Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z Play

O Z superior? Como o irmão mais barato do smartphone carro chefe Moto Z, o Moto Z Play também pode ser expandido mediante Moto Mods. Além de uma bateria maior, também está equipado com uma câmera principal de resolução mais alta a um preço muito mais baixo. Nosso teste revela quais recursos ele não possui.
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Moto Z Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
3 GB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.1 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, Hall, sensor de proximidade, magenetômetro, monitor de áudi, gíroscópio, USB OTG, Moto Mods
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), 4G LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28), SAR head (GSM/WDCMA/LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth): 0.396 W/kg, SAR body (LTE band 8, WiFi, Bluetooth): 1.4 W/kg , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7 x 156.4 x 76.4
Bateria
13.3 Wh, 3510 mAh, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 50 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (autofoco f/2.0, 2160p vídeo @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo f/2.2, 1080p vídeo @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono na frente, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação, ferramenta para slot SIM, Style Shell Nylon, Moto-App, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
165 g, Suprimento de energia: 97 g
Preço
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Moto Z Play front
Moto Z Play front
Moto Z Play back
Moto Z Play back
Moto Z Play back with Style Mod
Moto Z Play back with Style Mod
Moto Z Play physical buttons
Moto Z Play card slot
Moto Z Play with Insta-Share Projector
Moto Z Play with JBL Bass Boost speaker
Moto Z Play with Incipio offGRID power pack
Moto Z Play with Incipio offGRID power pack
Moto Z (l) and Moto Z Play (r)
Moto Z (l) and Moto Z Play (r)
Moto Z (below) and Moto Z Play (above)
Power supply with fixed USB Type-C cable
SIM and memory card tray

Size Comparison

156.4 mm 76.4 mm 7 mm 165 g155.3 mm 75.3 mm 5.19 mm 136 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g146.8 mm 72.6 mm 7.5 mm 147 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g144.8 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 155 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s +333%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s +188%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s +65%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s -9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s -72%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s +340%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s +164%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s +131%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
118 MBit/s -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s -73%
Moto Z Play - route
Moto Z Play - route
Moto Z Play - underpass
Moto Z Play - underpass
Moto Z Play - turning point
Moto Z Play - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
532
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 532 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 511 cd/m² Minimum: 6.52 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 509 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen
Brightness middle
509
378
-26%
518
2%
505
-1%
451
-11%
419
-18%
485
-5%
Brightness
511
380
-26%
475
-7%
468
-8%
443
-13%
431
-16%
490
-4%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
81
-13%
88
-5%
93
0%
84
-10%
92
-1%
Black Level *
0.61
0.74
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.2
1.95
11%
6.8
-209%
4.1
-86%
5.4
-145%
4.1
-86%
2.1
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
3.09
47%
11.4
-97%
5.8
-0%
9.9
-71%
12
-107%
5.5
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.86
7%
7
-250%
4.9
-145%
6.7
-235%
3.3
-65%
2.6
-30%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.13 103%
2.35 94%
2.5 88%
2.33 94%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
CCT
6768 96%
6376 102%
8151 80%
7116 91%
8262 79%
6550 99%
6843 95%
Contrast
849
682
1128
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 243.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Grayscale (standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (standard, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (standard, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Grayscale (intensive, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (intensive, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (intensive, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (intensive, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (intensive, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (intensive, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (intensive, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (intensive, target color space: AdobeRGB)
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points -32%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points -21%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points -18%
Honor 8
94671 Points +54%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points +132%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points +111%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4792 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3607 Points -25%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
925 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
692 Points -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
3768 Points
OnePlus 3
5645 Points
Lenovo Moto Z
5450 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Lite
883 Points
OnePlus 3
2398 Points
Lenovo Moto Z
2080 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2525 Points
Honor 8
5481 Points +117%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points +62%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points +56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points
Honor 8
1726 Points +117%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points +121%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points +86%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2465 Points
Honor 8
3101 Points +26%
OnePlus 3
7085 Points +187%
Lenovo Moto Z
6326 Points +157%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points -41%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points -31%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points -21%
Honor 8
6735 Points 0%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points +5%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points +13%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points +10%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points +18%
Honor 8
994 Points +53%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points +71%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points +48%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points -52%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points -34%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points -19%
Honor 8
1703 Points +68%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points +375%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points +327%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points +11%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points +18%
Honor 8
3952 Points +91%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points +71%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points +64%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points -21%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points +2%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points +17%
Honor 8
2034 Points +100%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points +145%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points +131%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points -30%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points +35%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points +69%
Honor 8
2556 Points +222%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points +158%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points +175%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -39%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps +22%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps -17%
Honor 8
43 fps +87%
OnePlus 3
60 fps +161%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps +130%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -39%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps -22%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps -17%
Honor 8
41 fps +78%
OnePlus 3
89 fps +287%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps +235%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -62%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps -28%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps -22%
Honor 8
19 fps +90%
OnePlus 3
47 fps +370%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps +310%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -62%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps +50%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps -16%
Honor 8
19 fps +90%
OnePlus 3
46 fps +360%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps +160%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps -23%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps -27%
Honor 8
10 fps +61%
OnePlus 3
31 fps +400%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps +335%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps +64%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps -27%
Honor 8
11 fps +64%
OnePlus 3
30 fps +348%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps +124%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points -43%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points -20%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points -15%
Honor 8
20235 Points +45%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points +117%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points +81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points -44%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points -19%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points -16%
Honor 8
22157 Points +65%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points +153%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points +98%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points -40%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points -24%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points -14%
Honor 8
15531 Points -2%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points +37%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points -23%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points -16%
Honor 8
2587 Points +59%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points -62%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points -28%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points -35%
Honor 8
1112 Points +53%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points +539%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points +413%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points -59%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points -27%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points -33%
Honor 8
1273 Points +54%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points +314%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points +266%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8169 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11887 ms * -46%
Sony Xperia XA
9610 ms * -18%
Huawei P9 Lite
9397 ms * -15%
Honor 8
2979 ms * +64%
OnePlus 3
2921 ms * +64%
Lenovo Moto Z
3155 ms * +61%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3611 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points -19%
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points -4%
Honor 8
10692 Points +115%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points +84%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points +56%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
64 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points -13%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points -19%
Honor 8
138 Points +66%
OnePlus 3
122 Points +47%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points +35%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22 Points -31%
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points -9%
Honor 8
64 Points +101%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points +71%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points +49%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Moto Z PlaySamsung Galaxy A5 2016Sony Xperia XAHuawei P9 LiteHonor 8OnePlus 3Lenovo Moto Z
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
-22%
-27%
-11%
91%
77%
Random Read 4KB
38.78
22.9
-41%
22.05
-43%
38.22
-1%
34.16
-12%
137.6
255%
117.2
202%
Random Write 4KB
45.58
11.2
-75%
10.6
-77%
15.35
-66%
31.5
-31%
18.23
-60%
74.9
64%
Sequential Write 256KB
73.1
60.4
-17%
68.6
-6%
46.24
-37%
119.3
63%
153.3
110%
168.3
130%
Sequential Read 256KB
254.8
209.4
-18%
240.4
-6%
283.5
11%
247.5
-3%
408.7
60%
439.7
73%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
50.6
50.7
0%
25.1
-50%
23.59
-53%
45.64
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.6
72.9
-2%
60.8
-18%
53.7
-28%
78.5
5%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high56 fps
Carga Máxima
 33 °C33.8 °C32.7 °C 
 34.5 °C32.2 °C31.2 °C 
 32 °C31.6 °C31.3 °C 
Máximo: 34.5 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C
31.4 °C32.6 °C32.7 °C
30.9 °C31.3 °C32.4 °C
30.5 °C31 °C27.9 °C
Máximo: 32.7 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  31 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.72525.434.63125.329.34032.928.45033.637.16331.634.78028.429.51002729.712520.8331602243.220021.349.625020.85631521.257.440019.459.350019.566.563017.768.580017.974.4100017.875.1125017.377.3160017.478.3200016.778.4250017.278.2315018.278.2400017.976.1500017.675630017.773.5800017.873.71000017.9741250018.175.21600018.269SPL3088.1N1.372.7median 17.9median 73.7Delta1.49.131.638.525.446.325.34832.945.933.646.631.650.728.449.12756.720.862.22268.421.373.620.876.421.276.919.476.519.580.817.778.917.981.817.883.317.38417.484.916.784.417.284.618.280.617.979.217.685.317.785.217.882.517.980.518.180.118.278.13095.21.3120.9median 17.9median 80.61.43.631.636.225.430.625.328.532.928.133.638.231.633.328.428.4272620.825.82230.921.336.420.844.721.248.919.453.719.56117.763.717.969.817.872.817.37317.472.816.773.317.274.418.27317.973.117.670.817.770.517.870.917.971.918.166.618.261.43083.91.356.8median 17.9median 69.81.411.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Moto Z PlayJBL-Speaker Moto-ModLenovo Moto Z
Lenovo Moto Z Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

