Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z

Name: Lenovo Moto Z
Brand: Lenovo

Moto-mania. O novo carro chefe Moto Z da Lenovo não apresenta apenas tecnologia de gama alta, mas também quer atrair clientes com a sua expansibilidade modular, bem como o design do chassi extremamente fino. O conceito funciona na prática ou existe alguma desvantagem como uma duração reduzida da bateria?

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/04/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Moto Z (Moto Z Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 1.8 GHz, Kryo

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 530, Análises do: 510 MHz

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 22.8 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Adaptador de cabo USB Type-C para conector de fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 2 TB (em combinação com o 2do slot SIM), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Proximidade, Hall, Magnetômetro, Giroscópio, USB-OTG, Moto Mods

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), 4G LTE (Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41), SAR Head: 0,304 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 5.19 x 155.3 x 75.3

Bateria

9.8 Wh, 2600 mAh

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (auto foco f/1.8, vídeo 2160p @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo f/2.2, vídeo 1080p @ 30 fps)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante mono frontal, Teclado: virtual, PSU, adaptador de áudio, ferramente para o slot SIM, Style Shell Nylon, para-choque plástico, Moto-App, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

136 g, Suprimento de energia: 97 g

Preço

699 EUR

Links

Lenovo página inicial
Lenovo Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Style Shell Nylon with transparent bumper

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	491 MBit/s
Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	427 MBit/s -13%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	303 MBit/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	303 MBit/s -38%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 MBit/s -42%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s -49%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	395 MBit/s +10%
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	360 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	290 MBit/s -19%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 MBit/s -29%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s -43%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	151 MBit/s -58%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Lenovo Moto Z

Huawei P9

Oneplus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Lenovo Moto Z

Huawei P9

Oneplus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Lenovo Moto Z

Huawei P9

Oneplus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

Picture of the ColorChecker colors. The reference color is displayed in the lower part of each patch.


486 cd/m²	498 cd/m²	512 cd/m²
470 cd/m²	485 cd/m²	502 cd/m²
469 cd/m²	485 cd/m²	506 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 512 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 490.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.87 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 485 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.14% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3"	Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Google Nexus 6P AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen
Brightness middle	485	554 14%	784 62%	361 -26%	419 -14%	363 -25%	297 -39%	557 15%
Brightness	490	552 13%	774 58%	366 -25%	431 -12%	365 -26%	297 -39%	553 13%
Brightness Distribution	92	96 4%	91 -1%	87 -5%	84 -9%	90 -2%	93 1%	97 5%
Black Level *			0.43					0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.1	1.59 24%	6.5 -210%	5.1 -143%	4.1 -95%	2.34 -11%	2.67 -27%	1.4 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.5	2.56 53%	11.7 -113%	10 -82%	12 -118%		3.98 28%	3.1 44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	2.01 23%	8 -208%	5.5 -112%	3.3 -27%	1.03 60%	2.81 -8%	1.3 50%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.01 ^109%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.1 ^105%	2.23 ^99%	2.08 ^106%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6843 ^95%	6321 ^103%	8699 ^75%	7388 ^88%	6550 ^99%	6429 ^101%	6379 ^102%	6667 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	88.14	82.12 -7%	68.08 -23%		89.38 1%		66.31 -25%	63.1 -28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	99.98 0%	97.46 -3%		100 0%		99.79 0%	99.83 0%
Contrast			1823					1591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Grayscale (Standard, target color space sRGB)

ColorChecker (Standard, target color space sRGB)

ColorChecker (Standard, target color space AdobeRGB)

Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space sRGB)

Grayscale (Intense, target color space sRGB)

ColorChecker (Intense, target color space sRGB)

ColorChecker (Intense, target color space AdobeRGB)

Saturation Sweeps (Intense, target color space sRGB)

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points 0%
LG G5	124244 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Plus	98413 Points -24%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points +10%
Google Nexus 6P	79502 Points -38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	94122 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	165399 Points +28%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	5450 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6480 (6415^min) Points +19%
LG G5	5507 Points +1%
Huawei P9 Plus	6556 Points +20%
OnePlus 3	5645 Points +4%
Google Nexus 6P	4587 Points -16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	2080 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2170 (2120^min) Points +4%
LG G5	2396 Points +15%
Huawei P9 Plus	1929 Points -7%
OnePlus 3	2398 Points +15%
Google Nexus 6P	1335 Points -36%

Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	6326 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2805 Points -56%
LG G5	6499 Points +3%
OnePlus 3	7085 Points +12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	5503 Points +39%
LG G5	3833 Points -3%
OnePlus 3	4097 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5630 Points +43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1840 Points +24%
LG G5	1674 Points +13%
OnePlus 3	1754 Points +19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3476 Points +135%

ANDEBench PRO
3D (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	58.9 fps
LG G5	47.42 fps -19%
OnePlus 3	62.9 fps +7%
Platform (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	404.1 Points
LG G5	298.6 Points -26%
OnePlus 3	246.4 Points -39%
Storage (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	14580 KB/s
LG G5	6137 KB/s -58%
OnePlus 3	6959 KB/s -52%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	5740 KOps/s
LG G5	6035 KOps/s +5%
OnePlus 3	6059 KOps/s +6%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	19176 MB/s
LG G5	19035 MB/s -1%
OnePlus 3	19937 MB/s +4%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	4834 Points
LG G5	4959 Points +3%
OnePlus 3	5098 Points +5%
Device Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	15951 Points
LG G5	13173 Points -17%
OnePlus 3	13768 Points -14%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -39%
LG G5	5581 Points -27%
Huawei P9 Plus	7159 Points -6%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points -7%
Google Nexus 6P	4716 Points -38%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points -12%
LG G5	2079 Points -12%
Huawei P9 Plus	2019 Points -14%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points +6%
Google Nexus 6P	1405 Points -40%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1465 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3097 Points +31%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -49%
LG G5	4807 Points +11%
Huawei P9 Plus	1512 Points -65%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points +11%
Google Nexus 6P	2424 Points -44%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2040 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6875 Points +59%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +20%
LG G5	2925 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Plus	3932 Points +16%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points +4%
Google Nexus 6P	1798 Points -47%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1386 Points -59%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6582 Points +94%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	542 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points +35%
LG G5	543 Points 0%
OnePlus 3	631 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1177 Points +117%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps -4%
LG G5	47 fps -11%
Huawei P9 Plus	43 fps -19%
OnePlus 3	60 fps +13%
Google Nexus 6P	33 fps -38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	18.75 fps -65%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	57.7 fps +9%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +5%
LG G5	74 fps -4%
Huawei P9 Plus	41 fps -47%
OnePlus 3	89 fps +16%
Google Nexus 6P	44 fps -43%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	27.11 fps -65%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	92 fps +19%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps -7%
LG G5	42 fps +2%
Huawei P9 Plus	18 fps -56%
OnePlus 3	47 fps +15%
Google Nexus 6P	25 fps -39%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	17.54 fps -57%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	58.7 fps +43%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps +4%
LG G5	30 fps +15%
Huawei P9 Plus	19 fps -27%
OnePlus 3	46 fps +77%
Google Nexus 6P	17 fps -35%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	11.81 fps -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	55.2 fps +112%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps +4%
LG G5	31 fps +15%
Huawei P9 Plus	10 fps -63%
OnePlus 3	31 fps +15%
Google Nexus 6P	16 fps -41%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.3 fps +53%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps 0%
LG G5	17 fps +13%
Huawei P9 Plus	11 fps -27%
OnePlus 3	30 fps +100%
Google Nexus 6P	9.5 fps -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.5 fps +177%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -6%
LG G5	18 fps +13%
Huawei P9 Plus	6.2 fps -61%
OnePlus 3	18 fps +13%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	9.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7.9 fps -19%
LG G5	11 fps +12%
Huawei P9 Plus	6.8 fps -31%
OnePlus 3	18 fps +84%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points +14%
LG G5	28730 Points +14%
Huawei P9 Plus	19936 Points -21%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points +20%
Google Nexus 6P	26876 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	37746 Points +50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points +24%
LG G5	32109 Points +20%
Huawei P9 Plus	21807 Points -18%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points +28%
Google Nexus 6P	34758 Points +30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	63386 Points +138%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points -6%
LG G5	20997 Points 0%
Huawei P9 Plus	15331 Points -27%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points +4%
Google Nexus 6P	14983 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	15626 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points +10%
LG G5	1695 Points -7%
Huawei P9 Plus	2336 Points +28%
OnePlus 3	1789 Points -2%
Google Nexus 6P	1142 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1522 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points -19%
LG G5	4468 Points +20%
Huawei P9 Plus	1042 Points -72%
OnePlus 3	4633 Points +25%
Google Nexus 6P	2302 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	4235 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points -10%
LG G5	3277 Points +8%
Huawei P9 Plus	1188 Points -61%
OnePlus 3	3424 Points +13%
Google Nexus 6P	1877 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3034 Points 0%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	24.33 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps -45%
LG G5	25.26 fps +4%
OnePlus 3	23.32 fps -4%

Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	59.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	60 fps 0%
LG G5	55.8 fps -7%
OnePlus 3	59.6 fps 0%

Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	33028 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	32273 Points -2%
LG G5	25532 Points -23%
OnePlus 3	33064 Points 0%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	41445 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	41091 Points -1%
LG G5	28538 Points -31%
OnePlus 3	Points -100%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	33082 Points -20%

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	2461 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2131 Points -13%
LG G5	2168 Points -12%
OnePlus 3	1913 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	2017 Points -18%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	4781 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6382 Points +33%
LG G5	5498 Points +15%
OnePlus 3	5727 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5495 Points +15%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	8912 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6136 Points -31%
LG G5	10573 Points +19%
OnePlus 3	11024 Points +24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	25299 Points +184%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	68378 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	36364 Points -47%
LG G5	100164 Points +46%
OnePlus 3	91875 Points +34%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	48907 Points -28%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	170521 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	225427 Points +32%
LG G5	162632 Points -5%
OnePlus 3	182968 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	49294 Points -71%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	8795 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	8049 Points -8%
LG G5	8724 Points -1%
OnePlus 3	8196 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	8420 Points -4%

Legend

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2564 ms * +19%
LG G5	3461 ms * -10%
Huawei P9 Plus	2792 ms * +12%
OnePlus 3	2921 ms * +7%
Google Nexus 6P	4193 ms * -33%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	5553 ms * -76%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1103 ms * +65%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13191 Points +70%
LG G5	9731 Points +25%
Huawei P9 Plus	12058 Points +55%
OnePlus 3	9155 Points +18%
Google Nexus 6P	8804 Points +13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	8059 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	26053 Points +235%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	112 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	163 Points +46%
LG G5	108 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Plus	130 Points +16%
OnePlus 3	122 Points +9%
Google Nexus 6P	116 Points +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	113 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	204 Points +82%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	75.1 Points +58%
LG G5	49.7 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Plus	70 Points +47%
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points +15%
Google Nexus 6P	47.4 Points 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	46 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	168.1 Points +254%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	5344 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7198 (6255^min) Points +35%
LG G5	5473 (4080^min) Points +2%
OnePlus 3	5814 (5467^min) Points +9%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points +4%
LG G5	900 Points -6%
Huawei P9 Plus	1049 Points +9%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points +16%
Google Nexus 6P	791 Points -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	837 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1542 Points +61%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	117.2 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	86.7 MB/s -26%
LG G5	89.3 MB/s -24%
Huawei P9 Plus	39.33 MB/s -66%
OnePlus 3	137.6 MB/s +17%
Google Nexus 6P	20.1 MB/s -83%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	74.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15.79 MB/s -79%
LG G5	16.22 MB/s -78%
Huawei P9 Plus	51.2 MB/s -32%
OnePlus 3	18.23 MB/s -76%
Google Nexus 6P	11.79 MB/s -84%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	168.3 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	145.1 MB/s -14%
LG G5	141.3 MB/s -16%
Huawei P9 Plus	140.4 MB/s -17%
OnePlus 3	153.3 MB/s -9%
Google Nexus 6P	122.5 MB/s -27%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	439.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	487.3 MB/s +11%
LG G5	427.6 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9 Plus	284.3 MB/s -35%
OnePlus 3	408.7 MB/s -7%
Google Nexus 6P	236.3 MB/s -46%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	45.64 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	50.4 MB/s +10%
LG G5	45.53 MB/s 0%
Huawei P9 Plus	24.95 MB/s -45%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	78.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	76.4 MB/s -3%
LG G5	78.5 MB/s 0%
Huawei P9 Plus	62.5 MB/s -20%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points -5%
LG G5	1478 Points -33%
Huawei P9 Plus	2667 Points +22%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points -6%
Google Nexus 6P	1136 Points -48%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1945 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1319 Points -40%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	29 fps
	very low	29 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	60 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


36.1 °C	37.2 °C	40.8 °C
35.8 °C	37.3 °C	42.4 °C
35.6 °C	37.5 °C	41.4 °C

Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C


38.3 °C	39.9 °C	37.2 °C
39.4 °C	40.6 °C	36 °C
39.9 °C	40.6 °C	36.1 °C

Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 34.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Lenovo Moto Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

no name audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.12 / 0.22 Watt
Ocioso	0.66 / 1.01 / 1.09 Watt
Carga	3.97 / 8.34 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Google Nexus 6P 3450 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh
Power Consumption		-15%	-38%	-11%	-22%	-29%	-172%	-49%
Idle Minimum *	0.66	0.63 5%	0.55 17%	0.87 -32%	0.57 14%	0.83 -26%	2.85 -332%	0.77 -17%
Idle Average *	1.01	1.1 -9%	1.37 -36%	1.2 -19%	1.24 -23%	1.09 -8%	2.95 -192%	2.04 -102%
Idle Maximum *	1.09	1.56 -43%	2.25 -106%	1.27 -17%	1.36 -25%	1.17 -7%	3.26 -199%	2.24 -106%
Load Average *	3.97	5.95 -50%	6.24 -57%	4.69 -18%	5.92 -49%	7.49 -89%	8.92 -125%	4.69 -18%
Load Maximum *	8.34	6.7 20%	9.12 -9%	5.63 32%	10.53 -26%	9.51 -14%	9.39 -13%	8.66 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		22h 51min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 53)		6h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 20min

	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Google Nexus 6P 3450 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh
Battery Runtime		38%	-1%	6%	26%	-10%	-23%	15%
Reader / Idle	1371	1663 21%	1833 34%	1446 5%	1338 -2%	1447 6%	1078 -21%	1835 34%
H.264	724	914 26%	600 -17%	776 7%	847 17%	533 -26%	611 -16%	813 12%
WiFi v1.3	407	732 80%	387 -5%	530 30%	840 106%	375 -8%	369 -9%	587 44%
Load	320	392 23%	267 -17%	263 -18%	268 -16%	280 -12%	179 -44%	225 -30%

Pro

+ Chassi fino e leve com boa qualidade de construção

+ Expansível com Moto Mods

+ Sem software desnecessário

+ Porta USB Type-C veloz

+ O cartão micro-SD pode ser formatado como armazenamento interno

+ AC WLAN muito veloz

+ Bons recursos do telefone

+ Tela táctil precisa

+ Tela de alta resolução

+ Leitor de digitais confiável

+ Rápido desempenho do sistema

+ Entregue com carregador rápido e Style Shell

Contra

- A qualidade das imagens da câmera principal revela fraquezas

- Sem suporte para Miracast

- Tela com flickering PWM

- Sem headset incluído

- Bateria integrada

- Sem conector para fones de 3,5 mm

In review: Lenovo Moto Z (XT1650-03). Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

O novo telefone carro chefe da Lenovo, Moto Z, se destaca principalmente dos rivais com sua expansibilidade modular. Os chamados Moto Mods introduzem novos recursos, que normalmente não estão disponíveis para um smartphone. Um obstáculo poderia ser os preços bastante altos dos módulos, mas a Lenovo promete suportar pelo menos três gerações de aparelhos, por isso, dito mod poder fazer sentido no longo prazo.

Mas o Moto Z é um smartphone bem-sucedido sem a compra de módulos adicionais e não tem nada que esconder da concorrência de gama alta: O chassi fino sofisticado e extremamente fino, bem como os poderosos componentes podem justificar o preço premium. E a interface de usuário mais padrão do Android também deve ter muitos fanáticos. Também ficamos surpreendidos pelas boas durações na prática, apesar da bateria pequena.

Não entendemos por que a Lenovo entrega o Moto Z com uma câmera apenas média – o sensor de 21 MP do irmão Moto Z Force teria sido uma boa adição aqui. Alguns compradores potenciais também podem sentir falta do conector para fones de 3,5 mm, embora o smartphone é entregue com um adaptador correspondente.

Graças ao novo conceito Moto Mod, existe um pouco de ar fresco no segmento de smartphones de gama alta. Mas o Moto Z também convence com clássicos recursos de smartphone. Somente a qualidade da imagem da câmera principal fica atrás de rivais de gama alta.

Se você gosta dos conceitos de smartphones modulares, também deveria dar uma olhada no LG G5 antes de comprar o Moto Z. A LG não tem muitas expansões e o manuseio não é tão confortável, mas o preço do smartphone já caiu para 450 Euros (~$506) apesar do hardware premium – e é, portanto, muito mais barato que o modelo de teste.

Lenovo Moto Z - 2016-09-26 09/26/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento

93%

Teclado

71 / 75 → 94%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

55 / 60 → 92%

Peso

93%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

60 / 63 → 94%

Desempenho da aplicação

64 / 70 → 91%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

74 / 91 → 81%

Camera

73%

Médio

80%

89%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z

Andreas Kilian, 2016-10- 4 (Update: 2016-10-13)