Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y7 2019
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 1116:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.35
Huawei Y7 2019 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3" | Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.7" | Nokia 3.1 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -8% | -3% | -5% | 16% | 29% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 547 | 528 -3% | 393 -28% | 479 -12% | 526 -4% | 519 -5% | 421 -23% |
Brightness | 543 | 525 -3% | 365 -33% | 481 -11% | 510 -6% | 513 -6% | 389 -28% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 85 -10% | 94 0% | 94 0% | 93 -1% | 85 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.51 -4% | 0.29 41% | 0.37 24% | 0.17 65% | 0.33 33% | |
Contrast | 1116 | 1035 -7% | 1355 21% | 1295 16% | 3094 177% | 1276 14% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.7 -4% | 5.28 -17% | 4.91 -9% | 6.64 -48% | 1.8 60% | 3.4 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 8.9 -13% | 9 -14% | 9.47 -20% | 10.02 -27% | 3.6 54% | 5.9 25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 6.4 -28% | 4.2 16% | 6.4 -28% | 6.4 -28% | 1.5 70% | 3.9 22% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.22 99% | 2.6 85% | 2.108 104% | 2.344 94% | 2.06 107% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 7400 88% | 7987 81% | 7086 92% | 7292 89% | 7989 81% | 6462 101% | 7330 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P20 Lite | |
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14) | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (28 - 34, n=8) | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei Y7 2019 | Huawei P20 Lite | Huawei Y7 2018 | Motorola Moto G7 Play | Nokia 3.1 Plus | Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 64% | -24% | 54% | -30% | -4% | 15% | -11% | 977% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 305 | 293.9 -4% | 256 -16% | 289 -5% | 272.5 -11% | 298.8 -2% | 282.6 -7% | 242 ? -21% | 1834 ? 501% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 88.8 | 198.3 123% | 71.5 -19% | 111 25% | 35.72 -60% | 88.5 0% | 172.4 94% | 100.5 ? 13% | 1422 ? 1501% |
Random Read 4KB | 83.5 | 48.19 -42% | 38.8 -54% | 74 -11% | 52.4 -37% | 72.9 -13% | 81.3 -3% | 43.2 ? -48% | 278 ? 233% |
Random Write 4KB | 17.48 | 71.1 307% | 9.5 -46% | 73 318% | 8.33 -52% | 16.1 -8% | 18.75 7% | 22.4 ? 28% | 310 ? 1673% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 86.4 ? | 83.5 ? -3% | 85 -2% | 84.7 ? -2% | 81.3 ? -6% | 83.4 ? -3% | 85.9 ? -1% | 71.8 ? -17% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.8 ? | 69 ? 5% | 61.5 -7% | 64.1 ? -3% | 55.2 ? -16% | 67.8 ? 3% | 64 ? -3% | 52.9 ? -20% |
Dead Trigger 2
Arena of Valor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Y7 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y7 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.51 / 1.7 / 1.85 Watt |
Carga |
3.17 / 4.44 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 3500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -35% | -38% | -42% | -47% | 28% | -37% | -34% | -53% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.51 | 0.98 -92% | 0.9 -76% | 1 -96% | 1 -96% | 0.62 -22% | 0.56 -10% | 0.794 ? -56% | 0.895 ? -75% |
Idle Average * | 1.7 | 2 -18% | 1.9 -12% | 1.7 -0% | 2.4 -41% | 0.96 44% | 1.99 -17% | 2.27 ? -34% | 1.447 ? 15% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.85 | 2.11 -14% | 2.3 -24% | 2.6 -41% | 2.9 -57% | 0.99 46% | 2.05 -11% | 2.48 ? -34% | 1.608 ? 13% |
Load Average * | 3.17 | 3.9 -23% | 4.7 -48% | 4.1 -29% | 3.7 -17% | 1.85 42% | 4.62 -46% | 3.95 ? -25% | 6.41 ? -102% |
Load Maximum * | 4.44 | 5.62 -27% | 5.7 -28% | 6.5 -46% | 5.5 -24% | 3.04 32% | 8.94 -101% | 5.38 ? -21% | 9.61 ? -116% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 3500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -46% | -33% | -38% | -17% | -9% | -40% | |
Reader / Idle | 2350 | 750 -68% | 1305 -44% | 1817 -23% | 1678 -29% | ||
H.264 | 938 | 470 -50% | 687 -27% | 916 -2% | 662 -29% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1113 | 582 -48% | 624 -44% | 690 -38% | 920 -17% | 848 -24% | 547 -51% |
Load | 296 | 247 -17% | 245 -17% | 335 13% | 150 -49% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei Y7 2019 é uma atualização triunfante sobre o Y7 2018. O fabricante chinês melhorou em quase todas as áreas importantes, incluindo design, tela, desempenho e duração da bateria. Seus marcos estreitos e painel IPS de 6,26 polegadas também fazem o Y7 2019 parecer mais caro do que é.
A combinação de 3 GB de RAM, 32 GB de espaço de armazenamento e um SoC Snapdragon 450 da Qualcomm é decente, também para um dispositivo de nível de entrada. Existem dispositivos que oferecem melhor desempenho pelo mesmo preço, mas poucos também têm câmeras decentes, funcionalidade real de dois cartões SIM e microSD, além de uma fantástica duração da bateria.
O Huawei Y7 2019 é um excelente valor pelo dinheiro. Poucos smartphones de nível de entrada oferecem tanto quanto o Y7 2019.
Claro, a Huawei comprometeu algumas áreas para manter os custos baixos. A resolução de 720p é decepcionante, assim como a falta de NFC e a inclusão de uma porta micro USB ao invés de Type-C. O Motorola Moto G7 Play e o Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite oferecem melhor desempenho, enquanto o Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018) também seria uma alternativa sólida e tem NFC. No entanto, a Huawei acertou muito com o Y7 2019, e suas deficiências não devem prejudicar o que é um excelente smartphone de nível de entrada.
Huawei Y7 2019
-
10/31/2019 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero