Breve Análise do Smartphone LG V10
LG V10 (V Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 418, Análises do: 600 MHz
Memória
4 GB
Pantalha
5.70 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multitouch, Quantum IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 21.95 GB livre
peso
192 g, Suprimento de energia: 78 g
Preço
649 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 450 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 430.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.92 cd/m²iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 450 cd/m²
Contraste: 2045:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
| LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -17% | 18% | -17% | 21% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 450 | 566 26% | 297 -34% | 538 20% | 363 -19% | 335.7 -25% |
| Brightness | 431 | 536 24% | 297 -31% | 528 23% | 365 -15% | 332 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 90 -3% | 93 0% | 92 -1% | 90 -3% | 89 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.47 -114% | 0.66 -200% | |||
| Contrast | 2045 | 1204 -41% | 815 -60% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.18 | 6.17 -19% | 2.67 48% | 2.63 49% | 2.34 55% | 2.33 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.39 | 3.98 62% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.94 | 6.26 10% | 2.81 60% | 3.24 53% | 1.03 85% | 2.15 69% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.48 89% | 2.08 106% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 8091 80% | 8171 80% | 6379 102% | 6906 94% | 6429 101% | 6184 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.48 | 66.31 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.63 | 99.79 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 40 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench 3.0 | PCMark for Android | Smartbench 2012 | BaseMark OS II | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | Linpack Android / IOS
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Smartbench 2012 | |
| Productivity Index (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Gaming Index (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Linpack Android / IOS | |
| Single Thread (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Multi Thread (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.08 / 0.21 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.67 / 1.94 / 2.1 Watt |
| Carga |
6.53 / 9.93 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | -8% | 7% | 13% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1697 | 1654 -3% | 1078 -36% | 1447 -15% | 1459 -14% | 1141 -33% |
| H.264 | 539 | 501 -7% | 611 13% | 533 -1% | 383 -29% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 353 | 326 -8% | 369 5% | 375 6% | 501 42% | 400 13% |
| Load | 203 | 114 -44% | 179 -12% | 280 38% | 223 10% | 219 8% |
Pro
+ SoC veloz
+ Design robusto e premium
+ Boa configuração da conectividade
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Bateria removível
+ Boa câmera
+ Carga rápida
+ Conversor HiFi D-A de 32 bits
+ Leitor de digitais veloz
+ Tela secundária frugal...
Contra
- ...com funcionalidade limitada
- Adaptador de força muito justo
- Afogamento do SoC
- UI deixa lento o sistema
- Sem carregamento sem fio
Com o LG V10, o fabricante coreano fornece outro excelente smartphone que é muito similar ao LG G4 na folha de especificações, mas não tem muito em comum com o seu modelo irmão, em termos de visual. Os fanáticos das selfies certamente gostarão das duas lentes frontais. A tela secundária é boa de ter, mas o seu potencial não é utilizado plenamente, e a maioria das ações são realizadas tão rápido quanto na tela principal.
O V10 também tem um bom leitor de digitais que foi integrado imperceptivelmente no botão de energia na parte traseira. De outra forma, a LG também faz um bom trabalho e melhorou a tela que é familiar do G4, que agora tem um contraste tremendamente alto, entre outras coisas. Os recursos da muito boa câmera foram desenvolvidos ainda mais, mas infelizmente, o fabricante não conseguiu melhorar o modo automático.
A LG apresenta outro smartphone forte com o seu V10. A sua maior desvantagem é o alto preço do mercado.
A opção finalmente é uma questão de gosto e orçamento quando se trata de optar por um dos modelos carro chefe da LG. O V10 custa aproximadamente 200 Euros (~$224) a mais que o G4, cujo preço ao mesmo tempo caiu de forma significativa.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
LG V10
- 02/02/2016 v4.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
