Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 II Compact

Emoção econômica. "Mais barato sempre é possível", a Huawei pensou, e então reduziu o preço da gama média inferior com o seu Y6 II Compact. Será isso suficiente para uma apresentação convincente?
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Y Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, bússola, WiFi Direct, DLNA, USB OTG, rádio FM
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); largura de banda (download/​upload): 150 MBps / ​50 MBps (LTE), 42 MBps / ​11.5 MBps (UMTS); SAR rates: 0.36 W/kg (ear), 1.23 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.95 x 144.2 x 72.5
Bateria
8.4 Wh, 2200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, removeable, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 160 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, flash dual-LED
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix Flash LED
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, designs, phone manager, HiCare, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
140 g, Suprimento de energia: 46 g
Preço
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

146.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.8 mm 140 g147.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.3 mm 156 g146.9 mm 70.9 mm 8.3 mm 140 g144.2 mm 72.5 mm 8.95 mm 140 g142.3 mm 71 mm 7.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
303 MBit/s +539%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s +539%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s +5%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s +453%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
151 MBit/s +188%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s +11%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Overview
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Overview
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Crossing
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Crossing
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Underpass
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Underpass

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
472
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 503 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 486.9 cd/m² Minimum: 15.92 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 491 cd/m²
Contraste: 546:1 (Preto: 0.9 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
Huawei Y6 II Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
LG K10
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5"
Screen
7%
22%
14%
-5%
Brightness middle
491
370
-25%
375
-24%
515
5%
295
-40%
Brightness
487
355
-27%
376
-23%
498
2%
299
-39%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
91
-1%
93
1%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.9
0.28
69%
0.32
64%
0.49
46%
Contrast
546
1321
142%
1172
115%
1051
92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.6
6.7
-2%
6
9%
6.2
6%
5.8
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.9
17.8
-38%
9.5
26%
11.4
12%
8.6
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
7.9
-61%
4.5
8%
7.4
-51%
4.8
2%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
1.84 120%
CCT
7090 92%
9072 72%
6975 93%
8664 75%
6252 104%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
33786 Points
LG K10
27383 Points -19%
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points -30%
Honor 5C
53143 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points -27%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4885 Points
LG K10
4339 Points -11%
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points -13%
Honor 5C
11755 Points +141%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points -28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4296 Points
LG K10
3774 Points -12%
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points -10%
Honor 5C
11319 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
9393 Points
LG K10
9106 Points -3%
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points -30%
Honor 5C
13588 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points
LG K10
52 Points -74%
Honor 5C
563 Points +177%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
167 Points
LG K10
41 Points -75%
Honor 5C
480 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
826 Points
LG K10
730 Points -12%
Honor 5C
1418 Points +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
192 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
157 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
848 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
124 Points
LG K10
Points -100%
Honor 5C
383 Points +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
100 Points
LG K10
Points -100%
Honor 5C
317 Points +217%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
873 Points
LG K10
Points -100%
Honor 5C
1418 Points +62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15 fps
LG K10
9.7 fps -35%
HTC Desire 530
8.9 fps -41%
Honor 5C
20 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps -49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
8.4 fps
LG K10
5.2 fps -38%
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps -43%
Honor 5C
19 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
6.1 fps
LG K10
4.1 fps -33%
HTC Desire 530
4 fps -34%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps +38%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2.8 fps
LG K10
1.8 fps -36%
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps -39%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps +182%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4.1 fps
LG K10
fps -100%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps +20%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1.7 fps
LG K10
fps -100%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps +165%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
3400 Points
LG K10
3999 Points +18%
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points -14%
Honor 5C
5120 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3350 Points -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points
LG K10
536 Points +164%
HTC Desire 530
149 Points -27%
Honor 5C
1225 Points +503%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points +108%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1093 Points
LG K10
1050 Points -4%
HTC Desire 530
742 Points -32%
Honor 5C
2600 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points +4%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
571 Points
LG K10
453 Points -21%
HTC Desire 530
300 Points -47%
Honor 5C
1504 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
283 Points
LG K10
310 Points +10%
HTC Desire 530
231 Points -18%
Honor 5C
814 Points +188%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points -44%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
10 Points
LG K10
562 Points +5520%
HTC Desire 530
10 Points 0%
Honor 5C
707 Points +6970%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points +5590%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
549 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1581 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
795 Points

Legend

 
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
13234 ms *
LG K10
16638 ms * -26%
HTC Desire 530
17471 ms * -32%
Honor 5C
9111 ms * +31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13702 ms * -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2805 Points
LG K10
2838 Points +1%
HTC Desire 530
1796 Points -36%
Honor 5C
4188 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points +1%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
50 Points
LG K10
47 Points -6%
HTC Desire 530
34 Points -32%
Honor 5C
73 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
39 Points -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
18.3 Points
LG K10
17.48 Points -4%
HTC Desire 530
12.1 Points -34%
Honor 5C
27.93 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
211 MB/s
LG K10
131 MB/s -38%
HTC Desire 530
127 MB/s -40%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s +25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.4 MB/s -69%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
75 MB/s
LG K10
78 MB/s +4%
HTC Desire 530
55.8 MB/s -26%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s -45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
23 MB/s
LG K10
9.2 MB/s -60%
HTC Desire 530
11.82 MB/s -49%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s +168%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s -27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15.5 MB/s
LG K10
7.5 MB/s -52%
HTC Desire 530
8.96 MB/s -42%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s -39%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
31.57 MB/s
LG K10
75.5 MB/s +139%
HTC Desire 530
35.56 MB/s +13%
Honor 5C
51.9 MB/s +64%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
20.82 MB/s -34%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
17.12 MB/s
LG K10
45 MB/s +163%
HTC Desire 530
18.22 MB/s +6%
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s +41%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
18.7 MB/s +9%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high24 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
Carga Máxima
 40.5 °C41.8 °C44.7 °C 
 40.1 °C40.5 °C45 °C 
 39.5 °C39.9 °C42.9 °C 
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 41.7 °C
41.2 °C41.5 °C42.2 °C
40.1 °C41 °C41 °C
40.2 °C40.6 °C40.7 °C
Máximo: 42.2 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.436.92531.3343131.733.8402632.85039.434.76336.231.28028.627.910025.424.412521.324.816023.325.920022.530.525022.437.131521.340.240018.444.850017.551.963017.555.680017.261.1100016.867.5125017.368.8160017.465200016.673.6250017.375.5315017.676.1400017.679.2500017.779.5630017.475.7800017.7711000017.967.31250018.161.51600018.142.9SPL29.886.4N1.356.8median 17.7median 61.5Delta1.715.635.432.335.235.428.226.137.828.228.63028.428.630.629.833.830.637.53739.537.529.329.434.329.328.426.927.328.432.229.130.832.238.426.526.238.441.22323.841.246.227.322.946.252.23322.452.2573819.95759.641.220.459.666.748.418.766.768.25117.768.270.25317.970.272.957.21872.973.857.117.873.873.255.11773.276.758.216.976.777.558.217.477.579.359.217.879.377.757.117.577.775.254.217.375.27858.817.3787253.4187264.646.318.364.663.245.517.963.253.33617.953.387.568.330.187.569.722.11.469.7median 69.7median 51median 17.9median 69.710.211.11.510.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Y6 II CompactSamsung Galaxy S7
Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.32 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.53 / 1.6 Watt
Carga midlight 2.82 / 5.69 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Power Consumption
8%
-28%
-79%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.96
-68%
0.89
-56%
1.58
-177%
Idle Average *
1.53
1.14
25%
2.07
-35%
2.59
-69%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.23
23%
2.15
-34%
2.66
-66%
Load Average *
2.82
2.45
13%
3.46
-23%
5.22
-85%
Load Maximum *
5.69
2.92
49%
5.18
9%
5.67
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
19h 35min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 42min
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
-14%
-16%
17%
Reader / Idle
1175
1123
-4%
1117
-5%
997
-15%
1212
3%
H.264
682
603
-12%
457
-33%
602
-12%
590
-13%
WiFi v1.3
623
453
-27%
425
-32%
584
-6%
502
-19%
Load
222
231
4%
250
13%
156
-30%
433
95%

Pro

+ Boa construção
+ Preço baixo
+ Dual-SIM
+ Boa tela táctil
+ Tela muito brilhante
+ Boa estabilidade dos ângulos de visão
+ Desempenho relativamente alto
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Veloz armazenamento interno

Contra

- Contraste muito baixo da tela
- ... e reprodução de cores imprecisa
- Versão antiga do Android
- Fotos embaçadas da câmera
- Alto falantes ruins
- Acesso lento para o micro-SD
- Longos tempos de recarga
In review: Huawei Y6 II Compact. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Huawei Y6 II Compact. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

O Huawei Y6 II Compact oferece três competências muito claras: desempenho, duração da bateria, e preço. O modelo de teste está muito bem posicionado nestes três setores, mas outras áreas como a câmera fraca e tele com baixo contraste evidentemente são inferiores.

Embora a carcaça seja de plástico, o preto com patrão e construção impecável lhe fornece uma impressão de qualidade. Além disso, muitos extras como dual-SIM, slot micro-SD, USB OTG, rádio, e LTE estão presentes. O alto falante muito pobre, o sistema operacional antigo, e as altas temperaturas estão no outro lado.

Os pontos fortes da Huawei para este smartphone são obviamente - uma boa razão de preço-desempenho e uma boa duração da bateria. No entanto, os outros aspectos do smartphone foram passados por alto, alguns dos quais são difíceis de ignorar.

Os usuários que gostam do design e simplesmente desejam um smartphone acessível e suficientemente poderoso podem considerar o Huawei Y6 II Compact. No entanto, a câmera não deveria ser um aspecto chave, nem uma tela colorida ou um bom alto falante.

Huawei Y6 II Compact - 09/13/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
71%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 68%
Peso
93%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
9 / 63 → 15%
Desempenho da aplicação
31 / 70 → 45%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
100%
Audio
44 / 91 → 48%
Camera
56%
Médio
66%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 II Compact
Florian Wimmer, 2016-10- 4 (Update: 2016-10-13)