no name audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.51 / 0.87 / 0.9 Watt
Carga midlight 1.69 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
-74%
-69%
-98%
-108%
-104%
-62%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.96
-88%
0.72
-41%
0.73
-43%
0.78
-53%
0.57
-12%
0.66
-29%
Idle Average *
0.87
1.64
-89%
1.5
-72%
2.09
-140%
1.89
-117%
1.24
-43%
1.01
-16%
Idle Maximum *
0.9
1.71
-90%
1.57
-74%
2.11
-134%
2.02
-124%
1.36
-51%
1.09
-21%
Load Average *
1.69
2.98
-76%
3.48
-106%
4.15
-146%
5.28
-212%
5.92
-250%
3.97
-135%
Load Maximum *
4
5.08
-27%
6.04
-51%
5.05
-26%
5.44
-36%
10.53
-163%
8.34
-109%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
42h 20min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 53)
13h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
10h 52min
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-26%
-65%
-46%
-49%
-33%
-47%
Reader / Idle
2540
2323
-9%
775
-69%
1404
-45%
1487
-41%
1338
-47%
1371
-46%
H.264
1190
672
-44%
460
-61%
568
-52%
526
-56%
847
-29%
724
-39%
WiFi v1.3
824
626
-24%
353
-57%
604
-27%
499
-39%
840
2%
407
-51%
Load
652
483
-26%
170
-74%
272
-58%
255
-61%
268
-59%
320
-51%

Pro

+ Carcaça sólida e de alta qualidade
+ Expansível via Moto Mods
+ Sem bloatware pré-carregado
+ Porta USB Type-C veloz
+ O cartão micro-SD pode ser utilizado como armazenamento interno
+ Bons recursos do telefone
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Tela AMOLED de alto contraste
+ Leitor de digitais confiável
+ Manuseio fluente
+ Carregador rápido e Style Shell inclusos
+ Duração da bateria muito longa
+ Baixa temperatura
+ Bom alto falante

Contra

- Autofoco não confiável da câmera principal
- Sem suporte para Miracast
- Tela com flickering PWM
- Headset não incluído
- Bateria não removível
In review: Lenovo Moto Z Play (XT1635-02). Review sample courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Moto Z Play (XT1635-02). Review sample courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

Como com o Moto Z, um dos recursos principais do Moto Z Play é sua expansibilidade via Moto Mods. De acordo com a Lenovo, esses módulos serão suportados por, pelo menos, três gerações de aparelhos. No entanto, primeiro os compradores terão que procurar mais profundo em seus bolsos. Embora isto possa ser considerado sem sentido, recomenda-se dar uma olhada no Moto Z Play: Com o seu SoC Snapdragon 625 energeticamente eficiente e suficientemente veloz, a tela convence com altos contrastes e boa estabilidade dos ângulos de visão, e a carcaça feita de uma composição de metal-vidro que se sente de primeira categoria. Além disso, o modelo de teste oferece quase tudo que os compradores de smartphone desejam com funcionalidade dual-SIM, NFC, porta USB Type-C, e veloz leitor de digitais - inclusive um conector de 3,5-mm está integrado. Uma das verdadeiras desvantagens do modelo de teste é pouco confiável auto-foco da câmera principal.

Em vista da grande diferença do preço de mais de 200 Euros (~$222) entre o Moto Z e Moto Z Play, as pequenas deficiências do modelo mais econômico, em alguns aspectos, são surpreendentes. Os compradores que podem dispensar á última gota de nitidez da tela, um design extremamente fino, e altas reservas de poder em favor de quase o dobro da duração da bateria, estarão bem cobertos com o Moto Z Play.

Uma alternativa interessante baseada em um SoC Snapdragon 625 seria o Asus ZenFone 3. A construção do aparelho é de alta qualidade e vem com um extenso pacote de software de fábrica. No entanto, à diferença do Moto Z Play, não possui NFC ou expansibilidade modular. Os compradores que desejem o poder de gama alta com um preço de gama média ficarão curiosos por nossa análise do ZTE Axon 7 que chegará em breve.

Lenovo Moto Z Play - 10/27/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
93%
Teclado
70 / 75 → 93%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
51 / 60 → 85%
Peso
91%
Bateria
98%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
32 / 63 → 51%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
72%
Médio
77%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z Play
Andreas Kilian, 2016-11- 9 (Update: 2016-11-26)