Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G8S ThinQ: Inovador ou desatualizado?

Name: LG G8s ThinQ
Brand: LG

Um entalhe grande demais.

O LG G8S ThinQ chegou atrasado para a festa, mas ainda traz um SoC carro-chefe, uma grande tela OLED, uma câmera ToF e uma bateria de 3.550 mAh. O G8S ThinQ pode ter tecnologia de câmera sofisticada, mas, de outra forma, é um carro-chefe bastante comum. No entanto, continue lendo para descobrir por que ainda pensamos muito na última tentativa da LG de interromper a ordem estabelecida.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/15/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG G8s ThinQ (G8 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.20 polegadas 18.7:9, 2248 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, P-OLED, Notch, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 106 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, barômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B20, B28, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.99 x 155.3 x 76.6

Bateria

3550 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge 3.0

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.8, Phase Detection AF (PDAF), LED Flash, videos at 2160p/ 60 FPS. 13.0 MP, f/2.4, wide-angle lens. 12.0 MP, f/2.6, telephoto lens.
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/1.9, vídeos a 1080p / 30 FPS. ToF secondary camera

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador USB, cabo USB, carcaça de silicone, pano de limpeza, headset, USB tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 1.587 W/kg, Head - 0.482 W/kg. LTE Cat 20/5 (2,000 Mbps/75 Mbps), fanless

peso

181 g, Suprimento de energia: 65 g

Preço

669 Euro

Links

LG página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P30 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	680 (646^min - 700^max) MBit/s +35%
LG G7 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 MBit/s +30%
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	644 (578^min - 672^max) MBit/s +28%
Sony Xperia 1 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	531 (414^min - 620^max) MBit/s +6%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	502 (465^min - 517^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (438^min - 506^max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	468 (351^min - 489^max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
LG G7 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	656 MBit/s +13%
Sony Xperia 1 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	617 (356^min - 662^max) MBit/s +7%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	578 (474^min - 617^max) MBit/s
Huawei P30 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	544 (38^min - 618^max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	520 (445^min - 571^max) MBit/s -10%
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	517 (477^min - 528^max) MBit/s -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	467 (375^min - 519^max) MBit/s -19%

LG G8s ThinQ; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø578 (474-617)

LG G8s ThinQ; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø502 (465-517)

GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ – Bridge q — GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour

A photo of our test chart shot in low light at 1 lux


531 cd/m²	549 cd/m²	580 cd/m²
538 cd/m²	539 cd/m²	572 cd/m²
539 cd/m²	550 cd/m²	605 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 605 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 555.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 539 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
146.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.274

	LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"	Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"	Sony Xperia 1 OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"	LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1"	OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8"	Huawei P30 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"
Screen		29%	35%	-16%	29%	13%	26%
Brightness middle	539	672 25%	541 0%	974 81%	586 9%	426 -21%	561 4%
Brightness	556	641 15%	543 -2%	975 75%	584 5%	427 -23%	560 1%
Brightness Distribution	88	92 5%	99 13%	96 9%	97 10%	96 9%	95 8%
Black Level *		0.35		0.49
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.78	1.3 66%	0.8 79%	5.4 -43%	1.39 63%	2.14 43%	1.5 60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.95	2.7 61%	1.7 76%	13.1 -88%	2.7 61%	3.29 53%	2.5 64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	2.2 -0%	1.2 45%	5 -127%	1.6 27%	1.8 18%	1.8 18%
Gamma	2.274 ^97%	2.3 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.31 ^95%	2.243 ^98%	2.111 ^104%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6013 ^108%	6868 ^95%	6601 ^98%	7480 ^87%	6672 ^97%	6329 ^103%	6512 ^100%
Contrast		1920		1988

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

235 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3406 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	4750 Points +39%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3506 Points +3%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2448 Points -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3472 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4506 Points +32%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3207 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14)	3480 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10274 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	11276 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11172 Points +9%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	9029 Points -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10812 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10553 Points +3%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9547 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14)	10955 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +53%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7442 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	21070 Points +183%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7509 Points +1%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13497 Points +81%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7470 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10170 Points +37%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5864 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12)	7629 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +69%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11890 Points
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10747 Points -10%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	9503 Points -20%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	11766 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10008 Points -16%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9890 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19)	12161 Points +2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9125 Points
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8760 Points -4%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7717 Points -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9974 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7966 Points -13%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8016 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19)	9710 Points +6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	65945 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	77597 Points +18%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	65656 Points 0%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	56669 Points -14%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	64389 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	56465 Points -14%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	35680 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55771 - 83518, n=17)	70036 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	97354 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	162695 Points +67%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	105718 Points +9%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	80534 Points -17%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106829 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	72022 Points -26%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	44261 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97354 - 110432, n=17)	105781 Points +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	30972 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	27413 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	28223 Points -9%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	27817 Points -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	26936 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	32155 Points +4%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	21257 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (20636 - 45072, n=18)	32923 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5251 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5724 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7197 Points +37%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5799 Points +10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7501 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4015 Points -24%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3337 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5251 - 7820, n=18)	7091 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=25, last 2 years)	4239 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6122 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	7806 Points +28%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9447 Points +54%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7633 Points +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9845 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4507 Points -26%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3281 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6122 - 10008, n=18)	9272 Points +51%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=25, last 2 years)	4795 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3505 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2960 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3656 Points +4%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3150 Points -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4091 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	2906 Points -17%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3548 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3001 - 4618, n=18)	3925 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=25, last 2 years)	3303 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5268 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	7555 Points +43%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5552 Points +5%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5877 Points +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7955 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4321 Points -18%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3226 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5268 - 8141, n=18)	7186 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=72, last 2 years)	11215 Points +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6358 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	14085 Points +122%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9158 Points +44%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7882 Points +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10420 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4886 Points -23%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3491 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6358 - 10420, n=18)	9569 Points +51%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=72, last 2 years)	19933 Points +214%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3293 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2880 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2345 Points -29%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3109 Points -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4352 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3077 Points -7%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2550 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2345 - 4703, n=18)	3892 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=72, last 2 years)	5021 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5068 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3629 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4556 Points -10%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4471 Points -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5581 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4477 Points -12%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4020 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4556 - 5747, n=20)	5489 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=69, last 2 years)	3014 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6040 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3806 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5663 Points -6%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5006 Points -17%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6248 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5206 Points -14%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4200 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5429 - 6362, n=20)	6201 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=69, last 2 years)	3179 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3242 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3121 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2705 Points -17%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3255 Points 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4063 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3005 Points -7%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3496 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2705 - 4612, n=20)	3954 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=69, last 2 years)	3259 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4604 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	4405 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3969 Points -14%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4735 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6270 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4620 Points 0%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3707 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3969 - 6404, n=20)	5819 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8239 Points +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5184 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5061 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5674 Points +9%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5322 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7115 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5368 Points +4%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4162 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5184 - 7148, n=20)	6793 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12402 Points +139%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3309 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3030 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1934 Points -42%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3416 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4429 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3106 Points -6%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2682 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1934 - 5024, n=20)	3942 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4754 Points +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3800 Points
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3832 Points +1%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Points +31%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4165 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3800 - 5012, n=20)	4719 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=68, last 2 years)	2791 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4236 Points
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5007 Points +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5794 Points +37%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4613 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4236 - 5884, n=20)	5618 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=68, last 2 years)	3021 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2794 Points
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2104 Points -25%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3317 Points +19%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3080 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2104 - 3452, n=20)	3045 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=68, last 2 years)	2684 Points -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	60 fps 0%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20)	63.4 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +45%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	85 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	232 fps +173%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +96%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	144 fps +69%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	166 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	141 fps +66%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	122 fps +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20)	153.1 fps +80%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=173, last 2 years)	297 fps +249%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +18%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +18%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	41 fps -20%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	55 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	59 fps +16%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	59 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20)	59.6 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	50 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	132 fps +164%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +100%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	63 fps +26%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	101 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	85 fps +70%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	87 fps +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20)	92.3 fps +85%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=173, last 2 years)	175.8 fps +252%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +67%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +14%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	26 fps -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps +47%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	54 fps +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20)	47.7 fps +33%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	67 fps +86%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	88 fps +151%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	55 fps +57%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	51 fps +46%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	71 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps +51%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	50 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20)	62 fps +77%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=173, last 2 years)	124.9 fps +257%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	21 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	58 fps +176%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	33 fps +57%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	17 fps -19%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	40 fps +90%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	27 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (16 - 41, n=20)	31.7 fps +51%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=174, last 2 years)	49.7 fps +137%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	54 fps +145%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +91%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	33 fps +50%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	43 fps +95%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	30 fps +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	39.2 fps +78%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=173, last 2 years)	75.2 fps +242%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps +168%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	34 fps +55%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	20 fps -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	23 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps -27%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17 - 38, n=20)	32.5 fps +48%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +131%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	63 fps +186%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +91%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	37 fps +68%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	41 fps +86%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=21)	39.9 fps +81%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years)	85.3 fps +288%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	14 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps +321%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	17 fps +21%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13 fps -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	15 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	28 fps +100%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	20 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (11 - 26, n=20)	20.9 fps +49%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	39.3 fps +181%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8.5 fps
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	20 fps +135%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps +159%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps +65%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	16 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps +88%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	14 fps +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8.5 - 24, n=21)	16.2 fps +91%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34.4 fps +305%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	321145 Points
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	334123 Points +4%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	256276 Points -20%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	369294 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	329444 Points +3%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	290650 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16)	354450 Points +10%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4389 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5721 Points +30%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4112 Points -6%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4257 Points -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4982 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4548 Points +4%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4327 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5397, n=19)	4796 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +48%
System (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8718 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	11946 Points +37%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8870 Points +2%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8070 Points -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9143 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7831 Points -10%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7684 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=19)	8539 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +19%
Memory (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4324 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3263 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2661 Points -38%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3744 Points -13%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5243 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4474 Points +3%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5425 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2661 - 7500, n=19)	5097 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +63%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8414 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	15969 Points +90%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9318 Points +11%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7906 Points -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9421 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	8484 Points +1%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6751 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9510, n=19)	9174 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +114%
Web (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1171 Points
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	1722 Points +47%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1300 Points +11%
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1374 Points +17%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1364 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	1439 Points +23%
Huawei P30 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1246 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1076 - 1601, n=19)	1356 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +35%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +131%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	62.5 Points +16%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	59.5 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16)	58.8 Points +9%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	53.8 Points
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)	48.63 Points -10%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +124%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	64.2 runs/min 0%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)	64.1 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15)	62 runs/min -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)	61.5 runs/min -4%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)	58.7 runs/min -8%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	161 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +40%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	111 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	107 Points
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	106 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20)	105.2 Points -2%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)	97 Points -9%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)	90 Points -16%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	42897 Points +80%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +62%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	24730 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	23830 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21)	23749 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	23318 Points -2%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)	20714 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	18697 Points -22%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)	16720 Points -30%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)	2484 ms * -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	2240 ms * -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19)	2147 ms * -5%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)	2095 ms * -3%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	2040 ms * -0%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	2036 ms *
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	1965 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +25%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	610 ms * +70%

* ... smaller is better

	LG G8s ThinQ	Sony Xperia 1	LG G7 ThinQ	OnePlus 7 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S10e	Huawei P30	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	1%	52%	4%	109%	76%	476%
Sequential Read 256KB	791	750 -5%	695 -12%	1468 86%	792 0%	909 15%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) -4%	1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 139%
Sequential Write 256KB	182.4	206.9 13%	176.4 -3%	387 112%	194.1 6%	186 2%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 63%	1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) 709%
Random Read 4KB	138	147.3 7%	110.5 -20%	174.1 26%	136.9 -1%	138.8 1%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 11%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) 101%
Random Write 4KB	29.6	24.16 -18%	23.26 -21%	24.8 -16%	24.1 -19%	195.3 560%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 345%	312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) 954%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	67.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	31.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -54%	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 25%		73.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	82.8 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 23%	76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) 13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	46.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	27.84 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -40%	62.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 34%		60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 30%	71.3 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 53%	59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) 28%

LG G8s ThinQ; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø28.1 (26-30)

LG G8s ThinQ; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø27.9 (24-30)

LG G8s ThinQ; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (59-61)

LG G8s ThinQ; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (53-61)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.6 °C	36 °C	33.6 °C
37.6 °C	36.7 °C	34.4 °C
38 °C	36.7 °C	33.5 °C

Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 36 °C


31.2 °C	35.7 °C	37.1 °C
32.2 °C	36.4 °C	37.6 °C
32.4 °C	36 °C	38.4 °C

Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

LG G8s ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G7 ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	1.2 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Carga	5 / 10 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh	LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh	Huawei P30 3650 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		1%	17%	0%	-5%	19%	4%	11%	4%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	0.61 49%	1 17%	1.16 3%	0.9 25%	0.6 50%	0.69 42%	0.939 ?(0.58 - 1.96, n=19) 22%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years) 26%
Idle Average *	1.6	2.67 -67%	1.48 7%	1.98 -24%	1.8 -13%	1.2 25%	2.41 -51%	1.506 ?(0.85 - 2.8, n=19) 6%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) 8%
Idle Maximum *	2	2.69 -35%	1.56 22%	2.07 -4%	2.9 -45%	1.5 25%	2.51 -26%	1.799 ?(1 - 2.9, n=19) 10%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	5	4.34 13%	3.76 25%	4.51 10%	5.5 -10%	5.2 -4%	3.86 23%	4.61 ?(3.64 - 5.8, n=19) 8%	6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) -32%
Load Maximum *	10	5.66 43%	8.48 15%	8.3 17%	8.2 18%	10.2 -2%	6.96 30%	9.04 ?(7.49 - 11.9, n=19) 10%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) 1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		28h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 23min

	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh	LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh	Huawei P30 3650 mAh
Battery Runtime		44%	-14%	8%	9%	-21%	14%
Reader / Idle	1689	2969 76%	1067 -37%	1662 -2%	1745 3%	1185 -30%	1914 13%
H.264	753	1011 34%	712 -5%	908 21%	802 7%	795 6%	1050 39%
WiFi v1.3	693	910 31%	441 -36%	591 -15%	768 11%	416 -40%	715 3%
Load	203	270 33%	246 21%	260 28%	236 16%	164 -19%	208 2%

Pro

+ GPS preciso

+ Sensor de digitais veloz

+ Tela táctil precisa

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Bons alto falantes estéreo

Contra

- Entalhe massivo

- Desempenho pobre da câmera com pouca luz

- Alto consumo de energia sob carga

- Afogamento da CPU

The LG G8S ThinQ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of LG Germany.

O LG G8 ThinQ é um smartphone intrigante. Seus gestos de movimento de ar oferecem um vislumbre do futuro e podem fornecer maneiras alternativas inovadoras de controlar o dispositivo à medida que o software amadurece. Da mesma forma, seus gestos de movimento de ar podem facilitar a captura de fotos. No entanto, atualmente é mais um belo truque que você poderia mostrar aos seus amigos e familiares. Com isso dito, um mago deve estudar seus truques de mágica bem, dado que os gestos de movimento de ar são muitas vezes difíceis de acertar.

No entanto LG G8S ThinQ não conta com apenas um truque. Tem navegação excelente e precisa, enquanto também faz bom uso do seu SoC Snapdragon 855. Gostamos que o dispositivo permaneça frio sob uso intenso contínuo, embora o consumo de energia seja maior do que gostaríamos. Além disso, o G8S ThinQ tem câmeras decentes, uma tela impressionante e uma bateria sólida. Além disso, os alto-falantes estéreo oferecem um bom som, enquanto o Wi-Fi e o sensor de digitais são rápidos. A inclusão de um conector para fones de ouvido e armazenamento expansível também é uma raridade para os carros-chefes de 2019.

As desvantagens? Bem, a câmera traseira tem um desempenho com pouca luz abaixo do esperado, o SoC se afoga sob uso intenso e já mencionamos o alto consumo de energia sob carga. No entanto, essas são as nossas únicas queixas principais sobre o G8S ThinQ. Você também pode comprar smartphones com armazenamento e Wi-Fi mais rápidos, mas a diferença real é mínima.

Os recursos inovadores do ToF são atualmente um tanto enigmáticos, mas o LG G8S ThinQ faz o básico certo e é um excelente smartphone topo de gama.

O grande entalhe também poderia assustar alguns compradores, mas isso é uma praga que atualmente aflige muitos carros-chefe modernos. Em suma, o LG G8S ThinQ é uma alternativa decente para a ordem estabelecida, especialmente porque os preços já começaram a cair.

LG G8s ThinQ - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

53 / 70 → 76%

Peso

90%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

44 / 64 → 68%

Desempenho da aplicação

74 / 86 → 86%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 86%

Camera

79%

Médio

79%

86%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11441 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G8S ThinQ: Inovador ou desatualizado?

Florian Schmitt, 2019-07-15 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

LG G8s ThinQ audio analysis

LG G7 ThinQ audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison