Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto G5
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 660 cd/m²
Contraste: 2276:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.18
| Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Lenovo Moto G5 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Lenovo Moto G4 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG K10 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Huawei P8 lite 2017 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -22% | -23% | -38% | -23% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 660 | 503 -24% | 724 10% | 384 -42% | 575 -13% | 507 -23% |
| Brightness | 625 | 495 -21% | 723 16% | 350 -44% | 559 -11% | 474 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 96 4% | 87 -5% | 85 -8% | 91 -1% | 85 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.31 -7% | 0.71 -145% | 0.36 -24% | 0.39 -34% | 0.53 -83% |
| Contrast | 2276 | 1623 -29% | 1020 -55% | 1067 -53% | 1474 -35% | 957 -58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 6.2 -27% | 4.5 8% | 6 -22% | 5.2 -6% | 4.7 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.6 | 9.8 -29% | 8.4 -11% | 14 -84% | 10.3 -36% | 7.2 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 6.8 -42% | 4.9 -2% | 5.9 -23% | 7.2 -50% | 4.8 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.33 94% | 2.44 90% | 2 110% | 2.4 92% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7357 88% | 8113 80% | 6496 100% | 8042 81% | 7224 90% | 6441 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 1 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 31 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto G5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto G4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.04 / 0.21 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.73 / 1.64 / 1.68 Watt |
| Carga |
3.46 / 6.13 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 Plus 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 3000 mAh | LG K10 2017 2800 mAh | Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | -19% | 8% | -47% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.73 | 0.91 -25% | 0.65 11% | 0.76 -4% | 1.44 -97% | 0.74 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 1.64 | 1.83 -12% | 1.89 -15% | 1.59 3% | 2.47 -51% | 2.04 -24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.68 | 1.87 -11% | 1.92 -14% | 1.61 4% | 2.58 -54% | 2.22 -32% |
| Load Average * | 3.46 | 3.17 8% | 5.28 -53% | 3.24 6% | 4.55 -32% | 5.57 -61% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.13 | 4.87 21% | 7.45 -22% | 4.15 32% | 6.3 -3% | 6.59 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Pro
Contra
À primeira vista, já podemos dizer que o Moto G5 é um smartphone muito interessante: acessível, porém equipado com uma tela premium, carcaça de metal leve, bom interior, e bateria substituível pelo usuário. A Lenovo parece estar em uma missão para provar que mesmo competindo no mercado de gama média inferior não necessariamente deve significar telas escuras de baixas resoluções e ICs de comunicação lenta.
Por $250 você recebe uma tela brilhante com incríveis níveis de preto e contraste, um bom alto falante, uma sólida carcaça de metal, uma bateria substituível pelo usuário, e um leitor de digitais. A adição de um veloz Wi-Fi e armazenamento, bom desempenho, e boa qualidade das chamadas, tornam o telefone quase perfeito para seu preço. Apenas a câmera poderia se desempenhar um pouco melhor em cenários com pouca luz, a temperatura sob uso intenso é um pouco alta para o nosso gosto, e a duração da bateria poderia ser melhor.
O Moto G5 oferece muito, e sua razão de preço/desempenho é bastante bom. A insuficiente duração da bateria é compensada pelo fato de que a bateria é substituível pelo usuário.
A diferença de preço entre o G5 e o G5 Plus é ainda maior agora principalmente graças ao fato de que a Lenovo conseguiu fazer o G5 ainda mais barato do que o G4. A Lenovo já ganhou nosso respeito melhorando os componentes ao mesmo tempo em que reduziu o preço, e isso torna o G5 em uma alternativa intermediária muito interessante.
Price comparison
