Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo P2
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 610 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
| Lenovo P2 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 27% | -34% | -46% | |
| Brightness middle | 479 | 509 6% | 539 13% | 658 37% | 625 30% |
| Brightness | 477 | 511 7% | 542 14% | 633 33% | 639 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 93 2% | 93 2% | 92 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.66 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.2 8% | 1.6 33% | 4.9 -104% | 5.9 -146% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.6 | 5.8 -4% | 2.6 54% | 9.1 -63% | 14.6 -161% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2 29% | 1.5 46% | 5.8 -107% | 3.8 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6702 97% | 6768 96% | 6422 101% | 7840 83% | 7196 90% |
| Contrast | 997 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 55 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo P2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.23 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.54 / 1.01 / 1.03 Watt |
| Carga |
1.78 / 3.98 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | -25% | -80% | -70% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.54 | 0.51 6% | 0.64 -19% | 0.83 -54% | 0.76 -41% |
| Idle Average * | 1.01 | 0.87 14% | 1.36 -35% | 2.11 -109% | 1.02 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.03 | 0.9 13% | 1.4 -36% | 2.12 -106% | 1.04 -1% |
| Load Average * | 1.78 | 1.69 5% | 2.53 -42% | 3.41 -92% | 4.4 -147% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.98 | 4 -1% | 3.63 9% | 5.46 -37% | 10.4 -161% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | -15% | -31% | -58% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2841 | 2540 -11% | 2418 -15% | 1502 -47% | |
| H.264 | 1199 | 1190 -1% | 984 -18% | 905 -25% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 978 | 824 -16% | 843 -14% | 797 -19% | 415 -58% |
| Load | 528 | 652 23% | 467 -12% | 352 -33% |
Pro
Contra
Nós já mencionamos que a duração da bateria do Lenovo P2 é fantástica na introdução. No entanto, ficamos realmente surpresos de que a Lenovo tenha criado um aparelho tão completo. Uma carcaça elegante e sólida, boas taxas de desempenho, fotos da câmera relativamente nítidas, diversas opções para adaptar os controles, uma tela AMOLED com cores bastante precisas, um excelente alto falante, e baixas temperaturas, não deixam muito espaço para críticas à primeira vista.
Alguns aspectos que podem ser criticados se encontram ao dar uma olhada mais de perto, por exemplo, o software traduzido muito mal, o brilho comparativamente baixo da tela, e a tonalidade azul. O microfone também não é perfeito, e as fotos da câmera são desfocadas em alguns lugares. No geral, estes são pequenos problemas, alguns dos quais poderiam ser melhorados via atualizações do software. Infelizmente, eles impedem que o Lenovo P2 receba uma avaliação de "muito bom".
O Lenovo P2 é um potente aparelho de gama média que dificilmente mostra fraquezas e brilha particularmente em termos de duração de bateria e som d alto falante.
No entanto, o Lenovo P2 é um excelente aparelho que quem estiver procurando um smartphone de gama média deveria colocar e sua lista. O P2 agradará particularmente usuários que apreciam uma longa duração da bateria.
Lenovo P2
- 02/24/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
