Breve Análise do Smartphone LG V40 ThinQ
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.46
LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3" | Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | ZTE Axon 9 Pro AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -83% | -2% | 11% | 13% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 567 | 432 -24% | 565 0% | 576 2% | 656 16% | 521 -8% |
Brightness | 559 | 428 -23% | 571 2% | 582 4% | 659 18% | 517 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 96 8% | 90 1% | 88 -1% | 96 8% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 4.18 -27% | 2.3 30% | 1.3 61% | 1.7 48% | 2.9 12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 8.53 -40% | 4.8 21% | 3.5 43% | 2.8 54% | 5.5 10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 5.3 -382% | 1.9 -73% | 1.6 -45% | 1.7 -55% | 2.7 -145% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.33 94% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% | 1.998 110% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 6495 100% | 7487 87% | 6332 103% | 6561 99% | 6487 100% | 6288 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21.3 - 32.9, n=5) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15.8 - 29.7, n=5) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (24.5 - 35.3, n=5) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
LG V40 ThinQ | |
LG V30 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
Honor View 20 | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4598 - 4731, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
LG V30 (Chrome 62) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
LG V30 (Chrome 62) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
LG V30 (Chrome 62) |
* ... smaller is better
LG V40 ThinQ | LG V30 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | Huawei Mate 20 Pro | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | Honor View 20 | ZTE Axon 9 Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -26% | 3% | 105% | -4% | 143% | 1% | 87% | 527% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 690 | 669 -3% | 819 19% | 853 24% | 675 -2% | 847 23% | 719 4% | 760 ? 10% | 1834 ? 166% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 203.9 | 193.2 -5% | 204.9 0% | 196.4 -4% | 206.8 1% | 250.1 23% | 196.4 -4% | 297 ? 46% | 1426 ? 599% |
Random Read 4KB | 130.1 | 78.2 -40% | 129.7 0% | 157.4 21% | 133.2 2% | 168.9 30% | 141.3 9% | 152.9 ? 18% | 278 ? 114% |
Random Write 4KB | 23.36 | 10.21 -56% | 22.74 -3% | 157.8 576% | 19.54 -16% | 138.9 495% | 22.52 -4% | 131.6 ? 463% | 310 ? 1227% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 ? | 62.8 -26% | 79.2 ? -7% | 83.2 ? -2% | 85.4 ? 1% | 76 ? -10% | |||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.1 ? | 47.2 -25% | 67.2 ? 6% | 72.4 ? 15% | 61.6 ? -2% | 59.6 ? -6% |
PUBG Mobile
Battle Bay
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG V40 ThinQ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.87 / 1.39 / 1.41 Watt |
Carga |
3.96 / 8.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | Honor View 20 4000 mAh | ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 20% | -22% | -6% | 27% | -44% | -3% | -20% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.87 | 0.72 17% | 0.68 22% | 0.95 -9% | 1 -15% | 0.49 44% | 0.97 -11% | 0.86 1% | 0.862 ? 1% | 0.895 ? -3% |
Idle Average * | 1.39 | 1.37 1% | 0.95 32% | 2.17 -56% | 1.4 -1% | 0.67 52% | 2.58 -86% | 1.1 21% | 1.728 ? -24% | 1.447 ? -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.41 | 1.41 -0% | 1.09 23% | 2.25 -60% | 1.7 -21% | 0.87 38% | 2.63 -87% | 1.21 14% | 2.07 ? -47% | 1.608 ? -14% |
Load Average * | 3.96 | 3.46 13% | 4.58 -16% | 4.47 -13% | 4.6 -16% | 3.64 8% | 5.24 -32% | 5.02 -27% | 4.87 ? -23% | 6.41 ? -62% |
Load Maximum * | 8.6 | 7.83 9% | 5.16 40% | 6.15 28% | 6.7 22% | 9.04 -5% | 8.73 -2% | 10.82 -26% | 9.27 ? -8% | 9.61 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | Honor View 20 4000 mAh | ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 32% | -1% | 30% | 13% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
Reader / Idle | 1140 | 1914 68% | 1343 18% | 1747 53% | 1305 14% | 1810 59% | 1928 69% | |
H.264 | 659 | 822 25% | 674 2% | 854 30% | 801 22% | 836 27% | 932 41% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 510 | 774 52% | 521 2% | 767 50% | 742 45% | 719 41% | 969 90% | 661 30% |
Load | 320 | 267 -17% | 237 -26% | 282 -12% | 223 -30% | 194 -39% | 222 -31% |
Pro
Contra
O LG V40 ThinQ melhora o V30 e integra alguns dos bons recursos do G7 ThinQ, oferecendo melhor desempenho do sistema e de câmeras do que ambos.
No entanto, as câmeras, apesar de seu volume, não se comparam as melhores que estão atualmente no mercado. A bateria também é muito pequena para a energia que a tela de alta resolução, DAC e SoC consomem. Os três alto-falantes também não são tão bons quanto poderiam ser, o que é decepcionante.
O LG V40 ThinQ é susceptível de ser esquecido com a chegada dos carros chefe de 2019, o que é uma pena, pois é um excelente smartphone que fica aquém da grandeza em áreas vitais.
Estas são as únicas desvantagens reais do V40. Ele possui uma das câmeras de vídeo mais versáteis de qualquer smartphone no mercado, e seu design é discreto, mas premium. Os codecs Hi-Fi Quad DAC e de alta resolução Bluetooth também são bem-vindos e devem garantir que o V40 ofereça uma qualidade de áudio excepcional, independentemente de se você escuta com ou sem fio.
Uma desvantagem do V40 é o seu preço. O LG G8 ThinQ será lançado nos próximos dias, o que superará o V40 em muitas áreas, por isso seu atraso no lançamento e chegada deste último na Europa parece estranho. Esperamos que o seu preço caia dentro de alguns meses, embora assim como aconteceu com o V30, assim o LG V40 ThinQ pode ser um sucesso tardio em 2019.
LG V40 ThinQ
-
09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt