Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto C
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 364 cd/m²
Contraste: 1174:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 12.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.04
| Lenovo Moto C TFT, 854x480, 5" | ZTE Blade A510 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei Y5 II IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo C2 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gretel A9 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5" | HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 16% | -4% | -13% | 20% | 5% | -8% | 38% | |
| Brightness middle | 364 | 528 45% | 344 -5% | 465 28% | 458 26% | 380 4% | 312 -14% | 482 32% |
| Brightness | 355 | 524 48% | 349 -2% | 443 25% | 449 26% | 370 4% | 315 -11% | 472 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 94 2% | 89 -3% | 90 -2% | 92 0% | 90 -2% | 87 -5% | 90 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.62 -100% | 0.65 -110% | 0.84 -171% | 0.35 -13% | 0.39 -26% | 0.56 -81% | 0.33 -6% |
| Contrast | 1174 | 852 -27% | 529 -55% | 554 -53% | 1309 11% | 974 -17% | 557 -53% | 1461 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.4 | 5.2 50% | 5.8 44% | 7.8 25% | 6.5 37% | 8 23% | 6.8 35% | 3.2 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18 | 8.7 52% | 10.7 41% | 15.7 13% | 11.7 35% | 13.6 24% | 14 22% | 5.4 70% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.7 | 5.7 55% | 5.7 55% | 8.4 34% | 7.7 39% | 8.5 33% | 7.1 44% | 2.2 83% |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 1.99 111% | 2.1 105% | 2.07 106% | 2.15 102% | 2.8 79% | 2.77 79% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 12904 50% | 6631 98% | 7792 83% | 8438 77% | 8518 76% | 8337 78% | 7402 88% | 6581 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 66 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 52 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 42 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| BaseMark OS II | |
| Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| System (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Memory (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Web (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| ZTE Blade A510 | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo C2 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto C | |
| HTC U11 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50) | |
| Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52) | |
| Gretel A9 (Chrome 58) | |
| Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55) | |
| ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56) | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52) | |
| Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52) | |
| Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50) | |
| Gretel A9 (Chrome 58) | |
| Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55) | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52) | |
| ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56) | |
| Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52) | |
| ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56) | |
| Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55) | |
| Gretel A9 (Chrome 58) | |
| Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52) | |
| Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto C | ZTE Blade A510 | Archos 50 Platinum 4G | Huawei Y5 II | Lenovo C2 | Gretel A9 | Ulefone Metal | HTC U11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | -2% | 23% | -11% | 18% | 73% | 406% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 179.3 | 111.9 -38% | 125.4 -30% | 173.3 -3% | 120.7 -33% | 176.2 -2% | 228.8 28% | 717 300% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 44.55 | 9.94 -78% | 7.56 -83% | 21.6 -52% | 8 -82% | 44.5 0% | 39.91 -10% | 206.4 363% |
| Random Read 4KB | 18.37 | 14.03 -24% | 14.31 -22% | 27.3 49% | 14.5 -21% | 18.1 -1% | 22.18 21% | 91.4 398% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.9 | 4.69 -57% | 4.35 -60% | 6 -45% | 4.7 -57% | 10.1 -7% | 7.87 -28% | 80 634% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 13.5 | 25.55 ? 89% | 31.85 ? 136% | 29.47 ? 118% | 24.2 79% | 23.83 ? 77% | 49.6 267% | 68.8 ? 410% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 10.7 | 16.5 ? 54% | 15.58 ? 46% | 18.03 ? 69% | 16.1 50% | 14.81 ? 38% | 27.6 158% | 46.25 ? 332% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 12 fps | ||
| very low | 22 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh | Lenovo Moto C Plus 4000 mAh | ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh | Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | Lenovo C2 2750 mAh | Gretel A9 2300 mAh | Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | |||||||||
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.41 | 0.73 | |
| Idle Average * | 1.87 | 1.75 | 1.68 | 1.58 | 1.62 | 1.99 | 2.46 | 1.96 | |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.89 | 1.83 | 1.79 | 1.7 | 1.64 | 2.2 | 2.83 | 1.98 | |
| Load Average * | 2.18 | 4.49 | 4.22 | 2.98 | 3.24 | 4.99 | 5.15 | 4.82 | |
| Load Maximum * | 3.61 | 5.14 | 4.26 | 4.98 | 3.36 | 5.14 | 7.05 | 7.15 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh | ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh | Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | Lenovo C2 2750 mAh | Gretel A9 2300 mAh | Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | -26% | -6% | 16% | -24% | -22% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1159 | 1102 -5% | 1250 8% | |||||
| H.264 | 529 | 498 -6% | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 416 -20% | 384 -26% | 503 -3% | 662 28% | 458 -11% | 403 -22% | 560 8% |
| Load | 278 | 253 -9% | 287 3% | 174 -37% | 212 -24% |
Pro
Contra
Na verdade, a Lenovo conseguiu produzir um bom aparelho eletrônico no segmento de baixo orçamento... se não fosse pela tela. Para nós, a câmera surpreendentemente boa (apesar do foco fixo), os bons recursos de áudio para esta classe de preço, a longa duração da bateria e a alta flexibilidade, graças à funcionalidade dual-SIM, o slot para cartão SD e a bateria trocável ainda não conseguem compensar a painel TFT ruim e sua resolução. O design combinado com a má relação tela-superfície e a escolha dos materiais são uma questão de gosto, mas o acabamento é bom.
Além do erro com a tela, o Moto C deixa pouco para reclamar. O desempenho da memória e do SoC são o que você esperaria desta classe de preço.
É um pouco peculiar que, em 2017, um fabricante como a Lenovo ainda vá para esse tipo de painel combinado com resolução tão baixa - mesmo no segmento de £ 100 ($129).
Mesmo que a qualidade não seja ruim para um painel TFT, não podemos recomendar o Moto C - pelo menos não se você o comprar no preço de varejo recomendado.
Lenovo Moto C
- 08/28/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
