Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 2018

Name: Huawei Y6 2018
Brand: Huawei

Ainda acessível. O Huawei Y6 2018 é um dispositivo que tem muito poder pelo valor. O dispositivo tem um visual moderno e tem uma tela decente, mas será que pode ser proclamado como o rei dos dispositivos de orçamento?

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Tanja Hinum, Published 05/23/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Y6 2018 (Y6 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 308

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.70 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartão microSD de até 256 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Sensor de Proximidade, Sensor de posição, USB-OTG

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 152.4 x 73

Bateria

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix Contrast Auto Focus (AF), LED flash, Vídeos de até 1080p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED flash

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, SIM Tool, HiCare, Game Suite, Phone Clone, App Gallery, Tips, Themes, 24 Meses Garantia, Bandwidth Download/Upload: 150 Mbps/50 Mbps LTE; SAR values: 0.31 W/kg Head, 0.5 W/kg Body, fanless

peso

150 g, Suprimento de energia: 50 g

Preço

149 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
BQ Aquaris VS Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash	230 MBit/s +341%
Motorola Moto G5s Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	111 MBit/s +113%
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	54.2 MBit/s +4%
Huawei Y6 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.2 MBit/s
Huawei Y6 2017 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
BQ Aquaris VS Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash	280 MBit/s +454%
Motorola Moto G5s Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s +140%
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 MBit/s +10%
Huawei Y6 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	50.5 MBit/s
Huawei Y6 2017 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	43.6 MBit/s -14%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


442 cd/m²	482 cd/m²	442 cd/m²
443 cd/m²	483 cd/m²	432 cd/m²
457 cd/m²	492 cd/m²	465 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 459.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 444 cd/m²
Contraste: 1208:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.42
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.6

	Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Nokia 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	BQ Aquaris VS IPS, 1280x720, 5.2"	Huawei Y6 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen		-8%	6%	-1%	37%
Brightness middle	483	527 9%	490 1%	535 11%	438 -9%
Brightness	460	503 9%	502 9%	544 18%	432 -6%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	92 5%	88 0%	90 2%
Black Level *	0.4	0.68 -70%	0.43 -8%	0.61 -53%	0.13 67%
Contrast	1208	775 -36%	1140 -6%	877 -27%	3369 179%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.8	5.3 9%	5.7 2%	5.3 9%	4.8 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.6	9.2 27%	7.8 38%	11.1 12%	11.4 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.42
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5	5.8 -16%	4.7 6%	4 20%	3.2 36%
Gamma	2.6 ^85%	2.12 ^104%	2.4 ^92%	1.95 ^113%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7709 ^84%	7894 ^82%	7526 ^86%	6800 ^96%	7090 ^92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.8 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	39089 Points
Nokia 2	24924 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G5s	46370 Points +19%
BQ Aquaris VS	44022 Points +13%
Huawei Y6 2017	40981 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (29054 - 39106, n=17)	36278 Points -7%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	46710 Points
BQ Aquaris VS	56906 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=10)	42979 Points -8%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	4756 Points
Nokia 2	3109 Points -35%
Motorola Moto G5s	4669 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris VS	4751 Points 0%
Huawei Y6 2017	4607 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3681 - 5253, n=17)	4389 Points -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	3629 Points
Nokia 2	2304 Points -37%
Motorola Moto G5s	3604 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris VS	3648 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 2017	3487 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3831, n=18)	3299 Points -9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	743 Points
Nokia 2	149 Points -80%
Motorola Moto G5s	848 Points +14%
BQ Aquaris VS	894 Points +20%
Huawei Y6 2017	839 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (207 - 891, n=17)	642 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +751%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	1043 Points
Nokia 2	901 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G5s	1553 Points +49%
BQ Aquaris VS	1544 Points +48%
Huawei Y6 2017	1354 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=17)	1274 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +876%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	1069 Points
Nokia 2	233 Points -78%
Motorola Moto G5s	656 Points -39%
BQ Aquaris VS	773 Points -28%
Huawei Y6 2017	1288 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (363 - 1372, n=17)	678 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +535%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	443 Points
Nokia 2	251 Points -43%
Motorola Moto G5s	723 Points +63%
BQ Aquaris VS	786 Points +77%
Huawei Y6 2017	386 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (418 - 447, n=17)	437 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +3775%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	616 Points
Nokia 2	9 Points -99%
Motorola Moto G5s	703 Points +14%
BQ Aquaris VS	680 Points +10%
Huawei Y6 2017	734 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10 - 802, n=17)	611 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +154%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	692 Points
Nokia 2	423 Points -39%
Motorola Moto G5s	630 Points -9%
BQ Aquaris VS	657 Points -5%
Huawei Y6 2017	680 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=18)	654 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +693%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	1939 Points
Nokia 2	1118 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G5s	2270 Points +17%
BQ Aquaris VS	2400 Points +24%
Huawei Y6 2017	1903 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=18)	1761 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +677%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	1419 Points
Motorola Moto G5s	1871 Points +32%
BQ Aquaris VS	1808 Points +27%
Huawei Y6 2017	1238 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=16)	1345 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +746%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	6067 Points
Nokia 2	4577 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G5s	9491 Points +56%
BQ Aquaris VS	9977 Points +64%
Huawei Y6 2017	6858 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6526, n=18)	5908 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	5426 Points
Nokia 2	4150 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G5s	9626 Points +77%
BQ Aquaris VS	10271 Points +89%
Huawei Y6 2017	6184 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5778, n=18)	5330 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	10344 Points
Nokia 2	7150 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G5s	9045 Points -13%
BQ Aquaris VS	9067 Points -12%
Huawei Y6 2017	11088 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3958 - 11927, n=18)	9933 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	70 Points
Nokia 2	120 Points +71%
Motorola Moto G5s	555 Points +693%
BQ Aquaris VS	605 Points +764%
Huawei Y6 2017	267 Points +281%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 350, n=18)	86 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +5906%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	55 Points
Nokia 2	120 Points +118%
Motorola Moto G5s	483 Points +778%
BQ Aquaris VS	533 Points +869%
Huawei Y6 2017	221 Points +302%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 297, n=18)	69.7 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +8518%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	907 Points
Nokia 2	539 Points -41%
Motorola Moto G5s	1158 Points +28%
BQ Aquaris VS	1145 Points +26%
Huawei Y6 2017	967 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 944, n=18)	869 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +264%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	14 fps
Nokia 2	9.6 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G5s	16 fps +14%
BQ Aquaris VS	21 fps +50%
Huawei Y6 2017	17 fps +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 20, n=18)	13.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +515%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	7.7 fps
Nokia 2	5.4 fps -30%
Motorola Moto G5s	16 fps +108%
BQ Aquaris VS	18 fps +134%
Huawei Y6 2017	11 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=18)	7.42 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +3575%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	5.9 fps
Nokia 2	4.4 fps -25%
Motorola Moto G5s	7.4 fps +25%
BQ Aquaris VS	15 fps +154%
Huawei Y6 2017	8.1 fps +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 11, n=18)	5.97 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +1180%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018	2.8 fps
Nokia 2	1.6 fps -43%
Motorola Moto G5s	7.1 fps +154%
BQ Aquaris VS	7.7 fps +175%
Huawei Y6 2017	3.9 fps +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 3, n=17)	2.71 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +5868%

Legend

Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

BQ Aquaris VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	18.66 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	18.55 Points
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)	18.13 Points -2%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)	17.64 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16)	17.5 Points -6%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	11.61 Points -37%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +1344%
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)	3296 Points +28%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)	3092 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	3035 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17)	2952 Points +14%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	2582 Points
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	1948 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	19275 ms * -19%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	16192 ms *
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)	13612 ms * +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17)	13125 ms * +19%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	13057 ms * +19%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)	12255 ms * +24%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +90%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=8)	71.3 Points 0%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	71 Points
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)	65 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	61 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Y6 2018	Nokia 2	Motorola Moto G5s	BQ Aquaris VS	Huawei Y6 2017	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-24%	72%	28%	-4%	-32%	1663%
Sequential Read 256KB	254.3	131.1 -48%	259 2%	254.4 0%	202.6 -20%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -35%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 626%
Sequential Write 256KB	65.6	50.8 -23%	77.5 18%	185.9 183%	66.9 2%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -34%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 2089%
Random Read 4KB	38.8	17.44 -55%	40.6 5%	47.2 22%	25.93 -33%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -44%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 614%
Random Write 4KB	9	8.1 -10%	46.2 413%	6.4 -29%	20.54 128%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -10%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 3322%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	81.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	83.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	48.4 -43%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	59.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	26.4 -59%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -38%

