Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone LG Q7 Stylus
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 458 cd/m²
Contraste: 898:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
| LG Q Stylus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4" | Sharp B10 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2" | Wiko View 2 Pro IPS, 1528x720, 6" | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 4% | -1% | 17% | -32% | 39% | |
| Brightness middle | 458 | 499 9% | 560 22% | 489 7% | 562 23% | 597 30% |
| Brightness | 441 | 506 15% | 549 24% | 486 10% | 541 23% | 592 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 96 2% | 90 -4% | 93 -1% | 92 -2% | 92 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.63 -24% | 0.34 33% | 0.56 -10% | 0.32 37% | |
| Contrast | 898 | 889 -1% | 1438 60% | 1004 12% | 1866 108% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.62 -3% | 5.02 -12% | 3.8 16% | 7.9 -76% | 2.4 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 10.91 -54% | 8.71 -23% | 7.1 -0% | 15.7 -121% | 5.3 25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 2.2 57% | 4.6 10% | 4.4 14% | 10.4 -104% | 3.4 33% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.103 105% | 2.216 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.02 109% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7381 88% | 6115 106% | 7587 86% | 7213 90% | 8834 74% | 7172 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 67.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 37.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (3969 - 4101, n=2) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (16 - 16, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (17 - 17, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (6.7 - 6.8, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (7.1 - 7.1, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.5 - 4.5, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.7 - 4.7, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (52855 - 56626, n=2) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (44064 - 45829, n=2) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (18.7 - 19.2, n=2) | |
| Sharp B10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (3422 - 3474, n=2) | |
| Sharp B10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sharp B10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (13203 - 13671, n=2) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (19 - 25, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (70 - 71, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
| LG Q Stylus | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | Sharp B10 | Xiaomi Poco F1 | Wiko View 2 Pro | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 115% | -16% | 83% | 21% | 30% | 13% | 1244% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 241.7 | 805 233% | 280.7 16% | 705 192% | 265.4 10% | 281.1 16% | 242 ? 0% | 1839 ? 661% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 121.4 | 196 61% | 100.5 -17% | 155.6 28% | 194.3 60% | 146.2 20% | 100.5 ? -17% | 1425 ? 1074% |
| Random Read 4KB | 31.45 | 134 326% | 54.6 74% | 101 221% | 65.6 109% | 77.4 146% | 43.2 ? 37% | 277 ? 781% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.07 | 21 74% | 12.9 7% | 17.81 48% | 6.72 -44% | 10.5 -13% | 22.4 ? 86% | 309 ? 2460% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.1 ? | 77 ? -7% | 9.83 ? -88% | 85.3 ? 3% | 82.3 ? -1% | 86 ? 3% | 71.8 ? -14% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.5 ? | 66.7 ? 5% | 6.8 ? -89% | 65.6 ? 3% | 57.8 ? -9% | 67 ? 6% | 52.9 ? -17% |
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| High Quality | 16 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 23 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 27 fps | ||
| high HD | 26 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG Q Stylus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.12 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.69 / 1.7 / 1.73 Watt |
| Carga |
3.21 / 5.31 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Sharp B10 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6750S | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -53% | -42% | -26% | -1% | 8% | -7% | -39% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.69 | 0.9 -30% | 1 -45% | 0.65 6% | 0.64 7% | 0.35 49% | 0.845 ? -22% | 0.894 ? -30% |
| Idle Average * | 1.7 | 1.9 -12% | 1.98 -16% | 1.97 -16% | 2.07 -22% | 1.81 -6% | 1.635 ? 4% | 1.456 ? 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.73 | 3.7 -114% | 2.5 -45% | 2.01 -16% | 2.13 -23% | 1.83 -6% | 1.685 ? 3% | 1.616 ? 7% |
| Load Average * | 3.21 | 5.3 -65% | 5.3 -65% | 4.29 -34% | 2.69 16% | 3.31 -3% | 3.66 ? -14% | 6.45 ? -101% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.31 | 7.6 -43% | 7.4 -39% | 9.05 -70% | 4.46 16% | 4.97 6% | 5.67 ? -7% | 9.8 ? -85% |
* ... smaller is better
| LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Sharp B10 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 62% | 116% | 55% | 105% | 135% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1529 | 1687 10% | 2088 37% | 4682 206% | ||
| H.264 | 527 | 896 70% | 936 78% | 893 69% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 419 | 794 89% | 903 116% | 808 93% | 857 105% | 837 100% |
| Load | 200 | 354 77% | 220 10% | 529 165% |
Pro
Contra
O LG Q Stylus apresenta-se como um smartphone robusto para uso diário. Ele oferece bom desempenho e pode gerenciar um pouco mais do que seu uso básico do WhatsApp e navegação na Internet. A caneta incluída fornece a este dispositivo um recurso exclusivo para essa faixa de preço.
O LG Q Stylus com sua caneta é exclusivo para esta faixa de preço. Seu desempenho é bom, mas as durações da bateria poderiam ser melhores.
Compradores em potencial devem estar cientes da duração medíocre da bateria, que é muito menor do que a dos dispositivos concorrentes. As câmeras são boas o suficiente para fotos ocasionais, mas não muito mais. O Q Stylus pode ser usado para jogos, embora os usuários não devam ter expectativas muito altas, uma vez que os tempos de carregamento podem ser muito longos, e as taxas de quadros baixas em títulos mais exigentes.
LG Q Stylus
- 10/26/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
