Breve Análise do Smartphone Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Name: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Brand: Microsoft

Olá, Lumia! O novo carro chefe Windows finalmente chegou. Além de componentes poderosos, você também obtém ótimos recursos como Windows Hello e Continuum. A maior desvantagem do aparelho é o software, porque o Windows 10 Mobile ainda parece não estar pronto.

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Lumia Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A57/-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 430

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.70 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 25.2 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado para fones e microfone, Card Reader: microSD até 200 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), NFC, Sensores: giroscópio, barõmetro, sensor de posição, sensor de luz ambiente, sensor de proximidade, magnetômetro, SensoreCore, Wifi Direct, Miracast, OTG, MHL 3.1, NFC

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5 e 8), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40 e 41), LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 151.9 x 78.4

Bateria

13 Wh, 3340 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 3.85 V, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 19 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 300 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile

Camera

Primary Camera: 20 MPix (6 lentes, zoom digital 2x, OS, tamanho do sensor: 1/2,4-polegadas, f/1.9, comprimento focal: 26 mm, flash Tri-LED, vídeo UHD)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, vídeo Full-HD)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, Microsoft Office Mobile, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR head: 0.56 W/kg, body SAR: 0.36 W/kg, carregamento wireless (Qi), carga rápida, Windows Hello

peso

165 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g

Preço

699 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

The Lumia 950 XL (left) next to the Lumia 950 DS.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

Canon EOS 70D


289 cd/m²	296 cd/m²	308 cd/m²
288 cd/m²	297 cd/m²	307 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	293 cd/m²	305 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 296.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.19 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 297 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.79% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		16%	-13%	13%	29%	23%	-37%
Brightness middle	297	343 15%	566 91%	583 96%	538 81%	363 22%	352 19%
Brightness	297	338 14%	536 80%	560 89%	528 78%	365 23%	350 18%
Brightness Distribution	93	94 1%	90 -3%	91 -2%	92 -1%	90 -3%	87 -6%
Black Level *			0.47	0.46	0.66
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.67	2.2 18%	6.17 -131%	3.55 -33%	2.63 1%	2.34 12%	4.95 -85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.98
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.81	2.37 16%	6.26 -123%	3.88 -38%	3.24 -15%	1.03 63%	6.54 -133%
Gamma	2.08 ^106%	2.41 ^91%	2.48 ^89%	2.2 ^100%	2.17 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6379 ^102%	6425 ^101%	8171 ^80%	7280 ^89%	6906 ^94%	6429 ^101%	6943 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	66.31	87.77 32%	65.48 -1%	59.05 -11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.79		98.63 -1%	92.8 -7%
Contrast			1204	1267	815

* ... smaller is better

Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)

Grayscale (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)

Grayscale (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)

ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)

ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)

ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)

ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: Adobe RGB)

ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: Adobe RGB)

ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: Adobe RGB)

Saturation (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)

Saturation (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)

Saturation (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.42 ms rise
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.52 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.72 ms rise
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.68 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	18.75 fps
Nokia Lumia 930	20 fps +7%
Google Nexus 6P	33 fps +76%
Motorola Moto X Style	24 fps +28%
HTC One M9	50 fps +167%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +161%
Huawei Mate S	11 fps -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	59 fps +215%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	27.11 fps
Nokia Lumia 930	15 fps -45%
Google Nexus 6P	44 fps +62%
Motorola Moto X Style	34 fps +25%
HTC One M9	49 fps +81%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +81%
Huawei Mate S	10 fps -63%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	78.9 fps +191%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	11.81 fps
Google Nexus 6P	17 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	14 fps +19%
Motorola Moto X Style	9.3 fps -21%
HTC One M9	24 fps +103%
Sony Xperia Z5	26 fps +120%
Huawei Mate S	6.3 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps +225%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	17.54 fps
Google Nexus 6P	25 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	18 fps +3%
Motorola Moto X Style	15 fps -14%
HTC One M9	23 fps +31%
Sony Xperia Z5	24 fps +37%
Huawei Mate S	5.8 fps -67%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps +119%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1465 Points
Nokia Lumia 930	1085 Points -26%
Google Nexus 6P	1405 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1801 Points +23%
Motorola Moto X Style	1743 Points +19%
HTC One M9	1410 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5	1437 Points -2%
Huawei Mate S	1222 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2206 Points +51%
System (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1386 Points
Nokia Lumia 930	1296 Points -6%
Google Nexus 6P	1798 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	3321 Points +140%
Motorola Moto X Style	2783 Points +101%
HTC One M9	1672 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z5	2360 Points +70%
Huawei Mate S	2129 Points +54%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3925 Points +183%
Memory (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1945 Points
Nokia Lumia 930	1500 Points -23%
Google Nexus 6P	1136 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1298 Points -33%
Motorola Moto X Style	1776 Points -9%
HTC One M9	933 Points -52%
Sony Xperia Z5	865 Points -56%
Huawei Mate S	1304 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1124 Points -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2040 Points
Nokia Lumia 930	1233 Points -40%
Google Nexus 6P	2424 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	2457 Points +20%
Motorola Moto X Style	1918 Points -6%
HTC One M9	3210 Points +57%
Sony Xperia Z5	3095 Points +52%
Huawei Mate S	962 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4299 Points +111%
Web (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	837 Points
Nokia Lumia 930	579 Points -31%
Google Nexus 6P	791 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	993 Points +19%
Motorola Moto X Style	974 Points +16%
HTC One M9	789 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5	675 Points -19%
Huawei Mate S	834 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1199 Points +43%

Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	369.6 MFLOPS
Nokia Lumia 930	232.5 MFLOPS -37%
Google Nexus 6P	87.1 MFLOPS -76%
Motorola Moto X Style	415 MFLOPS +12%
HTC One M9	578 MFLOPS +56%
Sony Xperia Z5	251.8 MFLOPS -32%
Huawei Mate S	129.6 MFLOPS -65%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	669 MFLOPS +81%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2957 MFLOPS
Nokia Lumia 930	930 MFLOPS -69%
Google Nexus 6P	262 MFLOPS -91%
Motorola Moto X Style	590 MFLOPS -80%
HTC One M9	685 MFLOPS -77%
Sony Xperia Z5	499 MFLOPS -83%
Huawei Mate S	282.5 MFLOPS -90%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1295 MFLOPS -56%

Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	33082 Points
Nokia Lumia 930	19987 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	31743 Points -4%
HTC One M9	27968 Points -15%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	46 Points
Google Nexus 6P	47.4 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	48.14 Points +5%
Motorola Moto X Style	45 Points -2%
HTC One M9	26.85 Points -42%
Sony Xperia Z5	37 Points -20%
Huawei Mate S	25.41 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	118.7 Points +158%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	8059 Points
Nokia Lumia 930	2737 Points -66%
Google Nexus 6P	8804 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	7724 Points -4%
Motorola Moto X Style	8065 Points 0%
HTC One M9	6493 Points -19%
Sony Xperia Z5	8627 Points +7%
Huawei Mate S	4106 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	15967 Points +98%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	5553 ms *
Nokia Lumia 930	11108 ms * -100%
Google Nexus 6P	4193 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	5067 ms * +9%
Motorola Moto X Style	7325 ms * -32%
HTC One M9	6508 ms * -17%
Sony Xperia Z5	5693 ms * -3%
Huawei Mate S	11029 ms * -99%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1743 ms * +69%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	113 Points
Google Nexus 6P	116 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	95 Points -16%
Motorola Moto X Style	110 Points -3%
HTC One M9	72 Points -36%
Sony Xperia Z5	73 Points -35%
Huawei Mate S	73 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	190 Points +68%

Legend

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia Lumia 930 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Motorola Moto X Style Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One M9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Mate S HiSilicon Kirin 935, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.2 °C	39.9 °C	45.7 °C
38.7 °C	42.4 °C	48.3 °C
40.1 °C	40.5 °C	45.4 °C

