Breve Análise do Smartphone LG X power2
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 237 cd/m²
Contraste: 1823:1 (Preto: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.07
| LG X power2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | LG X Power K220 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Lenovo P2 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -9% | 61% | -3% | 62% | 69% | |
| Brightness middle | 237 | 381 61% | 479 102% | 380 60% | 454 92% | 509 115% |
| Brightness | 237 | 352 49% | 477 101% | 369 56% | 463 95% | 511 116% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 85 -8% | 91 -1% | 92 0% | 86 -7% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.13 | 0.2 -54% | 0.26 -100% | |||
| Contrast | 1823 | 1905 4% | 1462 -20% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 7.3 -33% | 2.4 56% | 6.6 -20% | 2 64% | 2.2 60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.7 | 21.2 -67% | 5.6 56% | 10.4 18% | 5.3 58% | 5.8 54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 7.4 -21% | 2.8 54% | 7.4 -21% | 1.7 72% | 2 67% |
| Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7943 82% | 8417 77% | 6702 97% | 8665 75% | 6394 102% | 6768 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG X power2 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
* ... smaller is better
| LG X power2 | LG X Power K220 | Lenovo P2 | HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -33% | 78% | -24% | 3% | 74% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 243.8 | 196.8 -19% | 270.1 11% | 149.4 -39% | 198.5 -19% | 254.8 5% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 41.7 | 43.74 5% | 76.7 84% | 60.6 45% | 53 27% | 73.1 75% |
| Random Read 4KB | 25.3 | 18.78 -26% | 38.2 51% | 17.03 -33% | 25.86 2% | 38.78 53% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.7 | 7.32 -32% | 44.4 315% | 7.94 -26% | 10.54 -1% | 45.58 326% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.6 | 32.08 -58% | 79.3 4% | 47.7 -38% | 76.1 -1% | 74.6 -3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 58.1 | 18.17 -69% | 59.4 2% | 29.2 -50% | 63.9 10% | 50.6 -13% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 28 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 47 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG X power2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 42.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.23 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.63 / 1.42 / 1.47 Watt |
| Carga |
5.89 / 7.85 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| LG X power2 4500 mAh | LG X Power K220 4100 mAh | Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 38% | 44% | 43% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.63 | 0.64 -2% | 0.54 14% | 0.39 38% | 0.51 19% |
| Idle Average * | 1.42 | 1.3 8% | 1.01 29% | 1.06 25% | 0.87 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.47 | 1.34 9% | 1.03 30% | 1.08 27% | 0.9 39% |
| Load Average * | 5.89 | 4.18 29% | 1.78 70% | 1.82 69% | 1.69 71% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.85 | 4.87 38% | 3.98 49% | 3.21 59% | 4 49% |
* ... smaller is better
| LG X power2 4500 mAh | LG X Power K220 4100 mAh | Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle 2700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -2% | 10% | -44% | -3% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2720 | 2841 4% | 1485 -45% | 1950 -28% | 2540 -7% | |
| H.264 | 1226 | 1199 -2% | 622 -49% | 1096 -11% | 1190 -3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 982 | 987 1% | 978 0% | 574 -42% | 904 -8% | 824 -16% |
| Load | 384 | 365 -5% | 528 38% | 234 -39% | 525 37% | 652 70% |
Pro
Contra
Um smartphone com X – desta vez não funcionou. O LG X power2 não é um aparelho ruim; é só que existem muitos dispositivos de preço semelhante que são melhores. Fazer o X power2 100 Euros (~$118) mais caro que o LG X Power não é facilmente justificável, em nossa opinião. Há um pouco mais de desempenho, a tela é um pouco maior e a capacidade da bateria é um pouco maior. Caso contrário, as medições do poder LG X2 são ainda piores em algumas áreas do antecessor, por exemplo, no consumo de energia ou no brilho da tela.
Também existem alguns pontos positivos no LG X power2: nós gostamos da carcaça e é bastante robusta, o desempenho é bastante bom para a faixa de preços, o alto-falante é bastante forte e não distorce, e o aparelho permanece frio e não se afoga sob carga. Claro que a duração da bateria também é considerável, mas outros dispositivos nesta faixa de preços, como o Samsung Galaxy J7 ou o Lenovo P2 também contam com isso. Além disso, com um cargo adicional de 100 Euros (~ $118), o smartphone da segunda geração da LG chegou a uma classe de competição completamente nova sem ser ajustado em conformidade: A tela possui uma resolução menor do que muitos dispositivos concorrentes, a câmera tira fotos piores e o armazenamento fornecido está na parte inferior da competição. Estamos agradavelmente surpreendidos pelo fato de que o módulo GPS funcione com bastante precisão. No entanto, as taxas de transferência WLAN são baixas, e suporta menos bandas LTE que os dispositivos concorrentes.
O LG X power2 é simplesmente muito caro para os recursos oferecidos: uma tela de baixa resolução, câmera fraca e apenas valores de desempenho medíocres. A concorrência parece bastante imponente. A longa duração da bateria é um bom ponto de venda, mas neste ponto, outros dispositivos desta faixa de preço também têm isso.
Qualquer pessoa que simplesmente procura um smartphone com uma longa vida útil da bateria e que esteja disposta a gastar dinheiro recebe um smartphone bem equipado com o LG X power2. No entanto, concorrentes como o Lenovo P2 ou o Samsung Galaxy J7 oferecem muito mais pelo seu dinheiro. Uma dica: neste ponto o predecessor LG X Power custa apenas cerca de 150 Euros (~$177) na Internet e oferece uma duração de bateria similar.
LG X power2
- 08/01/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
