Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z Play
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 509 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
| Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | |||||||
| Brightness middle | 509 | 378 -26% | 518 2% | 505 -1% | 451 -11% | 419 -18% | 485 -5% |
| Brightness | 511 | 380 -26% | 475 -7% | 468 -8% | 443 -13% | 431 -16% | 490 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 81 -13% | 88 -5% | 93 0% | 84 -10% | 92 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.4 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.95 11% | 6.8 -209% | 4.1 -86% | 5.4 -145% | 4.1 -86% | 2.1 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 3.09 47% | 11.4 -97% | 5.8 -0% | 9.9 -71% | 12 -107% | 5.5 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.86 7% | 7 -250% | 4.9 -145% | 6.7 -235% | 3.3 -65% | 2.6 -30% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.35 94% | 2.5 88% | 2.33 94% | 2.1 105% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6768 96% | 6376 102% | 8151 80% | 7116 91% | 8262 79% | 6550 99% | 6843 95% |
| Contrast | 849 | 682 | 1128 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 88.14 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 243.9 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | Sony Xperia XA | Huawei P9 Lite | Honor 8 | OnePlus 3 | Lenovo Moto Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -38% | -22% | -27% | -11% | 91% | 77% | |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.78 | 22.9 -41% | 22.05 -43% | 38.22 -1% | 34.16 -12% | 137.6 255% | 117.2 202% |
| Random Write 4KB | 45.58 | 11.2 -75% | 10.6 -77% | 15.35 -66% | 31.5 -31% | 18.23 -60% | 74.9 64% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 73.1 | 60.4 -17% | 68.6 -6% | 46.24 -37% | 119.3 63% | 153.3 110% | 168.3 130% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 254.8 | 209.4 -18% | 240.4 -6% | 283.5 11% | 247.5 -3% | 408.7 60% | 439.7 73% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 50.6 | 50.7 0% | 25.1 -50% | 23.59 -53% | 45.64 -10% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 74.6 | 72.9 -2% | 60.8 -18% | 53.7 -28% | 78.5 5% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 56 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto Z Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
no name audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.51 / 0.87 / 0.9 Watt |
| Carga |
1.69 / 4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -74% | -69% | -98% | -108% | -104% | -62% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.51 | 0.96 -88% | 0.72 -41% | 0.73 -43% | 0.78 -53% | 0.57 -12% | 0.66 -29% |
| Idle Average * | 0.87 | 1.64 -89% | 1.5 -72% | 2.09 -140% | 1.89 -117% | 1.24 -43% | 1.01 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 0.9 | 1.71 -90% | 1.57 -74% | 2.11 -134% | 2.02 -124% | 1.36 -51% | 1.09 -21% |
| Load Average * | 1.69 | 2.98 -76% | 3.48 -106% | 4.15 -146% | 5.28 -212% | 5.92 -250% | 3.97 -135% |
| Load Maximum * | 4 | 5.08 -27% | 6.04 -51% | 5.05 -26% | 5.44 -36% | 10.53 -163% | 8.34 -109% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | -65% | -46% | -49% | -33% | -47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2540 | 2323 -9% | 775 -69% | 1404 -45% | 1487 -41% | 1338 -47% | 1371 -46% |
| H.264 | 1190 | 672 -44% | 460 -61% | 568 -52% | 526 -56% | 847 -29% | 724 -39% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 824 | 626 -24% | 353 -57% | 604 -27% | 499 -39% | 840 2% | 407 -51% |
| Load | 652 | 483 -26% | 170 -74% | 272 -58% | 255 -61% | 268 -59% | 320 -51% |
Pro
Contra
Como com o Moto Z, um dos recursos principais do Moto Z Play é sua expansibilidade via Moto Mods. De acordo com a Lenovo, esses módulos serão suportados por, pelo menos, três gerações de aparelhos. No entanto, primeiro os compradores terão que procurar mais profundo em seus bolsos. Embora isto possa ser considerado sem sentido, recomenda-se dar uma olhada no Moto Z Play: Com o seu SoC Snapdragon 625 energeticamente eficiente e suficientemente veloz, a tela convence com altos contrastes e boa estabilidade dos ângulos de visão, e a carcaça feita de uma composição de metal-vidro que se sente de primeira categoria. Além disso, o modelo de teste oferece quase tudo que os compradores de smartphone desejam com funcionalidade dual-SIM, NFC, porta USB Type-C, e veloz leitor de digitais - inclusive um conector de 3,5-mm está integrado. Uma das verdadeiras desvantagens do modelo de teste é pouco confiável auto-foco da câmera principal.
Em vista da grande diferença do preço de mais de 200 Euros (~$222) entre o Moto Z e Moto Z Play, as pequenas deficiências do modelo mais econômico, em alguns aspectos, são surpreendentes. Os compradores que podem dispensar á última gota de nitidez da tela, um design extremamente fino, e altas reservas de poder em favor de quase o dobro da duração da bateria, estarão bem cobertos com o Moto Z Play.
Uma alternativa interessante baseada em um SoC Snapdragon 625 seria o Asus ZenFone 3. A construção do aparelho é de alta qualidade e vem com um extenso pacote de software de fábrica. No entanto, à diferença do Moto Z Play, não possui NFC ou expansibilidade modular. Os compradores que desejem o poder de gama alta com um preço de gama média ficarão curiosos por nossa análise do ZTE Axon 7 que chegará em breve.
Lenovo Moto Z Play
- 10/27/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian
Price comparison
