Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG V40 ThinQ

Robust and with five cameras -

O LG V40 ThinQ finalmente chegou à Alemanha depois de ter sido anunciado há mais de três meses. O V40 é uma evolução do seu antecessor, com a LG prometendo melhorar particularmente a tela e as câmeras. Leia mais para descobrir o que distingue o LG V40 ThinQ de outros carros chefe e como ele se desempenhou em nossos testes.
LG V40 ThinQ (V Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.40 polegadas 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 537 PPI, Rela táctil capacitiva, multitouch de 10 pontos , OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.2 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 2 TB - FAT, FAT32, arquivos de sistema exFAT suportados, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Bússola Digital, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, Sensor de Digitais, USB 2.0 Type-C, USB-OTG, Miracast, WiFi Direct, Wi-Fi Concurrency
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA +: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8. LTE Cat. 18: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 158.7 x 75.8
Bateria
3300 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Carregamento sem fio Qi, carga rápida
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix , Super wide angle, 16 mm, f/1.9, 1.0 μm. 12MPix, standard, 27 mm, f/1.5, 1.4 μm. 12 MPix, telephoto, 52 mm, f/2.4, 1.0 μm, 2 x optical zoom. Camera2 API Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , standard, 26 mm, f/1.9, 1.4 μm. 5 MPix, wide angle, 21 mm, f/2.2, 1.4 μm.
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante Boombox, DTS:X support, 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC, Teclado: Virtual, Fones, Carregador, cabo USB Type-C, Ferramenta SIM, Guia de início rápido, pabo de microfibra, 24 Meses Garantia, Certificações IP68 e MIL-STD-810G1. SAR values: Head - 0.33 W/kg, Body - 1.353 W/kg, fanless
peso
169 g, Suprimento de energia: 73 g
Preço
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

157.8 mm 74.6 mm 8.8 mm 218 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g156.9 mm 75.4 mm 8.1 mm 180 g156.5 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 179 g151.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 158 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s +27%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (647min - 714max) MBit/s +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (289min - 805max) MBit/s +20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (6min - 792max) MBit/s +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (507min - 704max) MBit/s +20%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (613min - 699max) MBit/s +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s +9%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (492min - 579max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s -6%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (278min - 319max) MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1001 (209min - 1106max) MBit/s +48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (532min - 642max) MBit/s -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (100min - 534max) MBit/s -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (657min - 705max) MBit/s +1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (655min - 698max) MBit/s
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
674 (646min - 691max) MBit/s 0%
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s -8%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (325min - 351max) MBit/s -50%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
LG V40 ThinQ; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (655-698)
LG V40 ThinQ; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø554 (492-579)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: LG V40 ThinQ - Overview
GPS test: LG V40 ThinQ - Overview
GPS test: LG V40 ThinQ - Lake
GPS test: LG V40 ThinQ - Lake
GPS test: LG V40 ThinQ - Loop
GPS test: LG V40 ThinQ - Loop
Ultra-wide lens
Ultra-wide lens
Standard lens
Standard lens
Telephoto lens
Telephoto lens
Telephoto lens
Telephoto lens
Standard lens
Standard lens
Ultra-wide lens
Ultra-wide lens
Standard lens
Standard lens
Telephoto lens
Telephoto lens
Ultra-wide lens
Ultra-wide lens

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Test chart (Telephoto)
Test chart (Wide-angle)
580
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 580 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 558.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.46
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4"
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2"
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3"
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"
Screen
-83%
-2%
11%
13%
-22%
Brightness middle
567
432
-24%
565
0%
576
2%
656
16%
521
-8%
Brightness
559
428
-23%
571
2%
582
4%
659
18%
517
-8%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
96
8%
90
1%
88
-1%
96
8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.3
4.18
-27%
2.3
30%
1.3
61%
1.7
48%
2.9
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.1
8.53
-40%
4.8
21%
3.5
43%
2.8
54%
5.5
10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
5.3
-382%
1.9
-73%
1.6
-45%
1.7
-55%
2.7
-145%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.33 94%
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
1.998 110%
2.01 109%
CCT
6495 100%
7487 87%
6332 103%
6561 99%
6487 100%
6288 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2397 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1900 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3776 Points +58%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points +99%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2333 Points -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3314 Points +38%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2418 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5422 Points +126%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8687 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6078 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
8963 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8634 Points -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9868 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8988 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
14892 Points +71%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13519 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
8016 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6202 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
13374 Points -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9028 Points -33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13505 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)
11924 Points -12%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10361 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6854 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5822 Points -44%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
10052 Points -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12778 Points +23%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9795 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8141 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5603 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5319 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8326 Points +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9243 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8099 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7360 - 9868, n=27)
8368 Points +3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58651 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
34139 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
39745 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
64627 Points +10%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
57073 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63295 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
79818 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
55271 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46610 Points -42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points +100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83976 Points +5%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67388 Points -16%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
81640 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30418 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
14601 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
26226 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35987 Points +18%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37164 Points +22%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35430 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4947 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4738 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3895 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6118 Points +24%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4979 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6355 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6439 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5895 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4637 Points -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8236 Points +28%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5252 Points -18%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8219 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2731 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2808 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2496 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points +52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3221 Points +18%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4214 Points +54%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3543 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4842 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4728 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4018 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6054 Points +25%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5087 Points +5%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6487 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4034 - 6568, n=27)
5761 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)
11160 Points +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6024 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5819 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4797 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points +72%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8245 Points +37%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5327 Points -12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8341 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5228 - 8451, n=27)
7671 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)
19815 Points +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2855 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2561 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points +54%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3060 Points +7%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4393 Points +53%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3649 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2110 - 3763, n=27)
3094 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)
5009 Points +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3802 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3635 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3256 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3677 Points -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4238 Points +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4729 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4275 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3903 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3582 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4223 Points -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4256 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5181 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2740 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2931 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2469 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points +53%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2653 Points -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4175 Points +52%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3623 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3741 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3559 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3420 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3846 Points +3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3847 Points +3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5088 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3512 - 5200, n=28)
4607 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +105%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4133 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3809 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3792 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4480 Points +8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3718 Points -10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5741 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4133 - 8206, n=28)
5439 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2809 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2893 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2546 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points +55%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2802 Points 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4381 Points +56%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3639 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2185 - 3764, n=28)
3088 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
60 fps 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
105 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
113 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
147 fps +40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps +115%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
152 fps +45%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
118 fps +12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (98 - 152, n=28)
142.5 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
279 fps +166%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
35 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
45 fps +36%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps +27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps +79%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
56 fps +70%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps +79%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75 fps +127%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
59 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
74 fps +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps +81%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
81 fps +37%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67 fps +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82 fps +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
164.1 fps +178%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
19 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps +180%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
50 fps +138%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps +129%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55 fps +162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps +116%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +210%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
41 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
40 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
47 fps +15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps -29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps +69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
59 fps +44%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
50 fps +22%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
116.5 fps +184%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
14 fps +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps +138%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps +131%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps +115%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps +113%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.5 fps +265%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
24 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps +54%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps +35%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps +23%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
70.3 fps +170%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
16 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps +194%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps +25%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps +94%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (16 - 40, n=17)
29.1 fps +82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +208%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps +23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34 fps +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (29 - 38, n=16)
35.2 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +165%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps +58%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps +168%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps +67%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps +67%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (12 - 25, n=17)
18.6 fps +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps +209%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps +36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
31 fps +158%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps +17%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (11 - 31, n=17)
15.6 fps +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps +163%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (7.38min - 46.96max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21.3 - 32.9, n=5)
27.5 fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (6.06min - 28.78max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15.8 - 29.7, n=5)
22.8 fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (9.74min - 74.17max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (24.5 - 35.3, n=5)
30.9 fps
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
270884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
250577 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points +11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
292798 Points +8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
306296 Points +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287049 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points +2%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
229374 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
173749 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
222290 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
228173 Points -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
252800 Points +10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
231092 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points -2%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4598 - 4731, n=4)
4689 Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)
5819 Score
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3565 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2702 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3302 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points +31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4287 Points +20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4746 Points +33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4454 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3291 - 4693, n=26)
4111 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +76%
System (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6717 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4238 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6413 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points +74%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8146 Points +21%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8594 Points +28%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8212 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4417 - 8613, n=26)
7644 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points +51%
Memory (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2910 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2091 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2625 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points +116%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3791 Points +30%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5616 Points +93%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4492 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2193 - 5296, n=26)
3649 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +131%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6726 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5949 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6370 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points +133%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
7891 Points +17%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7484 Points +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7930 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5846 - 8001, n=26)
7797 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +149%
Web (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1228 Points
LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1009 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1109 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1386 Points +13%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1404 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1345 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (1009 - 1613, n=26)
1344 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +27%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1481 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1571 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (1169 - 1201, n=5)
1179 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)
2316 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273 Points +231%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.2 Points +32%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
108.1 Points +31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
86 Points +4%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
82.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25)
80.3 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
70.1 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.6 Points -16%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points +171%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +131%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points +46%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
22500 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points +4%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
15906 Points
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
15819 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points -7%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * -23%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
2361 ms *
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
2358 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2300 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2060 ms * +13%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
2048 ms * +13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1952 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * +33%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603 ms * +74%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points +65%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)
147.1 Points +56%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points +32%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
99 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
95 Points +1%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
94 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)
90.2 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points -32%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points +30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points +25%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
267 Points
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
263 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
260 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23)
246 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points -39%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points -48%

* ... smaller is better

LG V40 ThinQLG V30Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusHuawei Mate 20 ProXiaomi Mi Mix 3Honor View 20ZTE Axon 9 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-26%
3%
105%
-4%
143%
1%
87%
527%
Sequential Read 256KB
690
669
-3%
819
19%
853
24%
675
-2%
847
23%
719
4%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.9
193.2
-5%
204.9
0%
196.4
-4%
206.8
1%
250.1
23%
196.4
-4%
Random Read 4KB
130.1
78.2
-40%
129.7
0%
157.4
21%
133.2
2%
168.9
30%
141.3
9%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
18%
Random Write 4KB
23.36
10.21
-56%
22.74
-3%
157.8
576%
19.54
-16%
138.9
495%
22.52
-4%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
463%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
-26%
79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
83.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
-2%
85.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
-25%
67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
72.4 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
15%
61.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
LG V40 ThinQ; 0.10.0: Ø39.3 (7-41)
Battle Bay
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
LG V40 ThinQ; 4.2.22023: Ø60.3 (57-61)
Carga Máxima
 32.9 °C33.4 °C30.5 °C 
 30.6 °C32 °C29.8 °C 
 29.6 °C30.5 °C28.9 °C 
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C
28.9 °C31.1 °C33.2 °C
28.4 °C30.2 °C31.6 °C
28.1 °C29.5 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 33.2 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  25.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2019.931.12520.230.33121.423.84022.928.75026.931.76318.222.18022.82310019.126.512515.828.616016.534.720014.23925013.344.531515.345.140014.64750014.750.263014.564.680013.769.5100014.472125013.973.6160013.974.2200013.874.4250013.873.5315014.271400014.369.1500014.676630014.676.1800014.372.3100001561.11250015621600014.753.9SPL26.384.7N0.857.6median 14.5median 64.6Delta0.813.528.628.224.928.424.621.226.419.330.829.123.624.620.223.319.927.217.638.919.150.619.149.917.454.316.961.516.860.915.163.616.567.915.6701570.615.572.115.371.715.773.515.573.215.576.715.476.115.873.71677.415.872.916.169.816.164.817.357.227.985.6164.4median 16median 69.80.77.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG V40 ThinQSamsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG V40 ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.39 / 1.41 Watt
Carga midlight 3.96 / 8.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
20%
-22%
-6%
27%
-44%
-3%
-20%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.72
17%
0.68
22%
0.95
-9%
1
-15%
0.49
44%
0.97
-11%
0.86
1%
Idle Average *
1.39
1.37
1%
0.95
32%
2.17
-56%
1.4
-1%
0.67
52%
2.58
-86%
1.1
21%
1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
1.41
1.41
-0%
1.09
23%
2.25
-60%
1.7
-21%
0.87
38%
2.63
-87%
1.21
14%
2.07 ?(0.87 - 3.5, n=26)
-47%
Load Average *
3.96
3.46
13%
4.58
-16%
4.47
-13%
4.6
-16%
3.64
8%
5.24
-32%
5.02
-27%
4.87 ?(3.56 - 7.41, n=26)
-23%
Load Maximum *
8.6
7.83
9%
5.16
40%
6.15
28%
6.7
22%
9.04
-5%
8.73
-2%
10.82
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
19h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 71)
8h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 20min
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
-1%
30%
13%
22%
42%
30%
Reader / Idle
1140
1914
68%
1343
18%
1747
53%
1305
14%
1810
59%
1928
69%
H.264
659
822
25%
674
2%
854
30%
801
22%
836
27%
932
41%
WiFi v1.3
510
774
52%
521
2%
767
50%
742
45%
719
41%
969
90%
661
30%
Load
320
267
-17%
237
-26%
282
-12%
223
-30%
194
-39%
222
-31%

Pro

+ Tela OLED brilhante e com cores precisas
+ SoC veloz
+ aptX HDH
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Conector para fones
+ Hi-Fi Quad DAC
+ Carregamento sem fio
+ Bom sistema de câmeras traseiras triplas
+ Módulo GPS preciso
+ Certificações IP68 e MIL-STG-810G1
+ Garantia de até quatro anos

Contra

- Duração da bateria medíocre
- Somente USB 2.0
- PWM cintilante da tela
- O lançamento atrasado agora o torna sobrevalorizado
The LG V40 ThinQ. Test device courtesy of LG Germany.
The LG V40 ThinQ. Test device courtesy of LG Germany.

O LG V40 ThinQ melhora o V30 e integra alguns dos bons recursos do G7 ThinQ, oferecendo melhor desempenho do sistema e de câmeras do que ambos.

No entanto, as câmeras, apesar de seu volume, não se comparam as melhores que estão atualmente no mercado. A bateria também é muito pequena para a energia que a tela de alta resolução, DAC e SoC consomem. Os três alto-falantes também não são tão bons quanto poderiam ser, o que é decepcionante.

O LG V40 ThinQ é susceptível de ser esquecido com a chegada dos carros chefe de 2019, o que é uma pena, pois é um excelente smartphone que fica aquém da grandeza em áreas vitais.

Estas são as únicas desvantagens reais do V40. Ele possui uma das câmeras de vídeo mais versáteis de qualquer smartphone no mercado, e seu design é discreto, mas premium. Os codecs Hi-Fi Quad DAC e de alta resolução Bluetooth também são bem-vindos e devem garantir que o V40 ofereça uma qualidade de áudio excepcional, independentemente de se você escuta com ou sem fio.

Uma desvantagem do V40 é o seu preço. O LG G8 ThinQ será lançado nos próximos dias, o que superará o V40 em muitas áreas, por isso seu atraso no lançamento e chegada deste último na Europa parece estranho. Esperamos que o seu preço caia dentro de alguns meses, embora assim como aconteceu com o V30, assim o LG V40 ThinQ pode ser um sucesso tardio em 2019.

LG V40 ThinQ - 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
47 / 70 → 67%
Peso
91%
Bateria
85%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
42 / 64 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
44 / 90 → 49%
Camera
79%
Médio
76%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG V40 ThinQ
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-02-25 (Update: 2019-02-27)