Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 2018
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 444 cd/m²
Contraste: 1208:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.42
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.6
| Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Nokia 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | BQ Aquaris VS IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | Huawei Y6 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -8% | 6% | -1% | 37% | |
| Brightness middle | 483 | 527 9% | 490 1% | 535 11% | 438 -9% |
| Brightness | 460 | 503 9% | 502 9% | 544 18% | 432 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 92 5% | 88 0% | 90 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.68 -70% | 0.43 -8% | 0.61 -53% | 0.13 67% |
| Contrast | 1208 | 775 -36% | 1140 -6% | 877 -27% | 3369 179% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 5.3 9% | 5.7 2% | 5.3 9% | 4.8 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.6 | 9.2 27% | 7.8 38% | 11.1 12% | 11.4 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.42 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 5.8 -16% | 4.7 6% | 4 20% | 3.2 36% |
| Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.12 104% | 2.4 92% | 1.95 113% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 7709 84% | 7894 82% | 7526 86% | 6800 96% | 7090 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (29054 - 39106, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=10) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3681 - 5253, n=17) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3831, n=18) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 20, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 11, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s | |
| BQ Aquaris VS | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 3, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16) | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=8) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Y6 2018 | Nokia 2 | Motorola Moto G5s | BQ Aquaris VS | Huawei Y6 2017 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -24% | 72% | 28% | -4% | -32% | 1689% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 254.3 | 131.1 -48% | 259 2% | 254.4 0% | 202.6 -20% | 164.5 ? -35% | 1887 ? 642% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 65.6 | 50.8 -23% | 77.5 18% | 185.9 183% | 66.9 2% | 43 ? -34% | 1471 ? 2142% |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.8 | 17.44 -55% | 40.6 5% | 47.2 22% | 25.93 -33% | 21.7 ? -44% | 278 ? 616% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9 | 8.1 -10% | 46.2 413% | 6.4 -29% | 20.54 128% | 8.08 ? -10% | 311 ? 3356% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 ? | 81.9 ? -4% | 84.1 ? -1% | 83.3 ? -2% | 48.4 -43% | 59.1 ? -30% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64 ? | 61.2 ? -4% | 62.3 ? -3% | 59.4 ? -7% | 26.4 -59% | 39.8 ? -38% |
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 39 fps | ||
| minimal | 41.5 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.5 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.7 / 2.5 / 3.2 Watt |
| Carga |
5.2 / 6.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Nokia 2 4100 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS 3100 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 46% | 33% | 41% | 21% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.7 | 0.55 68% | 0.67 61% | 0.61 64% | 1.113 ? 35% | 0.88 ? 48% |
| Idle Average * | 2.5 | 1.02 59% | 1.4 44% | 1.7 32% | 2.19 ? 12% | 1.444 ? 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.2 | 1.09 66% | 1.52 52% | 1.71 47% | 2.55 ? 20% | 1.6 ? 50% |
| Load Average * | 5.2 | 4.48 14% | 4.56 12% | 3.02 42% | 4.32 ? 17% | 6.57 ? -26% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.8 | 5.32 22% | 7.05 -4% | 5.31 22% | 5.5 ? 19% | 9.91 ? -46% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Nokia 2 4100 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS 3100 mAh | Huawei Y6 2017 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 31% | -13% | 6% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1329 | 1233 -7% | 1522 15% | ||
| H.264 | 702 | 645 -8% | 693 -1% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 643 | 840 31% | 518 -19% | 681 6% | 654 2% |
| Load | 279 | 225 -19% | 302 8% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei Y6 2018 é um bom pacote a um preço acessível. Embora você poderia gastar mais dinheiro em outros dispositivos, eles não terão necessariamente mais recursos do que o Y6 2018 oferece. O Y6 2018 oferece bom desempenho pelo dinheiro. A tela é relativamente brilhante e tem uma boa taxa de contraste, enquanto o GPS é preciso o suficiente para usar o Google Maps. As câmeras também tiram fotos aceitáveis. Da mesma forma, os alto-falantes soam bem e o dispositivo permanece mais frio sob uso intenso.
Naturalmente, existem algumas desvantagens com um dispositivo de menos de €150: não há scanner de digitais ou bússola, o consumo de energia é alto e ocorrem engasgos ocasionais que prejudicam a experiência do usuário.
O Huawei Y6 2018 é uma boa opção para quem quer poupar algum dinheiro. No entanto, não espere milagres.
Embora o preço limite o elogio que podemos dar, o Y6 2018 ainda recebe uma recomendação nossa. Simplesmente, o Huawei Y6 2018 oferece bom desempenho e valor pelo dinheiro.
Huawei Y6 2018
- 05/17/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
