Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G8S ThinQ: Inovador ou desatualizado?
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei P30 | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Sony Xperia 1 | |
LG G8s ThinQ | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia 1 | |
LG G8s ThinQ | |
Huawei P30 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
OnePlus 7 Pro |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 539 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
146.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.274
LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2" | Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.1" | Sony Xperia 1 OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5" | LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1" | OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8" | Huawei P30 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 29% | 35% | -16% | 29% | 13% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 539 | 672 25% | 541 0% | 974 81% | 586 9% | 426 -21% | 561 4% |
Brightness | 556 | 641 15% | 543 -2% | 975 75% | 584 5% | 427 -23% | 560 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 99 13% | 96 9% | 97 10% | 96 9% | 95 8% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.49 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.78 | 1.3 66% | 0.8 79% | 5.4 -43% | 1.39 63% | 2.14 43% | 1.5 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.95 | 2.7 61% | 1.7 76% | 13.1 -88% | 2.7 61% | 3.29 53% | 2.5 64% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.2 -0% | 1.2 45% | 5 -127% | 1.6 27% | 1.8 18% | 1.8 18% |
Gamma | 2.274 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.31 95% | 2.243 98% | 2.111 104% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6013 108% | 6868 95% | 6601 98% | 7480 87% | 6672 97% | 6329 103% | 6512 100% |
Contrast | 1920 | 1988 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 235 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 235 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
LG G8s ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia 1 | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
Huawei P30 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
LG G8s ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia 1 | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
Huawei P30 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
LG G8s ThinQ | |
Sony Xperia 1 | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
Huawei P30 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) | |
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21) | |
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73) | |
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) |
* ... smaller is better
LG G8s ThinQ | Sony Xperia 1 | LG G7 ThinQ | OnePlus 7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S10e | Huawei P30 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | 1% | 52% | 4% | 109% | 76% | 465% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 791 | 750 -5% | 695 -12% | 1468 86% | 792 0% | 909 15% | 760 ? -4% | 1839 ? 132% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 182.4 | 206.9 13% | 176.4 -3% | 387 112% | 194.1 6% | 186 2% | 297 ? 63% | 1425 ? 681% |
Random Read 4KB | 138 | 147.3 7% | 110.5 -20% | 174.1 26% | 136.9 -1% | 138.8 1% | 152.9 ? 11% | 277 ? 101% |
Random Write 4KB | 29.6 | 24.16 -18% | 23.26 -21% | 24.8 -16% | 24.1 -19% | 195.3 560% | 131.6 ? 345% | 309 ? 944% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 67.5 ? | 31.34 ? -54% | 84.7 ? 25% | 73.2 ? 8% | 82.8 ? 23% | 76 ? 13% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 46.7 ? | 27.84 ? -40% | 62.7 ? 34% | 60.7 ? 30% | 71.3 ? 53% | 59.6 ? 28% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG G8s ThinQ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG G7 ThinQ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.2 / 1.6 / 2 Watt |
Carga |
5 / 10 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | Huawei P30 3650 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | 17% | 0% | -5% | 19% | 4% | 11% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 0.61 49% | 1 17% | 1.16 3% | 0.9 25% | 0.6 50% | 0.69 42% | 0.939 ? 22% | 0.894 ? 25% |
Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.67 -67% | 1.48 7% | 1.98 -24% | 1.8 -13% | 1.2 25% | 2.41 -51% | 1.506 ? 6% | 1.456 ? 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 2 | 2.69 -35% | 1.56 22% | 2.07 -4% | 2.9 -45% | 1.5 25% | 2.51 -26% | 1.799 ? 10% | 1.616 ? 19% |
Load Average * | 5 | 4.34 13% | 3.76 25% | 4.51 10% | 5.5 -10% | 5.2 -4% | 3.86 23% | 4.61 ? 8% | 6.45 ? -29% |
Load Maximum * | 10 | 5.66 43% | 8.48 15% | 8.3 17% | 8.2 18% | 10.2 -2% | 6.96 30% | 9.04 ? 10% | 9.8 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | Huawei P30 3650 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 44% | -14% | 8% | 9% | -21% | 14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1689 | 2969 76% | 1067 -37% | 1662 -2% | 1745 3% | 1185 -30% | 1914 13% |
H.264 | 753 | 1011 34% | 712 -5% | 908 21% | 802 7% | 795 6% | 1050 39% |
WiFi v1.3 | 693 | 910 31% | 441 -36% | 591 -15% | 768 11% | 416 -40% | 715 3% |
Load | 203 | 270 33% | 246 21% | 260 28% | 236 16% | 164 -19% | 208 2% |
Pro
Contra
O LG G8 ThinQ é um smartphone intrigante. Seus gestos de movimento de ar oferecem um vislumbre do futuro e podem fornecer maneiras alternativas inovadoras de controlar o dispositivo à medida que o software amadurece. Da mesma forma, seus gestos de movimento de ar podem facilitar a captura de fotos. No entanto, atualmente é mais um belo truque que você poderia mostrar aos seus amigos e familiares. Com isso dito, um mago deve estudar seus truques de mágica bem, dado que os gestos de movimento de ar são muitas vezes difíceis de acertar.
No entanto LG G8S ThinQ não conta com apenas um truque. Tem navegação excelente e precisa, enquanto também faz bom uso do seu SoC Snapdragon 855. Gostamos que o dispositivo permaneça frio sob uso intenso contínuo, embora o consumo de energia seja maior do que gostaríamos. Além disso, o G8S ThinQ tem câmeras decentes, uma tela impressionante e uma bateria sólida. Além disso, os alto-falantes estéreo oferecem um bom som, enquanto o Wi-Fi e o sensor de digitais são rápidos. A inclusão de um conector para fones de ouvido e armazenamento expansível também é uma raridade para os carros-chefes de 2019.
As desvantagens? Bem, a câmera traseira tem um desempenho com pouca luz abaixo do esperado, o SoC se afoga sob uso intenso e já mencionamos o alto consumo de energia sob carga. No entanto, essas são as nossas únicas queixas principais sobre o G8S ThinQ. Você também pode comprar smartphones com armazenamento e Wi-Fi mais rápidos, mas a diferença real é mínima.
Os recursos inovadores do ToF são atualmente um tanto enigmáticos, mas o LG G8S ThinQ faz o básico certo e é um excelente smartphone topo de gama.
O grande entalhe também poderia assustar alguns compradores, mas isso é uma praga que atualmente aflige muitos carros-chefe modernos. Em suma, o LG G8S ThinQ é uma alternativa decente para a ordem estabelecida, especialmente porque os preços já começaram a cair.
LG G8s ThinQ
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt