Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play |
|
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 434 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 8 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 19% | 32% | 33% | -20% | 45% | |
Brightness middle | 434 | 541 25% | 509 17% | 426 -2% | 470 8% | 554 28% |
Brightness | 404 | 514 27% | 511 26% | 431 7% | 445 10% | 552 37% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 91 12% | 93 15% | 93 15% | 88 9% | 96 19% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.22 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 3.2 27% | 2.2 50% | 1.6 64% | 5.5 -25% | 1.59 64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.6 | 7.2 16% | 5.8 33% | 4.1 52% | 11.9 -38% | 2.56 70% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4 5% | 2 52% | 1.7 60% | 7.6 -81% | 2.01 52% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 7343 89% | 7120 91% | 6768 96% | 6329 103% | 7454 87% | 6321 103% |
Contrast | 1803 | 2136 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
OnePlus 5 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
OnePlus 5 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
OnePlus 5 | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
HTC U Ultra | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | Honor 8 Pro | Lenovo Moto Z Play | OnePlus 5 | HTC U Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 119% | -11% | 115% | 27% | 24% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 245.6 | 738 200% | 254.8 4% | 748 205% | 423.9 73% | 487.3 98% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 137.5 | 187.1 36% | 73.1 -47% | 201.5 47% | 164.7 20% | 145.1 6% |
Random Read 4KB | 38.2 | 166.4 336% | 38.78 2% | 141 269% | 84.2 120% | 86.7 127% |
Random Write 4KB | 47.9 | 151.6 216% | 45.58 -5% | 19.3 -60% | 13.7 -71% | 15.79 -67% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.7 | 54.2 -32% | 74.6 -6% | 82.8 4% | 76.4 -4% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 58.7 | 32.16 -45% | 50.6 -14% | 67.6 15% | 50.4 -14% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
JBL Soundboost 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.45 / 0.78 / 0.84 Watt |
Carga |
1.69 / 3.79 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -189% | -8% | -132% | -192% | -99% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.45 | 0.98 -118% | 0.51 -13% | 0.73 -62% | 1 -122% | 0.63 -40% |
Idle Average * | 0.78 | 2.27 -191% | 0.87 -12% | 1.44 -85% | 2.41 -209% | 1.1 -41% |
Idle Maximum * | 0.84 | 2.36 -181% | 0.9 -7% | 1.5 -79% | 2.46 -193% | 1.56 -86% |
Load Average * | 1.69 | 6.58 -289% | 1.69 -0% | 6.91 -309% | 6.8 -302% | 5.95 -252% |
Load Maximum * | 3.79 | 10.12 -167% | 4 -6% | 8.51 -125% | 8.9 -135% | 6.7 -77% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -32% | 33% | -29% | -30% | -5% | |
Reader / Idle | 1589 | 1378 -13% | 2540 60% | 1534 -3% | 1568 -1% | 1663 5% |
H.264 | 946 | 675 -29% | 1190 26% | 623 -34% | 605 -36% | 914 -3% |
WiFi v1.3 | 749 | 573 -23% | 824 10% | 518 -31% | 546 -27% | 732 -2% |
Load | 477 | 181 -62% | 652 37% | 247 -48% | 214 -55% | 392 -18% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo Moto Z2 Play é um bom smartphone. Seria ainda melhor se o Moto Z Play não existisse mais. O antecessor faz muitas coisas igual de bem, algumas coisas um pouco pior, e outras coisas ainda melhor, sendo consideravelmente mais barato.
Há algum motivo para comprar o sucessor? A carcaça do Moto Z2 Play foi retrabalhada e agora é ainda mais fina. Este seria um esquema de marketing para um smartphone normal. No entanto, recebe outra dimensão no Moto Z2 Play: Os Moto Mods acopláveis podem fazer que um milímetro seja bastante significativo. O peso mais baixo também é um argumento, dado que os Mods adicionam peso suficiente. Além disso, o comprador recebe uma carcaça muito rígida e elegante com um leitor de digitais menos visível do que no antecessor. O veloz LTE está instalado, mas ainda não o Wi-Fi 802.11ac e a falta de taxas de transmissão Wi-Fi adequadas é realmente audacioso. Em troca, o módulo GPS é muito preciso e as câmeras produzem boas fotos. A tela é mais escura e o desempenho é apenas marginalmente superior ao do antecessor. A duração da bateria ainda é de primeira linha, mas também muito mais curta que a do Lenovo Z Play.
Teríamos recebido agradavelmente mais riscos para a atualização. O Moto Z2 Play da Lenovo é apenas uma versão retrabalhada do Moto Z Play com uma silhueta mais fina, bem como uma bateria menor que dificilmente oferece inovações reais.
Podemos dar ao Moto Z2 Play uma recomendação de compra se o comprador achar o sistema Moto Mods convincente, que funciona bem e com facilidade. O problema aqui é que existem muitas alternativas, como um banco de energia ou alto-falante Bluetooth. Em comparação com isso, os Moto Mods dificilmente oferecem vantagens reais. No entanto, os compradores também devem considerar o Moto Z Playe inclusive o Moto Z: Ambos são atualmente muito mais baratos e a Lenovo também garante a compatibilidade com os Moto Mods nos próximos anos.Lenovo's Moto Z2 Play is a good smartphone. It would look even better if the Moto Z Play (no longer) existed. The predecessor does many things just as good, some things just a bit worse, and other things even better while being considerably cheaper.
Are there any reasons at all for buying the successor? The casing of the Moto Z2 Play has been reworked and is now even slimmer. This would be a marketing scheme for a normal smartphone. However, it receives another dimension in the Moto Z2 Play: The attachable Moto Mods can make one millimeter quite significant. The lower weight is also an argument since the Mods add enough weight. Apart from that, the buyer gets a very rigid and stylish casing with a less conspicuous fingerprint scanner than in the predecessor. Fast LTE is installed, but still not 802.11ac Wi-Fi and the lack of appropriate Wi-Fi transmission rates is actually audacious. In return, the GPS module is very accurate and the cameras produce good photos. The screen is darker and the performance is only marginally higher than that of the predecessor. The battery life is still first-rate but also much shorter than that of Lenovo's Z Play.
We would have welcomed more risk taking for the update. Lenovo's Moto Z2 Play is just a reworked version of the Moto Z Play with a slimmer silhouette, as well as smaller battery that hardly offers any real innovations.
We can give the Moto Z2 Play a purchase recommendation if the buyer finds the Moto Mods system convincing, which function very easily and well. The problem here is that often-good alternatives, such as a power bank or Bluetooth speaker, exist. Compared to that, the Moto Mods hardly offer any real advantages. However, buyers should also consider the Moto Z Play and even the Moto Z: Both are presently much cheaper and Lenovo also guaranties the compatibility with the Moto Mods for the next few years.
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
- 08/15/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer