Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Z5 Pro
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 |
|
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
145.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.236
Lenovo Z5 Pro Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2" | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Honor Magic 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 15% | 45% | 16% | 44% | |
Brightness middle | 451 | 489 8% | 599 33% | 594 32% | 570 26% |
Brightness | 457 | 486 6% | 593 30% | 539 18% | 565 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 96 3% | 85 -9% | 93 0% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.07 | 3.8 37% | 1.4 77% | 5.37 12% | 1.5 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.34 | 7.1 37% | 3.2 72% | 8.32 27% | 3.6 68% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 4.4 -0% | 2 55% | 3.7 16% | 1.2 73% |
Gamma | 2.236 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.127 103% | 2.07 106% |
CCT | 7546 86% | 7213 90% | 6496 100% | 7212 90% | 6504 100% |
Contrast | 1438 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 122.5 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 122.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 122.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (7041 - 9345, n=6) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (6453 - 7460, n=6) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (20 - 40, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (32 - 33, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (19 - 30, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (23 - 23, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (11.4 - 13, n=3) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10.1 - 12.1, n=2) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (14.3 - 15.5, n=3) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (155113 - 169262, n=4) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (135848 - 137693, n=3) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1681 - 1708, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (479 - 488, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72) | |
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66.6, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (9771 - 12802, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=6) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72) | |
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magic 2 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (57 - 72, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331) | |
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (166 - 209, n=6) |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Z5 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F1 | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | Honor Magic 2 | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 45% | 62% | 474% | -7% | 70% | 863% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 284.5 | 705 148% | 675 137% | 908 219% | 295.8 4% | 283 ? -1% | 1834 ? 545% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 190.8 | 155.6 -18% | 206.8 8% | 185 -3% | 104.9 -45% | 194.6 ? 2% | 1426 ? 647% |
Random Read 4KB | 77.4 | 101 30% | 133.2 72% | 143 85% | 84 9% | 82.7 ? 7% | 278 ? 259% |
Random Write 4KB | 14.76 | 17.81 21% | 19.54 32% | 250 1594% | 15.45 5% | 55.1 ? 273% | 310 ? 2000% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.3 ? | 78.2 ? | 78.1 ? | ||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.6 ? | 64.4 ? | 61.8 ? |
Asphalt 9 Legends
PUBG Mobile
Dead Trigger 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Z5 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0 / 0.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.8 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt |
Carga |
3.7 / 5.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Z5 Pro 3350 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | Honor Magic 2 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -24% | 14% | -9% | -11% | 1% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.65 19% | 0.49 39% | 0.6 25% | 0.71 11% | 0.772 ? 3% | 0.895 ? -12% |
Idle Average * | 1.4 | 1.97 -41% | 0.67 52% | 0.9 36% | 1.36 3% | 1.474 ? -5% | 1.447 ? -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.9 | 2.01 -6% | 0.87 54% | 1.9 -0% | 1.47 23% | 1.882 ? 1% | 1.608 ? 15% |
Load Average * | 3.7 | 4.29 -16% | 3.64 2% | 6.3 -70% | 5.13 -39% | 3.33 ? 10% | 6.41 ? -73% |
Load Maximum * | 5.1 | 9.05 -77% | 9.04 -77% | 7.05 -38% | 7.89 -55% | 5.2 ? -2% | 9.61 ? -88% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Z5 Pro 3350 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | Honor Magic 2 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 705 | 808 15% | 719 2% | 773 10% | 605 -14% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo Z5 Pro é um smartphone muito interessante que está disponível por cerca de $ 300. O mecanismo deslizante permite que o dispositivo de gama média exiba uma aparência que, até agora, tem sido limitada principalmente à elite dos smartphones: Uma tela grande quase totalmente sem marcos. O acabamento e o material dão ao celular da Lenovo um exterior de alta qualidade.
Ao contrário de sua competição de “deslizantes” da Xiaomi e Honor, o Lenovo Z5 Pro é equipado com um Snapdragon 710. Este chip é rápido o suficiente e os usuários dificilmente notariam uma diferença entre esses dispositivos no uso diário. Somente jogos graficamente exigentes podem ter que ser evitados no Z5 Pro. O tipo de armazenamento moderno ausente pode ser mais um problema, pois isso tem um impacto negativo perceptível no tempo que os aplicativos precisam carregar. Isso significa que há diferenças perceptíveis na velocidade em comparação com o Mi Mix 3.
O Z5 Pro introduz o mecanismo deslizante para smartphones de gama média. No entanto, o fabricante chinês deve se esforçar um pouco mais em otimizar o software do seu telefone deslizante.
Atualmente, o Z5 Pro não está diretamente disponível nos EUA. Isso significa que o telefone teria que ser importado, o que implica certas restrições, como o suporte a LTE ausente e riscos.
Lenovo Z5 Pro
-
02/26/2019 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich