Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto G5

A próxima geração. Com a sua mais recente reencarnação, o Moto G tenta seduzir-nos com um bom valor para o dinheiro e um visual charmoso. Nossa revisão aprofundada vai revelar se a quinta geração do Moto G está, mais uma vez, seguindo os passos do seu antecessor e se se tornará outro smartphone Moto de gama média mais atraente.
Lenovo Moto G5 (Moto G Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5mm combo, Card Reader: microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: aceleração, proximidade, giroscópio, USB-OTG,
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); Bandwith (Download/​Upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps; SAR: 0,618 W/kg (head), 1,340 W/kg (body), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 144.3 x 73
Bateria
10.8 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Quick charge
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, phase detection autofocus, LED flash, videos @ 1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, wide angle
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Lato falante frontal, Teclado: Teclado virtual, charger, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
144.5 g, Suprimento de energia: 73 g
Preço
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

153 mm 76.6 mm 9.8 mm 155 g150.2 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 155 g149.5 mm 73.7 mm 8.55 mm 148 g148.7 mm 75.3 mm 7.99 mm 138 g147.2 mm 72.9 mm 7.6 mm 147 g144.3 mm 73 mm 9.5 mm 144.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
100 MBit/s -9%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s -50%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s -51%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 MBit/s -55%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s -55%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s -61%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.2 MBit/s -62%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Overview
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Overview
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Junction
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Junction
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
622
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
660
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 660 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 624.9 cd/m² Minimum: 6.63 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 660 cd/m²
Contraste: 2276:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Lenovo Moto G4
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2"
Screen
-22%
-23%
-38%
-23%
-23%
Brightness middle
660
503
-24%
724
10%
384
-42%
575
-13%
507
-23%
Brightness
625
495
-21%
723
16%
350
-44%
559
-11%
474
-24%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
87
-5%
85
-8%
91
-1%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.29
0.31
-7%
0.71
-145%
0.36
-24%
0.39
-34%
0.53
-83%
Contrast
2276
1623
-29%
1020
-55%
1067
-53%
1474
-35%
957
-58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.9
6.2
-27%
4.5
8%
6
-22%
5.2
-6%
4.7
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.6
9.8
-29%
8.4
-11%
14
-84%
10.3
-36%
7.2
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
6.8
-42%
4.9
-2%
5.9
-23%
7.2
-50%
4.8
-0%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.33 94%
2.44 90%
2 110%
2.4 92%
2.25 98%
CCT
7357 88%
8113 80%
6496 100%
8042 81%
7224 90%
6441 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Carga Máxima
 43 °C39.8 °C34.4 °C 
 43 °C40 °C33.3 °C 
 40.2 °C39 °C33.1 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
33.1 °C34.7 °C36.6 °C
33.2 °C34.3 °C36.5 °C
32.6 °C34.3 °C36.1 °C
Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.62525.436.23125.335.84032.927.85033.627.66331.630.38028.430.31002727.812520.832.9160223220021.339.625020.845.531521.252.840019.457.350019.564.963017.769.480017.969.8100017.873.2125017.372.1160017.470.2200016.770.7250017.272.5315018.271.8400017.969.8500017.669.6630017.765.7800017.8641000017.964.31250018.157.51600018.251.3SPL3082.1N1.351.5median 17.9median 64.9Delta1.49.83237.832.4323430.431.33430.628.931.730.630.831.52630.834.830.339.434.828.328.936.228.330.529.328.630.528.525.825.428.533.125.921.333.145.934.823.345.951.942.122.551.956.146.422.456.158.750.621.358.76354.218.46366.85817.566.870.761.817.570.772.16517.272.175.567.216.875.574.866.117.374.875.867.117.475.877.468.416.677.47869.417.37876.867.517.676.87566.417.67571.462.417.771.470.761.917.470.770.360.417.770.367.158.317.967.163.754.118.163.758.651.418.158.686.677.829.886.666.439.21.366.4median 70.3median 60.4median 17.7median 70.38.910.11.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Moto G5Lenovo Moto G4
Lenovo Moto G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.21 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.64 / 1.68 Watt
Carga midlight 3.46 / 6.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4
3000 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
-19%
8%
-47%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.91
-25%
0.65
11%
0.76
-4%
1.44
-97%
0.74
-1%
Idle Average *
1.64
1.83
-12%
1.89
-15%
1.59
3%
2.47
-51%
2.04
-24%
Idle Maximum *
1.68
1.87
-11%
1.92
-14%
1.61
4%
2.58
-54%
2.22
-32%
Load Average *
3.46
3.17
8%
5.28
-53%
3.24
6%
4.55
-32%
5.57
-61%
Load Maximum *
6.13
4.87
21%
7.45
-22%
4.15
32%
6.3
-3%
6.59
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Pro

+ Carcaça de metal sólida e de alta qualidade
+ Bateria substituível pelo usuário
+ Versão dual-sim disponível
+ Versão atual do Android 7
+ WiFi veloz
+ Boa qualidade das chamadas
+ Leitor de impressões digitais
+ Tela muito brilhante e de alto contraste
+ Bom alto falante
+ Consumo de energia moderado

Contra

- A tela sofre de uma leve tonalidade azul
- Patches de segurança não atualizados
- Esquenta bastante
- Má qualidade da câmera em situações de baixa iluminação
- reprodução de cores inexata nas fotos

À primeira vista, já podemos dizer que o Moto G5 é um smartphone muito interessante: acessível, porém equipado com uma tela premium, carcaça de metal leve, bom interior, e bateria substituível pelo usuário. A Lenovo parece estar em uma missão para provar que mesmo competindo no mercado de gama média inferior não necessariamente deve significar telas escuras de baixas resoluções e ICs de comunicação lenta.

Por $250 você recebe uma tela brilhante com incríveis níveis de preto e contraste, um bom alto falante, uma sólida carcaça de metal, uma bateria substituível pelo usuário, e um leitor de digitais. A adição de um veloz Wi-Fi e armazenamento, bom desempenho, e boa qualidade das chamadas, tornam o telefone quase perfeito para seu preço. Apenas a câmera poderia se desempenhar um pouco melhor em cenários com pouca luz, a temperatura sob uso intenso é um pouco alta para o nosso gosto, e a duração da bateria poderia ser melhor.

O Moto G5 oferece muito, e sua razão de preço/desempenho é bastante bom. A insuficiente duração da bateria é compensada pelo fato de que a bateria é substituível pelo usuário.

A diferença de preço entre o G5 e o G5 Plus é ainda maior agora principalmente graças ao fato de que a Lenovo conseguiu fazer o G5 ainda mais barato do que o G4. A Lenovo já ganhou nosso respeito melhorando os componentes ao mesmo tempo em que reduziu o preço, e isso torna o G5 em uma alternativa intermediária muito interessante.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto G5
Florian Wimmer, 2017-05-14 (Update: 2017-05-31)