Shadow Fight 3
	Configurações	Valor
	high	39 fps
	minimal	41.5 fps

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	31 fps
	high HD	30 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.6 °C	31.6 °C	30.5 °C
35.8 °C	31.2 °C	31.5 °C
33.8 °C	31.1 °C	32.6 °C

Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 32.6 °C


28.8 °C	29.7 °C	33 °C
29 °C	29.8 °C	31.4 °C
28.9 °C	30 °C	31.3 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 1.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.7 / 2.5 / 3.2 Watt
Carga	5.2 / 6.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris VS 3100 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		46%	33%	41%	21%	14%
Idle Minimum *	1.7	0.55 68%	0.67 61%	0.61 64%	1.113 ?(0.54 - 4.02, n=17) 35%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 47%
Idle Average *	2.5	1.02 59%	1.4 44%	1.7 32%	2.19 ?(1.2 - 6, n=17) 12%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 42%
Idle Maximum *	3.2	1.09 66%	1.52 52%	1.71 47%	2.55 ?(1.62 - 6.64, n=17) 20%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 50%
Load Average *	5.2	4.48 14%	4.56 12%	3.02 42%	4.32 ?(2.9 - 9.6, n=17) 17%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -25%
Load Maximum *	6.8	5.32 22%	7.05 -4%	5.31 22%	5.5 ?(4.3 - 7.34, n=17) 19%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -45%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		22h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 39min

	Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris VS 3100 mAh	Huawei Y6 2017 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		31%	-13%	6%	6%
Reader / Idle	1329		1233 -7%		1522 15%
H.264	702		645 -8%		693 -1%
WiFi v1.3	643	840 31%	518 -19%	681 6%	654 2%
Load	279		225 -19%		302 8%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina e com visual moderno

+ Alto-falantes com bom som

+ Permanece frio

+ Tela de alto contraste

+ Acessível

Contra

- Sem bússola, sem sensor de digitais

- Armazenamento interno reduzido

- Sem WiFi de 5 GHz

- Ocorrem dropouts do microfone no modo mãos livres

- Engasgamentos ocasionais

- Alto consumo de energia

The Huawei Y6 2018 in review: test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland.

O Huawei Y6 2018 é um bom pacote a um preço acessível. Embora você poderia gastar mais dinheiro em outros dispositivos, eles não terão necessariamente mais recursos do que o Y6 2018 oferece. O Y6 2018 oferece bom desempenho pelo dinheiro. A tela é relativamente brilhante e tem uma boa taxa de contraste, enquanto o GPS é preciso o suficiente para usar o Google Maps. As câmeras também tiram fotos aceitáveis. Da mesma forma, os alto-falantes soam bem e o dispositivo permanece mais frio sob uso intenso.

Naturalmente, existem algumas desvantagens com um dispositivo de menos de €150: não há scanner de digitais ou bússola, o consumo de energia é alto e ocorrem engasgos ocasionais que prejudicam a experiência do usuário.

O Huawei Y6 2018 é uma boa opção para quem quer poupar algum dinheiro. No entanto, não espere milagres.

Embora o preço limite o elogio que podemos dar, o Y6 2018 ainda recebe uma recomendação nossa. Simplesmente, o Huawei Y6 2018 oferece bom desempenho e valor pelo dinheiro.

Huawei Y6 2018 - 05/17/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

79%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

35 / 60 → 59%

Peso

92%

Bateria