Breve Análise do Smartphone Microsoft Lumia 650

Name: Microsoft Lumia 650
Brand: Microsoft

Microsoft convencional. O novo Lumia 650 da Microsoft deseja convencer aos usuários com um preço competitivo e obviamente o sistema operacional Windows. O fabricante da Redmond tem como alvo os clientes empresariais, em particular. Por causa do hardware lento, no entanto, existem algumas limitações, incluindo a falta do recurso Windows Continuum.

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Smartphone Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Microsoft Lumia 650 (Lumia Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A7

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 304

Memória

1024 MB

Pantalha

5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitiva, OLED, Clear Black, TrueColor, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 11.5 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD até 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Proximidade, luz ambiente, acelerômetro, WiFi-Direct

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850,900, 1.800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 900, 1.800, 2100 and 2600 MHz), LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.9 x 142 x 70.9

Bateria

7.6 Wh, 2000 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 624 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, comprimento focal: 28 mm, auto foco, flash LED)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, wide-angle)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força com cabo USB fixo, bateria, manual, Microsoft Edge, Outlook, Facebook, WhatsApp, OneDrive, Xbox Live Hub, Skype, Microsoft Office (OneNote, Word, Excel, PowerPoint), Amazon, Netflix, Lumia Offers, Audible, Expedia, Maps, Help + Tips, Shazam, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

122 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g

Preço

199 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Archos Diamond S Samsung Galaxy J5 LG Class Allview E4 Microsoft Lumia 650 DIN A6 ❌

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


372 cd/m²	344 cd/m²	342 cd/m²
372 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	341 cd/m²
369 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	342 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 372 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 353.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.67 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 349 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.06

	Microsoft Lumia 650 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Archos Diamond S Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-25%	7%	-46%	-44%	-28%	-59%
Brightness middle	349	418 20%	467 34%	357 2%	349 0%	534 53%	518 48%
Brightness	353	407 15%	460 30%	363 3%	353 0%	503 42%	492 39%
Brightness Distribution	92	95 3%	95 3%	95 3%	93 1%	82 -11%	91 -1%
Black Level *		0.49	0.3			0.57	0.51
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.6	3.92 -51%	3.28 -26%	6.11 -135%	5.22 -101%	5.65 -117%	5.41 -108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.2			9.91 -21%			8.76 -7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	3.81 -112%	1.89 -5%	4.12 -129%	3.96 -120%	3.69 -105%	7.67 -326%
Gamma	2.06 ^107%	2.27 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.08 ^106%	2.15 ^102%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6542 ^99%	7361 ^88%	6734 ^97%	7272 ^89%	7308 ^89%	7289 ^89%	8521 ^76%
Contrast		853	1557			937	1016

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	5.67 fps
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	9.5 fps +68%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	9.2 fps +62%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	21 fps +270%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	20 fps +253%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	5.2 fps -8%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	3.25 fps
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	5.3 fps +63%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	5.2 fps +60%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	12 fps +269%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	12 fps +269%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	9.8 fps +202%

Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	223.6 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	207.7 MFLOPS -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	202 MFLOPS -10%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	272.2 MFLOPS +22%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	55.9 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	117.1 MFLOPS +109%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	87.7 MFLOPS +57%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	111.5 MFLOPS +99%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	546 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	484 Points -11%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	643 Points +18%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	729 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	615 Points +13%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	731 Points +34%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	696 Points +27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	207 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	315 Points +52%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	316 Points +53%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	421 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	314 Points +52%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	423 Points +104%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	312 Points +51%
Memory (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	575 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	394 Points -31%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	797 Points +39%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	949 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	399 Points -31%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	877 Points +53%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	427 Points -26%
System (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	552 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	1166 Points +111%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	1077 Points +95%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	1792 Points +225%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	1058 Points +92%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	1694 Points +207%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	1068 Points +93%
Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	435 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	515 Points +18%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	646 Points +49%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	850 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	534 Points +23%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	823 Points +89%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	561 Points +29%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	31844 Points
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	35194 Points +11%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	37203 Points +17%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	2574 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	3296 Points +28%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	3012 Points +17%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	2754 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	3038 Points +18%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	3177 Points +23%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	3028 Points +18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	18237 ms *
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	11843 ms * +35%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048	14680 ms * +20%
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	13398 ms * +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	14074 ms * +23%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	13149 ms * +28%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	13980 ms * +23%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024	52 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024	52 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	52 Points 0%
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	59 Points +13%
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536	57 Points +10%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


36.2 °C	37.2 °C	35.1 °C
36.3 °C	36.7 °C	36.4 °C
35.1 °C	35.5 °C	35.1 °C

Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 36 °C


37.7 °C	38.2 °C	35.5 °C
36 °C	33.7 °C	33.3 °C
33.9 °C	33.7 °C	32.5 °C

Máximo: 38.2 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 40 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

	Microsoft Lumia 650 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Archos Diamond S Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Heat		-6%	1%	4%	-2%	-16%	-1%
Maximum Upper Side *	37.2	41.2 -11%	41.1 -10%	34.3 8%	38.3 -3%	41.3 -11%	38.6 -4%
Maximum Bottom *	38.2	39.2 -3%	37 3%	33.7 12%	37.7 1%	45.1 -18%	35 8%
Idle Upper Side *	30.9	33.4 -8%	30 3%	32 -4%	31.9 -3%	36 -17%	34.2 -11%
Idle Bottom *	30.5	31.1 -2%	27.9 9%	31 -2%	30.8 -1%	35.3 -16%	29.6 3%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.07 / 0.22 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.1 / 1.18 Watt
Carga	4.04 / 4.07 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Microsoft Lumia 650 7.6 Wh	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Wh	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Wh	Archos Diamond S Wh	Samsung Galaxy J5 10 Wh	Allview E4 8 Wh	LG Class Wh
Power Consumption		11%	18%	-10%	-64%	-193%	-49%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.4 43%	0.5 29%	0.8 -14%	1.5 -114%	3.11 -344%	1.2 -71%
Idle Average *	1.1	1 9%	0.9 18%	1.21 -10%	2.2 -100%	4.06 -269%	1.9 -73%
Idle Maximum *	1.18	1.2 -2%	1.1 7%	1.32 -12%	2.4 -103%	4.23 -258%	2.2 -86%
Load Average *	4.04	2.9 28%	2.4 41%	3.73 8%	3.5 13%	5.53 -37%	3.1 23%
Load Maximum *	4.07	5 -23%	4.3 -6%	4.97 -22%	4.8 -18%	6.33 -56%	5.6 -38%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		15h 10min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 33min

	Microsoft Lumia 650 7.6 Wh	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Wh	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Wh	Archos Diamond S Wh	Samsung Galaxy J5 10 Wh	Allview E4 8 Wh	LG Class Wh
Battery Runtime		40%	-23%	38%	45%	-10%	11%
Reader / Idle	910	1364 50%			1292 42%	827 -9%	976 7%
H.264	510	677 33%			657 29%	456 -11%	628 23%
WiFi v1.3	345	526 52%	267 -23%	475 38%	495 43%	315 -9%	422 22%
Load	213	264 24%			350 64%	193 -9%	196 -8%

Pro

+ Boa qualidade de construção da carcaça sólida

+ Tampa traseira desmontável

+ Bateria substituível

+ Expansão do armazenamento via microSD

+ Ótima tela AMOLED sem PWM

+ Boa câmera

+ Bom GPS

+ Microsoft Office

Contra

- Durações medíocres da bateria

- Desempenho lento

- Sem cabo ou headset

- Sem Continuum ou Windows Hello

- Alto falante ruim

- PSU fraco com cabo fixo

In review: Microsoft Lumia 650. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

O Microsoft Lumia é um bom sucessor ao antigo Lumia 640. O smartphone agora usa a linguagem de design dos irmãos maiores Lumia 950/Lumia 950 XL e obtemos um bom chassi com uma ótima tela AMOLED. Após a análise, no entanto, não sabemos porque o aparelho supostamente deveria ser uma solução perfeita para os clientes empresariais. Temos que renunciar a alguns recursos como o Windows Hello ou Continuum, por isso, no final, tudo se baseia no Microsoft Office.

Um dos maiores problemas é certamente o lento desempenho do Lumia 650. O próprio Windows 10 Mobile roda de forma muito fluente, mas você notara engasgamentos e atrasos com aplicativos mais complexos. O outro grande problema é o Windows, porque a seleção de aplicativos ainda é bastante limitada em comparação com Android e iOS. Você deveria verificar a disponibilidade de seus aplicativos favoritos se estiver pensando em mudar para o Windows 10 Mobile.

O Microsoft Lumia 650 é um bom smartphone convencional com uma ótima tela. No entanto, você deve estar ciente das limitações do Windows 10 Mobile, bem como do desempenho lento.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Microsoft Lumia 650 - 2016-05-09 05/09/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

81%

Teclado

74 / 75 → 98%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

35 / 60 → 59%

Peso

95%

Bateria

88%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

3 / 63 → 5%

Desempenho da aplicação

28 / 70 → 40%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Camera

71%

Médio

69%

82%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Microsoft Lumia 650

Andreas Osthoff, 2016-05-19 (Update: 2016-05-25)