Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 2017
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 438 cd/m²
Contraste: 3369:1 (Preto: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Huawei Y6 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Nokia 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gigaset GS170 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Sony Xperia E5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 PLS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -45% | -93% | -27% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 438 | 481 10% | 418 -5% | 538 23% | 502 15% |
| Brightness | 432 | 469 9% | 418 -3% | 534 24% | 494 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 92 2% | 96 7% | 89 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.13 | 0.22 -69% | 0.45 -246% | 0.33 -154% | 0.35 -169% |
| Contrast | 3369 | 2186 -35% | 929 -72% | 1630 -52% | 1434 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 8.1 -69% | 9.7 -102% | 5.7 -19% | 4.6 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.4 | 15.4 -35% | 18.9 -66% | 11 4% | 8 30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 8.5 -166% | 11.3 -253% | 4.7 -47% | 2.5 22% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.51 88% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 7090 92% | 9014 72% | 10414 62% | 7264 89% | 6351 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Y6 2017 | Nokia 3 | Gigaset GS170 | Sony Xperia E5 | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | -26% | 14% | 12% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 202.6 | 181 -11% | 197.9 -2% | 209.7 4% | 177.7 -12% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 66.9 | 34 -49% | 44.79 -33% | 83.1 24% | 51 -24% |
| Random Read 4KB | 25.93 | 17.7 -32% | 18.34 -29% | 26.04 0% | 24 -7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 20.54 | 5.5 -73% | 10.45 -49% | 9.84 -52% | 9.5 -54% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 48.4 | 64.3 33% | 37.41 ? -23% | 65 ? 34% | 70.3 45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 26.4 | 62.9 138% | 21.34 ? -19% | 45.56 ? 73% | 59.6 126% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 24 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Huawei Y6 2017 3000 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh | Sony Xperia E5 2300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | -32% | -35% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1522 | 1258 -17% | 1425 -6% | ||
| H.264 | 693 | 628 -9% | 819 18% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 654 | 552 -16% | 442 -32% | 422 -35% | 722 10% |
| Load | 302 | 283 -6% | 305 1% |
Pro
Contra
A Huawei recentemente anunciou que não querem mais produzir smartphones de nível de entrada devido às baixas margens. Isso é compreensível, mas um pouco triste em vista do Huawei Y6 (2017), bem feito. O aparelho oferece mais desempenho do que o habitual em sua classe de preço e uma bateria grande, o que possibilita durações decentes da bateria. Infelizmente, a bateria não pode mais ser substituída, o que é uma tendência nos dispositivos atuais.
O aparelho está bem equipado com slot microSD e suporte para dois SIMs. A carcaça dificilmente é mais pesada e maior do que a de aparelhos comparáveis, apesar da bateria maior. Sobre o design, o Y6 não é nada especial, mas a qualidade de construção e estabilidade do chassi é decente.
As queixas são o Wi-Fi lento e as poucas bandas LTE, o medíocre equipamento-livres através do alto-falante e o microfone excessivamente sensível. A qualidade da câmera é bastante modesta e a tela é um pouco mais escura do que a de muitos concorrentes.
O Huawei Y6 (2017) combina excelente desempenho do sistema e longa duração da bateria. A câmera é a fraqueza do dispositivo, que, de outra maneira, oferece uma boa relação preço-desempenho.
Para resumir, o Huawei Y6 (2017) é uma recomendação para todos aqueles que desejam alto desempenho e boas durações da bateria por pouco dinheiro, mas não consideram a qualidade da imagem da câmera muito importante.
Huawei Y6 2017
- 08/28/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