Máximo: 48.3 °C
Médio: 42.1 °C


45.8 °C	43.4 °C	39.2 °C
45.8 °C	45 °C	39.6 °C
44.2 °C	43.4 °C	39.3 °C

Máximo: 45.8 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 31.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.14 Watt
Ocioso	2.85 / 2.95 / 3.26 Watt
Carga	8.92 / 9.39 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		49%	43%	43%	41%	53%
Idle Minimum *	2.85	0.5 82%	0.83 71%	0.7 75%	0.7 75%	0.6 79%
Idle Average *	2.95	1.9 36%	1.09 63%	2.2 25%	1.7 42%	1.2 59%
Idle Maximum *	3.26	2.2 33%	1.17 64%	2.3 29%	1.8 45%	1.6 51%
Load Average *	8.92	3.2 64%	7.49 16%	3.9 56%	5.6 37%	4.1 54%
Load Maximum *	9.39	6.4 32%	9.51 -1%	6.8 28%	8.7 7%	7.4 21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		17h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 11min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 59min

	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Battery Runtime		32%	-0%	20%	28%	30%
Reader / Idle	1078	1459 35%	1141 6%	1447 34%	1124 4%	1655 54%
H.264	611		383 -37%	533 -13%	569 -7%	714 17%
WiFi v1.3	369	501 36%	400 8%	375 2%	575 56%	513 39%
Load	179	223 25%	219 22%	280 56%	282 58%	197 10%

Pro

+ SoC veloz

+ Armazenamento expansível

+ USB 3.1

+ Longo alcance do Wi-Fi

+ Continuum

+ Windows Hello

+ Bom desempenho do GPS

+ Ótimas câmeras

+ Boa conectividade

+ Ótima tela com cores precisas e tempos de resposta rápidos ...

Contra

- ... e PWM

- Pequenas falhas em termos de qualidade de voz

- Parece um pouco simples demais

- As durações poderiam ser melhores

- Aplicativos faltantes na loja

- Pequenos problemas wi

In review: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

A longa espera por um novo smartphone carro chefe da Microsoft valeu a pena. O Lumia 950 XL é um ótimo produto de gama alta, que não comete erros no relacionado com a tecnologia. Além do veloz SoC, você obtém armazenamento suficiente, que também pode ser expandido. A câmera também consegue convencer e tira ótimas fotos e vídeos. A Microsoft implementa uma nova porta USB Tipo-C que inclusive suporta o padrão USB 3.1, que atualmente é único neste segmento.

Apenas esta porta é a chave para Continuum, que pode ser um verdadeiro benefício e cria novas possibilidades. A Microsoft também adiciona um ano de Office 365, bem como um Display Dock se você adquirir o smartphone agora. Windows Hello é um simples e confiável método de autenticação e está bem integrado no sistema.

O Lumia 950 XL é um smartphone com boas especificações e ótimos recursos, que pode ser usado como um substituto de PC graças ao Continuum.

O maior problema do smartphone do gigante do software é, de fato, o software. Tanto a ideia quanto a interface do usuário do Windows 10 Mobile são ótimos, mas o sistema operacional infelizmente parece ainda não estar pronto. A loja também não tem muitos aplicativos, o qual é um problema conhecido para as versões móveis do Windows. A qualidade da voz também poderia ser melhor para um aparelho de gama alta nesta faixa de preços.

Se estiver procurando um ótimo smartphone com Windows 10, o Lumia 950 XL é definitivamente uma boa opção e não há outras alternativas sérias. O primeiro concorrente Windows de verdade será o Acer Liquid Jade Primo, que deve estar disponível em fevereiro.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL - 2016-04-13 04/13/2016 v5 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

87%

Teclado

77 / 75 → 100%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

60 / 60 → 100%

Peso

91%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

60 / 63 → 95%

Desempenho da aplicação

54 / 70 → 77%

Temperatura

83%

Ruído

100%

Audio

68 / 91 → 74%

Camera

87%

Médio

80%

89%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Read about the changes in the new rating version 5

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1693 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Daniel Schmidt, 2016-02- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)