 1489 58% | 760 ? -19% | 1839 ? 95% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 451.7 | 197.4 -56% | 205.1 -55% | 525 16% | 297 ? -34% | 1425 ? 215% |
| Random Read 4KB | 150.5 | 142.2 -6% | 119.2 -21% | 191.7 27% | 152.9 ? 2% | 277 ? 84% |
| Random Write 4KB | 145.2 | 164.2 13% | 108.5 -25% | 173.5 19% | 131.6 ? -9% | 309 ? 113% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 87.2 ? | 76 ? -13% | 76 ? -13% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.5 ? | 61 ? -7% | 59.6 ? -9% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Edge audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 1.4 / 2 Watt |
| Carga |
4.8 / 7.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Edge 4500 mAh | Google Pixel 4 XL 3700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 10% | -17% | -21% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.83 17% | 0.58 42% | 0.56 44% | 1.25 ? -25% | 0.894 ? 11% |
| Idle Average * | 1.4 | 1.24 11% | 1.55 -11% | 2.99 -114% | 1.75 ? -25% | 1.456 ? -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 1.25 37% | 1.64 18% | 3.02 -51% | 2.45 ? -23% | 1.616 ? 19% |
| Load Average * | 4.8 | 4.98 -4% | 4.29 11% | 4.17 13% | 5.75 ? -20% | 6.45 ? -34% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.3 | 9.09 -25% | 8.03 -10% | 5.44 25% | 8.25 ? -13% | 9.8 ? -34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Edge 4500 mAh | Google Pixel 4 XL 3700 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 5260 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -30% | 25% | -4% | 4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2515 | 2504 0% | 2765 10% | ||
| H.264 | 1197 | 1183 -1% | 1147 -4% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 888 | 623 -30% | 1112 25% | 823 -7% | 866 -2% |
| Load | 240 | 222 -7% | 267 11% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Dê uma olhada, dê uma chance
O Edge da Motorola é um dispositivo de gama média, de boa aparência, com um visual moderno. Sua tela sem marcos pode não ser a primeira de seu tipo - na verdade, o Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge leva uma vantagem por quatro anos - mas as bordas superior e inferior do Edge são ainda mais estreitas, e a parte frontal do aparelho é quase toda tela.
O que nos leva à sua maior falha: a usabilidade da tela táctil. Você tem que ajustar a sua pegada ao redor das bordas para evitar que toques acidentais sejam desencadeados ao longo de suas bordas.
O alto-falante e a qualidade da voz também foram medíocres, na melhor das hipóteses, e teríamos desejado mais oomph. Se você espera uma câmera de alta qualidade, você vai acabar decepcionado devido à ligeira, mas visível, falta de foco. Considerando seu preço, as câmeras estão bem.
As coisas que gostamos incluem o sabor do Android puro, o modem Wi-Fi rápido Edge, seu modem GPS bastante preciso e seu desempenho geral decente, permitindo uma experiência de jogo fluente em configurações médias. O conector de fones de 3,5 mm também é um bônus muito bem-vindo, com o qual muitos usuários se alegrarão. Se você está procurando por um smartphone 5G relativamente acessível, o Motorola Edge pode ser o dispositivo certo.
O Motorola Edge é um smartphone 5G de boa aparência com muitos prós e alguns contras menores.
Um smartphone Motorola caro já estava muito atrasado, e a equipe fez um trabalho fantástico e provou que ainda está à altura da tarefa. O Motorola Edge não é de forma alguma impecável, mas se você se sente inspirado e animado pelo seu design, o Edge é um smartphone chique 5G.
Motorola Edge
- 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
