Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G7 ThinQ
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG G6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 974 cd/m²
Contraste: 1988:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
| LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1" | LG G6 IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6% | 17% | 24% | 24% | 14% | 9% | 10% | |
| Brightness middle | 974 | 646 -34% | 565 -42% | 600 -38% | 569 -42% | 630 -35% | 430 -56% | 395 -59% |
| Brightness | 975 | 611 -37% | 571 -41% | 606 -38% | 578 -41% | 632 -35% | 437 -55% | 402 -59% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 89 -7% | 96 0% | 94 -2% | 95 -1% | 96 0% | 87 -9% | 90 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.23 53% | 0.44 10% | 0.37 24% | ||||
| Contrast | 1988 | 2809 41% | 1432 -28% | 1068 -46% | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 4.5 17% | 2.3 57% | 1.2 78% | 1.3 76% | 1.5 72% | 2.3 57% | 1.6 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.1 | 8.3 37% | 4.8 63% | 3 77% | 2.1 84% | 4.3 67% | 4.6 65% | 3.4 74% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 6 -20% | 1.9 62% | 1.6 68% | 1.6 68% | 2.1 58% | 2.4 52% | 1.1 78% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.27 97% | 2.16 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.17 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7480 87% | 7996 81% | 6332 103% | 6707 97% | 6401 102% | 6513 100% | 6160 106% | 6536 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 67.74 | |||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.05 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1174 Hz | ≤ 42 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1174 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 42 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1174 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
* ... smaller is better
| LG G7 ThinQ | LG G6 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | Sony Xperia XZ2 | HTC U12 Plus | Huawei P20 Pro | OnePlus 6 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -22% | 8% | -16% | 62% | 163% | 9% | 47% | 574% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 695 | 428.7 -38% | 819 18% | 679 -2% | 709 2% | 832 20% | 726 4% | 696 ? 0% | 1887 ? 172% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 176.4 | 122.8 -30% | 204.9 16% | 198.7 13% | 195.8 11% | 196.7 12% | 201.4 14% | 224 ? 27% | 1471 ? 734% |
| Random Read 4KB | 110.5 | 95.2 -14% | 129.7 17% | 149.4 35% | 118.1 7% | 144.3 31% | 137 24% | 137.2 ? 24% | 278 ? 152% |
| Random Write 4KB | 23.26 | 16.58 -29% | 22.74 -2% | 17 -27% | 104.2 348% | 160.5 590% | 21.8 -6% | 84.7 ? 264% | 311 ? 1237% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.7 ? | 77.6 ? -8% | 79.2 ? -6% | 34.25 ? -60% | 84.3 ? 0% | 68.6 ? -19% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.7 ? | 53.3 ? -15% | 67.2 ? 7% | 30.12 ? -52% | 63.6 ? 1% | 52.2 ? -17% |
| Arena of Valor - high HD | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Honor 10 | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| PUBG Mobile - HD | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Honor 10 | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| HD | 35 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high HD | 44 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG G7 ThinQ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U12 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.12 / 0.57 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.16 / 1.98 / 2.07 Watt |
| Carga |
4.51 / 8.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 1% | -9% | 38% | 4% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.16 | 0.62 47% | 0.72 38% | 0.77 34% | 0.84 28% | 0.862 ? 26% | 0.882 ? 24% |
| Idle Average * | 1.98 | 1.43 28% | 2.21 -12% | 2.18 -10% | 1.54 22% | 1.728 ? 13% | 1.448 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.07 | 1.48 29% | 2.22 -7% | 2.21 -7% | 1.57 24% | 2.07 ? -0% | 1.603 ? 23% |
| Load Average * | 4.51 | 5.52 -22% | 4.6 -2% | 6.25 -39% | 2.47 45% | 4.87 ? -8% | 6.57 ? -46% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.3 | 10.47 -26% | 9.34 -13% | 10.16 -22% | 2.49 70% | 9.27 ? -12% | 9.92 ? -20% |
* ... smaller is better
| LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -22% | 5% | -17% | 12% | -2% | -22% | -15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1662 | 1789 8% | 1452 -13% | 1806 9% | 1343 -19% | 1727 4% | 1706 3% | 1292 -22% | 1402 -16% |
| H.264 | 908 | 779 -14% | 464 -49% | 791 -13% | 674 -26% | 784 -14% | 672 -26% | 634 -30% | 722 -20% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 591 | 692 17% | 507 -14% | 762 29% | 521 -12% | 744 26% | 581 -2% | 564 -5% | 679 15% |
| Load | 260 | 252 -3% | 230 -12% | 246 -5% | 237 -9% | 345 33% | 302 16% | 180 -31% | 159 -39% |
Pro
Contra
O LG G7 ThinQ é melhor que o LG G6 em muitas áreas. A enorme tela de 6,1 polegadas pode não ser familiar para os usuários do LG G6; gostaríamos que a LG não tivesse feito o G7 ThinQ tão compacto. O Snapdragon 845 MSM8952 é um salto em frente comparado com o Snapdragon 835, o que é um benefício para o desempenho do sistema. A LG fex muitas coisas bem com o áudio também, graças ao Hi-Fi Quad DAC entre outras coisas.
O LG G7 ThinQ é um smartphone impressionante do ponto de vista técnico. No entanto, pouco faz para se distinguir de um mercado saturado, com seu alto preço representando um obstáculo para tentar atrair compradores em potencial de outros carros chefe.
A menor capacidade da bateria em comparação com o LG G6 é uma pena, mas o G7 ThinQ extrai muito de sua bateria relativamente pequena de 3.000 mAh. A tela também é impressionante, embora gostaríamos de ver o sensor de brilho ser menos conservador em áreas claras como ao usar o dispositivo em um dia ensolarado. O Wi-Fi também é rápido e estável, o que é bom. Um bônus é a inclusão da carga sem fio em variantes europeias, o que não era o caso com o LG G6. Também é bom ver o suporte para LTE Cat. 18, mas a sua inclusão parece bastante supérflua, dado que o dispositivo não suporta VoLTE nem VoWiFi na Alemanha.
Uma coisa que gostaríamos de ver é uma porta USB mais moderna, especialmente tendo em conta o preço de 849 euros do telefone (~$986).
Não pudemos avaliar a câmera nesta análise, pois nosso dispositivo de teste está rodando o software de pré-lançamento. A LG afirmou que quer lançar o software final, em breve. Vamos cobrir a câmera e, finalmente, avaliar o LG G7 ThinQ quando isso acontecer.
Price comparison
