Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y7 (2017)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
LG X power2 | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y7 | |
LG X power2 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus |
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 1197:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.35
Huawei Y7 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | LG X power2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia L1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Huawei Y6 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -10% | -21% | 20% | -13% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 467 | 425 -9% | 237 -49% | 454 -3% | 479 3% | 438 -6% |
Brightness | 456 | 425 -7% | 237 -48% | 463 2% | 478 5% | 432 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 92 0% | 86 -7% | 94 2% | 90 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.37 5% | 0.13 67% | 0.58 -49% | 0.13 67% | |
Contrast | 1197 | 1149 -4% | 1823 52% | 826 -31% | 3369 181% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 4.7 -9% | 5.5 -28% | 2 53% | 4.5 -5% | 4.8 -12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.8 | 8.3 -22% | 12.7 -87% | 5.3 22% | 7.5 -10% | 11.4 -68% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 4.6 -31% | 6.1 -74% | 1.7 51% | 4.1 -17% | 3.2 9% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.07 106% | 2.1 105% | 2.03 108% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 7273 89% | 7445 87% | 7943 82% | 6394 102% | 7139 91% | 7090 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2315 Hz | ≤ 14 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
59.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise | |
↘ 29.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Sony Xperia L1 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Y7 | |
LG X power2 | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
Huawei Y6 2017 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
LG X power2 (Chrome 59) | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
LG X power2 (Chrome 59) | |
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
LG X power2 (Chrome 59) | |
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60) | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
LG X power2 (Chrome 59) | |
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60) |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei Y7 | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | LG X power2 | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | Sony Xperia L1 | Huawei Y6 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 51% | 20% | 20% | -21% | 37% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 119.4 | 194.4 63% | 243.8 104% | 198.5 66% | 181.9 52% | 202.6 70% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 33.2 | 42 27% | 41.7 26% | 53 60% | 40.2 21% | 66.9 102% |
Random Read 4KB | 53.2 | 19.15 -64% | 25.3 -52% | 25.86 -51% | 13.6 -74% | 25.93 -51% |
Random Write 4KB | 6.9 | 29.4 326% | 10.7 55% | 10.54 53% | 5.9 -14% | 20.54 198% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.5 ? | 66.3 -20% | 76.6 ? -7% | 76.1 ? -8% | 37.81 ? -54% | 48.4 -41% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.6 ? | 46.6 -26% | 58.1 ? -7% | 63.9 ? 2% | 26.25 ? -58% | 26.4 -58% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Y7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.12 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.57 / 1.61 / 1.62 Watt |
Carga |
3.09 / 4.26 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei Y7 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | LG X power2 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -17% | -33% | 33% | -55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 0.89 -56% | 0.63 -11% | 0.39 32% | 0.89 -56% |
Idle Average * | 1.61 | 1.87 -16% | 1.42 12% | 1.06 34% | 2.05 -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.62 | 1.98 -22% | 1.47 9% | 1.08 33% | 2.18 -35% |
Load Average * | 3.09 | 3.04 2% | 5.89 -91% | 1.82 41% | 6.02 -95% |
Load Maximum * | 4.26 | 4.01 6% | 7.85 -84% | 3.21 25% | 6.94 -63% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei Y7 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | LG X power2 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh | Huawei Y6 2017 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 10% | 32% | 24% | -28% | -17% | |
Reader / Idle | 1914 | 2720 42% | 1950 2% | 1398 -27% | 1522 -20% | |
H.264 | 812 | 1226 51% | 1096 35% | 656 -19% | 693 -15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 716 | 788 10% | 982 37% | 904 26% | 567 -21% | 654 -9% |
Load | 402 | 384 -4% | 525 31% | 223 -45% | 302 -25% |
Pro
Contra
Com o Huawei Y7, o fabricante montou um pacote atraente. As imagens da câmera principal são bastante nítidas e apresentam uma boa reprodução das cores. Você também pode gravar vídeos decentes com ela. Em particular, o Huawei Y7 é a escolha para todos os fanáticos de smartphones poderosos, que não querem gastar mais de 200 euros (~$238). Graças ao poderoso SoC, ele supera os outros aparelhos com preços semelhantes, e até mesmo mais caros, em termos de poder de computação. Dado que a operação também funciona bem, a carcaça cabe bem na mão, a bateria dura muito e a qualidade da voz é convincente, pelo menos, do lado do usuário, você pode estar satisfeito com um pacote geral bem sucedido.
O Huawei Y7 convence com imagens das câmeras com boas cores e nitidez, uma carcaça de metal sólida, uma longa duração da bateria e um bom desempenho para sua faixa de preços. Vale a pena recomendar, mesmo que existam alguns detalhes que o afastam ligeiramente da impressão geral.
Então, qual é a razão para hesitar? Está o microfone que não oferece um bom desempenho, a câmera frontal que tira fotos em exteriores que são muito brilhantes, e você também deve considerar as correções de segurança desatualizadas do software. No entanto, o Huawei Y7 ainda oferece uma excelente relação preço-desempenho por 200 euros (~$238) atualmente.
Huawei Y7
-
09/15/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer